Treatment of schizophrenic patients within their communities and away from mental hospitals has been accepted all over the world. The more developed countries of the world have experimented with various models of community care for the mentally ill for over two decades (Langsley et al., 1969; Pasamanic et al., 1967; Goodacre et al., 1975; Test and Stein, 1976; Hogarty et al., 1974). However, in the developing countries, where mental illness still suffers from severe social stigma, and where public opinion is not very enlightened regarding causation and treatment of mental illness, the acceptance of a policy of community care has been a slow process. At present, most of the developing countries have realized that the enormous task of treating all their mentally ill patients by way of hospitalization through a psychiatrist seems an unattainable objective and that community care may offer the only feasible alternative (Kapur, 1975; Swift, 1972; Wintrob, 1972). World bodies such as the World Health Organization and the Commonwealth Foundation have been advocating community-based care, offered through mental health professionals and paramedical personnel, as a possible model of delivery of care. Various experiments have been carried out by workers in many of the developing countries, which may be suitable for their particular cultural milieu (Lambo, 1973; Vidyasagar, 1973; Schmidt, 1973). These efforts have been made out of necessity. As such, their emphasis has not been on evaluation-oriented design. In India, the paucity of psychiatrists and institutional treatment facilities necessitates the management of the patients within their own homes. The poor economic condition of the majority of the people precludes utilization of nursing homes. One therefore has to look for alternative modes of treatment delivery which may be more practical, culturally acceptable, economical to operate, and yet would be aimed at reaching a greater number of people. Training more nurses is more economical and feasible than training more