You have accessJournal of UrologyInfections/Inflammation/Cystic Disease of the Genitourinary Tract: Kidney & Bladder II1 Apr 2018MP23-09 COMPARISON OF POSTOPERATIVE CATHETER-ASSOCIATED URINARY TRACT INFECTION (CAUTI) RATES IN THE UROLOGIC PATIENT WITH A SUPRAPUBIC CATHETER VERSUS TRANSURETHRAL CATHETER Jason Warncke, Brittan Sutphin, John Hohenmeyer, E. David Crawford, and Brian Flynn Jason WarnckeJason Warncke More articles by this author , Brittan SutphinBrittan Sutphin More articles by this author , John HohenmeyerJohn Hohenmeyer More articles by this author , E. David CrawfordE. David Crawford More articles by this author , and Brian FlynnBrian Flynn More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.741AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common type of healthcare-associated infection. Among UTIs acquired in the hospital, 75% are catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). CAUTI has gained much attention, as in 2008 Medicare regulations ceased reimbursement for costs related to nosocomial CAUTIs. Traditional teaching has been that suprapubic catheters (SPC) are associated with less risk of CAUTI than transurethral catheters (TUC). However, studies directly comparing the CAUTI rate in patients with SPC versus TUC are lacking, particularly in the postoperative Urologic patient. Thus, in this study we aim to compare the CAUTI rate with SPC versus TUC in the postoperative Urologic patient. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed and compared the medical records of 354 patients over a 5-yr period that underwent Urologic surgery. The SPC group consisted of patients that underwent SPC placement at the time of concomitant autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling (PVS) by a single surgeon (BJF). SPC placement was accomplished using the T-Spec device from Swan Valley Medical. The TUC group consisted of patients that underwent TUC placement using an 18 Fr Foley at the time of open radical prostatectomy (RP) by a single surgeon (EDC). Patients without a SPC or TUC and patients with both were excluded from the study. The primary outcome of comparison was the CAUTI rate (defined by the 2017 CDC guidelines) between the SPC and TUC cohorts. A Fisher’s exact test was performed to determine if the difference in CAUTI rate between the two cohorts was statistically significant (p<0.05). RESULTS 252 patients were included, including 145 (57.6%) in the SPC group and 107 (42.5%) in the TUC group, mean age 54.5 and 61.5 yrs, respectively. The mean catheter duration at the time of CAUTI for the SPC and TUC groups were 21.3 and 16.0 days, respectively (p=0.79). The mean catheter duration for the TUC group with and without CAUTI was 25.4 and 14.7 days, respectively (p=0.14). The overall CAUTI rate when catheter duration was less than 15 days compared to greater than 15 days was 3.3% and 5.0%, respectively (p=0.39). The CAUTI rate for the SPC group was 2.1% versus the TUC group 7.5% (p=0.039; OR 3.82). CONCLUSIONS In this study of postoperative Urologic patients, SPC was found to have a statistically significant lower rate of CAUTI when compared to TUC. This information may help guide providers when choosing the appropriate bladder drainage modality for their patients, particularly in the postoperative Urologic setting. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e284 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Jason Warncke More articles by this author Brittan Sutphin More articles by this author John Hohenmeyer More articles by this author E. David Crawford More articles by this author Brian Flynn More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract