Common Carotid Artery Access Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of a new torque-controlled angiographic catheter in cerebral angiography: A multicenter, randomized, open-label trial

ObjectiveWe aimed to examine the effectiveness and safety of a novel torque-controlled catheter for cerebral angiography. MethodsA total of 417 patients who underwent routine transfemoral cerebral angiography were enrolled in a randomized controlled study to compare the new torque-controlled and control group catheters. Device success was assessed on parameters such as the assessment of the common carotid artery, device rotation force, and success rate with the crossover group after the failed procedure. Four neurointerventionalists investigated the degree of satisfaction of using the new device. Superiority and non-inferiority tests of satisfaction scores were estimated for the new torque-controlled and the control group catheters. ResultsThe new torque-controlled catheter showed improved performance in terms of technical device success (92.79 vs. 98.09 %, P = 0.010), crossover after technical device failure (0 vs. 86.67 %, P = 0.004), and common carotid artery access (92.79 vs. 98.56 %, P = 0.004). The flexibility and rotational force of the new torque-controlled catheter were higher than those of the control group catheters (75.48 vs. 100 %, P < 0.001). No marked adverse cerebrovascular accidents or vessel damage occurred in either group during the procedure. The differences between the two groups in terms of the device rotational force and operator satisfaction were 1.836 (1.765–1.907) and 2.092 (2.000–2.183), respectively. The new torque-controlled catheter showed superior device rotational force satisfaction, operator satisfaction, and manufacturer satisfaction, with statistical significance. ConclusionThe new torque-controlled catheter was effective, safe, and convenient compared to the control group catheters for diagnostic cerebrovascular angiography.

Nationwide experience with transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the POL-CAROTID registry.

The carotid artery is an alternative access route for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), especially useful in patients unsuitable for traditional access routes including transfemoral (TF), subclavian, transapical, and aortic. To investigate the feasibility and safety of transcarotid (TC) access for TAVI in comparison to the TF approach in a multicenter setting. A total of 41 patients, treated between December 2014 and December 2018, were retrospectively reported to the Polish Registry of Common Carotid Artery Access for TAVI (POL-CAROTID). The median follow-up time was 619 (365-944) days, and Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) definitions were applied. Clinical outcomes were compared with 41 propensity-matched TF-TAVI patients. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) patients' age was 78.0 (7.2) years, and 29 patients (70.7%) were men. Prohibitive iliofemoral anatomy and/or obesity (46.3%) and/or the presence of a stent graft in the abdominal aorta (31.7%) were the most common indications for TC-TAVI. Device success for TC-TAVI was comparable with the matched TF-TAVI group (90.2% vs. 95.3%, respectively, P = 0.396), and no periprocedural mortality was observed. Moreover, early safety was similar between the two groups (92.7% vs. 95.3%, respectively, log-rank P = 0.658) with only 1 case of non-disabling stroke during the first month after TC-TAVI. Consequently, no cerebrovascular events were observed in the mid-term, and the clinical efficacy of TC-TAVI corresponded well with TF-TAVI (90.2% vs. 92.7%, respectively, log-rank P = 0.716). A total of 4 (9.8%) deaths were noted in the TC-TAVI cohort in comparison to 3 (7.3%) in the TF-TAVI group. The results of the study indicated that the first cohort of Polish patients with implantations of second-generation transcarotid transcatheter heart valves had a similar prognosis to TF-TAVI with regard to safety and feasibility. TC access may be considered an optimal alternative for patients in whom the TF approach is precluded.

Emergent In Situ Fenestration in the Ascending Aorta for the Endovascular Repair of a Large Pseudoaneurysm: A Technical Note

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to describe an emergent in situ fenestration (ISF) technique in the ascending aorta for the endovascular repair of a large pseudoaneurysm using a trans-septal needle device through direct right common carotid artery access, in a patient with left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Technique: We performed, in a multidisciplinary team-work approach, an emergent ISF to correct the displacement of a physician-modified thoracic endograft released in the ascending aorta to correct a large anastomotic pseudoaneurysm in a patient who underwent ascending aorta replacement and subsequent LVAD implantation. We used a trans-septal needle device inserted through a direct access to the right carotid artery and performed an ISF to restore the patency of the outflow ostium of the LVAD. Window was then completed and stabilized with a nitinol balloon expandable covered stent graft obtaining an effective exclusion of the anastomotic aortic aneurism and the regular patency of the LVAD outflow graft with no signs of leaks. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary teamwork approach can be crucial in challenging procedures where an alternative approach may lead to problem solving. The ISF technique may be a valid option to adopt in emergency cases in which no other technical solutions are suitable. Clinical Impact The endovascular approach has become more and more frequent for the treatment of vascular pathologies, getting increasingly refined and complex. Thereby the chance of incurring intraprocedural troubles has grown and bailout strategies should always be present. In situ fenestration is a technique to be aware of and that could help you recover from difficult situations. We report a possible rescue maneuver that can be applied also in arduous anatomies such as the ascending aorta. Moreover, we would like to highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary working environment that can enrich our everyday practice accomplishing effective and unexpected solutions.

Percutaneous Common Carotid Artery Access for Cardiac Interventions in Infants Does Not Acutely Change Cerebral Perfusion.

Pediatric cardiac interventions via percutaneous common carotid artery (CCA) access have been shown to be safe and effective. However, the impact of placement of a sheath in the carotid artery for interventions on cerebral perfusion is unknown. In this study we used cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to analyze the effects of percutaneous CCA access for cardiac interventions on cerebral perfusion. This study is a retrospective chart review carried out at a tertiary care center on all pediatric patients who underwent percutaneous cardiac catheterization via carotid artery access from January 2010 to January 2020. All patients who had ipsilateral NIRS recorded on the side of carotid artery access were included. Patients with only partial or no ipsilateral NIRS data were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the change in NIRS upon CCA access; the mean NIRS for 15min before obtaining access was compared to the mean NIRS during the procedure and to the mean NIRS 15min after removal of the CCA sheath. We hypothesized that there would be a significant drop in NIRS values on the side of CCA access. There were 48 catheterizations in the study period where percutaneous CCA was accessed. Of those, 21 catheterizations had complete data and were included in the study. 13 (62%) were of males. The median age was 23days (IQR 7-79). The indications for CCA access were patent ductus arteriosus stent implantation (n = 13; 62%), aortic valvuloplasty (n = 5; 24%), balloon angioplasty of coarctation of aorta (n = 2; 10%), and renal artery angioplasty (n = 1; 4%). In 16 patients (72%), the left common carotid artery was accessed. The median weight of the patients was 3.3kg (IQR 2.8-2.9). The most common sheath size used was 4F, in 16 patients (72%). The mean NIRS prior to the procedure was 67 ± 15%, during the procedure was 68 ± 20%, and after removal of sheath was 68 ± 21%. Paired t test of cerebral NIRS before, during, and after the procedure showed no significant change with CCA access (P = 0.08). No patient in the series had a documented neurologic deficit following the procedure. Percutaneous CCA access was not associated with a decrease in NIRS on the side of the access during the procedure, suggesting there was no significant acute change in cerebral perfusion with CCA access.

Learning curve and proficiency of transcarotid artery revascularization compared to transfemoral carotid artery stenting

Both transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS) and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) are competing endovascular alternatives to carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis. TF-CAS is an endovascular procedure associated with a long learning curve and higher periprocedural stroke and death rates during an operator’s early experience. Estimates suggest that more than 50 cases are required to achieve outcomes similar to carotid endarterectomy. TCAR is a novel hybrid procedure combining direct common carotid artery access and cerebral blood flow reversal with carotid stent placement. In distinction from TF-CAS, TCAR has a rather short learning curve. A multi-institutional analysis showed that operators achieved technical proficiency after approximately 10 to 15 cases. This was reinforced by a large Society for Vascular Surgery, Vascular Quality Initiative Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Surveillance Project analysis that demonstrated that expertise peaked after approximately 20 cases. Both studies found that TCAR was not associated with an increased rate of stroke or death during operator’s early experience. These data suggest that TCAR is readily learned and patients are not at increased risk during a surgeon’s early experience.

Common carotid artery puncture in anterior circulation thrombectomy in patients with unfavorable vascular anatomy: A case-control study.

The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes in patients who with unfavorable vascular anatomy underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) by common carotid artery access versus transfemoral approach.A retrospective review was performed in our hospital database to identify patients with challenging vascular anatomy who underwent MT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) between August 2015 and November 2018. Transcarotid and transfemoral cohorts were compared. Patient characteristics, procedural techniques, clinical outcomes were recorded.A total of 52 patients were included, 16 (31%) underwent MT via transcarotid access. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, intravenously recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy, clot location, or carotid tortuosity and presence of aortic arch type. There were significant differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 cohorts, including mean access-to-reperfusion time (84 vs 44 minutes; P = .000), poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale >2) at 90 days follow-up (37.5% vs 63.9%; P = .034). But there were no significant differences in successful revascularization rates (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score ≥2b 87.5% vs 80.6%; P = .541), post-thrombectomy symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (12.5% vs 13.9%; P = .892), and mortality (12.5% vs 22.2%; P = .412) were similar between transcarotid and transfemoral cohorts.Our results demonstrate that transcarotid access for MT of anterior circulation LVO in patients with unfavorable vascular anatomy may be considerable. Transcarotid access may be better than transfemoral access in well-selected unfavorable vascular anatomy patients undergoing MT.

Ultrasound guided percutaneous common carotid artery access in piglets for intracoronary stem cell infusion.

In pigs, the deep location of the common carotid artery and overlying sternomastoideus muscle in the neck has led to the recommendation for a surgical cutdown for common carotid access, as opposed to minimally invasive techniques for vascular access. We sought to determine if direct percutaneous common carotid artery access in piglets is attainable. Seventeen piglets were anesthetized and intubated. Under two-dimensional and color flow Doppler ultrasound guidance, a 21 gauge needle was utilized to access the right common carotid artery. Following arterial puncture, the Seldinger technique was applied to place a 4 or 5 French introducer. Upon completion of cardiac catheterization with intracoronary stem cell infusion the introducer was removed and manual pressure was applied to prevent hematoma development. Successful access with an introducer was achieved in all 17 piglets. The average weight was 8.5 ± 1.7 kg. One piglet developed a hematoma with hemorrhaging from the catheterization site and was euthanized. This piglet was given bivalirudin for the procedure. After this incident, subsequent piglets were not given anticoagulation and no other complications occurred. Ultrasound guided percutaneous common carotid artery access in piglets is attainable in a safe, reliable, and reproducible manner when performed by microvascular experts.

Transcutaneous aortic valve implantation using the carotid artery access: Feasibility and clinical outcomes

Transcarotid access is an alternative route for transcutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with impossible transfemoral access. We evaluated the safety, effectiveness and early and late clinical outcomes of CoreValve® implantation via the common carotid artery. Eighteen patients (10 men, 8 women; mean age 84±5 years) at high surgical risk (mean EuroSCORE II 16±13%) with significant peripheral artery disease underwent TAVI via common carotid artery access under general anaesthesia. Mean aortic valve area was 0.64±0.13cm2 (0.36±0.07cm2/m2). At a mean follow-up of 605±352 days, two patients (11%) had died in hospital, on days 6 and 20, as a result of sepsis with multiorgan failure (n=1) or pneumonia (n=1). There were no perioperative deaths, myocardial infarctions or strokes. Perioperative prosthesis embolization occurred in one patient (6%), requiring implantation of a second valve. In-hospital complications occurred in four patients (23%): blood transfusion for transient significant bleeding at the access site in one patient (6%); permanent pacemaker implantation in two patients (11%); and pericardial drainage in one patient (6%). The rate of event-free in-hospital stay was 66%. Post-procedural echocardiography showed very good haemodynamic performance, with a mean gradient of 8±3mmHg. Moderate paravalvular leak was present in one patient (6%). Mean intensive care unit stay was 48±31h; mean in-hospital stay was 7±3 days. TAVI performed by transcarotid access in this small series of severely ill patients was associated with a low incidence of complications, which were associated with the procedure itself rather than the access route.

Percutaneous Common Carotid Artery Access for Pediatric Interventional Cardiac Catheterization.

Surgical cutdown for access to the common carotid artery provides a more direct route for certain pediatric cardiac interventions and avoids femoral artery injury in small infants. The safety of percutaneous carotid access (PCA) in children is unknown. Retrospective review of PCA at Texas Children's Hospital and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta. From July 2006 to November 2014, 42 patients underwent 47 attempts at catheterization via PCA. Median (range) age was 20 days (0 days-2.9 years) and weight was 3.2 kg (1.1-12.2). Two patients had failed PCA with no sequelae. Of the 45 catheterizations with successful PCA and sheath placement, 44 interventions were performed, the most common being stenting or stent redilation of the ductus arteriosus, balloon aortic valvuloplasty, and stenting or angioplasty of Blalock-Taussig shunts. After sheath withdrawal, hemostasis was achieved with manual compression, with no need for surgical control of bleeding. Follow-up carotid imaging was performed in all. Acutely, 3 patients developed carotid thrombosis with resolution in 1 and mild residual narrowing in 2 after anticoagulation therapy. At follow-up, 40 of 42 patients (95%) had a normal carotid artery, with 2 instances of mild stenosis. There were no neurological sequelae attributable to PCA. PCA is safe even in small infants, and hemostasis can be achieved without surgical repair, with a carotid patency rate superior to published data after surgical cutdown. Surgical cutdown is not routinely required for pediatric cardiac catheterization via the carotid artery.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation through carotid artery access under local anaesthesia

Trans-femoral and transapical are the most commonly used accesses for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, when these approaches are unsuitable, alternative accesses are needed. We report a series of 19 patients undergoing TAVI through common carotid artery (CCA) access under local anaesthesia in order to assess its feasibility and safety. From November 2008 to September 2013, 361 patients underwent TAVI at our institution. Nineteen of them (14 men) with mean age 82.2 ± 6.2 years, EuroSCORE 25.2 ± 15.7, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 11.9 ± 5.1 and with severe peripheral arteriopathy were unsuitable for usual approaches and underwent TAVI through CCA access under local anaesthesia. Preoperative computed tomography assessed suitable carotid artery anatomy. Common carotid cross-clamping test allowed verifying patient's neurological status stability. An 18-Fr or 20-Fr sheath inserted into the CCA down into the ascending aorta was used for the delivery catheter. Valve implantation procedures were as usual. After sheath removal, the CCA was surgically purged and repaired. Feasibility and safety end points (VARC-2) were collected up to 30 days. Transcarotid insertion of the delivery sheath was successful in all cases (8 right, 11 left) and accurate deployment of the device was achieved in 18 patients (4 Edwards SAPIEN XT and 14 Medtronic CoreValve). There was 1 intraoperative death by annulus rupture during preimplant balloon valvuloplasty, and 1 in-hospital death due to multisystem organ failure. There was no myocardial infarction, stroke or major bleeding. Third-degree atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation occurred in 3 patients. No vascular access-site, access-related or other TAVI-related complication occurred. Echocardiography revealed good prosthesis functioning with none, mild and moderate paravalvular leak in, respectively, 8, 9 and 1 patients. Patient ambulation was immediate after TAVI and hospital stay was 4.6 ± 2.3 days. TAVI through the CCA approach under local anaesthesia is feasible and safe. It allows continuous clinical neurological status monitoring with low risk of stroke, bleeding events, vascular access-site and access-related complications and immediate patient ambulation. It appears to be a valuable alternative access for patients who cannot undergo trans-femoral TAVI.