The European Union’s (EU) Common European Asylum System (CEAS), established in 1999 and codified in secondary legislation since 2003, has undergone major reform once, in the 2010s. From the beginning, academics have scrutinized the EU legislator’s efforts to achieve harmonized standards on asylum law among EU Member States, pointing out improvements, but more often gaps, contradictions, and fundamental rights issues identifiable in the CEAS instruments and their implementation. In 2020, the European Commission proposed a new set of reforms, the so-called New Pact on Migration and Asylum – a political communication, accompanied by five proposals for new legislation and amendments to existing CEAS instruments, as well as non-binding recommendations. Reforming the Common European Asylum System: Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum continues the tradition of academic scrutiny of the CEAS. The volume, not to be confused with a 2016 publication bearing the same main title,1 is, however, unusual in that it deals with reform proposals, rather than a completed CEAS reform. Publishing a book on reform proposals while they are still in flux may seem counterintuitive, considering that changes to the proposals may render the book irrelevant. However, the volume’s focus on the bigger picture of what a common European asylum system ought to address offers valuable insights beyond the detailed content of the proposed reforms. Thanks to its timely publication while reform negotiations are still ongoing, the book constitutes a unique resource for policymakers to consult. Granted, this may not happen – a couple of years ago, while a Commission trainee, I heard a policymaker complain about academics’ tendencies to ‘pull apart’ new proposals. Nevertheless, the book has much to offer in terms of suggestions for improving the New Pact. Indeed, it carefully ‘pulls apart’ the Commission proposals. As promised in the title, this includes views on the opportunities the proposals offer, although the book’s focus is decidedly on the New Pact’s pitfalls and downsides.
Read full abstract