Since the commercialization of lithium-ion batteries, portable energy storage devices have undergone extensive development. This has allowed for the significant extension of their application areas especially large-scale applications such as plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and electric vehicles (EVs). However, the limited driving range, high costs, and safety concerns of electrified transportation systems are impeding their wider acceptance by society.1 Therefore, further improvements in the energy density, thermal stability, and cycle life of LIBs are necessary to accelerate their penetration into the automobile market.Generally, two approaches can be undertaken to enhance the energy density of NCM cathodes. The first approach is improving the specific capacity of the cathodes by increasing the composition of the redox-active nickel metal relative to other transition metals.2 This transition towards higher Ni produced positive effects in terms of energy density. However, it inevitably led to the deterioration of the cycling and thermal stability of the materials. The second approach is increasing the upper cut-off voltage to extract more Li+ ions. Enhancing the energy density of NCM-111 and NCM-523 has been investigated by operating at charge cut-off potentials higher than 4.3 V.3, 4 However, there is no report directly comparing electrochemical, structural, and thermal properties of the cathodes which are currently used (NCM-622) and will be adapted (NCM-811 and NCM-90) for EVs.In this study, the two approaches, increasing the Ni contents and the upper cut-off potential for high energy density, are directly compared. The comparative study is specifically carried out in terms of capacity and cycling lifespan as well as thermal stability. References S.-T. Myung, F. Maglia, K.-J. Park, C. S. Yoon, P. Lamp, S.-J. Kim and Y.-K Sun., ACS Energy Lett., 2017, 2, 196.H.-J. Noh, S. Youn, C. S. Yoon and Y.-K. Sun, J. Power Sources, 2013, 233, 121.J. Kasnatscheew, M. Evertz, B. Streipert, R. Wagner, S. Nowak, I. C. Laskovic and M. Winter, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 1521.J. A. Gilbert, J. Bareno, T. Spila, S. E. Trask, D. J. Miller, B. Z. Polzin, A. N. Jansen and D. P. Abraham, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2017, 164, A6054.