Combination Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Research Articles

Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in subjects with solid tumor cancers receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

ABSTRACT The incidence of severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in cancer subjects receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) following COVID-19 vaccination and the relationship between the incidence of severe irAE and the interval between COVID-19 vaccination and ICI dose have not been established. We performed a retrospective study evaluating the incidence of irAEs in solid tumor subjects receiving ICI therapy who received any COVID-19 vaccinations since FDA authorization. irAEs were defined as severe with one or more grade 3 or above events (CTCAE v5.0), multiple organ involvement, or requiring hospitalization for management. Two hundred and eighty-four subjects who received COVID vaccinations from December 2020 and February 2022 were included in this analysis [median age at vaccination 67 years (IQR 59.0–75.0); 67.3% male]. Twenty-nine subjects (10.2%) developed severe irAEs, of which 12 subjects (41.4%) received ICI monotherapy, 10 subjects (34.5%) received combination ICI therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, and 7 subjects (24.1%) received ICI plus VEGFR-TKI therapy. Hospitalization occurred in 62% of subjects with severe irAEs, with a median duration of 3 days (IQR: 3.0–7.5 days). Immunosuppressive therapy was required in 79.3%, with a median duration of 103 days (IQR: 42.0–179.0). ICI therapy was discontinued in 51.7% of subjects with severe irAE; dosing was held or interrupted in 34.5%. Among severe irAEs, the median interval between vaccination and ICI treatment closest to the occurrence of severe irAE was 15.5 days (IQR: 10.0–23.0). In solid tumor cancer subjects receiving ICIs, COVID-19 vaccination is not associated with an increased incidence of severe irAEs compared to historical data and may be safely administered during ICI cancer therapy in subjects who lack contraindications.

Recent Progress in Immunotherapy for Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Under the standard of care, patients with advanced GC (AGC) have a median survival time of approximately 12-15 months. With the emergence of immunotherapy as a key therapeutic strategy in medical oncology, relevant changes are expected in the systemic treatment of GC. In the phase III ATTRACTION-2 trial, nivolumab, a monoclonal anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody, as a third- or later-line treatment improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in patients with AGC. Furthermore, nivolumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil and platinum as a first-line treatment improved OS in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative AGC in the global phase III CheckMate-649 study. Another anti-PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab, in combination with trastuzumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy as a first-line treatment, significantly improved the overall response rate in patients with HER2-positive AGC. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential components of the current treatment of GC. Subsequent treatments after ICI combination therapy, such as ICI rechallenge or combination therapy with agents having other modes of action, are being actively investigated to date. On the basis of the success of immunotherapy in the treatment of AGC, various clinical trials are underway to apply this therapeutic strategy in the perioperative and postoperative settings for patients with early GC. This review describes recent progress in immunotherapy and potential immunotherapy biomarkers for GC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pure red cell aplasia: Case series and large-scale pharmacovigilance analysis.

Impressive advances in immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have made great progress in treating multiple cancers. However, ICIs can also cause serious, even incurable, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), most often in patients with colitis, dermatitis, hepatitis, and thyroiditis. Rare autoimmune hematologic toxicities have been reported in the literature but are poorly described. Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) induced by ICIs is a life-threatening autoimmune disease; however, only a few cases have been reported in the literature. To characterize and evaluate PRCA associated with different ICI regimens in a public database and to review the relevant literature. We described a case series of patients experiencing PRCA while on ICIs. We also mined the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and used reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms to analyze the data of the suspected adverse events of PRCA induced by ICIs between January 2011 and June 2022. Fifteen patients with PRCA events while on ICIs were included in our case series. In FAERS, a total of 41 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) with different ICI regimens were retrieved, among which 28 (68.3%) were related to monotherapy and three (7.3%) involved a fatal outcome. Signals of PRCA for all four ICI monotherapies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, and atezolizumab) and ICI combination therapy (ipilimumab/nivolumab) were detected. Ipilimumab/nivolumab presented a higher reporting signal than nivolumab. There is a significant reporting signal of PRCA with several ICI agents. Clinicians should be aware of and monitor this potentially fatal adverse event.

The Predictive Model Construction for Immune-Related Adverse Events in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy.

It is possible to predict immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) based on clinical and hematological parameters. Nevertheless, the specific parameters which can predict irAEs are still in the exploration. The purpose of this retrospective study was to develop a predictive model for irAEs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the treatment of ICIs. Researchers enrolled NSCLC patients treated with at least 1 type of ICIs at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between January 30, 2019 and December 31, 2021. Baseline parameters including demographic, clinicopathology, treatment information, and peripheral blood markers were selected retrospectively. Type, onset time, grade, and treatment of irAEs were also assessed. By analyzing the risk factors for irAEs, an irAEs prediction model was established using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. In a total of 484 patients, 81 patients experienced 112 irAEs in which thyroid dysfunction was the most common irAE (n = 38, 33.9%) and ICI pneumonitis was the most serious irAE (n = 6, 33.3%). Finally, a prediction model based on lines and combination therapy of ICIs, ECOG performance status, neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio (NLR), platelet (PLT), and lymphocyte (LYM) was established. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that 2 or ≥3 lines of immunotherapy, ICIs combination therapy, and ECOG PS 1-2 were independent risk factors for irAEs. Baseline LYM was positively associated with irAEs (OR = 2.599, P = 0.048) while baseline NLR and PLT were negatively associated with irAEs (OR = 0.392, P = 0.047; OR = 0.992, P = 0.035, respectively). The model showed great prediction performance with the AUC value of 0.851 and 0.779 in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. Our study identified the risk factors related to irAEs occurrence and constructed and assessed the predictive model of irAEs in patients with NSCLC treated by ICIs using clinical and hematological parameters, thus guiding clinicians to select precisely the population receiving immunotherapy and develop individualized treatment therapy.

Adverse events induced by durvalumab and tremelimumab combination regimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown remarkable therapeutic outcomes among cancer patients. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) is under investigation as a new ICI combination therapy, and its efficacy has been reported in various types of cancer. However, the safety profile of DT remains unclear, especially considering rare adverse events (AEs). We aimed to assess the frequency of AEs associated with DT. This study type is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Four databases were searched for articles. Randomized trials, single-arm trials, and prospective and retrospective observational studies were included. The type of cancer, previous treatment, and performance status were not questioned. Major AE indicators such as any AE and the pooled frequency of each specific AE were used as outcomes. As a subgroup analysis, we also compared cases in which DT was performed as first-line treatment with those in which it was performed as second-line or later treatment. The protocol for this systematic review was registered on the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center website (ID: UMIN000046751). Forty-one populations including 3099 patients were selected from 30 articles. Pooled frequencies of key AE indicators are shown below: any AEs, 77.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 67.9-87.6]; grade ⩾ 3 AEs, 29.3% (95% CI: 24.2-34.4); serious AEs, 34.9% (95% CI: 28.1-41.7); AE leading to discontinuation, 13.3% (95% CI: 9.3-17.4); treatment-related deaths, 0.98% (95% CI: 0.5-1.5). AEs with a frequency exceeding 15% are shown below: fatigue, 30.1% (95% CI: 23.8-36.3); diarrhea, 21.7% (95% CI: 17.8-25.6); pruritus 17.9% (95% CI: 14.4-21.3); decreased appetite, 17.7% (95% CI: 13.7-22.0); nausea, 15.6% (95% CI: 12.1-19.6). There were no significant differences in these pooled frequencies between subgroups. The incidence of any AE in DT therapy was approximately 78%, and the incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was approximately 30%, which was independent of prior therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated hypophysitis: no place like home

Ambulatory emergency care forms a fundamental part of the strategy of trying to ensure safe and sustainable acute care services. Immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI)-mediated hypophysitis is an important life-threatening complication of therapy. Patients presenting with clinical features and findings consistent with ICI-mediated hypophysitis were considered in the current study. In the absence of severe features (sodium <125 mmol/L, hypotension, reduced consciousness, hypoglycaemia and/or visual field defect), patients were administered a single intravenous dose of hydrocortisone (100 mg), observed for at least 4 h and then discharged on oral hydrocortisone (20 mg, 10 mg and 10 mg). Patients were then seen urgently in the endocrinology outpatient setting for further management. Fourteen patients (median age 64, 10 male) were managed using the pathway. All patients had biochemically confirmed adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency. Seven of the 14 were treated with combination ICI therapy, with four having pan-anterior hypopituitarism. There were no 30-day readmissions or any associated hypophysitis-related mortality. All patients continued ICI therapy without interruption.

Current Status in Rechallenge of Immunotherapy.

The treatment of malignant tumors has entered the era of immunotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought significant benefits to patients. However, some patients are required to discontinue treatment with ICIs owing to factors such as disease progression and intolerable side effects. Faced with limited subsequent treatment options and complex medical needs, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and the NIH clinical trials database and found that ICI rechallenge could be a relevant clinical strategy. The factors that could affect the rechallenge efficacy include the patients' characteristics, therapeutic strategy selection, and the timing of treatment. Multiple factors are used to identify target population, of which clinical features and PD-L1 expression are more potential. Both single ICI rechallenge and combination therapy may have survival benefits. Patients who have tolerated initial immunotherapy well could undergo ICI rechallenge, while patients who have experienced grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events should be carefully assessed prior to rechallenge. Interventions and the interval between two courses of ICI will clearly have an impact on the efficacy of subsequent treatment. Preliminary data evaluation supports further investigation on ICI rechallenge to identify the factors that could contribute to its efficacy.

Clinical Outcomes Associated with Monotherapy and Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Practice: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based therapy has recently been demonstrated to greatly ameliorate survival outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of ICIs-based monotherapy and combination therapy as first-line treatment of adults with advanced HCC in real-world practice by conducting a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 25 April 2022. Retrospective or prospective real-world studies evaluating progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of patients with advanced HCC receiving first-line ICIs-based therapy were included. Of 7805 studies retrieved, 38 were deemed eligible for inclusion. For patients receiving first-line ICIs-based therapy in real-world practice, the pooled median PFS and OS were 7.03 (95% CI: 5.55-8.51) and 14.39 (95% CI: 10.91-17.86) months. The ORR and DCR were 0.432 (95% CI: 0.327-0.538) and 0.756 (95% CI: 0.677-0.836), according to mRECIST 1.1, 0.317 (95% CI: 0.218-0.416) and 0.740 (95% CI: 0.644-0.835), judged by RECIST 1.1. The best outcomes of survival and response rate were observed in ICIs-based combination therapy of ICIs, TKIs, plus LRTs. Furthermore, ORR, DCR judged by mRECIST 1.1, and PFS could be potential prognostic factors for OS. This research revealed diversified first-line ICIs-based therapies for advanced HCC in real-world practice. Future studies are needed to adopt prospective, multicentric and comparative designs to test the ICIs-based combination therapies, especially triple therapies of ICIs, TKIs, plus LRTs.

The Effect of Pleural Effusion on Prognosis in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Immunochemotherapy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Combined immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pleural effusion (PE) is associated with poor outcomes among patients with NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy. However, minimal data exists on PE for patients undergoing combined ICI and chemotherapy. Therefore, we investigated how PE affects survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC undergoing this combined therapy. We identified patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy and ICI therapy from the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group-Immune Chemotherapy Database (OLCSG-ICD) between December 2018 and December 2020; the OLCSG-ICD includes the clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC from 13 institutions. Then, we analyzed the treatment outcomes based on the presence of PE. We identified 478 patients who underwent combined ICI therapy and chemotherapy; 357 patients did not have PE, and 121 patients did have PE. Patients with PE had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those without PE (median PFS: 6.2 months versus 9.1 months; p &lt; 0.001; median OS: 16.4 months versus 27.7 months; p &lt; 0.001). The negative effect of PE differed based on the patient's programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status; with the effect being more evident in patients with high PD-L1 expression. In addition, PFS and OS did not differ between patients who did and did not undergo bevacizumab treatment; thus, bevacizumab-containing regimens did not improve the survival outcomes for patients with PE. PE is associated with poor outcomes among patients with NSCLC undergoing combined ICI therapy and chemotherapy.

IMAGENE trial: multicenter, proof-of-concept, phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of niraparib with PD-1 inhibitor in solid cancer patients with homologous recombination repair genes mutation

Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the potential efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) in patients with cancer involving homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutation. Moreover, HRR gene-mutated cancers are effectively treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with the increase in tumor mutation burden. We have proposed to conduct a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial (IMAGENE trial) for evaluating the efficacy and safety of niraparib (PARPi) plus programmed cell death-1 inhibitor combination therapy in patients with HRR gene-mutated cancers who are refractory to ICIs therapy using a next generation sequencing-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and tumor tissue analysis. Key eligibility criteria for this trial includes HRR gene-mutated tumor determined by any cancer gene tests; progression after previous ICI treatment; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≤ 1. The primary endpoint is the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in all patients. The secondary endpoints include the confirmed ORR in patients with HRR gene-mutation of ctDNA using the Caris Assure (CARIS, USA). The target sample size of the IMAGENE trial is 57 patients. Biomarker analyses will be performed in parallel using the Caris Assure, proteome analysis, and T cell repertoire analysis to reveal tumor immunosurveillance in peripheral blood. Our trial aims to confirm the clinical benefit of PARPi plus ICI combination therapy in ICI-resistant patients. Furthermore, through translational research, our trial will shed light on which patients would benefit from the targeted combination therapy for patients with HRR gene-mutated tumor even after the failure of ICIs. The IMAGENE trial: jRCT, Clinical trial no.: jRCT2051210120, Registered date: November 9, 2021.

Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy Combination Prolonged Progression-Free Survival in Patients with NSCLC with High PD-L1 Expression and Low Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided overall survival (OS) benefits in patients with treatment-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable driver mutations. However, studies comparing ICIs monotherapy with combination therapy either with chemotherapy or radiotherapy in programmed death-ligand 1 high expressors remain limited. This study aimed to retrospectively compare the treatment efficacy of the therapies by studying 47 patients with treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC who received ICI monotherapy (n = 28) or combination therapy either with chemotherapy or radiotherapy (n = 19). Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. It was observed that patients who received combination therapy had a better PFS than monotherapy, but no such significant benefit was observed in OS. The difference in PFS was higher in the subgroup of patients with low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) than in the high-NLR patient subgroup. This study suggests that pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy could provide a significant benefit in PFS, especially in patients with treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC with low NLR. Furthermore, our study also demonstrates the potential use of NLR as a biomarker for prediction of treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving combination therapy.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenic agents in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted a systematic literature search of articles published between the establishment of the database and February 2022. Data were extracted and analyzed using STATA 14.0. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (980 patients for combination therapy and 565 patients for monotherapy) and 5 single-arm studies (246 patients for ICIs combination therapy) were enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 26% and 70%, respectively, after ICIs combination therapy. Compared with monotherapy in RCTs, ICIs combination therapy resulted in higher progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), but also increased the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Increased incidences of fatigue, hypertension, hyperbilirubinemia, proteinuria, and nausea were more common after ICIs combination therapy. The analysis results reveal that ICI-combined anti-angiogenesis therapy has higher efficacy than either ICIs or anti-angiogenesis options for unresectable HCC, but it is necessary to manage the AEs.

Cardiac arrhythmias associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A comprehensive disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

Introduction: With the widespread application of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), it is important to explore the association between ICIs and cardiac arrhythmias and to characterize the clinical features of ICI-associated cardiac arrhythmias in real-world studies. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize the main features of ICI-related cardiac arrhythmias. Methods: From January 2017 to June 2021, data in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were retrieved to conduct the disproportionality analysis. For the ICI-related cardiac arrhythmia detection, signals were detected by reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC), calculated using two-by-two contingency tables The clinical characteristics of patients reported with ICI-related cardiac arrhythmias were compared between fatal and non-fatal groups, and the time to onset (TTO) following different ICI regimens was further investigated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between concurrent cardiotoxicities and ICI-associated arrhythmias. Results: We identified a total of 1957 ICI-associated cardiac arrhythmias reports which appeared to influence more men (64.44%) than women (30.76%), with a median age of 68 [interquartile range (IQR) 60-75] years. Cardiac arrhythmias were reported most often in patients with lung, pleura, thymus and heart cancers (38.02% of 1957 patients). Compared with the full database, ICIs were detected with pharmacovigilance of cardiac arrhythmias (ROR025 = 1.16, IC025 = 0.19). Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monotherapies were found to be related to higher reporting of arrhythmias, corresponding to ROR025 = 1.03, IC025 = 0.06 and ROR025 = 1.27, IC025 = 0.29, respectively, with the exception of anti-CTLA-4 monotherapies (ROR025 = 0.57, IC025 = -1.21). The spectrum of arrhythmias induced by ICIs differed among therapeutic regimens. There was no significant difference in the onset time between monotherapy and combination regimen. Moreover, reports of ICI-associated arrhythmias were associated with other concurrent cardiotoxicity, including cardiac failure [ROR 2.61 (2.20-3.09)], coronary artery disorders [ROR 2.28 (1.83-2.85)], myocardial disorders [ROR 5.25 (4.44-6.22)], pericardial disorders [ROR 2.76 (2.09-3.64)] and cardiac valve disorders [ROR 3.21 (1.34-7.68)]. Conclusion: ICI monotherapy and combination therapy can lead to cardiac arrhythmias that can result in serious outcomes and tend to occur early. Our findings underscore the importance of early recognition and management of ICI-related cardiac arrhythmias.

Imaging of Drug-Related Pneumonitis in Oncology.

Clinical applications of novel anticancer agents in the past few decades brought marked advances in cancer treatment, enabling remarkable efficacy and effectiveness; however, these novel agents are also associated with toxicities. Among various toxicities, drug-related pneumonitis is one of the major clinical challenges in the management of cancer patients. Imaging plays a key role in detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of drug-related pneumonitis during cancer treatment. In the current era of precision oncology, pneumonitis from molecular targeted therapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has been recognized as an event of clinical significance. Additionally, further advances of therapeutic approaches in cancer have brought several emerging issues in diagnosis and monitoring of pneumonitis. This article will describe the computed tomography (CT) pattern-based approach for drug-related pneumonitis that has been utilized to describe the imaging manifestations of pneumonitis from novel cancer therapies. Then, we will discuss pneumonitis from representative agents of precision cancer therapy, including mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, and ICI, focusing on the incidence, risk factors, and the spectrum of CT patterns. Finally, the article will address emerging challenges in the diagnosis and monitoring of pneumonitis, including pneumonitis from combination ICI and radiation therapy and from antibody conjugate therapy, as well as the overlapping imaging features of drug-related pneumonitis and coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia. The review is designed to provide a practical overview of drug-related pneumonitis from cutting-edge cancer therapy with emphasis on the role of imaging.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Clinical evidence suggests that first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies can improve survival in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC). However, the optimal strategy remains unknown without a systematic comparison of their long-term effects. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis by retrieving up-to-date literature from PubMed® (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA), Embase® (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands), MEDLINE® (National Library of Medicine), ClinicalTrials.gov (National Library of Medicine), and major international conference publications. Published studies and abstracts comparing first-line ICI combination therapies with other treatments for patients with advanced nsq-NSCLC were included. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was measured over 12 months for progression-free survival (PFS) and 18 months for overall survival (OS), and the Royston-Parmar model was used to extrapolate and compare data for the long-term outcomes. We included a total of 11 trials involving 12 therapies and 6,130 patients. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited the best overall survival (OS) benefit at both 18 and 60 months [RMST = 2.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.96 to 3.97; life-years gained over a 5-year period = 2.18 years]. Nivolumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy was found to present the best progression-free survival (PFS) benefit at 12 months (RMST 3.02, 95% CI 2.11 to 3.91), whereas atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy showed the best PFS benefit at 36 months (life-years gained over 3 years = 1.22 years). Subgroup analyses showed that among patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%, atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab resulted in superior OS benefits at 18 and 60 months, respectively. Among patients with PD-L1 expression< 1%, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was associated with OS benefits at both 18 and 60 months. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy was associated with relatively fewer grade ≥ 3 adverse events than other ICI combination therapies. Our results show that ICI combination therapies showed better survival benefits than chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy could provide the best OS benefits to patients with advanced nsq-NSCLC, whereas atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy could bring the best PFS benefits. The optimal ICI combination therapy varies depending on PD-L1 expression level. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=325005, identifier CRD42022325005.

Early Experience of Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor and Radiotherapy in Heavily Pretreated Hepatobiliary Cancer

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Promising therapeutic results of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) have been reported in various solid tumors. Radiotherapy (RT) is known to enhance the immunogenic effect. The immunogenic effect of RT is expected to improve the therapeutic effect of ICI. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of combining ICI and RT in hepatobiliary cancer. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Patients who received RT and ICI combination therapy for hepatobiliary cancer from January 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline patient characteristics such as age at diagnosis, stage, previous treatment, radiation dose, tumor volume, and lymphocyte count were recorded. The primary endpoints were in-field and out-field control rate. The secondary endpoint was treatment-related toxicities. Overall survival and progression-free survival were also evaluated. The disease control rate and survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. <h3>Results</h3> In total, 20 patients and 42 treated lesions were included for analysis. The median follow-up period was 6.2 months (range 2.4 – 23 months). Of the 20 patients, 15 were diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (75.0%). Sixteen patients had distant metastasis (80.0%). Various treatments were administered to the patients prior to ICI and RT combination treatment. The 6-month overall survival and progression-free survival was 62.8% and 31.5%, respectively. The 6-month in-field control rate was 71.8% and 6-month out-field control rate was 30.2%. Higher BED (≥ 90 Gy) was a significant prognostic factor for both in-field and out-field control, and lymphopenia (≤ 800 /μL) at the time of RT start was a poor prognostic factor for outfield control. Fractional dose of less than 5 Gy showed improved in-field control. Treatment related toxicity occurred in 11 patients (55.0%). The most frequent adverse event was GI disorders such as esophagitis (n=3) and epigastric pain (n=3). Patients who experienced treatment-related toxicity were well recovered after conservative care. There was no grade 3 or 4 toxicity. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The combination of ICI and RT showed substantial efficacy with acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated advanced hepatobiliary cancer patients. Dose per fraction of less than 5 Gy may be appropriate for better efficacy in future study of combining ICI and RT. The results of this study provide a basis for future prospective study in hepatobiliary cancer.

Relation of overall tumor burden with severe immune-related adverse events in nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment for lung cancer.

Compared to chemotherapy alone, monoclonal antibodies like ipilimumab and nivolumab, with or without chemotherapy, improve the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), albeit with a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) than those with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if baseline overall tumor burden was associated with the development of Grade ≥ 3 irAEs (severe irAEs) when treated with first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab with or without chemotherapy.We retrospectively examined consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy at Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital between December 2020 and December 2021. Baseline overall tumor burden was measured as the sum of unidimensional diameters of up to five target lesions according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. We defined irAEs as ICI therapy-related toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0.A significant difference in tumor burden was observed between patients with and without severe irAEs (100mm vs. 67.5mm, p = 0.001). We evaluated various clinical parameters, including baseline overall tumor burden, before treatment initiation. Of the various parameters, only high tumor burden correlated with severe irAEs, independent of complementary chemotherapy. The multivariate odds ratio of severe irAEs and high tumor burden was 6.62.Conclusively, baseline overall tumor burden may be a risk factor for severe irAEs in patients treated with first-line combination ICI therapy. Therefore, patients with large tumor burden should be carefully monitored to prevent irAEs.

Skin rash associated with combined cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunotherapy for cancer: A retrospective single-center case series.

In recent years, the development of combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and cytotoxic anticancer drugs has radically changed the management of diverse malignancies and significantly improved patient outcomes. Several clinical trials have shown that skin rash caused by combination therapy with ICIs and cytotoxic drugs may be more frequent and severe than that developing after administration of ICIs alone or cytotoxic drug monotherapy. However, most reports provide little information on severity, treatment, post-diagnosis course, and recurrence of rashes on drug rechallenges. We aimed to describe the experience of skin rashes developing within 2 weeks from the first administration of combination therapy with ICIs and cytotoxic drugs in 11 patients visiting our dermatology department. This study included seven men and four women, and the patients' median age was 52 years. The primary disease was non-small-cell lung cancer in eight patients, cervical cancer in two patients, and esophageal cancer in one patient. Nine patients had a maculopapular rash and two patients developed erythema multiforme-like eruptions. The skin rash was often accompanied by extracutaneous symptoms, such as fever (n=9), mucositis (n=4), and liver dysfunction (n=2). In all cases, the symptoms improved with topical steroid therapy alone, with no patients exhibiting severe symptoms requiring systemic steroids or immunosuppressive agents. In addition, when the causative drugs were re-administered after recovery from the rash, only two patients relapsed with accompanying systemic symptoms, and all patients except one were able to continue treatment using the same drug regimen. Although it was suggested that the rash caused by the combination therapy of ICIs and cytotoxic drugs may be more prominent than that caused by each agent alone, comprehensive judgment, including histopathological examination, may indicate the feasibility of continuing the treatment regimen for cancer.

PD-1/PD-L1 combined with LAG3 is associated with clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma.

Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is an Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-related, rare subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) show durable responses in advanced NSCLC. However, their effects and predictive biomarkers in PLELC remain poorly understood. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 48 metastatic PLELC patients treated with ICI. Pretreated paraffin-embedded specimens (n = 19) were stained for PD-1, PD-L1, LAG3, TIM3, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD68, FOXP3, and cytokeratin (CK) by multiple immunohistochemistry (mIHC). Next-generation sequencing was performed for 33 PLELC samples. Among patients treated with ICI monotherapy (n = 30), the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall survival (mOS) were 13.3%, 80.0%, 7.7 months, and 24.9 months, respectively. Patients with PD-L1 ≥1% showed a longer PFS (8.4 vs. 2.1 months, p = 0.015) relative to those with PD-L1 <1%. Among patients treated with ICI combination therapy (n = 18), ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS were 27.8%, 100.0%, 10.1 months, and 19.7 months, respectively. Patients with PD-L1 ≥1% showed a significantly superior OS than those with PD-L1 <1% (NA versus 11.7 months, p = 0.001). Among the 19 mIHC patients, those with high PD-1/PD-L1 and LAG3 expression showed a longer PFS (19.0 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.003). ICI also showed promising efficacy for treating metastatic PLELC. PD-L1 may be both predictive of ICI treatment efficacy and prognostic for survival in PLELC. PD-1/PD-L1 combined with LAG3 may serve as a predictor of ICI treatment effectiveness in PLELC. Larger and prospective trials are warranted to validate both ICI activity and predictive biomarkers in PLELC.This study was partly presented as a poster at the IASLC 20th World Conference on Lung Cancer 2019, 7–10 September 2019, Barcelona, Spain.

The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic therapy as a second-line or later treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy remains the standard of second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) , the objective response rate (ORR) is low. There is an urgent need to increase the response population of second-line immunotherapy, and ICI combination therapy may be a possible option. However, the evidence is insufficient. We retrospectively collected the medical records of patients who received ICI monotherapy or ICI combination therapy as a second-line or later treatment option. We further analysed baseline clinical characteristics, evaluated treatment efficacy, assessed treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and followed up survival. The outcome variables assessed in the study were ORR, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and AEs. A total of 145 patients were ultimately enrolled in this study, including the ICI monotherapy group (n=63) and ICI combination therapy group (n=82). The ICI combination therapy group was further divided into the ICI/chemotherapy group (n=57) and ICI/anti-angiogenic therapy group (n=25). The baseline was comparable among the three subgroups. The ICI combination therapy groups showed a higher ORR (29.3% vs. 11.1%, P=0.008) and DCR (85.4% vs. 61.9%, P=0.001) and a longer PFS (6.77 vs. 3.47 months, P<0.001) and OS (18.60 vs. 8.47 months, P<0.001) than the ICI monotherapy group. The ICI/chemotherapy group showed a significantly higher ORR (31.6% vs. 11.1%, P=0.006) and DCR (84.2% vs. 61.9%, P=0.006) and a longer PFS (6.37 vs. 3.47 months, P<0.001) and OS (18.60 vs. 8.47 months, P<0.001) than the ICI monotherapy group. The ICI/anti-angiogenic therapy group showed a significantly higher DCR (88.0% vs. 61.9%, P=0.021) and a longer PFS (8.17 vs. 3.47 months, P<0.001) and OS (19.20 vs. 8.47 months, P=0.005) than the ICI monotherapy group. Neither of the combined ICI therapy groups showed a significant increase in the incidence of AEs compared to the ICI monotherapy group. ICI combined with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic therapy as second-line or later treatment demonstrated superiority over ICI monotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients without prior immunotherapy. These results provide a potentially superior treatment strategy and require verification in prospective clinical trials.