Combination Of Treosulfan Research Articles

Improved Outcome Following Busulfan-Based Conditioning in Children with Functional Neutrophil Disorders Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant from HLA-Matched Donors.

Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) and leukocyte-adhesion deficiency (LAD), but both diseases have high rates of graft failure in transplant and patients with these diseases are often referred to HSCT with significant comorbidity. The intensity of the conditioning regimen should be balanced between the need to ensure durable engraftment and to minimize toxicity when transplanting young children with infections and organ damage. We report on 26 children transplanted at our institution with CGD and LAD over 24years. We found a higher incidence of graft failure in patients receiving treosulfan based conditioning for their first transplant. There was no effect of conditioning regimen on overall survival, as all 8 patients that proceeded to a second busulfan-based HSCT were salvaged. We recommend giving patients with CGD and LAD fully myeloablative conditioning with either a busulfan-based regimen or the combination of treosulfan, fludarabine, and thiotepa.

Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms

PurposeTreosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) conditioning prior to allogeneic SCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN).Methods Seventy-seven patients (median age 54 years) at high risk of disease relapse due to unfavorable cytogenetics or failure to achieve complete remission prior to SCT were included. Median follow-up was 3.2 years.ResultsThe 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates were 49.4%, 41.7%, and 37.6% and OS rates were 59.3%, 49.3%, and 45.4%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of NRM was 10% at 100 days, 18.8% at 1 year and 20.1% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of relapse increased from 31% at 1 year to 38.5% after 3 years. The cumulative incidences of engraftment, chimerism, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and toxicities were acceptable and comparable with similar patients conditioned with Treo/Flu or FLAMSA-RIC.Conclusion In conclusion, Treo/Flu/AraC provides tolerable, feasible, and effective conditioning for patients with AML, MDS or MPN, even in advanced disease states. The incidence of NRM and relapse is acceptable in this heavily pre-treated population with high-risk disease. Future research will aim to confirm these initial findings and include a larger number of participants in a prospective trial.

Treosulfan in combination with fludarabine as part of conditioning treatment prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The combination of treosulfan with fludarabine (Treo-Flu) is one of the new megatherapies prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Preclinical studies have documented the myeloablative and myelosuppressive effects of treosulfan, in addition to its immunosuppressive and antimalignant activities. Treosulfan pharmacokinetics involves nonenzymatic activation and generation of epoxides as active compounds. In the clinical studies, the most common adverse effects of Treo-Flu were grade 4 hematologic toxicities with leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Among the most common nonhematologic toxicities, grade 2 or lower mucositis was usually reported. One of the advantages of treosulfan-based conditioning regimens is their good safety profile, especially the low risk of hepatic venoocclusive disease. Additional drugs reported in combination with the Treo-Flu backbone are thiotepa and melphalan. Treo-Flu alone and in multiple drug combinations can be successfully and safely combined with posttransplant cyclophosphamide immunosuppression for unma¬nipulated haploidentical transplantations. On the basis of chimerism studies, the Treo-Flu megatherapy lacks full myeloablative potential, but the profound myelosuppression with donor cell-mediated alloreactivity can result in full donor chimerism in the majority of transplant recipients. The clinical studies of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation show high heterogeneity, but the safety and feasibility of the Treo-Flu regimen are evident and support its place among reduced-intensity protocols.

Treosulfan and Fludarabine Conditioning for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children with Primary Immunodeficiency: UK Experience

We previously published results for 70 children who received conditioning with treosulfan and cyclophosphamide (n = 30) or fludarabine (n = 40) before undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for primary immunodeficiency (PID). Toxicity was lower and T cell chimerism was better in the patients receiving fludarabine, but cohort numbers were relatively small and follow-up was short. Here we report outcomes of 160 children who received homogeneous conditioning with treosulfan, fludarabine, and, in most cases, alemtuzumab (n = 124). The median age at transplantation was 1.36 years (range, .09 to 18.25 years). Donors included 73 matched unrelated, 54 1 to 3 antigen-mismatched unrelated, 12 matched sibling, 17 other matched family, and 4 haploidentical donors. Stem cell source was peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in 70, bone marrow in 49, and cord blood in 41. Median duration of follow-up was 4.3 years (range, .8 to 9.4 years). Overall survival was 83%. No patients had veno-occlusive disease. Seventy-four patients (46%) had acute GVHD, but only 14 (9%) greater than grade II. Four patients underwent successful retransplantation for graft loss or poor immune reconstitution. Another patient experienced graft rejection and died. There was no association between T cell chimerism >95% and stem cell source, but a significant association was seen between myeloid chimerism >95% and use of PBSCs without an increased risk of significant GVHD compared with other sources. All 11 patients with severe combined immunodeficiency diagnosed at birth were alive at up to 8.7 years of follow-up. Long-term studies are needed to determine late gonadotoxic effects, and pharmacokinetic studies are needed to identify whether specific targeting is advantageous. The combination of treosulfan, fludarabine, and alemtuzumab is associated with excellent results in HSCT for PID.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Treosulfan-Based Conditioning for Treatment of Marrow Failure Disorders

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is effective in the treatment of inherited marrow failure disorders and other nonmalignant diseases. Conventional myeloablative conditioning regimens have been associated with high transplant-related mortality, particularly in patients with comorbid conditions. Here we report on 14 patients with marrow failure disorders (Shwachman-Diamond syndrome, n = 3; Diamond Blackfan anemia, n = 4; GATA2 deficiency, n = 2; paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, n = 4; and an undefined marrow failure disorder, n = 1) who underwent HCT on a prospective, phase II, multicenter clinical trial. Patients were given HLA-matched related (n = 2) or unrelated (n = 12) grafts after conditioning with treosulfan (42 g/m2), fludarabine (150 mg/m2), ± thymoglobulin (n = 11; 6 mg/kg). All patients engrafted. At a median follow-up of 3 years, 13 patients are alive with complete correction of their underlying disease. These results indicate that the combination of treosulfan, fludarabine, and thymoglobulin is effective at establishing donor engraftment with a low toxicity profile and excellent disease-free survival in patients with marrow failure disorders.

Refined Disease Risk Index (DRI) and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) Predict Survival after Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation: A Comparative Study with EBMT Risk Score in 220 Consecutive Patients

BackgroundOptimization of pre-transplant risk assessment is a crucial issue to improve the allo-HSCT decision making process. Actually 3 major algorithms are in use in clinical practice: the EBMT risk score, the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score and - more recently introduced - the refined Disease Risk Index (DRI).DRI was defined to calibrate HSCT outcome across studies and centers. It was developed as a tool to assign patients into risk groups based on disease type and status at the time of transplantation. The aim of the DRI is to provide a robust tool that can be used for prognostication, for the analysis and interpretation of retrospective data, whether conducted in single-center, multicenter, or registry settings, or within the context of the federally mandated center outcome reporting. The DRI can also be used for the stratification of patients entering prospective HCT clinical trials.DRI is not a fixed tool but instead it was conceived to be refined by the transplant community as new information becomes available.Here we are presenting the results of a retrospective study designed to evaluate the 3 aforementioned score in stratification and prognostication of transplant outcome after a haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT).Patients and MethodsWe included 220 adult patients (pts - 138 male, 82 female) who underwent a haplo-HSCT for hematologic malignancies, between 2006 and 2014 and were reported to our Institutional database. Risk assessment score and outcome analysis included all consecutive pts receiving an haplo-HSCT as 1st allogeneic transplantation. Pts receiving haplo-HSCT as 2nd or 3rd HSCT were excluded from the present analysis. Median age was 49 years (range, 15-77). The cohort included a broad representation of diseases (138/220 acute leukemia, 30 Hodgkin lymphoma); 62 pts were in complete remission at transplant, 158 were presenting active disease.Conditioning regimens mostly rely upon the combination of treosulfan plus fludarabine (201/220) and total body irradiation (range 200 - 400 cGy) was utilized in 52 patients. GVHD prophylaxis consisted mostly of an mTor inhibitor (rapamycin) combined with mycophenolate mofetil. The majority of patients received peripheral blood stem cells from a family haploidentical donor as stem cell source, while only 4 patients received bone marrow transplant.A written consent was given by pts allowing the use of medical records for research in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.ResultsThe median follow-up for survivors was 37 months (r 6-107). The overall survival (OS) at 2-y was 35% and the transplant related mortality at 100-days 23%. The 2y OS according to EBMT / HCT-CI / DRI risk score are reported in table 1.a and figure 1.The evaluation of the HCT-CI impact after DRI stratification was able to show a significant difference in outcome showing better survival for pts with low DRI score and low HCT-CI score as expected (table 1.b).DiscussionRefined DRI score and HCT-CI score predict survival after haplo-HSCT. The integrated application of refined DRI and HCT-CI may improve the definition of transplant eligibility for pts candidate to allogeneic HSCT form alternative donors including family haploidentical source.Table 1aEBMT score0-3% pts4-5%pts> 5%ptsp51%1734%5127%320.07HCT-CI score0-23-4>/= 548%5936%310%100.0001DRI scoreLow-IntermediateHighVery-High61%3227%515%170.0001Table 1bHCT-CI 0-4HCT-CI >/=5pDRILow-Intermediate64%0%0.0001DRIHigh-Very High29%0% [Display omitted] DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Analysis of Treosulfan Conditioning Before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Hematological Malignancies.

Standard myeloablative conditioning regimens for children with hematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic HSCT are based mainly on total body irradiation or busulfan. Their serious short- and long-term side effects warranted the exploration of less toxic alternatives. Treosulfan is increasingly used for adults and children before HSCT due to its potent immunosuppressive and cytotoxic effects combined with low organ toxicity. To further investigate the role of treosulfan conditioning in children, the EBMT Pediatric diseases working party performed a retrospective analysis of 193 children with hematological malignancies (ALL n = 71, AML n = 47, MDS/MPS n = 40, other leukemia/lymphoma n = 25) undergoing allogeneic HSCT following treosulfan between January 2005 and July 2010. Early regimen-related toxicity was low and mainly gastrointestinal. Veno-occlusive disease and neurological toxicity were rare. There was no association of toxicity with type of disease or treosulfan dose. High-grade early toxicity was not higher in infants or patients undergoing second or later transplantation. Treatment related mortality was low at 14%. Three-year event-free survival was 45 ± 4% and not significantly influenced by number of transplants, however it appeared to be significantly better for infants (P = 0.022). When compared to treosulfan plus fludarabine, the combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and an alkylator (either thiotepa or melphalan) resulted in significantly better overall survival (OS, P = 0.048) and a trend toward better EFS. Treosulfan based conditioning is a safe and effective approach for children with hematological malignancies, including and importantly for infants and those patients undergoing second or later transplantation.

Treosulfan-Based Conditioning and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Nonmalignant Diseases: A Prospective Multicenter Trial

Hematopoietic cell transplantation is an effective treatment for patients with nonmalignant diseases and for many is the only known cure. Conventional myeloablative regimens have been associated with unacceptably high early transplant-related mortality (TRM), particularly in patients with comorbid conditions. This prospective multicenter trial was designed to determine the safety and engraftment efficacy of treosulfan-based conditioning in patients with nonmalignant diseases. Thirty-one patients received HLA-matched related (n = 4) or unrelated (n = 27) grafts after conditioning with treosulfan (total dose, 42 g/m2), fludarabine (total dose, 150 mg/m2), ± thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg; n = 22). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and methotrexate. All patients engrafted. Day-100 TRM was 0%. With a median follow-up of 2 years, the 2-year survival was 90%. Three patients died of GVHD, recurrent hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and a surgical complication, respectively. The cumulative incidences of grades II to IV and III to IV acute GVHD at day 100 and chronic GVHD at 2 years were 62%, 10%, and 21%, respectively. Patients who received thymoglobulin had a significantly lower incidence of grades III to IV acute GVHD (0% versus 33%; P = .005). These results indicate that the combination of treosulfan, fludarabine, and thymoglobulin is effective at establishing donor engraftment with low toxicity and improved survival in patients with nonmalignant diseases and support the need for future disease-specific clinical trials.

912P - Salvage Chemotherapy in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: a Combination of Gemcitabine and Treosulfan is Equally Active in Platinum-Resistant and Platinum-Sensitive Disease

ABSTRACT Aim: The prognosis of heavily pretreated patients (pts) with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) and related malignancies having failed multiple chemotherapy (CTx) regimens is poor, irrespectively of the individual platinum-resistance status. In preceding studies, the combination of treosulfan and prolonged low-dose gemcitabine (GeT) has shown promising activity in platinum-resistant EOC. This non-interventional study has been set up in order to obtain more detailed informations regarding the clinical value of GeT given under routine conditions. Methods: 59 pts with recurrent EOC (n = 54), fallopian tube cancer (FTC; n = 2), peritoneal papillary-serous carcinoma (PPSC; n = 2), and type II endometrial carcinoma (EC-II; n = 1) who did not qualify for recruitment into a controlled clinical trial were included in this study. Pts had failed a median of 3 (range 1-11) prior Ctx, 37 were platinum-resistant (group R) and 22 were sensitive (group S). GeT was administered for 1-11 q2w cycles with treosulfan at 1 g/m2 PO on days 1-4 and gemcitabine at 450 mg/m2 IV (3 h infusion) on day 1. Adverse effects were scored according to CTCAE 4.0, responses were classified according to the integrated GCIG criteria. PFS and OS were calculated from the start of GeT until progression or death from any reason or loss to follow up. Results: GeT was generally well tolerated. Hematological side-effects were frequent but manageable with G3-4 neutropenia seen in 6, G3-4 anemia in 8, G3 fever in 3 and G3 infection in 1 pt. Non-hematological side effects exceeded G2 in only 4 pts. In 1 pt, GeT was prematurely stopped due to toxicity (allergic exanthema). A total of 8 CR and 19 PR accounted for an ORR of 45.8%. Adding 16 pts with SD, the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 72.9%. PFS was 17.3 weeks (wks) and OS was 67.6 wks. No significant differences between groups R and S were found in regard to ORR (40.5% vs 54.5%), CBR (70.3% vs 77.3%), PFS (17.0 vs 18.4 wks), and OS (63.0 vs 72.6 wks). Moreover, prior Ctx with one of the single agents did not lower the likelihood to benefit from GeT. Conclusions: GeT given under routine conditions is well-tolerated and efficacious in heavily pretreated pts with recurrent EOC, FTC, PPSC, and EC-II by exhibiting chemomodulatory properties. Its particularly promising activity in platinum-resistant disease should be further explored in large-scaled prospective clinical trials. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Salvage therapy of intensively pretreated patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and other Müllerian tract carcinomas with treosulfan and gemcitabine

Objectives: The prognosis of intensively pretreated patients (pts) with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) and related malignancies having failed multiple chemotherapy (CTx) regimens is poor, irrespectively of the individual platinum-resistance status. In preceding studies, the combination of treosulfan and prolonged low-dose gemcitabine (GeT) has shown promising activity in pretreated, mainly platinum-resistant EOC. This retrospective study has been set up in order yield more detailed information about the clinical value of GeT administered under routine conditions.

The use of treosulfan and gemcitabine in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

The combination of treosulfan and gemcitabine (TG) has been shown to have activity in ovarian cancer. These two agents are thought to be synergistic, with gemcitabine causing the persistence of treosulfan-induced DNA crosslinks. This study aimed to investigate the response rates, survival and toxicity in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated with TG. A retrospective case note review of the patients treated with TG was performed in one cancer centre between May 1st, 2000 and November 1st, 2005. Estimates of cumulative survival were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method. Forty-nine patients were identified; median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range, 31-72) and the median follow-up was 45.1 months (range, 12.2-118.3). TG was used as second-, third-, fourth- and fifth-line chemotherapy in 15, 19, 13 and 2 patients, respectively. Fifteen patients (30.6%) had stable disease; 25 (51%), a partial response; 1 (2%), a complete response and 8 (16.3%) had progressive disease. Median survival following diagnosis was 45.1 months and the median relapse-free survival was 12 months. The median survival time from the start of TG was 13.7 months with a relapse-free survival of 6.3 months. The median number of cycles given was 7. The most common toxicity recorded was myelosuppression. There were no treatment-related deaths. TG chemotherapy produced favourable response rates in a heavily pre-treated group of patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. This doublet warrants further investigation in a phase III trial setting.

Cytotoxic effects of treosulfan and busulfan against leukemic cells of pediatric patients

The alkylating agent treosulfan exerts a high cytotoxic activity against various malignant cells. Due to limited non-hematological toxicity, treosulfan might be a promising compound in myeloablative therapy for hematopoietic transplantation in children. Since in vitro data regarding the activity of treosulfan against childhood leukemic cells are limited, we compared the effect of treosulfan and busulfan against pediatric leukemic and non-malignant cells. Both agents were tested alone and in combination with fludarabine by means of the MTT and/or a five color-flow cytometric assay. Moreover, the induction of apoptosis by treosulfan was investigated via regulation of the proteinase caspase 3. Treosulfan was more active against leukemic cells of 20 children as well as against 3 leukemia-derived cell lines than busulfan, with increasing IC50 values from initial diagnosis to relapse. Overall purified stem cells were most sensitive, followed by CD56+CD3- NK and CD3+ T cells. The combination of treosulfan with fludarabine resulted in a synergistic effect against leukemic cells. In malignant cells, treosulfan induced rapid cell apoptosis measured by the activation of the centrally proteinase caspase 3. Our results indicate that treosulfan has activity against pediatric leukemic cells, myeloablative potential and immunosuppressive properties suitable for conditioning regimen in childhood malignancies.

Treosulfan and fludarabine: a new toxicity-reduced conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

AbstractNew conditioning regimens are being explored to reduce toxicity and enable allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients not eligible for conventional transplantation. We have investigated treosulfan, an alkylating agent, with the aim of developing an efficient and reliable but less-toxic conditioning regimen. A series of 30 patients who were not eligible for standard conditioning therapy received transplants from HLA-matched related (n = 14) or unrelated (n = 16) donors after administration of treosulfan 10 g/m2 intravenously daily for 3 days and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days. Patients receiving grafts from unrelated donors also were given rabbit antithymocyte globulin 10 mg/kg intravenously daily for 3 days. All patients achieved prompt neutrophil and platelet recovery. Extramedullary toxicity was generally mild with Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 3 or 4 attributable to the conditioning seen only with transaminases. Complete donor chimerism was achieved by 90% of the patients. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade III or IV developed in 14% of the patients and chronic GVHD in 39%. An estimated overall survival rate of 73% and an event-free survival rate of 49% have been reached after a median of 22 months (range, 7.4-33.4 months). In summary, the combination of treosulfan and fludarabine is a safe and efficient conditioning regimen.

Combination chemotherapy for choroidal melanoma: ex vivo sensitivity to treosulfan with gemcitabine or cytosine arabinoside.

Treatment of choroidal melanoma by chemotherapy is usually unsuccessful, with response rates of less than 1% reported for dacarbazine (DTIC)-containing regimens which show 20% or more response rates in skin melanoma. Recently, we reported the activity of several cytotoxic agents against primary choroidal melanoma in an ATP-based tumour chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA). In this study, we have used the same method to examine the sensitivity of choroidal melanoma to combinations suggested by our earlier study. Tumour material from 36 enucleated eyes was tested against a battery of single agents and combinations which showed some activity in the previous study. The combination of treosulfan with gemcitabine or cytosine arabinoside showed consistent activity in 70% and 86% of cases, respectively. Paclitaxel was also active, particularly in combination with treosulfan (47%) or mitoxantrone (33%). Addition of paclitaxel to the combination of treosulfan + cytosine analogue added little increased sensitivity. For treosulfan + cytosine arabinoside, further sequence and timing experiments showed that simultaneous administration gave the greatest suppression, with minor loss of inhibition if the cytosine analogue was given 24 h after the treosulfan. Administration of cytosine analogue 24 h before treosulfan produced considerably less inhibition at any concentration. While we have so far been unable to study metastatic tumour from choroidal melanoma patients, the combination of treosulfan with gemcitabine or cytosine arabinoside shows activity ex vivo against primary tumour tissue. Clinical trials are in progress. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign