Combination Of Kinase Inhibitors Research Articles

Different Impacts of DNA-PK and mTOR Kinase Inhibitors in Combination with Ionizing Radiation on HNSCC and Normal Tissue Cells.

Despite substantial advancements in understanding the pathomechanisms of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), effective therapy remains challenging. The application of kinase inhibitors (KIs) in HNSCC, specifically mTOR and DNA-PK inhibitors, can increase radiosensitivity and therefore presents a promising strategy when used simultaneously with ionizing radiation (IR) in cancer treatment. Our study focused on the selective DNA-PK-inhibitor AZD7648; the selective mTOR-inhibitor Sapanisertib; and CC-115, a dual inhibitor targeting both mTOR and DNA-PK. The impact of these KIs on HNSCC and normal tissue cells was assessed using various analytical methods including cell death studies, cell cycle analysis, real-time microscopy, colony-forming assays and immunohistochemical staining for γH2AX and downstream mTOR protein p-S6. We detected a strong inhibition of IR-induced DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, particularly in AZD7648-treated HNSCC, whereas normal tissue cells repaired DNA DSB more efficiently. Additionally, AZD7648 + IR treatment showed a synergistic decline in cell proliferation and clonogenicity, along with an elevated G2/M arrest and cell death in the majority of HNSCC cell lines. CC-115 + IR treatment led to an elevation in G2/M arrest, increased cell death, and a synergistic reduction in cell proliferation, though the effect was notably lower compared to the AZD7648 + IR- treated group. Sapanisertib led to a high cellular toxicity in both HNSCC and normal tissue cells, even in non-irradiated cells. Regarding cell proliferation and the induction of apoptosis and necrosis, Sapanisertib + IR was beneficial only in HPV+ HNSCC. Overall, this study highlights the potential of AZD7648 as a radiosensitizing agent in advanced-stage HPV-positive and negative HNSCC, offering a promising therapeutic strategy. However, the dual mTOR/DNA-PK-I CC-115 did not provide a distinct advantage over the use of selective KIs in our investigations, suggesting limited benefits for its application in KI + IR therapy. Notably, the selective mTOR-inhibitor Sapanisertib was only beneficial in HPV+ HNSCC and should not be applied in HPV- cases.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of first-line combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma.

429 Background: Due to the rarity of TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma ( TFE3-rRCC) and the poor understanding of its underlying mechanisms, the clinical treatment landscape in TFE3-rRCC is largely undefined. Hence, the optimal therapy for TFE3-rRCC remains to be determined. The diversity of fusion partners leads to the high heterogeneity of TFE3-rRCC, yet no studies have compared responses of patients with different fusion partners to systemic treatment. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from our institution. Patients with metastatic TFE3-rRCC were eligible. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to compare survival outcomes. RNA-seq was performed to determine fusion partners and explore the transcriptomic features. Results: A total of 38 patients with metastatic TFE3-rRCC were enrolled in this study. The fusion partners were identified in 33 (87%) patients. Patients receiving first-line ICI plus TKI had longer PFS than those not receiving first-line ICI plus TKI (median PFS: 11.5 vs. 5.1 months, P=0.098). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion significantly benefited from ICI plus TKI (PFS HR: 0.068, 95% CI: 0.008-0.609, P=0.016), whereas no improvement in PFS was observed in patients with other fusions. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis further demonstrated that besides IMDC risk score, ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion could also serve as an independent prognostic factor for PFS in patients receiving first-line ICI plus TKI. Among patients receiving ICI plus TKI, those with ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion had longer PFS than those with other fusions (median PFS: not reached vs. 6.5 months, P=0.01). Transcriptomic data revealed that ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion rearranged RCC harbored higher angiogenesis activity. Additionally, decreased infiltration of immunosuppressive M2-phenotype macrophages and Tregs was observed in tumors with ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion. Conclusions: Metastatic TFE3-rearranged RCC patients with ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion could benefit from ICI plus TKI. Higher angiogenesis activity and decreased infiltration of immunosuppressive cells were observed in tumors with ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusions, which may explain the clinical outcome.

Systemic and surgical treatment in renal cell carcinoma: Does timing matter?

417 Background: Today, targeted systemic therapy is standard 1st line treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been an important treatment option. Recently its role is under debate, especially in combination with the new 1st line treatments. Our study evaluated the current relevance of initial surgical intervention and the role of inductive systemic therapy in aRCC. Methods: We included 33 patients with aRCC from the University Hospitals in Essen and Münster initiating 1st line treatment from 03/18 to 01/23 pre or post surgery. We retrospectively formed two cohorts, either CN followed by systemic therapy (cohort 1; 13 patients) or vice versa (cohort 2; 20 patients). Patients received either Ipilimumab/Nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo) (42.4%) or a checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (CPI/TKI) combination (57.6%). Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier-method from initiation of systemic therapy or CN to progression or death. In Cohort 2, we additionally analyzed the radiologic response of the primary measured by change of the longest diameter. The radiographic response was analysed according to RECIST1.1. Results: Patients’ age ranged from 44 to 80 years with a median of 63 years. Intermediate and poor prognosis occurred in 61.3% and 38.7% of cases. The two cohorts did not differ significantly regarding baseline characteristics. Median PFS was 8 vs. 23 months (p=0.03) in cohort 1 (95% CI 0.9-15.1) compared to cohort 2 (95% CI 18.8-27.2). In cohort 2 the time between start of systemic therapy and surgery was in median 8.5 months (95% CI 3.3-21.1), the primary had a median diameter of 10.7 cm (95% CI 4.5-13.3). Median reduction of the primary was in total 32.2%, 28.9% in the Ipi/Nivo and 34.7% in the CPI/TKI group (p=0.74). In seven patients (35%) response led to modification of the surgical approach, enabling partial instead of radical nephrectomy. Conclusions: The sequence of systemic therapy followed by surgery was associated with a significant PFS benefit. In addition, prior systemic therapy led to a primary reduction and better operability, in some cases even to kidney sparing surgery. Major limitation is the retrospective nature of our analysis and a potential selection bias. However, the sequence of prior systemic therapy followed by surgery in aRCC was associated with notably better outcomes.

Immune checkpoint blockade combined with targeted therapies to provide disease control in mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases.

133 Background: Metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (mCRC) with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) is associated with poor response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in the refractory setting, with a median overall survival (OS) of 10.8 months. Recent immunotherapy (IO) regimens utilizing a combination of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that suppress tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have shown promise for extra-hepatic, but not hepatic metastases. However, few studies include patients with peritoneal metastases (PMs) and the response rate of PMs to these therapies is unknown. We sought to examine the disease control rates (DCR) and OS of patients treated with PM who were treated with ICB regimens. Methods: Patients with pMMR tumors treated with ICB and TKI after progression on 1st and 2nd-line therapy from 2015 to 2022 were identified. Date of start of therapy, end of therapy, last follow up and vital status were determined from the medical record. Radiographic disease response within each metastasis site at 6 months and at last follow-up on therapy was determined for each patient. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 93 patients treated with an ICB and TKI after at least two lines of cytotoxic systemic therapy were identified. Five were excluded due to dMMR/MSI-H status and eight due to lack of follow-up. A total of 33 patients with PM, with or without other metastases, had a median follow-up on therapy of 6.1 months and median follow-up until death or censoring of 9.8 months. Median OS was 15.1 (9.7-29.5) months, and 18-month survival was 43% (95%CI: 24-62%). OS was not associated with either BRAF (HR 0.98, 0.38-2.6, p=0.98) or RAS (HR 1.50, 0.62- 3.63, p=0.37) mutation status. Partial response of PM was noted in 5 patients (15%), stable disease in 14 (42%) and progressive disease in 14 (42%), resulting in DCR of 57%. Disease control for all metastatic sites was noted in 9 (27%) of patients, and median OS was not reached at 2 years. Median OS for patients without peritoneal progression was 22.0 months [12.3-NR], and PM progression was associated with worse OS (HR 0.66, p=0.024). A total of 32 patients with any metastatic site were treated for at least 6 months. Median follow-up was 16.1 months for this cohort. DCR at 6 months for CRLM was 23% (3/13), PM was 58% (14/24, p=0.08 vs CRLM) and for LM was 62% (8/13, p=0.11 vs CRLM). Conclusions: Response to ICB and targeted therapy combinations can vary widely by metastatic site, with liver trending towards less response than peritoneum or lung. Disease control in the peritoneum can be achieved in the majority of patients, and median OS compares favorably to standard-of-care therapy in the refractory setting. Patients with peritoneal disease should be included in future trials of ICBs as treatment options are otherwise limited.

Chromosome 3p gene alterations as biomarkers for immunocombinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A hypothesis-generating analysis

BackgroundIdentifying biomarkers for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is an unmet need in actual immunotherapy era. Available data regarding chromosome 3p genes (i.e., VHL, PBRM1, SETD2) mutations as potential predictors for therapy response is conflicting. We describe the impact of these mutations on clinical outcomes in mRCC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-doublet or ICI/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations. MethodsWe performed a single-center retrospective analysis on mRCC patients treated with first line ICI/ICI or ICI/TKI. A multi-gene panel was used, allowing the amplification of 841 amplicons (54.93 kb, human reference sequence hg19/GRCh37) in the coding sequences of the following genes: ATM, BAP1, KDM5C, MET, MTOR, NF2, PBRM1, PIK3CA, PTEN, SETD2, SMARCB1, TP53, TSC1, TSC2, VHL. Results18 patients undergoing ICI/ICI and ICI/TKI who had tumor tissue adequate for molecular analysis were included. Histology was 100% clear cell. IMDC risk was 50% intermediate, 33.4% good, 16.6% poor. First line therapy was 89% ICI/TKI, 11% ICI/ICI. 83.3% pts (n = 15) carried genomic alterations (GA). Most common GA included VHL in 44% (n = 8; 7 pathogenic - PAT and 1 variant of unknown significance - VUS), PBRM1 in 44% (n = 8; 5 PAT and 3 VUS) and SETD2 in 33% (n = 6; 4 PAT and 2 VUS).With the limit of a small sample that did not allow proper statistical analyses, SETD2-mutated patients had lower median progression free (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) than non-SETD2 mutated patients. Higher mPFS and mOS were shown with VHL or PBRM1 GA, especially in PBRM1 +VHL mutated pts. ConclusionsOur data shows a possible negative predictive role of SETD2 GA for ICI-based therapy in RCC. Concomitant VHL and PBRM1 GA could act as a predictor for ICI/TKI efficacy. Our hypothesis-generating analysis highlights the need of an integrated evaluation of these genes as promising biomarkers in RCC. Further larger studies are required.

Design and synthesis of new 1,2,4-oxadiazole/quinazoline-4-one hybrids with antiproliferative activity as multitargeted inhibitors.

The combination of BRAF and tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors has been demonstrated to be highly effective in inhibiting tumor development and is an approach for overcoming resistance in clinical trials. Accordingly, a novel series of 1,2,4-oxadiazole/quinazoline-4-one hybrids was developed as antiproliferative multitargeted inhibitors. The structures of the newly synthesized compounds 9a-o were validated using IR, NMR, MS, and elemental techniques. 9a-o were tested as antiproliferative agents. The results showed that the majority of the tested compounds showed significant antiproliferative action with 9b, 9c, 9h, 9k, and 9l being the most potent. Compounds 9b, 9c, 9h, 9k, and 9l were tested as EGFR and BRAFV600E inhibitors. These in vitro tests revealed that compounds 9b, 9c, and 9h are strong antiproliferative agents that may act as dual EGFR/BRAFV600E inhibitors. 9b, 9c, and 9h were further investigated for their inhibitory effect on mutant EGFR (EGFRT790M), and the results showed that the tested compounds had considerable inhibitory action. Cell cycle study and apoptosis detection demonstrated that compound 9b exhibits cell cycle arrest at the G2/M transition. Molecular docking simulations reveal the binding mechanism of the most active antiproliferative agents.

Biological evaluation of combinations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with Inecalcitol as novel treatments for human chronic myeloid leukemia

BackgroundThe use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as a treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has improved the natural history of the disease and increased the duration of survival. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent the success of target therapies that work on molecular targets, although some patients still have therapy failure. Vitamin D has antiproliferative, pro-apoptotic, and anti-angiogenic effects on cells, therefore it can be considered as a potential cancer preventative and treatment agent. Inecalcitol (TX-522) is the 14-epi-analogue of Calcitriol (1,25(OH)2-vitamin D3), and inhibits cancer cell proliferation more effectively than Calcitriol. This study was conducted to evaluate the antiproliferative and synergistic effects of the anticancer drugs Imatinib and Dasatinib in combinations with Inecalcitol on human chronic myeloid leukemia K-562 cells. MethodThe growth inhibitory activities of Inecalcitol, Imatinib, Dasatinib, and different combinations of one of the two drugs (Imatinib and Dasatinib) with Inecalcitol, were determined in vitro using MTT assay against K-562 cell line. ResultsInecalcitol, Imatinib, and Dasatinib showed potent antiproliferative activities against K-562 cells with GI50 values of 5.6 µM, 0.327 µM, and 0.446 nM, respectively. Combinations of Imatinib or Dasatinib with different concentrations of Inecalcitol increased significantly the antiproliferative activities and potencies of both drugs (****p < 0.0001), with optimal GI50 values of 580 pM (Imatinib) and 0.51 pM (Dasatinib). Furthermore, the combination treatments showed synergistic interaction between the antileukemic drugs and Inecalcitol, with combination indices (CI) < 1. ConclusionThe study demonstrated that the human chronic myeloid leukemia K-562 cells were subjected to a synergistic growth inhibitory impact when antileukemic drugs (Imatinib or Dasatinib) were combined with Inecalcitol, therefore, it is recommended that these combinations be viewed as promising novel antileukemic medications and used in place of individual medications with lower dosages and negligible side effects in the treatment of CML.

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease-like uveitis after drug therapy including BRAF/MEK inhibitors in melanoma patients with HLA-DRB1*04.

The combination of BRAF kinase inhibitors (BRAFis) and MEK kinase inhibitors (MEKis) is one of the most promising chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of BRAF-mutant melanoma. Although BRAFi plus MEKi combined therapy is widely used for the treatment of BRAFV600-mutated melanoma, the incidence of uveitis caused by BRAFi plus MEKi is limited. In this report, we described five cases (two men and three women) of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease-like uveitis in melanoma patients who received BRAFi plus MEKi combined therapy. Of note, all the patients had the HLA-DRB1*04 haplotype, which is frequently detected in VKH-like non-infectious uveitis. On the other hand, among BRAFi plus MEKi-treated patients who did not develop VKH disease-like uveitis, only one of five (20%) patients had the HLA-DRB1*04 haplotype. Collectively, BRAFi/MEKi might induce severe VKH disease-like uveitis in melanoma patients with the HLA-DRB1*04 haplotype.

Death by a thousand cuts through kinase inhibitor combinations that maximize selectivity and enable rational multitargeting.

Kinase inhibitors are successful therapeutics in the treatment of cancers and autoimmune diseases and are useful tools in biomedical research. However, the high sequence and structural conservation of the catalytic kinase domain complicate the development of selective kinase inhibitors. Inhibition of off-target kinases makes it difficult to study the mechanism of inhibitors in biological systems. Current efforts focus on the development of inhibitors with improved selectivity. Here, we present an alternative solution to this problem by combining inhibitors with divergent off-target effects. We develop a multicompound-multitarget scoring (MMS) method that combines inhibitors to maximize target inhibition and to minimize off-target inhibition. Additionally, this framework enables optimization of inhibitor combinations for multiple on-targets. Using MMS with published kinase inhibitor datasets we determine potent inhibitor combinations for target kinases with better selectivity than the most selective single inhibitor and validate the predicted effect and selectivity of inhibitor combinations using in vitro and in cellulo techniques. MMS greatly enhances selectivity in rational multitargeting applications. The MMS framework is generalizable to other non-kinase biological targets where compound selectivity is a challenge and diverse compound libraries are available.

Combination of Olverembatinib and VP Regimen As First-Line Therapy for Adult Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Backgrand ： Ph+ALL is the largest genetically defined subtype in adult ALL and is considered associated with high relapse risk and inferior clinical outcomes. The combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) with intensive chemotherapy has achieved a major step forward in the therapy of Ph+ALL in deep response and long-term survival. The upfront use of third generation TKI ponatinib has improved the frequency of complete molecular response (CMR) and the overall survival rate to a greater extent. More interesting, the data coming from MDACC showed that combination of ponatinib in the chemotherapy in Ph+ALL maybe challenge the need for stem cell transplantation (SCT) in most patients who achieved CMR (defined BCR-ABL1 transcript &amp;lt; 0·01%) within 3 months after induction therapy. But the cardiovascular adverse event(AE) of ponatinib was more and severely frequently occurred in the former reports. Olverembatinib,a new third generation of TKI, which can also suppress the mutation of T315I and showed promising results in the Ph+CML. Herein we designed the clinical trial to invest the efficiency and safety of Olverembatinib combine with VP regimen (OVP) on Ph+ALL patients as the first-line therapy. Motheds: In this multi-centers, phase 2, single-arm trial, adult patients with previously untreated Ph+ALL were sequentially enrolled. The patients had to be aged 18 years or older, have normal cardiac function (defined by ejection fraction above 50%), and have adequate organ function (serum creatinine≦3*ULN，BUN≦3*ULN，ALT≦3*ULN，AST≦3*ULN，serum bilirubin≦3*ULN). They received three cycles of OVP regimen(for 28 days each cycle :olverembatinib 40mg qod d1-28，Vindesine 4mg d1,8,15,22,Prednisone1mg/Kg/d d1-21,0.5mg/kg/dd22-28). Twelve intrathecal injections of cytarabine alternating with methotrexate were designed as central nervous system prophylaxis in the following therapy after the diagnosis. Findings: 32 patients were screened and 29 were eligible from June 21, 2022 until 21 July,2023. 3 Patients were withdrawn from the clinical trial(1 refused therapy after induction,1 early death due to Covid infection, 1 Protocol deviation ).Among all , Male 12 and Female 17. BCR/ABL1 transcript:M-p210 (11),m-p190（18）.The Median Age was 45(19-74) years old. The Median WBC was 24.8(1.06-308.00) *10E9/L. The treatment has resulted in a 100% overall response, including 96% (24/25) CR and 4% (1/25) CRp. As of data collection,23 finished 3cycles of OVP chemotherapy and 82.6% (19/23) got CMR.AS far the rest 6 patients, 1 got CMR after 1 cycle OVP,1 got CMR after 2cycles of OVP, the other 4 patients were undergoing induction therapy. The total CMR rate was 84% (21/25) at any time. The CMR rate was 36%（9/25） ,76%（19/25）and 82.6%(19/23) at 4weeks,8weeks and 12 weeks respectively. Among all the patients finished the 3 cycles, there were 4 patients not reached the CMR and all of them were M-bcr/abl-p210 protein status. The best response was MMR for 3 patients and CR for 1patient. The CMR rate was 70% (7/10) in M-bcr/abl-p210 transcript and 100% (13/13) in that of m-bcr/abl-p190. During a median follow-up of 241 days, one patient died within one month after transplantation, while all the remaining survived without relapse. During induction therapy, 4 patients had platelets consistently above normal values and 4 patients did not experience a further decrease in hemoglobin compared to baseline. The median time for the occurrence of the lowest values of platelets, hemoglobin, and neutrophils was 6th, 12th, and 11th respectively. The most common non-Hematology AE was liver function damage. AE events greater than or equal to grade 3 included 2 cases of elevated Alanine transaminase ,3 cases γ- GT elevation and 2 cases of triglyceride elevation. Other AEs were mild and less than level 3. Discussion: Ongoing efforts exist to optimize therapeutic options in the frontline for Ph+ALL. The future lies in using less cytotoxic and more targeted agents. The first results of our ongoing trial indicate that the OVP regimen is effective in achieving early high rate of CMR in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL as first-line therapy. All these results were achieved with surprisingly few toxic effects.Until now,16 patients underwent ASCT. Will the excellent outcomes be preserved with longer？ Will there be a difference in long-term outcomes between patients who underwent ASCT and those who do not?The trial is ongoing. we need more time to observe.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Discontinuation in Non-Allografted Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients, a Campus ALL Real-Life Study

Introduction. Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) patients are commonly treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in combination with either steroids, chemotherapy and more recently also immunotherapy. In the past, allogeneic transplant (SCT) was considered the only curative option; however, with the introduction of more potent TKIs as well as immunotherapy this milestone is nowadays debated, mostly for patients who achieve a molecular response. Moreover, as in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), it is becoming relevant to understand if patients may over time discontinue TKI treatment. For this purpose, it is pivotal to report the outcome of Ph+ ALL patients who, for any reason, stopped TKI treatment. Patients and Methods. Forty-seven adult Ph+ ALL patients treated since 1 January 2000, and who did not undergo a SCT, were retrospectively collected from 12 Italian centers participating to the Campus ALL network. Their treatment plan included a TKI +/- chemotherapy according to the center current practice and/or according to the ongoing national trial they were enrolled in. The median age was 63 years (20-84), 20 patients (43%) were males, 30 patients harbored a p190 transcript, 15 a p210 transcript and 2 had both transcripts. Twenty-six patients were treated within a trial, while 21 were off-protocol. For 32 patients, induction was based only on a TKI plus steroids, whereas the remaining 15 received a combination of a TKI plus chemotherapy (in 3 cases high intensity protocols such as the NILG (Northern Italian Leukemia Group) and HCVAD regimens, in 12 low dose chemotherapy). The reasons not to transplant patients were: donor unavailability (5), clinical decision, mainly due to age/unfitness (30), patient's refusal (4), and achievement of a molecular response (i.e. at least BCR-ABL/ABL ≤0.01%) (8). The median follow-up was 60 months, with a median overall survival (OS) not reached at the last follow-up and a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 12 years. At the last follow-up, 12/47 patients had experienced a relapse. At the end of the induction (i.e. after 3 months, at a median of +82 days, from treatment initiation), 27 patients had achieved a molecular response. Overall. a molecular response was obtained in 40/46 pts (data not available for 1 case) after a median of 5 month, and was associated with a significantly lower hazard of disease recurrence (HR=0.057, 95% CI: 0.006-0.51, p=0.011) after adjusting for gender, fusion protein, association with chemotherapy, CMR at 3 months. Results. TKI treatment was discontinued in 14 of the 47 patients evaluated. The reasons for discontinuation were either toxicity (6) or clinical/patient decision (8). Eight patients harbored a p190 transcript, 5 a p210 transcript and 1 carried both. At the time of discontinuation, the median age was 75 years (23-87) and patients had been on a TKI for a median of 57.5 months (8-160) prior to stopping treatment. For these cases, the median WBC at diagnosis were 8.6 x 10 9/l (2.1-306 x 10 9/l). In 7 patients the first TKI used was imatinib, in 3 dasatinib, in 3 ponatinib and in 1 nilotinib. All patients but 1 had achieved a molecular response before stopping treatment; the only patient who never achieved a molecular response prior to discontinuing the TKI had a rapid relapse (1 month). At the last follow-up, 9 cases were still in treatment-free remission (TFR), whereas 5 eventually relapsed after 1, 1, 4, 14 and 30 months, respectively. Re-challenge with a TKI led to a hematological and molecular response in 3 of the 5 patients. The remaining 2 patients, who had been previously heavily treated and whose TFR was of only 1 month, received salvage standard chemotherapy but eventually died from ALL progression. The median time of TFR for the entire cohort of 14 patients was 20.5 months (1-82). When considering only the 9 patients who remain off treatment, the median time of TFR was 29.5 months (7-82) (Table 1, Figure 1). Conclusions. We report the outcome of 14 Ph+ ALL patients who discontinued TKI treatment due to various reasons. Nine of them are still on TFR after more than 2 years at the last follow-up, reinforcing the concept that a TFR is feasible in selected adult Ph+ ALL patients. Of further relevance, TKI re-challenge was successful in 3/5 patients who relapsed, similarly to what observed in CML.

Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: Strategies for Selection of Consolidation Therapy

The 2 primary treatment options for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are pediatric-inspired Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster protocols and the hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) regimen—these treatment strategies are now being augmented with novel agents. Current strategies also emphasize measurable residual disease (MRD) quantification as a critical tool for determining the treatment course. For patients with MRD-positive ALL, the standard of care has shifted toward blinatumomab, resulting in improved outcomes and survival rates. Another novel agent, inotuzumab ozogamicin, is also being explored for the treatment of earlier stages of disease in patients with ALL. For Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)–negative ALL, the NCCN Guidelines recommend treatment with blinatumomab followed by allogeneic transplants for patients remaining MRD-positive after initial therapy. For patients achieving MRD negativity at the level of 10-4, blinatumomab is now recommended as consolidation, with or without subsequent allotransplant, depending on patient disease risk features. For Ph-positive ALL, the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in combination with blinatumomab has demonstrated excellent efficacy, indicating the growing importance of combination targeted therapies to improve outcomes and decrease the toxicity of therapy in adults with ALL.

Baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio appear predictive of immune treatment related toxicity in hepatocellular carcinoma.

A well-recognized class effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) ranging from low grade toxicities to life-threatening end organ damage requiring permanent discontinuation of ICI. Deaths are reported in < 5% of patients treated with ICI. There are, however, no reliable markers to predict the onset and severity of IrAEs. We tested the association between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at baseline with development of clinically significant IrAEs (grade ≥ 2) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with ICI. To test the association between NLR and PLR at baseline with development of clinically significant IrAEs (grade ≥ 2) in HCC patients treated with ICI. Data was extracted from an international database from a consortium of 11 tertiary-care referral centers. NLR = absolute neutrophil count/absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and PLR = platelet count/ALC. Cutoff of 5 was used for NLR and 300 for PLR based on literature. We also tested the association between antibiotic and steroid exposure to IrAEs. Data was collected from 361 patients treated between 2016-2020 across the United States (67%), Asia (14%) and Europe (19%). Most patients received Nivolumab (n = 255, 71%). One hundred sixty-seven (46%) patients developed at least one IrAE, highest grade 1 in 80 (48%), grade ≥ 2 in 87 (52%) patients. In a univariable regression model PLR > 300 was significantly associated with a lower incidence of grade ≥ 2 IrAEs (OR = 0.40; P = 0.044). Similarly, a trend was observed between NLR > 5 and lower incidence of grade ≥ 2 IrAEs (OR = 0.58; P = 0.097). Multivariate analyses confirmed PLR > 300 as an independent predictive marker of grade ≥ 2 IrAEs (OR = 0.26; P = 0.011), in addition to treatment with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1)/cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (OR = 2.57; P = 0.037) and PD-1/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (OR = 3.39; P = 0.01) combinations. Antibiotic use was not associated with IrAE incidence (OR = 1.02; P = 0.954). Patients treated with steroids had a > 2-fold higher incidence of grade ≥ 2 IrAEs (OR = 2.74; P < 0.001), although 74% were prescribed steroids for the treatment of IrAEs. Given that high baseline NLR and PLR are associated with a decreased incidence of IrAEs, lower baseline NLR and PLR may be predictive biomarkers for the appearance of IrAEs in HCC treated with ICI. This finding is in keeping with several studies in solid tumors that have shown that baseline NLR and PLR appear predictive of IrAEs.

The Role of Anticoagulation in Tumor Thrombus Associated with Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Literature Review.

Tumor thrombus (TT) is a complication of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) for which favorable medical management remains undefined. While radical nephrectomy has been shown to increase overall survival in RCC patients, surgical interventions such as cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) utilized to perform TT resection carry high mortality rates. While it has been documented that RCC with TT is associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) development, anticoagulation use in these patients remains controversial in clinical practice. Whether anticoagulation is associated with improved survival outcomes remains unclear. Furthermore, if anticoagulation is initiated, there is limited evidence for whether direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), heparin, or warfarin serve as the most advantageous choice. While the combination of immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been shown to improve the outcomes of RCC, the clinical benefits of this combination are not well studied prospectively in cases with TT. In this literature review, we explore the challenges of treating RCC-associated TT with special attention to anticoagulation. We provide a comprehensive overview of current surgical and medical approaches and summarize recent studies investigating anticoagulation in RCC patients undergoing surgery, targeted therapy, and/or immunotherapy. Our goal is to provide clinicians with updated clinical insight into anticoagulation for RCC-associated TT patients.

Ponatinib Versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Ph+ ALL: Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 Phallcon Study

Background: BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in combination with chemotherapy or steroids remain the standard of care in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Most patients treated with first- or second-generation TKIs eventually experience disease progression due to treatment resistance. Ponatinib is the only currently approved pan-BCR::ABL1 inhibitory TKI that potently inhibits wild-type and single resistance mutation variants of BCR::ABL1, including T315I. Multiple studies have shown promising minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (neg) rates and survival outcomes with ponatinib in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy-free regimens. PhALLCON (NCT03589326) is the first randomized study comparing frontline TKIs in adults with Ph+ ALL. The primary endpoint for PhALLCON was met, with a clinically significantly higher MRD-neg complete remission (CR) rate at end of induction (EOI) with ponatinib vs imatinib (34.4% vs 16.7%; risk difference: 0.18 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06‒0.29]; P=0.0021) and a manageable safety profile comparable with imatinib. Here we report subgroup efficacy analyses from PhALLCON. Methods: This global, registrational, phase 3, open-label study randomized newly diagnosed adult patients with Ph+ ALL 2:1 to receive ponatinib (30 mg once daily [QD]) or imatinib (600 mg QD) plus reduced-intensity chemotherapy through EOI (Cycles 1-3), consolidation (Cycles 4-9), and post-consolidation (Cycles 10-20). Following post-consolidation, patients continued to receive single-agent ponatinib or imatinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The composite primary endpoint was MRD-neg ( BCR:: ABL1 ≤0.01% [MR4])CR for 4 weeks at EOI. Event-free survival (EFS; any-cause death, failure to achieve CR by EOI, relapse from CR) was a key secondary endpoint. A post-hoc analysis of progression-free survival (PFS; EFS-defined events, failure to achieve MRD-neg by the end of treatment, and loss of MRD-neg) was conducted. Subgroup analyses were performed relative to baseline demographic and disease characteristics. Results: Of 245 randomized patients, 232 (ponatinib, n=154; imatinib, n=78) had baseline BCR::ABL1 p190/p210 variants verified by central lab (efficacy-evaluable population); median age was 54 years (37.1% ≥60 years). As of Aug 2022, 78 patients (ponatinib/imatinib: 68 [41.5%]/10 [12.3%]) remained on study treatment; the top 3 reasons for discontinuation were hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; 30.5%/37.0%), adverse events (12.2%/12.3%), and lack of efficacy (7.3%/25.9%). Median follow-up in the ponatinib and imatinib arms was 20 months and 18 months, respectively. Benefit for ponatinib was observed across all subgroups analyzed ( Table). All age subgroups had higher rates of MRD-neg CR with ponatinib vs imatinib, with the greatest benefit observed in patients ≥60 years (40.0% ponatinib vs 10.3% imatinib; P=0.0005). MRD-neg CR rate was higher for ponatinib vs imatinib among those with the BCR::ABL1 p190 variant (38.6%/17.0%; P=0.0017); it was higher for the p210 variant as well, but not significantly (22.5% vs 16.0%; P=0.51). Median PFS was longer with ponatinib vs imatinib regardless of age, with the greatest difference observed in the subgroup of patients ≥60 years (22.5 months for ponatinib vs 8.3 months for imatinib; hazard ratio: 0.594 [95% CI: 0.332-1.063]). Conclusions: Ponatinib was superior to imatinib in combination with reduced-intensity chemotherapy in the front-line setting for patients with Ph+ ALL, with a clinically significantly higher MRD-neg CR rate at EOI. Benefit was observed across all subgroups, particularly for patients ≥60 years and for those with the BCR::ABL1 p190 variant.

242P Changing the first-line landscape in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with a combination of immunotherapy and VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A real-world Indian experience

242P Changing the first-line landscape in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with a combination of immunotherapy and VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A real-world Indian experience

Triple combination of HAIC-FO plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The triple combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is expected to have a synergistic anticancer effect in HCC. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the triple combination treatment in advanced HCC patients. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant studies from the inception of each database to May 10, 2023. All articles focusing the triple combination treatment of HAIC-FO plus TKI and ICIs for advanced HCC were eligible. The meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for case series and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary results were adverse events. Further meta-analysis of control studies demonstrated the superiority of the triple combination modality to TKI plus ICIs, and TKI alone. Nine articles (four cohort studies and five one-arm studies) involving 777 advanced HCC patients were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of survival analysis, the pooled median PFS was 11 months (95% CI: 10.1-12.0 months) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.97). With regard to tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR was 61.6% (I2=0%, p = 0.71) and 87.9% (I2 = 13%, p = 0.33) with low heterogeneity, respectively. As compared with TKIs plus ICIs, and TKIs alone, the triple combination thrapy was associated with improved median OS (HR=0.51, 95%CI 0.41-0.62) with low heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%, p = 0.47), median PFS (HR=0.51, 95%CI 0.41-0.64) with low heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%, p = 0.41), ORR (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.42-0.74) with high heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 69%, p = 0.02), and DCR (RR = 0.38, 95%CI 0.27-0.54) with low heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 14%, p = 0.32). The most common 3/4 AEs were elevated ALT and AST, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, nausea and vomiting in this meta-analysis. The triple combination therapy of HAIC-FO plus TKI and ICIs showed promising efficacy and safety in patients with advanced HCC. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID:CRD42023424281).

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibodies with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy or Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-PD-1 antibodies with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has shown encouraging anti-tumor effects in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We explored the efficacy and safety of TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with HAIC or TACE in HCC. Data from 302 HCC patients receiving HAIC combined with TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies (HAIC-TP group) and 446 HCC patients receiving TACE combined with TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies (TACE-TP group) were retrospectively collected. Clinicopathological characteristics, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize bias. The HAIC-TP group exhibited better objective response rate (RECIST: 33.1% versus 7.8%, P < 0.001; mRECIST: 51.4% versus 17.5%, P < 0.001), longer PFS (12.4 months versus 8.2 months, P < 0.001), and longer OS (not reached versus 13.8 months, P < 0.001) than TACE-TP group. Surgery was performed after combination therapy in 34 patients of the HAIC-TP group and in 7 patients of the TACE-TP group (P < 0.001). Similar results were also observed in the PSM analysis. Multivariate analysis indicated type of treatment, alpha-fetoprotein, ALBI grade, portal vein tumor thrombus, and extrahepatic status were risk factors for poor prognosis. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain occurred more frequently in the HAIC-TP group, whereas liver dysfunction occurred more frequently in the TACE-TP group. All AEs were acceptable and manageable as a result of treatment interruption or dose modification. The combination of HAIC with TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies is an effective and safe therapeutic regimen over TACE-based combination therapy for patients with HCC. A prospective study with a large sample size is required to validate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy.

Systemic Treatment for Advanced and Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Examining Modern Therapeutic Strategies for a Notoriously Challenging Malignancy.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that represents 25% of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases. Treatment for non-clear cell histologies is mostly based on evidence from small phase II clinical trials or extrapolated from successful therapies in clear cell RCC because of the low incidence of non-clear cell pathology. Advances in genomic profiling have improved clinicians' understanding of molecular targets for nccRCC, such as altered mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) gene status and fumarate hydratase (FH) gene inactivation, but patient outcomes remain poor and optimal management of this disease remains unclear. This review assesses outcomes by histologic subtype from 27 prospective and 13 ongoing clinical trials to identify therapeutic strategies for advanced or metastatic nccRCC. Vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as sunitinib, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, such as everolimus, have demonstrated efficacy and remain viable treatment options, with a preference for sunitinib. However, everolimus is preferred in patients with chromophobe RCC because folliculin (FLCN) gene mutations upregulate the mTOR pathway. Novel TKIs, such as cabozantinib, show improved outcomes in patients with papillary RCC because of targeted MET inhibition. Platinum-based chemotherapy continues to be the recommended treatment strategy for collecting duct and medullary RCC. Clinically meaningful antitumor activity has been observed across all non-clear cell histologies for immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab. Ongoing trials are evaluating novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immunotherapy combination regimens, with an emphasis on the promising MET-inhibitor cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib.

Synergistic effect of Dactolisib/Lys05 combination on autophagy in A549 cells.

Effective therapeutic strategies are urgently required to enhance the prognosis of patients suffering from KRAS mutations. Owing to the undruggable nature of KRAS, targeting downstream signaling pathways, namely PI3K/AKT/mTOR, shows antiproliferative and apoptotic effects. Unfortunately, targeting this pathway upregulates autophagy, contributing to reduced drug efficacy. Therefore, it was reasonable to use a combination of kinase inhibitors and autophagy inhibitors to achieve a higher therapeutic benefit. The impact of Dactolisib, a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, and Lys05, a dimeric chloroquine, was tested on the survival of breast cancer MCF-7 and lung cancer A549 cells. The dose selection for the optimal effect of the Dactolisib/Lys05 combination was determined using CompuSyn software. This combinatorial effect was evaluated using various methodologies, such as expression profile analysis for autophagic, proliferative, and apoptotic markers. These effects were corroborated by ELISA, Western blot, and flow cytometry using the Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit. A549 cells treated in a 2:1 ratio of Lys05 and Dactolisib demonstrated a synergistic effect on cell death, proliferation, and apoptotic gene markers, in addition to its effect on autophagic gene and protein markers, showing an enhanced effect compared to monotherapy. Therefore, the PI3K/AKT kinase inhibitor/autophagy inhibitor combination establishes higher therapeutic benefits on A549 cells compared to kinase inhibitor monotherapy.