Combination Of Carfilzomib Research Articles

Using protein turnover assay to explore the drug mechanism of Carfilzomib.

Carfilzomib (CFZ) is the second-generation proteasome inhibitor that is approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of USA for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Although the preclinical and clinical efficacy of CFZ is obvious, the mechanism by which CFZ leads to cell death has not been fully elucidated. Since CFZ primarily functions as a proteasome inhibitor, profiling CFZ-induced changes in protein turnover at the systematic level is sufficient and necessary. In this study, we characterize the effects of CFZ on the stability of 15,000 human proteins using Protein Turnover Assay (ProTA). CFZ affects fundamental cellular glycolysis, nitric oxide production and proteasome subunit homeostasis in multiple myeloma cells. In addition, LY294002 or KU-0063794 has synergistic effects with CFZ in multiple myeloma treatment. A profound understanding of how cells respond to chemotherapeutic agents provides insights into the basic mechanism of drug function and the rationale for CFZ combination therapy.

Acute suppression of translation by hyperthermia enhances anti-myeloma activity of carfilzomib.

Hyperthermia is a unique treatment option for cancers. Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable and innovative therapeutic options are needed. We investigated the efficacy of hyperthermia and carfilzomib in combination against MM cells. Although MM cell lines exhibited different susceptibilities to pulsatile carfilzomib treatment, mild hyperthermia at 43℃ induced MM cell death in all cell lines in a time-dependent manner. Hyperthermia and carfilzomib cooperatively induced MM cell death even under suboptimal conditions. The pro-survival mediators PIM2 and NRF2 accumulated in MM cells due to inhibition of their proteasomal degradation by carfilzomib; however, hyperthermia acutely suppressed translation in parallel with phosphorylation of eIF2α to reduce these proteins in MM cells. Recovery of β5 subunit enzymatic activity from its immediate inhibition by carfilzomib was observed at 24h in carfilzomib-insusceptible KMS-11, OPM-2, and RPMI8226 cells, but not in carfilzomib-sensitive MM.1S cells. However, heat treatment suppressed the recovery of β5 subunit activity in these carfilzomib-insusceptible cells. Therefore, hyperthermia re-sensitized MM cells to carfilzomib. Our results support the treatment of MM with hyperthermia in combination with carfilzomib. Further research is warranted on hyperthermia for drug-resistant extramedullary plasmacytoma.

Real-life effectiveness of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma receiving treatment in the context of early access: The CARMYN study.

The real-life retrospective observational study CARMYN aimed at investigating the long-term efficacy and safety of carfilzomib in combination with dexamethasone and lenalidomide (KRd, 159 patients). These patients (62% in first and 38% in second relapse, median age 62 yo) were treated between 02/2014 and 02/2017. Most had been pre-exposed to bortezomib (98.2%) and to an IMID (75.4%). At the time of collection, 90% had permanently discontinued carfilzomib. Data collection was conducted from January to July 2021 in 27 participating sites, after a median of 39 months follow-up. For patients treated with KRd, an overall response rate of 78.4% translated in a median progression free survival (PFS) of 24.0 months (95% CI 18.8-27.6) and a median overall survival (OS) of 51.1 months (95% CI 41.3-not reached). Results were poorer but difficult to interpret in the small cohort of Kd recipients. The study is one of the longest real-life studies of carfilzomib treatment in patients in first or second relapse. CARMYN confirmed the real-life long-term efficacy of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone with results similar to those of clinical trials. The KRd regimen is thus an option to consider for late relapses in the current context of MM management.

Efficacy of Maintenance Therapies By Prognostic Subgroups in Post-Transplant Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Introduction The optimal maintenance regimen by prognostic categories remains unclear in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the comparative effectiveness of novel agents by different prognostic groups. Methods A comprehensive systematically structured literature search was conducted to identify phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating maintenance therapies in post-transplant NDMM patients and reporting data by subgroups including but not limited to international staging system (ISS), and cytogenetic risk. High cytogenetic risk (HCR) and standard cytogenetic risk (SCR) were defined in accordance with the eligible trials. Main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Precomputed hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI were pooled using an inverse variance approach. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted. P-score (PS) were used to assess relative rankings of the treatments and were interpreted in congruency with pairwise estimates. Higher ranks indicated better efficacy. Results This NMA included six RCTs with 4119 participants and six unique treatment arms. In patients with SCR, the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) improved PFS when compared to lenalidomide (Len; HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.24-0.81), daratumumab (Dara; 0.27; 0.13-0.55), ixazomib (Ixa; 0.26; 0.13-0.53), and no maintenance therapy (0.17; 0.09-0.32). Similarly, KR improved PFS compared to lenalidomide (Len; 0.56; 0.33-0.96), daratumumab (Dara; 0.34; 0.18-0.65), ixazomib (Ixa; 0.33; 0.17-0.63), and no maintenance therapy (0.21; 0.12-0.38). There was no statistically significant difference between KRd and KR. KRd was ranked as potentially the most efficacious treatment (rank 1) followed by KR (rank 2), Len (rank 3), Dara (rank 4), and Ixa (rank 5) for improving PFS in SCR. In patients with HCR, KRd (0.35; 0.14-0.92), KR (0.32; 0.15-0.67), Dara (0.43; 0.25-0.73), and Len (0.48; 0.35-0.64) improved PFS when compared to no maintenance therapy. No other significant differences were observed in HCR patients. KR was ranked as potentially the most efficacious treatment followed by KRd (rank 2), Dara (rank 3), Len (rank 5), and Ixa (rank 5) for PFS in HCR patients. In patients with ISS-I/II, KRd and KR improved PFS when compared to Dara (KRd vs. Dara - 0.32; 0.16-0.65, KR vs Dara - 0.50; 0.26-0.94), and Ixa (KRd vs. Ixa - 0.22; 0.11-0.45, KR vs Ixa - 0.35; 0.18-0.65). KRd, not KR, improved PFS when compared to Len (0.41; 0.22-0.76). Rankings were consistent with those observed in SCR patients. No significant differences were observed among mixed treatment comparisons for ISS-III patients. Limited number of trials reporting OS precluded formal assessment. Conclusions The current data suggest that KRd and KR may delay disease progression regardless of risk category. Overall survival data is still emerging and, if consistent, may influence clinical practice. We maintain a living meta-analysis to incorporate new evidence constantly.

Synergy of Ruxolitinib and Carfilzomib in Targeting the PAX5::JAK2 fusion I n Vitro: Potential Therapeutic Advantage for a Subset of Ph-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

INTRODUCTION PAX5::JAK2 is a gene fusion that drives a subset of Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) and confers aggressive disease, poor prognosis and poor response to treatment. PAX5::JAK2 is present in approximately 12% of Ph-like ALL cases. Targeted therapy is urgently required to improve outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy of JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) and proteosome inhibitors carfilzomib (CFZ) and bortezomib (BTZ) as monotherapy and in combination against PAX5::JAK2 transfected Ba/F3 cells in vitro. Downregulation of proteosome genes via reduction in STAT3 phosphorylation is a shared mechanism of RUX and proteosome inhibitors. Given that the PAX5::JAK2 fusion results in increased STAT3 phosphorylation driving proliferation, it was proposed that the combination of proteosome inhibitors and RUX would demonstrate synergy in inhibiting proliferation of PAX5::JAK2 driven leukemic cells. METHODS Mouse derived Ba/F3 cells, an IL-3 dependent B-ALL model, were transfected with the PAX5::JAK2 fusion and demonstrated IL-3 independence. We applied, as single treatments, differing concentrations of RUX and the proteosome inhibitors CFZ and BTZ to PAX5::JAK2 transfected Ba/F3 cells and two control cell lines - IL-3 dependent empty vector Ba/F3 cells and an IL-3 independent KG1a myeloid cell line. Differing concentrations of CFZ and 200nM of RUX were then applied in combination. 200nM of RUX was selected because it is a dose at which the drug has minimal effect as a single agent. Inhibitors were applied to cells for 72 hours then percentage of live and dead cells at each concentration was ascertained by flow cytometry using Annexin V and LIVE/DEAD fixable aqua dead cell stain. Downstream STAT5 and STAT3 activation in basal state, and as a response to treatment, was assessed using phosphoflow. We demonstrated mechanisms of growth inhibition via reduction in STAT5 and STAT3 phosphorylation by the inhibitors. RESULTS RUX, CFZ and BTZ were all effective against PAX5::JAK2 transfected Ba/F3 cells with a median lethal dose (LD50) of 514nM (CI 498-530nM) for RUX, 38nM (CI 36-39nM) for CFZ and 19nM (CI 18-20nM) for BTZ. RUX had a variable effect on IL-3 dependent empty vector control cells which also demonstrate JAK/STAT activation, but no effect on the IL-3 independent KG1a cells. CFZ had a lesser effect on empty vector control cells with a LD50 of 59nM (CI 58-60nM) and no effect on KG1a control cells. BTZ had a significant effect on both control cell lines, predicting off-target toxicity and consequently was not applied in combination with RUX. RUX and CFZ in combination demonstrated an LD50 of 21nM (CI 18-25nM) (see figure 1) which is significantly lower than the LD50s for either agent used as monotherapy. Combination index for RUX and CFZ at 45nM was 0.80 and at 50nM was 0.49, suggesting moderate synergy. Phosphoflow demonstrated reduced pSTAT5 with the application of RUX and CFZ to PAX5::JAK2 transfected Ba/F3 cells with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) reducing from 351 to 285 in inhibitor treated cells, while for STAT3 MFI reduced from 396 to 249. (see figure 2) There was no effect on MFI for control cell lines. This demonstrates that the mechanism for growth inhibition is inhibition of JAK/STAT signaling due to the reduction in pSTAT3 and pSTAT5. CONCLUSIONS We showed in vitro that RUX, CFZ and BTZ are all potent against the high risk PAX5::JAK2 fusion. RUX and CFZ in combination demonstrated moderate synergy against PAX5::JAK2 and inhibited proliferation through their effect on JAK/STAT pathways. The RUX/CFZ combination, drugs widely available in clinical practice, is particularly promising given the apparent synergistic effect on limiting leukemic cell growth. Such treatments warrant clinical trials for management of the poor prognostic group of Ph-like ALL with PAX5::JAK2, given that they may enhance efficacy and lessen toxicity. Clinical trials have already demonstrated efficacy and safety of RUX and CFZ as single agents in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of B-ALL which indicates the feasibility of combining the two agents clinically in Ph-like ALL.

Efficacy of Carvykti in CARTITUDE-4 Versus Other Conventional Treatment Regimens for Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting

Introduction: CARTITUDE-4 is a phase 3 randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the efficacy and safety of CARVYKTI (ciltacabtagene autoleucel; cilta-cel) versus pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) or daratumumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received one to three prior line(s) of therapy that included an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) and a proteasome inhibitor (PI), and who are refractory to lenalidomide. CARTITUDE-4 demonstrated superiority of cilta-cel over PVd and DPd on progression-free survival (PFS) and response rates (overall response rate [ORR], very good partial response [VGPR] or better, and complete response [CR] or better [CR or stringent CR]). Other available therapies for the treatment of this patient population where individual patient data was available for analysis include: daratumumab in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd), bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone (Vd), carfilzomib in combination with daratumumab and dexamethasone (DKd) or dexamethasone alone (Kd), and pomalidomide in combination with dexamethasone (Pd). This analysis aims to compare efficacy outcomes in patients randomized to the cilta-cel arm (i.e., patients apheresed or infused with cilta-cel) in CARTITUDE-4 vs each of these regimens in the same target population. Methods: Individual patient data were collected from the CARTITUDE-4 (cilta-cel), CASTOR (DVd and Vd), CANDOR (DKd and Kd), and APOLLO (Pd) RCTs. Patients who met CARTITUDE-4 eligibility criteria were identified from the above mentioned RCTs. As no patients in the comparative trials had prior treatment with anti-CD38, patients with prior exposure to anti-CD38 therapies in the cilta-cel cohort were excluded. Key prognostic baseline covariates including refractory status, ISS stage, presence of extramedullary disease, and time to progression on prior line, were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), with average treatment effect in the treated weights. Differences in baseline characteristics were assessed using standardized mean differences. PFS, ORR, VGPR or better, and CR or better were compared between patients in the cilta-cel arm and the comparator regimens. Relative efficacy of cilta-cel vs comparator regimens were estimated with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from weighted Cox proportional hazards models for PFS, and response rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs from weighted logistic regression models for ORR, VGPR or better, and CR or better. Sensitivity analyses using alternative statistical approaches and including additional covariates were explored. Results: After the exclusion of 53 patients with prior exposure to an anti-CD38 therapy, 155 patients in the cilta-cel arm remained. Across the comparative trials, 44 patients treated with DVd, 46 patients treated with Vd, 98 patients treated with DKd, 46 patients treated with Kd, and 92 patients treated with Pd met the inclusion criteria of CARTITUDE-4. Baseline covariates were similar across the cohorts after IPTW. Patients randomized to the cilta-cel arm showed significant improvements in PFS (adjusted HRs from 0.11 vs Vd to 0.51 vs DKd), VGPR or better (adjusted RRs from 1.51 vs DKd to 5.13 vs Vd), and CR or better rate (adjusted RRs from 2.90 vs DKd to 35.24 vs Pd) (Table). Improvements in ORR were also observed against all comparator regimens (adjusted RRs from 1.22 vs DKd to 1.90 vs Pd), though were marginally not statistically significant vs DVd and Kd. Treatment with DKd consistently yielded the best results out of all comparator regimens, but results were still in favor of cilta-cel. Results of cilta-cel benefit were consistent across sensitivity analyses, yielding adjusted HRs below 1.00 and RRs above 1.00 in all cases against other comparator regimens. Conclusions: Data from CARTITUDE-4 and these analyses demonstrate the benefit of cilta-cel over additional regimens commonly used in clinical practice, highlighting its potential to become a new standard of care option for patients with RRMM, who have received one to three prior lines(s) of therapy, including an IMiD and a PI, and who are refractory to lenalidomide. These comparisons provide valuable information to contextualize the efficacy of CARVYKTI in countries where standard of care may be different from DPd/PVd.

Belatacept and carfilzomib-based treatment for antibody-mediated rejection in a sensitized nonhuman primate kidney transplantation model.

One-third of HLA-incompatible kidney transplant recipients experience antibody mediated rejection (AMR) with limited treatment options. This study describes a novel treatment strategy for AMR consisting of proteasome inhibition and costimulation blockade with or without complement inhibition in a nonhuman primate model of kidney transplantation. All rhesus macaques in the present study were sensitized to maximally MHC-mismatched donors by two sequential skin transplants prior to kidney transplant from the same donor. All primates received induction therapy with rhesus-specific ATG (rhATG) and were maintained on various immunosuppressive regimens. Primates were monitored postoperatively for signs of acute AMR, which was defined as worsening kidney function resistant to high dose steroid rescue therapy, and a rise in serum donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels. Kidney biopsies were performed to confirm AMR using Banff criteria. AMR treatment consisted of carfilzomib and belatacept for a maximum of four weeks with or without complement inhibitor. Treatment with carfilzomib and belatacept was well tolerated and no treatment-specific side effects were observed. After initiation of treatment, we observed a reduction of class I and class II DSA in all primates. Most importantly, primates had improved kidney function evident by reduced serum creatinine and BUN as well as increased urine output. A four-week treatment was able to extend graft survival by up to two months. In summary, combined carfilzomib and belatacept effectively treated AMR in our highly sensitized nonhuman primate model, resulting in normalization of renal function and prolonged allograft survival. This regimen may translate into clinical practice to improve outcomes of patients experiencing AMR.

Identification of genes encoding targets associated with adverse events in multiple myeloma.

1556 Background: Despite novel therapeutic options, understanding the toxicity profile of anti multiple myeloma (MM) drug regimens (AMDR) is vital. Data suggests adverse event (AE) profile is orchestrated by certain associated genes. The purpose of this study is to explore the interplay of genes, regimens, AEs and provide genetic evidence for a linkage between regimens and the presence of AEs. Methods: We examined a group of AMDRs retrieved from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Drug-associated genes were obtained from the Drug Gene Interaction Database, DGIdb. Then, genes were imported to the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) to search for the existing clinical synopses (features) in the peer reviewed biomedical material, or phenotypes when no data was available. Clinical synopses were then linked to MedDRA. Gene gene interaction was also determined through the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING). We then constructed a detailed large MM pharmacogenetic network to illustrate the linkage among drugs, genes and MM via various expert integrated resources. AMDR responses were then assessed at the DNA and protein levels by modularizing genetic causation into different scenarios i) a direct drug effect on gene expression; ii) the secondary or tertiary effect of drug(s) on subsequent drug metabolism or disposition altering gene expression pathways; iii) modulation of another biological network that disturbs drug effect on gene expression resulting in exacerbating AE occurrence. Results: We found multiple genes including CTLA4, NFKB1, PSMB8, CCND1 and HLAA were complicit/associated with different AEs including cardiac or hepatobiliary disorders or other serious events. Our results suggested the expression of CTLA4 was influenced by multiple AMDRs from combinations of bortezomib (V), lenalidomide (R), melphalan (M), or dexamethasone (d). When AMDRs involve these agents, the occurrence of pericardial disorders due to the treatment exhibited high confidence. We also found carfilzomib (K) combinations (Kd or KRd) were associated with PSMB8 which was likely to be the genetic factor concomitant with heart failures, cardiac arrhythmias, or hepatobiliary toxicities. Furthermore, our findings suggested NFKB1, thalidomide associated gene interacting with PSMB8, may present the same toxicity events in hepatobiliary disorders. Conclusions: Understanding the genomic basis of specific drug-AE combinations could reveal molecular mechanisms underlying drug-gene-AE associations and recognize the causality of AEs. When considering alternative agents in MM, our study offers insights for predicting treatment responses such as PSMB8 which could potentially cause an off target effect of K on cardiomyocyte 20S beyond MM cells. Our plan is to integrate this novel computational biology approach with translational medicine to further investigate our observation.

A phase 1b dose-escalation study of carfilzomib in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory systemic immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis

Introduction Proteasome inhibitors are the backbone of AL amyloidosis treatment – bortezomib being most widely used. Carfilzomib is a proteasome inhibitor licenced to treat multiple myeloma; autonomic and peripheral neuropathy are uncommon toxicities with carfilzomib. There is limited data on the use of carfilzomib in AL amyloidosis. Here, we report the results of a phase Ib dose-escalation study of Carfilzomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (KTD) in relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis. Results The trial registered 11 patients from 6 UK centres from September 2017 to January 2019; 10 patients received at least one dose of trial treatment. 80 adverse events were reported from 10 patients in the 1st three cycles. One patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity (acute kidney injury) at a dose of 45 mg/m2, and another patient had a SAR (fever). Five patients experienced an AE ≥ grade 3. There were no haematologic, infectious, or cardiac AE ≥ grade 3. The overall haematological response rate (ORR) at the end of three cycles of treatment was 60%. Conclusion Carfilzomib 45 mg/m2 weekly can be safely given with thalidomide and dexamethasone. The efficacy and tolerability profile appears comparable to other agents in relapsed AL amyloidosis. These data provide a framework for further studies of carfilzomib combinations in AL amyloidosis.

High-dose carfilzomib achieves superior anti-tumor activity over low-dose and recaptures response in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma resistant to lowdose carfilzomib by co-inhibiting the β2 and β1 subunits of the proteasome complex.

Optimal carfilzomib dosing is a matter of debate. We analyzed the inhibition profiles of proteolytic proteasome subunits β5, β2 and β1 after low-dose (20/27 mg/m2) versus high-dose (≥36 mg/m2) carfilzomib in 103 pairs of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM). β5 activity was inhibited (median inhibition >50%) in vivo by 20 mg/m2, whereas β2 and β1 were co-inhibited only by 36 and 56 mg/m2, respectively. Coinhibition of β2 (P=0.0001) and β1 activity (P=0.0005) differed significantly between high-dose and low-dose carfilzomib. Subsequently, high-dose carfilzomib showed significantly more effective proteasome inhibition than low-dose carfilzomib in vivo (P=0.0003). We investigated the clinical data of 114 patients treated with carfilzomib combinations. High-dose carfilzomib demonstrated a higher overall response rate (P=0.03) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.007) than low-dose carfilzomib. Therefore, we escalated the carfilzomib dose to ≥36 mg/m2 in 16 patients who progressed during low-dose carfilzomib-containing therapies. High-dose carfilzomib recaptured response (≥ partial remission) in nine (56%) patients with a median PFS of 4.4 months. Altogether, we provide the first in vivo evidence in RRMM patients that the molecular activity of high-dose carfilzomib differs from that of low-dose carfilzomib by coinhibition of β2 and β1 proteasome subunits and, consequently, high-dose carfilzomib achieves a superior anti-MM effect than low-dose carfilzomib and recaptures the response in RRMM resistant to low-dose carfilzomib. The optimal carfilzomib dose should be ≥36 mg/m2 to reach a sufficient anti-tumor activity, while the balance between efficacy and tolerability should be considered in each patient.

Measurable Residual Disease Assessment Using Next-Generation Flow in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With a Combination of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone.

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRD) therapy is widely used for patients with relapse/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the response in patients who underwent assessment for measurable residual disease (MRD) has not been elucidated in a prospective study. We aimed to clarify the response rate and outcome of KRD therapy in patients in RRMM, including those with MRD. Twenty-one consecutive RRMM patients treated with KRD at 4 Japanese Centers between September 2016 and October 2018 were enrolled and assessed for MRD in the bone marrow (cut-off: 1×10-5) using the EuroFlow-next-generation flow (NGF) method. The median number of therapy lines before KRD was 3 (range=1-6), and the median number of KRD cycles was 4 (range=1-22). As the best overall response post-KRD therapy, 52% (11/21) of patients achieved a MRD negative complete response, 71% (15/21) achieved stringent complete response/complete response, and 14% (3/21) achieved a very good partial response. MRD negativity was achieved in 12 of 16 (75%) and 14 of 21 (67%) patients during and after KRD treatment, respectively. The 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival from the start of KRD therapy were 100% and 100%, respectively, in MRD-positive cases and 88% and 100%, respectively, in MRD-negative cases (median follow-up=1.8 years). Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 15 patients (71%), with thrombocytopenia being the most frequent toxicity (6 patients, 29%). This is the first study that prospectively assessed MRD of patients with RRMM after KRD therapy. KRD treatment achieved a high MRD negativity rate and good outcomes with manageable toxicities.

Interim Results of a Risk-Adaptive Phase II Study: Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone and Daratumumab (KRD-Dara) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) at the Levine Cancer Institute (LCI)

Background: The combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) has previously demonstrated deep and durable responses in patients with NDMM. A quadruplet regimen incorporating daratumumab (KRd-Dara) may further improve results. We report an interim analysis from stage 1 (Simon's optimal 2-stage design) of an ongoing minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven, single center phase 2 trial of KRd-Dara. Methods: The study design has been previously published (Bhutani et al, Blood 2020 Abstr 1388). Briefly, patients with NDMM (both transplant eligible and ineligible) were allowed one cycle of non-protocol therapy (if deemed necessary) and then 7 or 8 cycles of induction therapy with KRd-Dara (total induction cycles: 8). MRD assessment was performed by both next generation sequencing (NGS) and next generation flow cytometry (NGF) at the end of 8 cycles of induction, post- autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and every 4 cycles of consolidation (maximum of 12 cycles). Post-induction treatment was dictated by an MRD-driven algorithm, using MRD (NGS, 10-5) to assign patients to one of the 3 study groups. The primary endpoint is complete response (CR) + stringent CR (sCR) at the completion of KRd-Dara induction therapy. Group A (MRD negative post-induction) proceeded directly to lenalidomide maintenance therapy deferring ASCT, if transplant eligible. Group B (MRD positive, transplant eligible) received upfront ASCT, KRd consolidation (maximum 12 cycles), and then lenalidomide maintenance. Group C (MRD positive after 8 cycles of induction, transplant ineligible) received KRd consolidation (maximum 12 cycles) followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Conversion to MRD negative status at any protocol specified time point allowed the patients to proceed to lenalidomide maintenance. Results: Stage 1 futility analysis criteria were met in November 2021 and stage 2 enrollment is actively ongoing. As of a data cutoff of 4/8/22, 30/39 patients have been enrolled. Twenty-three patients were enrolled in Stage 1. The median age of stage I patients was 60 (range 34- 76) years, 74% were male and 35% were Black. R-ISS stage 3 was present in 2 (8.7%), high-risk cytogenetics in 1 (4.4%) and gain 1q21 in 7 (30.4%). Fifteen patients (65.2%) received one cycle of pre-study treatment. All patients completed 8 total cycles of induction therapy. At the end of induction, CR + sCR was achieved in 15/23 (65.2%) patients with sCR in 52.2%, and very good partial response (VGPR) in 7 (30.4%). The MRD negativity rate was 69.6% (NGS, 10-5) and 43.5% (NGS, 10-6). The MRD negativity rate by NGF was 82.6% at 10-5and 47.4% at 10-6 sensitivity level in 23 and 19 evaluable patients, respectively; 43% of bone marrow specimen tested by NGF were hemodiluted. Concordance of MRD by NGS/ NGF at 10-5 was 16/23 (69.6% in agreement and 30.4% disagreement, Cohen's kappa: 0.183). Concordance of MRD by NGS/ NGF at 10-6 was 12/19 (63.2% in agreement and 36.8% disagreement, Cohen's kappa: 0.257). Grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events (>10% of patients) included hypophosphatemia (30%), hypertension (13%), and neutropenia (13%). Covid infection occurred in 7 (30.4%) patients; only one needed hospitalization. Other Infections (any grade) were seen in 15 (65.2%) patients. At least one dose reduction of carfilzomib was required in 5 (21.7%) patients, dexamethasone in 3 patients, and lenalidomide in 4 patients. Systemic injection reactions to subcutaneous daratumumab occurred in 5 (21.7%). Thromboembolic events happened in 3 patients. No patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity. There was no treatment-related mortality during stage 1. Post-induction, 16 patients (MRD negative) transitioned to lenalidomide maintenance, 5 patients (MRD positive) underwent ASCT, and 2 patients (MRD positive) proceeded to consolidation phase. Stem cell collection for eligible patients (n=22) was performed upon completion of induction; 5 patients failed to collect optimal target (3 million CD34+ cells/kg) during their first mobilization attempt. Survival results will be updated after stage 2 enrollment is completed, but as of data cutoff, no subjects in the Stage 1 cohort have progressed. Conclusions: The quadruplet regimen KRd-Dara as induction in NDMM leads to deep responses reflected in high rates of sCR and MRD negativity with an acceptable and well-tolerated safety profile. The stage 2 enrollment is ongoing.

Real-world use of carfilzomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma in Europe and Israel.

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM); however, prospective real-world data are limited. This real-world, prospective, observational study evaluated carfilzomib use, effectiveness and safety in adults with RRMM. Data are presented for a subset of patients (n=383) who received carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd). The overall response rate (ORR) was 83.6% among 360 evaluable patients. Treatment responses were better when KRd was administered at earlier therapy lines than at later lines of therapy (ORR: second line, 85.3%; third line or later, 81.0%). In patients with the anti-CD38 antibody-refractory disease, ORR was higher when KRd was administered earlier than at later therapy lines (second line/third line, 75.0%; fourth line or later, 60.0%). An ORR of 68.1% and 82.0% was achieved in the lenalidomide-refractory and not lenalidomide-refractory subgroups, respectively. KRd was consistently administered per the European label (twice weekly dose of 27mg/m2) and the median time to discontinuation was 14.6 months. The safety profile of KRd was consistent with previous studies. These real-world data highlight the effectiveness of KRd as a treatment for patients with RRMM, including those with disease refractory to lenalidomide or anti-CD38 antibodies.

Combination of Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor Carfilzomib with Bortezomib in Four Different Breast Cancer Cell Lines.

Proteasome inhibitors target different pathways in cells and therefore are promising drugs in cancer therapy. The use of these inhibitors is approved mainly in hematological cancers, and recently many clinical trials and preclinical studies have been conducted on efficacy in solid tumors. Carfilzomib is a second-generation inhibitor and was developed to decrease the side effects of bortezomib. Although there are many valid therapies for breast cancer, resistance and recurrence are inevitable in many cases and the proteasomal system plays an important role in related pathways. This study is a preliminary work to evaluate the combined effects of bortezomib and carfilzomib in four different breast cancer cells. MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, UACC-2087, and SKBR-3 cell lines were used. Cell viability was determined using bortezomib and carfilzomib alone and in combination. Combination effect values were determined using the Chou- Talalay method. Apoptosis, proteasome activity, cleaved PARP, and HSP70 expressions were analyzed in the determined doses. The response to the combination of the two inhibitors was different in four cell lines. Apoptosis was significantly higher in combination groups compared to carfilzomib in three cell lines except for SKBR-3, and higher in the combination group compared to bortezomib only in UACC-2087. Combination decreased cleaved PARP levels in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 and increased SKBR-3 compared to bortezomib. HSP70 levels decreased in combination with UACC-2087 and SKBR-3 compared to carfilzomib. Taken together, the combination of the two inhibitors was more apoptotic compared to carfilzomib and apoptosis was higher only in UACC-2087 compared to bortezomib. This apoptosis data can not be directly correlated to the degree of proteasome inhibition, PARP cleavage, and HSP70 response.

FOXM1 Is a Novel Molecular Target of AFP-Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Abrogated by Proteasome Inhibition.

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is an oncofetal protein that is elevated in a subset of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with poor prognosis, but the molecular target activated in AFP-positive HCC remains elusive. Here, we demonstrated that the transcription factor forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) is upregulated in AFP-positive HCC. We found that FOXM1 expression was highly elevated in approximately 40% of HCC cases, and FOXM1-high HCC was associated with high serum AFP levels, a high frequency of microscopic portal vein invasion, and poor prognosis. A transcriptome and pathway analysis revealed the activation of the mitotic cell cycle and the inactivation of mature hepatocyte metabolism function in FOXM1-high HCC. The knockdown of FOXM1 reduced AFP expression and induced G2/M cell cycle arrest. We further identified that the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib attenuated FOXM1 protein expression and suppressed cell proliferation in AFP-positive HCC cells. Carfilzomib in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) blockade significantly prolonged survival by suppressing AFP-positive HCC growth in a subcutaneous tumor xenotransplantation model. These data indicated that FOXM1 plays a pivotal role in the proliferation of AFP-positive liver cancer cells. Carfilzomib can effectively inhibit FOXM1 expression to inhibit tumor growth and could be a novel therapeutic option in patients with AFP-positive HCC who receive anti-VEGFR2 antibodies.

Survival Risk Scores for Real-Life Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Elotuzumab or Carfilzomib In Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone as Salvage Therapy: Analysis of 919 Cases Outside Clinical Trials.

The present study aimed to develop two survival risk scores (RS) for overall survival (OS, SRS KRd/EloRd ) and progression-free survival (PFS, PRS KRd/EloRd ) in 919 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who received carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd)/elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloRd). The median OS was 35.4 months, with no significant difference between the KRd arm versus the EloRd arm. In the multivariate analysis, advanced ISS (HR = 1.31; P = 0.025), interval diagnosis–therapy (HR = 1.46; P = 0.001), number of previous lines of therapies (HR = 1.96; P < 0.0001), older age (HR = 1.72; P < 0.0001), and prior lenalidomide exposure (HR = 1.30; P = 0.026) remained independently associated with death. The median PFS was 20.3 months, with no difference between the two strategies. The multivariate model identified a significant progression/death risk increase for ISS III (HR = 1.37; P = 0.002), >3 previous lines of therapies (HR = 1.67; P < 0.0001), older age (HR = 1.64; P < 0.0001), and prior lenalidomide exposure (HR = 1.35; P = 0.003). Three risk SRS KRd/EloRd categories were generated: low-risk (134 cases, 16.5%), intermediate-risk (467 cases, 57.3%), and high-risk categories (213 cases, 26.2%). The 1- and 2-year OS probability rates were 92.3% and 83.8% for the low-risk (HR = 1, reference category), 81.1% and 60.6% (HR = 2.73; P < 0.0001) for the intermediate-risk, and 65.5% and 42.5% (HR = 4.91; P < 0.0001) for the high-risk groups, respectively. Notably, unlike the low-risk group, which did not cross the median timeline, the OS median values were 36.6 and 18.6 months for the intermediate- and high-risk cases, respectively. Similarly, three PRS KRd/EloRd risk categories were engendered. Based on such grouping, 338 (41.5%) cases were allocated in the low-, 248 (30.5%) in the intermediate-, and 228 (28.0%) in the high-risk groups. The 1- and 2-year PFS probability rates were 71.4% and 54.5% for the low-risk (HR = 1, reference category), 68.9% and 43.7% (HR = 1.95; P < 0.0001) for the intermediate-risk, and 48.0% and 27.1% (HR = 3.73; P < 0.0001) for the high-risk groups, respectively. The PFS median values were 29.0, 21.0, and 11.7 months for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cases. This analysis showed 2.7- and 4.9-fold increased risk of death for the intermediate- and high-risk cases treated with KRd/EloRd as salvage therapy. The combined progression/death risks of the two categories were increased 1.3- and 2.2-fold compared to the low-risk group. In conclusion, SRS KRd/EloRd and PRS KRd/EloRd may represent accessible and globally applicable models in daily clinical practice and ultimately represent a prognostic tool for RRMM patients who received KRd or EloRd.

Carfilzomib plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A retro-prospective observational study.

ObjectiveWe investigate safety and efficacy in common clinical practice of the combination of carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd56) approved for the ENDEAVOR trial for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.MethodsWe retro‐prospective analyzed 75 patients in three centers in Tuscany, 48 of whom had a clinically relevant comorbidity and 50 of whom were older than 65 years, treated with a median use in the fourth line of therapy. We assessed the efficacy based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria.ResultsThe overall response rate was 60%. Median PFS was 10 months in the general cohort; in patients treated for more than 1 cycle of therapy PFS was 12 months. Quality of response to Kd56 treatment was found to positively impact PFS. Refractory status to previous line of therapy or to lenalidomide or an history of exposure to pomalidomide, seemed to have no impact on survival. We also showed a low adverse events rate, with no neuropathy events, and a relatively small number of cardiovascular events above grade 3 (10%).ConclusionKd56 is an effective and well tolerated regimen in highly pretreated and elderly patients with a good safety profile.

Emodin Ameliorates the Efficacy of Carfilzomib in Multiple Myeloma Cells via Apoptosis and Autophagy.

Background: Carfilzomib, the proteasome inhibitor, can increase the overall survival rate of multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing targeted therapy. However, relapse and toxicity present great challenges for such treatment, so an urgent need for effective combination therapy is necessary. Emodin is a natural chemical compound that inhibits the proliferation of various cancers and can effectively combine with other treatments. In this study, we evaluated the sensitizing effect of emodin combined with carfilzomib on MM cells. Methods: The cells were treated with emodin, carfilzomib, and a combination of drugs to determine their effects on cell proliferation and viability. The cell cycle distribution and reactive oxygen species (ROS) expression were measured by flow cytometry. The level of RNA and protein were analyzed through real-time qPCR and immunoblotting. Results: Emodin acted synergistically with carfilzomib to reduce the proliferation and viability of MM cell lines in vitro. Furthermore, the combination of emodin and carfilzomib increased ROS production, inducing apoptosis and autophagy pathways via caspase-3, PARP, p62, and LC3B. Conclusions: These results provide a molecular target for combination therapy in MM patients.

Abstract 5439: MDM2 inhibitor alrizomadlin (APG-115) stabilizes p53 and synergizes with proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for about 2% of all cancers and 18% of all hematologic malignancies in the US. Newly developed treatments (e.g., immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies) have significantly improved outcomes, but MM inevitably relapses and is considered incurable. Genomic analysis shows that the TP53 gene encoding tumor suppressor protein p53 is infrequently mutated in patients with MM, of whom about 82% retain wild-type (WT) TP53. Mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that inhibits p53 via proteasome degradation. Proteasome inhibitors might help to stabilize p53 and synergize with MDM2 inhibitors. Therefore, MDM2 inhibitors that activate p53 might constitute an attractive pharmacologic approach to MM. Alrizomadlin (APG-115) is an investigational, new small molecule targeting the p53/MDM2 interaction and is in clinical development for solid and hematologic cancers. This study aimed to evaluate whether alrizomadlin can potentiate the antitumor effects of proteasome inhibitors in MM. In cell-based antiproliferation studies, alrizomadlin demonstrated selective activity against WT TP53 MM cell lines, including MOLP-8, H929, and MM1S, with IC50 values of 0.495 ± 0.132 µM, 0.259 ± 0.251 µM, and 0.325 ± 0.105 µM, respectively. In contrast, alrizomadlin was inactive against TP53-mutant MM cell lines (IC50 &amp;gt;10 µM). In MM cell lines, APG-115 exhibited synergistic activity with anti-MM agents (e.g., carfilzomib, lenalidomide, melphalan, selinexor) and other targeted agents (e.g., panobinostat, bromodomain inhibitor OTX-015, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptotic-inducing ligand). In vivo studies showed that coadministration of alrizomadlin with proteasome inhibitor bortezomib or carfilzomib enhanced tumor regression (vs. single agents) in H929 xenograft models. As to mechanism, alrizomadlin likely disrupts MDM2/p53 interactions and induces accumulation of p53, MDM2, and downstream proteins 4 hours after treatment. The proteasome inhibitors induced dose-related increases in p53 protein expression 24 hours after treatment. The combination of carfilzomib with alrizomadlin further promoted accumulation of p53 and MDM2 and increased phosphorylation of p53. As a transcription factor, p53: (1) activated expression of p21 to cause cell cycle arrest (2) augmented downstream BCL-2-associated X protein (BAX) and p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA), (3) increased cleavage of caspase-3 and poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 (PARP-1; hallmarks of apoptosis), and (4) increased apoptosis and associated antitumor effects. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the combination of MDM2 inhibitor APG-115 and proteasome inhibitors have synergistic antitumor effects on MM tumors harboring WT TP53. These data lay a foundation for clinical trials of a new and novel therapeutic option for patients with refractory MM. Citation Format: Guangfeng Wang, Eric Liang, Chunyang Tang, Li Rui, Ping Min, Jing Lv, Yangfeng Ge, Fei Zhang, Lvcheng Wang, Jingjin Shang, Dajun Yang, Yifan Zhai. MDM2 inhibitor alrizomadlin (APG-115) stabilizes p53 and synergizes with proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5439.

A phase 1/2 study of ixazomib in place of bortezomib or carfilzomib in a subsequent line of therapy for patients with multiple myeloma refractory to their last bortezomib or carfilzomib combination regimen

Identifying effective combination regimens is a high priority in multiple myeloma (MM), as most patients eventually become refractory to their current treatments. In this study, we investigated whether the proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib could delay disease progression among patients who failed regimens containing another PI, bortezomib or carfilzomib. This phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized study enrolled patients who were refractory to a previous regimen containing bortezomib or carfilzomib. Patients continued the other anti-MM drugs in the regimen at the same doses and frequencies. Patients with combination regimens with unknown maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib were enrolled in phase 1, with ixazomib starting at 3 mg and then dose escalated to 4 mg. Patients on regimens with a known ixazomib MTD were enrolled in phase 2. Primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), adverse events (AEs), and determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Of the 46 patients enrolled, 39 were evaluable for efficacy. ORR and CBR were 12.8% and 17.9%, respectively. Ixazomib appeared to be well tolerated as a replacement for carfilzomib and bortezomib, with 23.9% of patients experiencing at least one grade ≥3 serious adverse event (SAE) and 37.0% experiencing at least one grade ≥3 AE. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were hyponatremia (8.7%), anemia (8.7%), dyspnea (8.7%), thrombocytopenia (6.5%), dehydration (4.3%), and pneumonia (4.3%). The results indicate that ixazomib is not an effective replacement for bortezomib or carfilzomib for patients with MM who have previously relapsed on other bortezomib/carfilzomib-containing regimens.