Combination Cohort Research Articles

Systemic Steroid and Nebulized Budesonide Combination Therapy Versus Systemic Steroid Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Community Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes and costs of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and systemic corticosteroid combination therapy versus systemic corticosteroid monotherapy for treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods: Hospitalized patients aged 41 to 85 years old who received ≥40 mg/day of systemic prednisone equivalents between April 3, 2017 to July 31, 2017 and April 3, 2018 to July 31, 2018 with a primary discharge diagnosis of AECOPD. Two cohorts were identified: those who received >2 doses of ICS (combination therapy) and those who received ≤2 doses of ICS (monotherapy) while on systemic corticosteroid therapy. Primary outcomes were progression of respiratory support or ≥20% increase in daily dose of systemic corticosteroids. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), COPD 30-day readmissions, in-hospital mortality, and nebulized budesonide costs. Results: One hundred twenty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Daily corticosteroid dose increases were similar between the combination and monotherapy cohorts (4% vs. 5%, P = 0.76) as was progression in ventilatory support (12% vs. 8%, P = 0.53). In-hospital mortality (4% vs. 1%, P = 0.36) and COPD 30-day readmissions (16% vs. 9%, P = 0.22) were not significantly different, however, patients in the combination arm had longer lengths of stay (4.8 days vs. 3.9 days, P = 0.04). Total nebulized budesonide costs were $1857 with a mean of $37 per patient stay for combination therapy cohort. Conclusion: Outcomes showed no clinical difference between combination therapy and monotherapy. This study suggests monotherapy may be more cost-effective while providing similar outcomes for the treatment of hospitalized patients with AECOPD.

Outcomes of Gastrocnemius Recession in Patients with Plantar Fasciitis and Achilles Tendinosis: A Retrospective Study of 160 Patients

Category:HindfootIntroduction/Purpose:Plantar fasciitis and achilles tendonopathy are two of the most common foot and ankle overuse conditions encountered in clinical practice. Several recent studies have shown isolated gastrocnemius recession to be a viable treatment option for these conditions when conservative management has failed. Patient outcomes have primarily been assessed through pain and functionality scores. While pain improvement and motion restoration are of utmost importance, plantar flexion power and endurance are also key to patients’ ability to return to everyday activities. Here, we assess patient outcome scores of individuals that underwent gastrocnemius recession for plantar fascitis and achilles tendonopathy to see if surgery was beneficial.Methods:We reviewed 160 patients who underwent isolated gastrocnemius recession for chronic plantar fasciitis and achilles tendinopathy by a single surgeon from June 2011 to August 2018. Data was collected regarding patient pre-operative and post- operative pain scores at 3 months, 1 year, and final follow-up, and post-operative PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (D) t-scores at final follow-up. We also collected data regarding time to full weight bearing, time to 50% and 100% pain relief, time to return to work, time to return to ADL, and time for patient to be out of boot. The patient population was then stratified by preoperative diagnosis and if patients received formal physical therapy. The cohorts consisted of patients that had plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinosis, or a combination of both. The other cohorts were patients that received formal physical therapy and those that did not receive physical therapy.Results:The average preopeartive VAS score fot plantar fasciitis Achilles tendinosis and a combination of both was 4.27 4.10 and 4.93 respectively. For patients that had 3 month follow up (96) all three cohorts saw a decrease in VAS scores at 3 months (1.98, 1.50, and 1.80 respectively). Patients who received physical therapy saw a larger decrease in VAS scores (2.05 vs 1.03 respectively). Patients in all three groups were able to be fully weight baring within 30 days. 20.27 days in the plantar fasciitis, 19.25 for Achilles tendinopathy, and 28.3 days in the combination cohort. Patients with Achillis tendinosis had were able to get out of their boot the fastest (29.75 days). PROMIS scores were similar across all cohorts.Conclusion:This study is the first to complete a through evaluation of patient outcomes after gastrocnemius recession. Additionally, the study is one of the largest cohorts. This study helps to confirm that the surgery is beneficial for both plantar fasciitis and achilles tendinosis. In all cohorts patients pain improved with surgical intervention despite preoperative diagnosis and physical therapy status. Additionally, PROMIS scores across all of the patients were similar and did not indicate any signifcant decreases in physical function or increases in pain.

A retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free- vs fixed-dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with LUTS in Spain.

IntroductionCombination therapy with an alpha blocker (AB) plus an antimuscarinic (AM) is recommended for men with moderate‐to‐severe mixed lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) when monotherapy is not effective in relieving storage symptoms. This study compared treatment persistence and adherence with an AB plus AM fixed‐dose combination (FDC) vs an AB plus AM free‐dose combination in men with LUTS in Spain.MethodsRetrospective study using the Spanish IQVIA Cegedim Electronic Medical Records database. Men prescribed AB plus AM combination therapy were included in an FDC or free‐dose combination cohort based on their index treatment. Treatment persistence was the time from index date to first discontinuation of ≥1 of the two index drugs over 12 months. Adherence was measured using the fixed medication possession ratio (MPR).ResultsOf 3114 patients identified, 999 were included (FDC, n = 790; free‐dose combination, n = 209). Median (95% CI) persistence was longer in the FDC (125 [109‐151] days) than in the free‐dose combination (31 [31‐36] days) cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; 95% CI, 2.4‐3.4; P < .0001). The 12‐month persistence rates were 31.1% (FDC cohort) and 8.9% (free‐dose cohort). The mean (SD) fixed MPR was higher in the FDC cohort (48.8 [37.2]) compared with the free‐dose cohort (23.1 [28.4]); more patients in the FDC cohort (34.2%) than in the free‐dose cohort (10.0%) were adherent (MPR ≥ 80%). The probability of treatment persistence and adherence increased with age (>80 vs <65 years, persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5‐0.9]; MPR difference, 12.5), polypharmacy (persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6‐0.9]; MPR difference, 10.7) and previous use of AB (persistence HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7‐1.0]; MPR difference, 5.7) or AB/AM combinations (persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5‐0.9]; MPR difference, 11.1).ConclusionsTreatment with an AB/AM FDC is associated with better persistence and adherence vs a free‐dose combination in men with LUTS in Spain.

PD-1 blockade in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Data from cemiplimab phase I expansion cohorts and characterization of PD-L1 expression in cervical cancer

ObjectivesTo characterize the safety, tolerability, and anti-tumor activity of cemiplimab as monotherapy or in combination with hypofractionated radiation therapy (hfRT) in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. To determine the association between histology and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. MethodsIn non-randomized phase I expansion cohorts, patients (squamous or non-squamous histology) received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks for 48 weeks, either alone (monotherapy cohort) or with hfRT during week 2 (combination cohort). Due to insufficient tissue material, PD-L1 protein expression was evaluated in commercially purchased samples and mRNA expression levels were analyzed from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). ResultsTwenty patients enrolled in both cohorts in total; 10 had squamous histology. The most common adverse events of any grade were diarrhea, fatigue, and hypokalemia, occurring in 35%, 25%, and 25%, respectively. Objective response rate was 10% in each cohort; responders had squamous histology. Duration of response was 11.2 months and 6.4 months for the responder in the monotherapy and combination cohort, respectively. Irradiated lesions were not included in the response assessments. In separate archived specimens (N = 155), PD-L1 protein expression in tumor and immune cells was negative (<1%) more commonly in adenocarcinoma than in squamous tumors. PD-L1 mRNA levels were lower in adenocarcinoma than squamous cell tumors (1.2 vs 5.0 mean transcripts per million, respectively) in TCGA. ConclusionsCemiplimab has activity in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. The phase I results, combined with results from other anti–PD-1 trials in cervical cancer and our biomarker analyses have informed the design of the ongoing phase III trial, with the primary overall survival hierarchical analyses being done first in patients with squamous histology.

ABCL-135: RE-MIND: A Comparison of Tafasitamab (MOR208) + Lenalidomide (L-MIND) Versus Lenalidomide Monotherapy (Real-World Data) in Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Context: Tafasitamab (MOR208), a humanized anti-CD19 antibody, combined with lenalidomide (LEN) showed encouraging results in the Phase II, single-arm L-MIND study ( NCT02399085 ) of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Objective: To generate a LEN monotherapy matched comparator cohort for L-MIND using patient-level data to isolate the tafasitamab contribution to the efficacy of the tafasitamab + LEN combination. Design: RE-MIND ( NCT04150328 ), a retrospective observational study, used a Nearest Neighbor ePS-based 1:1 Matching methodology to balance the LEN monotherapy cohort (observational data) and combination cohort (derived from L-MIND) for nine prespecified baseline covariates: age, Ann Arbor stage, last therapy refractoriness, number of prior therapy lines, primary refractoriness, prior ASCT, LDH, neutropenia, and anemia. The primary analysis set included matched patients who received a LEN starting dose of 25 mg/day (as in L-MIND) with sufficient follow-up. Patients: LEN monotherapy-treated patients from the US and EU who met the L-MIND-aligned eligibility criteria: adult patients with R/R DLBCL; 1–3 prior systemic therapies, including 1 CD20-targeting regimen; ASCT-ineligible. Baseline characteristics, LEN dosing, and patient outcomes were collected retrospectively from health records. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed best objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and complete response (CR) rates. Results: 490 patients were enrolled, of which 140 fulfilled the ePS matching criteria. Following matching, the primary analysis set included 76 patients from each cohort. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The primary endpoint was met. Best ORR was significantly higher in the combination cohort (67.1%) versus the monotherapy cohort (34.2%) (odds ratio 3.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.90–8.14; p Conclusions: Significantly better ORR, CR, and OS indicate potential synergistic effects of the tafasitamab + LEN combination in ASCT-ineligible R/R DLBCL. RE-MIND demonstrates the utility of real-world data in interpreting non-randomized trials.

Abstract LB-133: Correlative analysis of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of RGX-104, a first-in-class Liver-X-Receptor (LXR) agonist, and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumors

Abstract RGX-104, a first-in-class small-molecule LXR agonist modulates innate immunity and cancer progression via transcriptional activation of ApoE. ApoE protein suppresses tumor cell invasion and angiogenesis, and also depletes circulating and tumoral myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC), leading to T cell activation.A multivariate approach was used to address pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic relationships of RGX-104 in a phase 1 dose escalation study in patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. The study entailed multiple escalation arms with RGX-104 as monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab, ipilimumab, or docetaxel. Various markers including intratumoral ApoE and its receptor LRP1 in biopsy specimens, gene expression of LXR-targets in whole blood, serum markers including cytokines and lipids, as well as immune cell types such as MDSC, CD8 T-cells, and neutrophils in peripheral blood from patients were monitored at several time points. PK metrics were tracked to assess dose response relationships. Clinical outcomes such as objective response, time to disease progression, and duration on therapy were used for exploratory correlative analyses. A generally dose dependent increase in steady state exposure to RGX-104 was observed among all cohorts; the lowest efficacious exposure among patients with partial response was ~14,000 ng*h/mL. Treatment with RGX-104 at doses ranging from 120 mg BID to 240 mg BID induced expression of LXR targets, ApoE [2.7X (p=0.008) to 7.1X (p=0.007)] and ABCA1 [ 6.3X (p=1.20E-03) to 7X (p=8.1E-04] over baseline in a generally dose-dependent manner as assessed in whole blood. Similarly, MDSC depletion, ranging from 70%-90% relative to baseline, was observed in patients treated with RGX-104 along with concomitant CD8 T-cell activation; similar effects were noted in patients in combination cohorts. A model to explore dose dependency of change in immune cell types suggested that baseline levels of MDSC were most predictive of the magnitude of MDSC reduction after treatment, and that favorable clinical outcomes correlate with the extent of MDSC reduction and T cell activation. Low baseline levels of tumoral ApoE were associated with greater clinical benefit, with almost all patients with stable disease or partial response exhibiting ApoE tumor positive score of ≤20%; these patients also exhibited low/negative PD-L1 (&amp;lt;1%) staining, revealing a target specific tumor biomarker and PD-L1 subset that could support prospective patient selection. These and additional markers will be tracked in expansion cohorts of RGX-104 in combination with pembrolizumab and carboplatin/pemetrexed for 1st line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (PD-L1 &amp;lt;1%) and in combination with docetaxel for 2nd line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer. Citation Format: Monica Mita, Alan Mita, Erika Hamilton, Gerald S. Falchook, Michael Postow, Bartosz Chmielowski, Russell J. Schilder, James Strauss, Emerson Lim, Shubham Pant, Angela Jain, Oliver Rixe, Rebecca Redman, Kevin B. Kim, Tomislav Dragovich, R. Donald Harvey, Igor Puzanov, Nimisha Schneider, Renee Deehan, Tobi Guennel, Joe Lin, Sohail Tavazoie, Roger Waltzman, Eric Rowinsky, Michael Szarek, Subhasree Sridhar, Robert Busby, Narayan Lebaka, Celia Andreu, Isabel Kurth, David Darst, Masoud Tavazoie, Syed Raza, Robert Wasserman, Foster C. Gonsalves. Correlative analysis of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of RGX-104, a first-in-class Liver-X-Receptor (LXR) agonist, and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-133.

Abstract A23: The EV-103 Trial: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab and/or chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer

Abstract Background: PD-(L)1-targeted immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), such as pembrolizumab, are approved for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) who progress after platinum, are ineligible for first-line (1L) cisplatin (PD-L1 positive), or are ineligible for 1L platinum. However, la/mUC remains a lethal disease, with an ORR of ~25% for all CPI-treated patients, and a combination approach may provide additional benefit. Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an investigational antibody-drug conjugate, delivers the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E to cells expressing Nectin-4, which are found in 97% of mUC patient samples (Petrylak, ASCO 2017). In a phase 1 study (NCT02091999), EV (1.25 mg/kg) was generally well tolerated with a confirmed ORR of 43% in 112 mUC patients (Rosenberg, ASCO-GU 2019). These encouraging results, along with the potential for an enhanced immune response, suggest that EV+pembrolizumab may improve response rates and extend response durability. Trial Design: EV-103, a phase 1b trial for nonresectable la/mUC patients with no prior CPI, added an additional 4 cohorts (Parts 2 and 3) in an Oct. 2018 amendment. Anticipated enrollment is now approximately 159 patients. Dose-escalation patients (EV+pembrolizumab, 1L or 2L) must be ineligible for 1L cisplatin-based chemotherapy or have disease progression during/following treatment with ≥1 platinum-containing regimen. Dose expansion (Part 1) will evaluate EV+pembrolizumab in 1L (Cohort A) and 2L settings (Optional Cohort B). Part 2 will evaluate 1L EV+cisplatin (Cohort D), 1L EV+carboplatin (Cohort E), and 1L or 2L EV+gemcitabine (Optional Cohort F). Part 3 (Cohort G) will evaluate 1L EV+pembrolizumab+cisplatin or carboplatin, depending on patients' cisplatin-eligibility. In all cohorts, patients receive EV on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle. In combination therapies, patients receive pembrolizumab, cisplatin, and carboplatin on Day 1 or gemcitabine on Days 1 and 8 of each cycle. The primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of EV+pembrolizumab and/or chemotherapy. Secondary objectives are establishing the recommended EV dose for combination cohorts, assessing ORR per RECIST for all cohorts and per iRECIST for therapies with pembrolizumab, as well as assessing disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers. The study opened in Oct. 2017. Citation Format: Christopher J. Hoimes, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Daniel P. Petrylak, Anne-Sophie Carret, Amal Melhem-Bertrandt, Thomas W. Flaig. The EV-103 Trial: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab and/or chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Bladder Cancer: Transforming the Field; 2019 May 18-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(15_Suppl):Abstract nr A23.

OP0205 PHASE I STUDY OF D-0120, A NOVEL URAT1 INHIBITOR IN CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT FOR HYPERURICEMIA AND GOUT

Background:D-0120 is a novel oral selective uric acid transporter (URAT1) inhibitor being developed for the treatment of hyperuricemia and gout by blocking the reabsorption of uric acid (UA) within the renal proximal tubule, thereby reducing serum uric acid concentrations. As a novel URAT1 inhibitor, D-0120 is anticipated to have more potent serum UA reducing effect than the approved URAT1 inhibitor lesinurad, but with less toxicity and wider therapeutic window. The pharmacological potential of D-0120 for the treatment of hyperuricemia and gout was demonstrated in preclinical studies. The results of the in vitro hURAT1 expressed CHO cell model showed that the inhibitory activity of D-0120 is 150-fold more potent than lesinurad and slightly more potent than verinurad.Objectives:The purpose of this dose escalation study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of D-0120 in multiple ascending doses in healthy volunteer, to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of D-0120 and to assess pharmacodynamic (PD) effects and determine the drug-drug interaction (DDI) effect of febuxostat and D-0120 in healthy volunteers.Methods:This is a randomized, double blind, multiple ascending doses Phase I study of D-0120 in healthy volunteers conducted at one site. Thirty-two healthy eligible volunteers with serum uric acid level ≥ 4.5 mg/dL but within normal range at screening were enrolled and dosed with D-0120 within 4 different single agent cohorts for a period of 7 days. Each cohort had 8 subjects randomized at 3:1 ratio for D-0120:placebo. A fifth cohort of 8 healthy eligible volunteers were enrolled and dosed with 5 mg of D-0120 in combination with 40 mg of febuxostat over a period of 9 days. Evaluation of safety, PK and PD was conducted at various timepoints while the patients were in confinement. Further safety evaluation took place on Day 14. A Safety Review Committee reviewed safety, PK and PD data for each cohort of D-0120 dose level (2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg) as well as when D-0120 5 mg was combined with 40 mg febuxostat. PK evaluation for multiple dose parameters included AUC0-τ, Cmax, Cmin, Tmax and Fl.Results:Dose escalation of D-0120 from 2.5 mg/day to 20 mg/day was completed without any dose limiting toxicities. Most AEs occurred during the study were mild to moderate in severity and did not require any treatment before resolution. There was no SAE and no dose reduction during the treatment period. The pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation of ascending dose levels of D-0120 suggested a dose proportional increase in drug exposure and there was no significant change of PK profile between Day 1 and Day 7 of dosing. For pharmacodynamic (PD) evaluation, the serum uric acid (UA) levels before and after D-0120 dosing was evaluated on multiple days. The UA reduction effect achieved maximum at about 4-8 hours after dosing and the effect lasted for at least 24 hours. After the 7-day dosing period, the mean percentage of UA reduction from baseline showed an increasing trend as the dose level increased.More detailed safety, PK and PD data from multiple D-0120 dose cohorts and D-0120/febuxostat combination cohort will be presented at the meeting.Conclusion:The oral daily administration of a novel URAT1 inhibitor, D-0120, in healthy volunteers for 7 days was well tolerated at dose levels from 2.5 mg/day to 20 mg/day. The PK profile demonstrated a dose proportional increase. D-0120 administration for 7 days resulted in significant reduction of serum UA levels. Further evaluation of this novel agent in longer treatment period and in patients with hyperuricemia and/or gout is warranted.

Trial in progress: A phase Ib study of AMG 510, a specific and irreversible KRASG12C inhibitor, in combination with other anticancer therapies in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring KRAS p.G12C mutation (CodeBreak 101).

TPS3661 Background: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) p.G12C mutation has been identified as a driver oncogenic mutation in several solid tumors (eg, non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], colorectal cancer [CRC]). Development of therapies targeting KRASG12C has been unsuccessful. AMG 510 is a specific and irreversible small molecule inhibitor of KRASG12C. A first-in-human clinical trial of AMG 510 monotherapy in patients with KRAS p.G12C mutant solid tumors is currently ongoing. AMG 510 in combination with additional anticancer therapies may lead to enhanced antitumor efficacy. This study is a master protocol designed to evaluate multiple investigational regimens of AMG 510 in patients with KRAS p.G12C mutant solid tumors. Here, we present two combination cohorts of AMG 510 with a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor and an investigational anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) therapy, respectively. Additional combination cohorts will be presented at the meeting. Methods: This is a phase 1b, open-label study evaluating AMG 510 in combination with a MEK inhibitor or an investigational anti-PD-1 therapy in pts with KRAS p.G12C mutant solid tumors. The dose exploration phase (part 1; n=20) will evaluate the safety and tolerability of AMG 510 in combination with the MEK inhibitor or anti-PD-1 therapy; this will be followed by a dose expansion phase (part 2; n=40) to verify the safety and tolerability profile of AMG 510 combination therapies and assess antitumor efficacy. Key eligibility criteria include locally-advanced or metastatic malignancy with KRAS p.G12C mutation identified through molecular testing and at least one or multiple lines of prior systemic therapy (eg, ≥2 for advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer). Primary endpoints include dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-emergent or -related adverse events. Secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetic parameters of combination regimens, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and duration of stable disease (measured by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and assessed per RECIST 1.1). The study began enrolling pts in December 2019 and is ongoing. For more information, please contact Amgen Medical Information: medinfo@amgen.com . Clinical trial information: NCT04185883 .

A phase I study of ALX148, a CD47 blocker, in combination with standard anticancer antibodies and chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced malignancy.

3056 Background: CD47 is a myeloid checkpoint upregulated by tumor cells to evade the host immune response. ALX148 (A) is a fusion protein comprised of a high affinity CD47 blocker linked to an inactive immunoglobulin Fc region. ALX148 enhances innate and adaptive immune responses against cancer and has previously been shown to be well tolerated in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), pembrolizumab (P), and trastuzumab (T) in a range of solid tumors (ASCO 2019 #2514). ALX148 safety and activity in combination with T or P and standard chemotherapy regimens are reported in patients (pts) including head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) and HER2 positive gastric/gastroesophageal cancer (GC). Methods: Pts with advanced malignancy were administered AP or AT. Patients with ≥2L HNSCC progressed on platinum therapy received AP, while those with untreated advanced disease received AP+5FU (FU)+platinum. Pts with ≥2L GC progressed on T+FU+platinum received AT +/- ramucirumab (ram)+paclitaxel (pac). Safety, response, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) markers were assessed. Data are reported as of 21, Jan. 2020. Results: Patients received AP (n=52); AP+FU+platinum (n=1); AT (n=30); or AT+ram+pac (n=3) as of data cutoff. Eighty-two pts experienced any adverse event (AE). Fifty-seven pts administered AP or AT regimens reported mostly low grade ALX148 treatment related (TR) AEs, the most common being fatigue (18%), AST increase (11%), platelets decreased (10%), ALT increase (8.5%), anemia (8.5%), and pruritus (8.5%). Pts receiving AP+FU+platinum or AT+ram+pac reported no TRAEs as of data cutoff. Anticancer activity was observed in response-evaluable pts. AP: HNSCC CPI-naïve (n=10) 40% ORR, mPFS 4.6 [95% CI:0.5;7.5], mOS not reached with 14.4m median follow-up; AP: HNSCC CPI-experienced (n=10) 0% ORR, mPFS 2.0 [95% CI:0.9;3.6], mOS 7.4 [95% CI:3.1;NC]; and AT: GC (n=20) 20% ORR, mPFS 2.2 [95% CI:1.9;5.4], mOS 8.1 [95% CI:3.4;12.8]. Full peripheral CD47 target occupancy and increased infiltrating immune cells in tumor biopsies were seen. Exploratory analysis of biomarkers associated with response is ongoing. Conclusions: Initial data suggests ALX148 demonstrates excellent tolerability in combination with anti cancer antibodies and standard chemotherapy. Clinical activity in pts with advanced CPI naïve HNSCC (including PD-L1 negative) and GC compares favorably with historic controls. Final data from AP and AT cohorts and initial data from chemotherapy combination cohorts will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03013218 .

A phase I study of Aurora kinase A inhibitor LY3295668 erbumine as a single agent and in combination in patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma.

TPS10561 Background: Aurora kinase A (AurA) has been implicated in high-risk neuroblastoma, including roles stabilizing and increasing expression of MYCN protein. AurA impacts the function of MYCN in mediating transcription in a cell cycle dependent manner, suggesting that neuroblastoma and other MYC/MYCN-driven tumors may be sensitive to AurA inhibition. LY3295668 is a selective AurA inhibitor. The lack of AurB inhibitory activity is hypothesized to minimize on-target hematologic toxicity associated with AurB inhibition. The molecule’s selectivity is intended to allow for continuous dosing at exposures associated with &gt; 90% target inhibition at trough. In an analysis of LY3295668 antiproliferative effects in 560 cancer cell lines, neuroblastoma was among the most sensitive histologies tested. This screen also separately evaluated genomic predictors of response to LY3295668, with MYC/ MYCN amplification identified as among the strongest predictors of sensitivity to this agent. LY3295668 is currently being evaluated in early phase adult trials. The current trial (J10-MC-JZHD) was uniquely designed to hasten time to first-in-child oncology development for a rare unmet need of relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma patients. Methods: Study J1O-MC-JZHD (NCT04106219) is a multicenter, dual collaboration (NANT and ITCC), randomized, open-label, Phase 1 study of oral LY3295668 in children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. A rolling 6 design will be followed for dose escalation in both a monotherapy cohort and a combination cohort testing LY3295668 together with cyclophosphamide and topotecan. The starting monotherapy dose will be equivalent to 80% of the adult maximum tolerated dose. Key eligibility criteria include recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma not amenable to curative treatment, age 2-21 years, mandatory archival tissue submission, ability to swallow capsules, and adequate hematologic and organ function. LY3295668 is administered in capsule form orally BID continuously. Primary objectives include assessments of safety and tolerability of study drug to identify RP2D as monotherapy and combination, and assess antitumor activity. Secondary objectives include assessment of the pharmacokinetic profile as monotherapy and in combination, and assessment of the relationship between study drug exposure and efficacy. Following determination of the RP2Ds, an expansion phase will randomize patients to monotherapy or to the combination arm. Enrollment began 16 Dec 2019 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04106219.

Safety and tolerability of MEDI0562 in combination with durvalumab or tremelimumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

3003 Background: We report safety and tolerability of MEDI0562, a humanized IgG1κ OX40 monoclonal antibody (mAb), in combination with durvalumab (durva; anti-PD-L1 mAb) or tremelimumab (treme; anti-CTLA-4 mAb) in patients (pts) with previously treated advanced solid tumors. Methods: In this phase 1, open-label study (NCT02705482), adult pts received escalating doses of MEDI0562 (2.25, 7.5 or 22.5 mg/kg) every 2 wks (Q2W) in combination with durva (1500 mg/kg) or treme (75 or 225 mg/kg) Q4W, until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor assessments were performed Q8W with immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Results: In total, 27 and 31 pts received MEDI0562 + durva or treme, across 5 dose combination cohorts (3 + 3 design), with a maximum tolerated dose of 7.5 mg MEDI0652 + 1500 mg durva and maximum administered dose of 10 mg MEDI0562 + 225 mg treme. Median duration of exposure was 12.0 (range 2.0–80.9) and 8.0 (range 2.0–42.0) wks, respectively. Two (22.5 mg MEDI10562 + durva) and 3 (2.25 mg MEDI0652 + 225 mg treme, 22.5 mg MEDI0562 + 75 and 225 mg treme) dose limiting toxicities were observed. For MEDI0562 + durva and MEDI0562 + treme groups respectively, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 96.3% and 100% of pts; most common TEAEs were fatigue (55.6%) and pruritus (45.2%), Gr 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 74.1% and 67.7%; and MEDI0562-related AEs were reported in 20 (74.1%) and 24 (77.4%) pts. Six TEAEs in each group led to MEDI0562 discontinuation (22.2% and 19.4%, respectively), 2 led to death (renal failure [7.5 mg MEDI0562 + durva], multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [22.5 mg MEDI0562 + 225 mg treme]). Three response evaluable pts had PR (11.5% [7.5 and 22.5 mg MEDI0562 + durva, n = 26]). Median overall survival was 17.4 and 11.9 mos for MEDI0562 + durva and MEDI0562 + treme, with stable disease seen in 9 pts from each group, 34.6% vs 29.0%, respectively. Serum exposure of MEDI0562 increased dose proportionally. Post treatment serum antidrug antibody (ADA) was detected in 20 pts from MEDI0562 + durva and MEDI0562 + treme (74.1% and 71.4%, respectively). The impact of ADA on MEDI0562 pharmacokinetics was seen at all doses. Mean percentage of Ki67+CD4+ and Ki67+CD8+ memory T cells increased, while mean percentage of OX40+CD4+ memory T cells decreased following the first dose of MEDI0562 + durva or treme. Conclusions: The safety profile of MEDI0562 in combination with durva or treme was similar between groups. Clinical activity was observed with MEDI0562 + durva in pts with advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02705482 .

Phase 1 trial of vorolanib (CM082) in combination with everolimus in patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundVorolanib (X-82, CM082) is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activities of vorolanib plus everolimus (an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin). MethodsPatients had histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced RCC and failed with standard therapy were eligible for this study. Dose-escalated combinations of vorolanib (100, 150 or 200 mg once daily) with everolimus (5 mg once daily) were administered on 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity using a conventional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Findings22 patients (100 mg n = 4, 150 mg n = 3, 200 mg n = 15) were enrolled. Only one patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, grade 4 thrombocytopenia) in the vorolanib 200 mg combination cohort, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events were proteinuria (100%), leukopenia (77%), hypercholesterolaemia (77%), increased low-density lipoprotein (68%), hypertriglyceridaemia (64%), hyperglycaemia (59%), and fatigue (55%). Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1 to 2, with grade 3 or higher toxicities mostly seen in the 200 mg cohort. Single dosing of vorolanib demonstrated dose-proportional increases in the Cmax and AUC, and observed short t1/2z ranging from 4.74±1.44 to 12.89±7.49 h. The pharmacokinetic parameters for everolimus were similar among all cohorts. Of 19 evaluable patients, the ORR and DCR was 32% (n = 6, 95% CI, 13–57%) and 100% (95% CI, 82–100%), respectively. InterpretationCombination therapy of vorolanib 200 mg plus everolimus 5 mg once daily is potentially effective with potential activity. Further evaluation of the combination in advanced RCC patients is ongoing (NCT03095040). FundingBetta Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China.

Melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (O-12-M1): a multicentre, international, open-label, phase 1–2 study

Multiple myeloma is an incurable haematological malignancy, representing over 10% of haematological cancers in the USA. We did a phase 1-2 study of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma to determine the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen and to investigate its safety and efficacy. We did a multicentre, international, dose-confirmation and dose-expansion, open-label, phase 1-2 study in seven centres in the USA and Europe. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, had received two or more previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and bortezomib), were refractory to their last line of therapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less. In phase 1, patients received an intravenous infusion of melflufen at 15 mg, 25 mg, 40 mg, or 55 mg for 30 min on day 1 in 21-day cycles plus oral dexamethasone 40 mg weekly and did not receive melflufen as a single agent. Melflufen was also tested in a single-agent cohort late in phase 2 in a small number of patients at the maximum tolerated dose identified in phase 1. In phase 2, patients were enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose in the melflufen plus dexamethasone in the combination cohort.. The phase 1 primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose. The phase 2 primary objective was to evaluate overall response rate and clinical benefit rate. This primary analysis was done per protocol, in the all-treated and efficacy-evaluable population (defined as patients who received at least two doses of melflufen and who had a response assessment after baseline). The single-agent melflufen cohort was closed on October 6, 2016, as per the recommendation by the data safety monitoring committee on the basis of interim data suggesting greater activity in the melflufen plus dexamethasone cohort. The study is completed but survival follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01897714. Patients were enrolled between July 4, 2013, and Dec 31, 2016: 23 patients in phase 1 and 58 in phase 2, including six patients from phase 1 treated at the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen 40 mg plus weekly dexamethasone. In phase 2, 45 patients were given a combination of melflufen plus dexamethasone and 13 patients were given single-agent melflufen. In phase 1, the established maximum tolerated dose was 40 mg of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the first three dose cohorts (15 mg, 25 mg, and 40 mg). The highest dose cohort tested (55 mg) exceeded the maximum tolerated dose because four of six patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia with grade 4 thrombocytopenia also occurring in three of these patients; therefore, the planned highest dose of 70 mg was not tested. In phase 2, patients treated with combination therapy achieved an overall response rate of 31% (14 of 45 patients; 95% CI 18-47) and clinical benefit rate of 49% (22 of 45; 34-64) in the all-treated population, and 41% (14 of 34; 25-59) and 65% (22 of 34; 47-80) in the efficacy-evaluable population. In the phase 2 single-agent cohort, the overall response rate was 8% (one of 13 patients; 0·2-36·0) and the clinical benefit rate was 23% (three of 13; 5-54). Among the 45 patients given melflufen plus dexamethasone during phase 2, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were clinically manageable thrombocytopenia (28 [62%] patients) and neutropenia (26 [58%]), and non-haematological toxicity was infrequent. 24 serious adverse events were reported in 17 (38%) of 45 patients, most commonly pneumonia (five [11%]). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events that occurred in the phase 2 single-agent cohort of 13 patients were neutropenia (nine [69%]) and thrombocytopenia (eight [62%]). Nine patients experienced serious adverse events in the single-agent cohort, most commonly thrombocytopenia (two [15%]). There were three deaths from adverse events within 30 days of treatment that were possibly related to treatment: one in the 25 mg cohort in phase 1 (due to bacteraemia) and two in the phase 2 combination cohort (one due to neutropenic sepsis and one due to Escherichia coli sepsis), each in the setting of progressive disease. These data show that melflufen is active in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and tolerable in most patients. These results show the feasibility of this regimen and support the initiation of additional clinical studies of melflufen in multiple myeloma, both in combination with dexamethasone as well as in triplet regimens with additional classes of drugs. Oncopeptides AB.

Comparison of Periarticular Infiltration and Combination Delivery of Local Anesthetics for Reducing Pain and Opioid Consumption after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Surgical-site delivery of local anesthetics decreases pain and opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal route of administration is unknown. We compared local anesthetic delivery using periarticular soft-tissue infiltration to delivery using a combination of preimplantation immersion and intra-articular injection (combination treatment). The records of patients who underwent unilateral, cemented, primary TKA with spinal anesthesia and adductor canal blocks at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Three subgroups were compared, including controls who did not receive additional local anesthetics, patients who received periarticular infiltration, and patients who received combination treatment. Mean daily pain scores and mean 24-hour opioid consumption on postoperative days (PODs) 0 and 1 were calculated, and analysis of variance was used to assess for significant differences. Factors that were associated with lower pain scores and opioid consumption were then identified using multivariate stepwise regression. There were 26 controls, 25 periarticular infiltration patients, and 39 combination patients. The periarticular infiltration cohort had significantly lower mean pain scores and opioid consumption than controls on POD 0, but not on POD 1. The combination cohort had significantly lower mean pain scores and opioid consumption than controls on PODs 0 and 1. There were no significant differences between the infiltration and combination groups on either day. Multivariate regression analysis showed that infiltration was associated with significantly decreased opioid consumption on both days and decreased pain on POD 0. Combination treatment was associated with significantly decreased pain and opioid consumption on both days. Both local anesthetic periarticular infiltration and combination treatment are associated with decreased pain and opioid consumption after TKA. The stronger effects of the combination treatment compared with periarticular infiltration on POD 1 suggests that combination delivery may have a longer duration of action.

Conditions, pathogenesis, and progression of diabetic kidney disease and early decliner in Japan

ObjectiveGlomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreases without or prior to the development of albuminuria in many patients with diabetes. Therefore, albuminuria and/or a low GFR in patients with diabetes is referred...

First-in-human phase I trial of small activating RNA (saRNA) oligonucleotide MTL-CEBPA in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

554 Background: MTL-CEBPA is the first saRNA to enter clinical trials and targets the transcription factor C/EBPα, a master regulator of myeloid cell differentiation. We have previously reported a favourable safety profile of MTL-CEBPA given as a single agent QWx3 every 28 days, in patients with HCC (Sarker D et al, ASCO 2018). After discontinuation of MTL-CEBPA, three out of five patients treated with sorafenib off study have had maintained complete radiological response (CR) of 7-18 months duration; 2 patients demonstrated resolution of lung metastases &gt; 1 year. Here we provide updated data on phase 1 patients treated with sorafenib off study as well as subsequent combination cohorts. Methods: MTL-CEBPA 130mg/m2 QWx3 or BIW and sorafenib 400mg bd were administered to patients with HCC using combination or sequential dosing regimens, in cohorts either tyrosine kinase inhibitor naive or resistant. On treatment liver biopsies evaluated changes in M2 macrophages (CD163). Flow cytometry of peripheral blood determined changes in myeloid cell populations. Results: 12 patients have been treated with MTL-CEBPA co-administered with sorafenib and 14 patients treated with MTL-CEBPA followed by sorafenib (23M/3F, median age 65.5years, range 44-83, ECOG PS 0/1: 18/8). The most common treatment-related AEs (all grades/grade 3) in this group include facial flushing (4/0), raised AST (3/1) raised ALT (2/1), fatigue (5/0), raised ALP (2/0), and anaemia (2/2), diarrhoea (3/0), rash (2/0) and anorexia (1/0). 1 TKI naïve patient in the co-administration cohort has maintained CR at 7 months and two patients have SD (ongoing at 3 &amp; 4 months both in sequential cohort). IHC in the patient with CR has demonstrated 95% reduction in M2 macrophages with significant decrease in frequency of immature CD10- neutrophils (-85.7%; p = 0.0078), PMN-MDSCs (-49.3%; p = 0.00145) and M-MDSCs (-18.4%; P = 0.0072). All responding patients have underlying HBV or HCV. Conclusions: MTL-CEBPA is a novel saRNA targeting myeloid cells which may result in a significantly enhanced oncological response in HCC of viral aetiology. Updated safety and efficacy data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02716012.

Research round-up

In a phase 2 trial, Robert DeRubeis and colleagues evaluated antidepressant medication alone or with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to prevent recurrence of depression. In the phase 1 stage of the study, participants with persistent major depressive episode were randomly allocated to antidepressant medication with or without CBT. Participants who achieved recovery were included in the phase 2 study (n=292), CBT ended in the combination cohort, and patients were randomly allocated to medication withdrawal or maintenance. At 3 years follow-up, in the monotherapy phase 1 cohort, risk of depressive recurrence was lower in participants who continued medication in phase 2 compared with medication withdrawal (hazard ratio [HR] 0·47, 95% CI 0·29–0·75; p=0·002). In the combination treatment phase 1 cohort, relapse risk was lower in those who continued medication in phase 2 compared with medication withdrawal (HR 0·46, 95% CI 0·30–0·71; p<0·001).

Complete and long-lasting clinical responses in immune checkpoint inhibitor-resistant, metastasized melanoma treated with adoptive T cell transfer combined with DC vaccination

ABSTRACT Development of T cell-directed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has revolutionized metastatic melanoma (MM) therapy, but <50% of treated patients experience durable responses. This phase I trial (NCT01946373) investigates the safety/feasibility of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) adoptive cell therapy (ACT) combined with dendritic cell (DC) vaccination in MM patients progressing on ICI. An initial cohort (5 patients) received TIL therapy alone to evaluate safety and allow for optimization of TIL expansion protocols. A second cohort (first-in-man, 5 patients) received TIL combined with autologous tumor lysate-loaded DC vaccination. All patients received cyclophosphamide/fludarabine preconditioning prior to, and intravenous (i.v.) IL-2 after, TIL transfer. The DC vaccine was given as five intradermal injections after TIL and IL-2 administration. [18F]-FDG PET/CT radiology was performed to evaluate clinical response, according to RECIST 1.1 (on the CT part). Immunological monitoring was performed by flow cytometry and T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing. In the safety/optimization cohort, all patients had a mixed response or stable disease, but none durable. In the combination cohort, two patients experienced complete responses (CR) that are still ongoing (>36 and >18 months, respectively). In addition, two patients had partial responses (PR), one still ongoing (>42 months) with only a small bone-lesion remaining, and one of short duration (<4 months). One patient died early during treatment and did not receive DC. Long-lasting persistency of the injected TILs was demonstrated in blood. In summary, we report clinical responses by TIL therapy combined with DC vaccination in 4 out of 4 treated MM patients who previously failed ICI.

162TiP A phase I study evaluating BI 765063, a first in class selective myeloid SIRPa inhibitor, as standalone and in combination with BI 754091, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumours

Abstract Background Signal Regulatory Protein α [SIRPα] is a polymorphic protein, strongly expressed on myeloid suppressive cells. BI 765063 (OSE172), a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody (mAb), is a selective antagonist of SIRPα/CD47 interaction and does not bind to SIRPɣ, known to assist T cell co-stimulation and migration. BI 765063 strongly binds V1 allele, one of the 2 major functional allele of SIRPα expressed in more than 80% of general population and Asian (in 60%). Anti-tumor effect was shown in various in vivo cancer models using the validated anti-mouse SIRPα mAbs surrogate as single agent. The effect was more pronounced in combination with T checkpoint inhibitors (Gauttier V et al, 2018). BI 765063 mechanism of action includes promotion of tumor-antigen-presentation while preserving T-cell activation and increasing tumor phagocytosis. Trial Design This study comprises a dose escalation (step 1) to determine the Dose-Limiting Toxicities, Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), and Recommended phase II Dose (RP2Ds) of BI 765063 monotherapy and with BI 754091, and dose-confirmation expansion cohorts (step 2). In Step 1, ascending doses of BI 763063 every 3 weeks intravenously (iv) using a Bayesian approach with overdose control are tested. When MTD determined, BI 763063 will be tested with BI 754091, a PD-1 mAb inhibitor. In step 2, 2 parallel randomized, non-comparative mono and combination cohorts will further confirm the RP2Ds and assess the safety and preliminary efficacy (RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST). Patients ≥ 18 years, PS:0-1, with advanced solid tumor who failed or are not eligible to standard therapy will be included. V1/V1 and V1/V2 patients (central testing) are evaluated in separate cohorts in step 1. In step 2 selected population of V1/V1 patients with selected advanced-stage cancers will be included. Pharmacokinetics (PK), SIRPα receptor occupancy (RO) and a comprehensive translational program (in blood and tumour) will assess PK/PD profile and biomarkers of activity. The trial is currently active and will include 116 patients (56 in step 1 and 60 in step 2). Clinical trial identification EudraCT: 2018-003830-34; Release date 1 October 2018. Legal entity responsible for the study OSE Immunotherapeutics. Funding OSE Immunotherapeutics in collaboration with Boehringer Ingelheim. Disclosure A. Marabelle: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, Pierre Fabre, Onxeo, EISAI, Bayer, Genticel, Rigontec, Daiichii Sankyo, Imaxio, Sanofi, BioNTech, Corvus, GLG, Deerfield, Guidepoint Global, Edimark, System Analytics, imCheck, Sotio, Bioncotech, Molecular Partners, Pillar Partners, Boehringer Inge; Advisory / Consultancy: Innate Pharma, Merck Serono, eTheRNA, Lytix pharma, Kyowa Kirin Pharma, Bayer, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Symphogen, Genmab, Amgen, Biothera, Nektar, GSK, Oncovir, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Flexus Bio, Roche/Genentech, OSE immunotherapeutics, Transgene, Gritstone, M; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi ; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck (MSD), Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche/Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck (MSD), Merck Serono, AstraZeneca/Medimmune, Amgen, Sanofi. P. Cassier: Honoraria (self): Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Blueprint Medicines, Amgen; Honoraria (institution): Novartis , Roche/Genentech, Lilly, Blueprint Medicines, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Plexxikon, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Toray Industries, Transgene, Loxo, GlaxoSmithKline, Innate Pharma, Janssen ; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche, Amgen, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme. S. Champiat: Honoraria (self): Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Novartis and Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Cilag, Merck , Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi; Non-remunerated activity/ies: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Medimmune, Merck, NH TherAGuiX, Pfizer, Roche. A. Vinceneux: Advisory / Consultancy: UBS. R. Huhn: Full / Part-time employment: Boehringer-Ingelheim. N. Poirier: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Ose Immunotherapeutics; Full / Part-time employment: Ose Immunotherapeutics. B. Vasseur: Full / Part-time employment: Ose Immunotherapeutics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.