Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage Research Articles

Mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Italian colorectal anastomotic leakage (iCral) study group prospective cohorts.

Retrospective evaluation of the effects of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on data derived from two prospective open-label observational multicenter studies in Italy regarding elective colorectal surgery. MBP for elective colorectal surgery remains a controversial issue with contrasting recommendations in current guidelines. The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group, therefore, decided to estimate the effects of no MBP (treatment variable) versus MBP for elective colorectal surgery. A total of 8359 patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis were enrolled in two consecutive prospective studies in 78 surgical centers in Italy from January 2019 to September 2021. A retrospective PSMA was performed on 5455 (65.3%) cases after the application of explicit exclusion criteria to eliminate confounders. The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infections (SSI) rates; the secondary endpoints included SSI subgroups, overall and major morbidity, reoperation, and mortality rates. Overall length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) was also considered. Two well-balanced groups of 1125 patients each were generated: group A (No MBP, true population of interest), and group B (MBP, control population), performing a PSMA considering 21 covariates. Group A vs. group B resulted significantly associated with a lower risk of AL [42 (3.5%) vs. 73 (6.0%) events; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38-0.84; p = 0.005]. No difference was recorded between the two groups for SSI [73 (6.0%) vs. 85 (7.0%) events; OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.63-1.22; p = 0.441]. Regarding the secondary endpoints, no MBP resulted significantly associated with a lower risk of reoperation and LOS > 6days. This study confirms that no MBP before elective colorectal surgery is significantly associated with a lower risk of AL, reoperation rate, and LOS < 6days when compared with MBP.

Anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery: Contribution of gut microbiota and prediction approaches.

To monitor prospectively the occurrence of colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) in patients with colon cancer undergoing resectional surgery, characterizing the microbiota in both faeces and mucosal biopsies of anastomosis. In a second stage, we investigated the ability to predict CAL using machine learning models based on clinical data and microbiota composition. A total of 111 patients were included, from whom a faecal sample was obtained, as well as biopsy samples from proximal and distal sites in the healthy margins of the tumour piece. The microorganisms present in the samples were investigated using microbial culture and 16S rDNA massive sequencing. Collagenase and protease production was determined, as well as the presence of genes responsible for expressing enzymes with these activities. Machine learning analyses were developed using clinical and microbiological data. The incidence of CAL was 9.0%, and CAL was associated with collagenase/protease-producing Enterococcus. Significant differences were found in the microbiota composition of proximal and distal biopsy samples, but not in faecal samples, among patients who developed CAL. Clinical predictors of CAL were 5-day C-reactive protein and heart disease, whereas 3-day C-reactive protein and diabetes were negative predictors. Biopsy samples from surgical margins, rather than faecal samples, are the most appropriate samples for exploring the contribution of the intestinal microbiota to CAL. Enterococci are only enriched in the anastomosis after surgery, and their collagenases and proteases are involved in the degradation of the anastomotic scar.

The aortic calcification is a risk factor for colorectal anastomotic leakage.

The current pooling up analysis aimed to evaluate whether aortic calcification (AC) was a potential risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery. In this study, we searched studies in three databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on April 20, 2022. In order to investigate the association between AC and AL, the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of AC were pooled up. Our study was performed with RevMan 5.3 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We finally enrolled eight studies involving 1955 patients for statistical analysis. As for all patients, we found that AC could significantly increase the risk of AL after surgery (HR = 2.31, I2 = 0%, 95%CI = 1.58 to 3.38, P < 0.01). In five studies including patients undergoing colorectal surgery (benign diseases and cancers), AC was also a risk factor for AL (HR = 3.30, I2 = 2%; 95%CI = 1.83 to 5.95, P < 0.01). In terms of the other three studies that only included CRC patients, there was still a correction between AC and AL (HR = 1.80, I2 = 0%, 95%CI = 1.10 to 2.96, P = 0.02). Patients with AC were more likely to develop AL after colorectal surgery. Moreover, subgroup analysis suggested that AC was a predictor for AL after CRC surgery.

Non-Gastrointestinal Complications and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Anastomotic Leak After Colon Resection: A Propensity Matched Analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

Introduction: Anastomotic leak is a devastating complication after colorectal surgery. There is paucity of data on non-gastrointestinal complications after anastomotic leak in this population. We aimed to investigate non-gastrointestinal complications, as well as causes of major morbidity and mortality following anastomotic leak after colorectal resection and hypothesized that non-gastrointestinal complications after anastomotic leak are a sizable proportion of the overall morbidity and mortality in this population. Methods: We used the ACS NSQIP database, and searched for CPT codes for colorectal procedures with primary anastomosis between 2015-2019. The cohorts (anastomotic leak vs. no-leak) were aligned using propensity score matching, and 30-day mortality, length of stay, and readmission outcomes were compared. Results: We identified 4881 patients with anastomotic leak and 150331 patients with no-leak. The overall leak rate was 3.14%. Anastomotic leak group had an 85% longer length-of-stay. Predicted mean (95% CI) length-of-stay for the leak group was 10.2 (9.9-10.5) days vs. 5.5 (5.4-5.7) days for the no-leak group. Anastomotic leak was associated with a higher 30-day risk of unplanned return to the operating room (OR 34.5; 95% CI 27.2-43.8), and thirty-day mortality (OR 2.8; 95% 2.2-3.5). Anastomotic leak was associated with a higher incidence of pulmonary complications including: pneumonia (OR 4.4; 95% CI 3.5-5.6), unplanned intubation (OR 6.3; 95% CI 4.8-8.3), mechanical ventilation (OR 6.3; 95% CI 5.1-8.0), and pulmonary embolism (OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.6-7.0); cardiac complications, including myocardial infarction (OR 2.9 (95% CI 2.0-4.2) and cardiac arrest (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.1-4.9); and new-onset renal failure requiring dialysis (OR 3.8; 95% CI 2.6-5.5). There was no significant difference in risk of acute kidney injury (OR 1.1; 95% CI 0.6-2.0), and stroke (OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.9-3.6). Conclusion: Colorectal anastomotic leak independently lengthens length-of-stay, and is associated with increased mortality (2.7% vs. 7.2%) after colorectal surgery with an enteric anastomosis.

Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.

The aim of the present study is to assess the impact of Echelon Circular™ powered stapler (PCS) on left-sided colorectal anastomotic leaks and to compare results to conventional circular staplers (CCS). A single center cohort study was carried out on 552 consecutive patients, who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection and anastomosis to the rectum between December 2017 and September 2022. Patients who underwent powered circular anastomosis to the rectum were matched to those who had a conventional stapled anastomosis using a propensity score matching. Main outcomes were anastomotic leak (AL) rate, anastomotic bleeding, and postoperative outcomes. After adjusting cases with propensity score matching, two new groups of patients were generated: 145 patients in the PCS and 145 in the CCS. The two groups were homogeneous with respect to demographics and comorbidities on admission. Overall, AL occurred in 21 (7.3%) patients. No significant differences were observed with respect to AL (5.5% in PCS vs 9% in CCS; p = 0.66), fistula severity (p = 0.60) or reoperation rate (p = 0.65) in the two groups in study. A higher rate of anastomotic bleeding was observed in the CCS vs PCS (5.5% vs 0.7%, p = 0.03). At univariate analysis performed after propensity score matching, stapler diameter ≥ 31mm and age ≥ 70years were the only variable significantly associated with anastomotic leak (p = 0.001 and p = 0.031; respectively). The powered circular stapler has no impact on AL, while it could affect bleeding rate at the anastomotic site.

Cyanoacrylate in Colorectal Surgery: Is It Safe?

Anastomotic leakage (AL) of a gastrointestinal (GI) anastomosis continues to be an important complication in GI surgery. Since its introduction more than 60 years ago, Cyanoacrylate (CA) has gained popularity in colorectal surgery to provide "prophylaxis" against AL. However, although in surgical practice it is increasingly used, evidence on humans is still lacking. The aim of this study is to analyze in humans the safety of CA to seal colorectal anastomosis. All consecutive patients from Jannuary 2022 through December 2022 who underwent minimally invasive colorectal surgery were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Inclusion criteria were a histological diagnosis of cancer, a totally minimally invasive procedure, and the absence of intraoperative complications. 103 patients were included in the study; N-butyl cyanoacrylate with metacryloxisulfolane (Glubran 2®) was used to seal colorectal anastomosis, no adverse reactions to CA or postoperative complications related to inflammation and adhesions occurred; and only one case of AL (0.9%) was recorded. We can consider this study an important proof of concept on the safety of CA to seal colorectal anastomosis. It opens the possibility of starting prospective and comparative studies in humans to evaluate the effectiveness of CA in preventing colorectal AL.

Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Resection: Survey among the German CHIR-Net Centers.

(1) Background: A widely accepted algorithm for the management of colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) is difficult to establish. The present study aimed to evaluate the current clinical practice on the management of CAL among the German CHIR-Net centers. (2) Methods: An online survey of 38 questions was prepared using the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC) grading score of CAL combined with both patient- and surgery-related factors. All CHIR-Net centers received a link to the online questionary in February 2020. (3) Results: Most of the answering centers (55%) were academic hospitals (41%). Only half of them use the ISREC definition and grading for the management of CAL. A preference towards grade B management (no surgical intervention) of CAL was observed in both young and fit as well as elderly and/or frail patients with deviating ostomy and non-ischemic anastomosis. Elderly and/or frail patients without fecal diversion are generally treated as grade C leakage (surgical intervention). A grade C management of CAL is preferred in case of ischemic bowel, irrespective of the presence of an ostomy. Within grade C management, the intestinal continuity is preserved in a subgroup of patients with non-ischemic bowel, with or without ostomy, or young and fit patients with ischemic bowel under ostomy protection. (4) Conclusions: There is no generally accepted therapy algorithm for CAL management within CHIR-Net Centers in Germany. Further effort should be made to increase the application of the ISREC definition and grading of CAL in clinical practice.

How to reduce the colorectal anastomotic leakage? The MIRACLe protocol experience in a cohort in a single high-volume centre.

This article reports the results of a novel perioperative treatment implementing the gut microbiota to prevent anastomotic fistula and leakage (AL) in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections for cancer and represents the continuation of our pilot study on 60 cases. A series of 131 patients underwent elective colorectal surgery at the S. Eugenio Hospital (Rome-Italy) between December 1, 2020, and November 30, 2022, and received a perioperative preparation following the Microbiota Implementation to Reduce Anastomotic Colorectal Leaks (MIRACLe) protocol comprising oral antibiotics, mechanical bowel preparation and perioperative probiotics. The results obtained in the MIRACLe group (MG) were compared to those registered in a Control group (CG) of 500 patients operated on between March 2015 and November 30, 2020, who received a standard ERAS protocol. Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed to overcome patients' selection bias. Patients were categorised according to perioperative preparation (MIRACLe protocol vs standard ERAS protocol) into two groups: 118 patients were in post-matched MIRACLe group (pmMG) and 356 were in post-matched Control group (pmCG). In the pmMG, only 2 anastomotic leaks were registered, and the incidence of AL was just 1.7% vs. 6.5% in the pmCG (p = 0.044). The incidence of surgical site infections (1.7% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.536), reoperations (0.8% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.136) and postoperative mortality (0% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.200) was lower in pmMG. Additionally, the postoperative outcomes were better: the times to first flatus, to first stool and to oral feeding were shorter (1 vs. 2, 2 vs. 3 and 2 vs. 3days, respectively; p < 0.001). The postoperative recovery was faster, with a shorter time to discharge (5 vs. 6days; p < 0.001). The MIRACLe protocol was confirmed to be safe and significantly able to reduce anastomotic leaks in patients receiving elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer.

Systematic review of preoperative and intraoperative colorectal Anastomotic Leak Prediction Scores (ALPS)

ObjectiveTo systematically review preoperative and intraoperative Anastomotic Leak Prediction Scores (ALPS) and validation studies to evaluate performance and utility in surgical decision-making. Anastomotic leak (AL) is the most feared complication...

Colorectal Anastomotic Leak – Anything New?

Colorectal Anastomotic Leak – Anything New?

Fluid management and vasopressor use during colorectal surgery: the search for the optimal balance

BackgroundAlthough it is known that excessive intraoperative fluid and vasopressor agents are detrimental for anastomotic healing, optimal anesthesiology protocols for colorectal surgery are currently lacking.ObjectiveTo scrutinize the current hemodynamic practice and vasopressor use and their relation to colorectal anastomotic leakage.DesignA secondary analysis of a previously published prospective observational study: the LekCheck study.Study settingAdult patients undergoing a colorectal resection with the creation of a primary anastomosis.Outcome measuresColorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) within 30 days postoperatively, hospital length of stay and 30-day mortality.ResultsOf the 1548 patients, 579 (37%) received vasopressor agents during surgery. Of these, 201 were treated with solely noradrenaline, 349 were treated with phenylephrine, and 29 received ephedrine. CAL rate significantly differed between the patients receiving vasopressor agents during surgery compared to patients without (11.8% vs 6.3%, p < 0.001). CAL was significantly higher in the group receiving phenylephrine compared to noradrenaline (14.3% vs 6%, p < 0.001). Vasopressor agents were used more often in patients treated with Goal Directed Therapy (47% vs 34.6%, p < 0.001). There was a higher mortality rate in patients with vasopressors compared to the group without (2.8% vs 0.4%, p = 0.01, OR 3.8). Mortality was higher in the noradrenaline group compared to the phenylephrine and those without vasopressors (5% vs. 0.4% and 1.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, patients with intraoperative vasopressor agents had an increased risk to develop CAL (OR 2.1, CI 1.3–3.2, p = 0.001).ConclusionThe present study contributes to the evidence that intraoperative use of vasopressor agents is associated with a higher rate of CAL. This study helps to create awareness on the (necessity to) use of vasopressor agents in colorectal surgery patients in striving for successful anastomotic wound healing. Future research will be required to balance vasopressor agent dosage in view of colorectal anastomotic leakage.

Early stoma closure after low anterior resection is not recommended due to postoperative complications and asymptomatic anastomotic leakage

The safety of early stoma closure after lower anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer remains controversial. In this study, patients scheduled to undergo LAR and stoma creation for rectal cancer were recruited. In absence of anastomotic leakage on radiological examination, closure of the diverting ileostomy was performed within 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was incidence of the colorectal anastomosis leakage after early stoma closure. Because of the slow accrual rate, the study was closed before recruitment reached the planned number of patients (n = 20). Among the 13 patients enrolled between April 2019 and March 2021, early stoma closure was performed in seven patients (53.8%). Non-clinical anastomotic leakage, leakage identified only on radiological examination, occurred in five cases, resulting in rescheduling of stoma closure. One patient did not undergo early stoma closure due to ileus. After stoma closure, colorectal anastomotic leakage manifested in one case; its incidence rate was 14.2%. Surgical site infection occurred in 42.8% of patients. This study revealed that asymptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred frequently. Considering the low rate of successful cases and the high rate of complications, early stoma closure within 2 weeks after LAR should not be performed routinely. Trial registration: (UMIN000036382 registered on 03/04/2019).

Turnbull-Cutait Pull-through Operation: An Option to Restore Intestinal Continuity after Colorectal Anastomotic Leaks in Setting of Rectal Cancer

Lavryk, Olga MD; Duraes, Leonardo MD; Steele, Scott R MD, FACS; Hull, Tracy Lynn MD, FACS Author Information

Tube-in-tube endoscopic vacuum therapy for treatment of colorectal anastomotic leaks: A low-cost, patient-friendly, feasible and efficient technical modification of sponge-based endoscopic vacuum therapy.

Colorectal endoscopic vacuum therapy (CR EVT) is usually performed using sponges passed through the anus. It may be associated with patient discomfort and displacement of the aspiration tube. With the tube-in-tube endoscopic vacuum therapy modification (CR TT-EVT), it is possible to position the aspiration tube in the pelvic cavity through the abdominal wall. In addition, it allows frequent cleaning of the fistula, eliminates the need for programmed device changes, and enables a standardized approach to such a wide variety of fistulas, leaks, and perforations. Here is a technical note on how to perform CR TT-EVT, while we are at the early phase of our case series we have reached 100% of technical success.

The association between anastomotic leakage and health-related quality of life after colorectal cancer surgery.

Colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication. Studies on the impact of AL on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are scarce. We aimed to investigate the association between AL and HRQoL in colorectal cancer patients up to 2 years after diagnosis, and to evaluate whether AL is associated with a clinically relevant decrease in HRQoL over time. Patients diagnosed with Stage I-III colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgical resection with primary anastomosis between 2010 and 2017 were included. HRQoL was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30, represented by the summary score, and analysed at diagnosis and at 6 months and 2 years post-diagnosis. Multivariable linear regression was performed to assess the association between AL and HRQoL, while multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the association between AL and a clinically relevant HRQoL decrease (≥10 points) during follow-up compared to the time of diagnosis. In total, 1197 patients were included of whom 63 (5%) developed AL. AL was not associated with HRQoL at 6 months post-diagnosis nor at 2 years post-diagnosis. However, having AL was associated with an increased risk of a clinically relevant decrease in HRQoL at 6 months post-diagnosis (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.62-8.21) but not at 2 years after diagnosis (OR 1.91, 95% CI 0.62-5.93). Although AL was not associated with HRQoL at 6 months or 2 years post-diagnosis, AL was a determinant of a clinically relevant decrease in HRQoL at 6 months after diagnosis. Future work should identify feasible and effective strategies to prevent declines in QoL in this patient population.

Operative management of anastomotic leak after sigmoid colectomy for left-sided diverticular disease: Ileostomy creation may be as safe as colostomy creation.

The management of anastomotic leak after sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease has not been well defined. Specifically, there is a lack of literature on optimal types of reoperations for leaks. The aim of this study was to describe and compare reoperative approaches and their postoperative outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study using the NSQIP Colectomy Module (2012-2019) and single-institution chart review. Patients with diverticular disease who underwent elective sigmoid colectomy were included. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak requiring reoperation and management of anastomotic leak. Of 37,471 patients who underwent sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease, 1003 (2.7%) suffered an anastomotic leak, of whom 583 underwent reoperation. Of the 572 patients who were not initially diverted and underwent reoperation for leak, 302 (52.8%) were managed with stoma creation - 200 (35.0%) with colostomy and 102 (17.8%) with ileostomy. The remaining 47.2% underwent colectomy with reanastomosis, suturing of large bowel, and drainage. There were no differences in length of stay, readmission, or mortality between patients who underwent ileostomy or colostomy at reoperation (p > 0.05). Single-institution analysis demonstrated that 100% of patients with ileostomies underwent subsequent ileostomy closure, compared to 60% of patients with colostomies. In patients who suffer anastomotic leaks after sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease and undergo reoperations, ileostomy at the time of reoperation appears to be safe, with comparable results to colostomy. Ileostomies were more frequently closed than colostomies. When faced with a colorectal anastomotic leak, ileostomy creation may be considered.

Microbiota Phenotype Promotes Anastomotic Leakage in a Model of Rats with Ischemic Colon Resection.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after colorectal surgery, but the mechanism behind this complication is still not fully understood. Despite the advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, the complication rates have remained steady. Recently, it has been suggested that colon microbiota may be involved in the development of complications after colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of gut microbiota in the development of colorectal AL and their possible virulence strategies to better understand the phenomenon. Using 16S rRNA sequencing of samples collected on the day of surgery and the sixth day following surgery, we analyzed the changes in tissue-associated microbiota at anastomotic sites created in a model of rats with ischemic colon resection. We discovered a trend for lower microbial diversity in the AL group compared to non-leak anastomosis (NLA). There were no differences in relative abundance in the different types of microbial respiration between these groups and the high abundance of the facultative anaerobic Gemella palaticanis is a marker species that stands out as a distinctive feature.

A nomogram to predict the risk of colorectal anastomotic leakage combining inflammatory-nutritional and abdominal aorta calcium index.

Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication after colorectal cancer surgery, which affects the quality of life and the prognosis. This study aims to create a novel nomogram to predict the risk of anastomotic leakage for patients with colorectal cancer based on the preoperative inflammatory-nutritional index and abdominal aorta calcium index. 292 patients at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (Tianjin, China) from January 2018 to October 2021 who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with a primary anastomosis were retrospectively reviewed. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of multivariate logistic regression model. The calibration curves and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to verify the efficacy of the nomogram. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that tumor location (P = 0.002), preoperative albumin (P = 0.006), preoperative lymphocyte (P = 0.035), preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.024), and superior mesenteric artery calcium volumes score (P = 0.004) were identified as the independent risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage in patients with colorectal carcinoma. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of the multivariate analysis, and the C-index of the calibration curves was 0.913 (95%CI: 0.870-0.957) in the training cohort and 0.840 (95%CI: 0.753-0.927) in the validation cohort. The nomogram, combining basic variables, inflammatory-nutritional index and abdominal aorta calcium index, could effectively predict the possibility of postoperative anastomotic leakage for patients with colorectal cancer, which could guide surgeons to carry out the appropriate treatment for the prevention of anastomotic leakage.

Fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery

To evaluate the impact of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on the incidence of colorectal anastomotic leakage. We summarized the results of non-comparative and randomized clinical trials, as well as meta-analyses. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography changes the anastomosis site in 10% of patients due to inadequate blood supply to intestinal wall at the initially scheduled level. This method can decrease the incidence of «low» colorectal anastomosis leakage. Routine intraoperative fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green can become a standard method for prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage.

ICG angiography in prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage

To evaluate the effectiveness of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in assessment of colorectal anastomosis perfusion. A prospective single-center non-randomized comparative study included 85 patients with rectum and sigmoid colon cancer between September 2019 and March 2023. In the main group (n=41), we intraoperatively injected indocyanine green (ICG) IV to assess perfusion in the near infrared spectrum. In the control group (n=44), the same interventions were performed without ICG. In the main group, anterior resection of the rectum was performed in 23 (56.1%) patients with neoplasms of distal sigmoid colon and rectosigmoid tumors. Low anterior resection was performed in 18 (43.9%) cases. In the control group, the same procedures were carried out in 24 (54.5%) and 20 (45.5%) patients, respectively. After mobilization of the colon and ICG injection, we corrected resection line in 4 cases. As soon as anastomosis was formed and blood supply was controlled by ICG fluorescence angiography, we performed a water-bubble test to detect anastomotic leakage. Positive tests were detected in 4 (9.8%) and 5 (11.4%) patients of both groups, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 10 (24.4%) and 11 (27.3%) patients, respectively (p=0.94). Anastomosis failure was found in 1 and 7 patients, respectively. Anastomotic leakage grade «B» was significantly more common in the control group (2.4 and 13.6%, respectively, p=0.06). Anastomotic leaks were absent in all 4 patients who underwent resection level adjustment after intraoperative ICG angiography. Fluorescent luminescence will qualitatively improve intraoperative diagnosis of hypoperfusion of resection edges. Undoubtedly, this will reduce the incidence of colorectal anastomotic leaks caused by ischemia of large bowel wall.