To present our initial clinical experience with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients in Megavoltage (MV)-Topogram trial, for evaluating the potential of MV-Topogram-based alignment as an alternative to Megavoltage Computed Tomography (MVCT) in reducing imaging time and dose. Four mesothelioma patients were enrolled in an on-going Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved MV-Topograms clinical trial at our institute. Patients were set up using the clinical protocol employing red lasers. Anterior-Posterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) MV-Topograms were acquired using gantry angles of 0°/90° with 1 mm collimator opening, all MLC leafs open, 4 cm/s couch speed, and 12.5 s scanning time. Routine MVCT scans were performed immediately afterwards. MV-Topograms were reconstructed and enhanced using contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE). AP and LAT kilo voltage (kV) digital reconstructed topograms (DRT) images were reconstructed based on TomoTherapy geometry from CT simulation scans. Registrations between MV-Topograms and kV-DRT images were performed by a physicist manually. Due to image contrast limitations, the registration primarily involved aligning the carina. To be consistent with MV-Topograms, the same physicist re-aligned MVCTs to planning CT based on carina as well. Results were compared between MV-Topograms based shifts and the corresponding MVCT shifts. MV-Topogram and MVCT doses were measured using an ion-chamber in a 28 cm diameter cylindrical water-equivalent phantom at depths between 1-14 cm. The mean and standard deviation of shift discrepancies between MV-Topogram and MVCT were -0.52±1.35 mm, 2.51±2.40 mm, -0.24±4.09 mm in lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions for manual registrations. The dose ratio between MVCT and MV-Topogram ranged from 14.7 to 26.9 for depths between 1 cm and 14 cm, respectively. On average, the time required to acquire 38 cm long MVCT scans were five times more than a pair of 50 cm long MV-Topograms. Lateral and vertical shifts from MV-Topograms showed equivalent alignment results with MVCT. The greatest discrepancy between the MV Topograms and MVCT was in the longitudinal direction. This could be due to the breathing motion of the carina, which has been shown to be approximately 5 mm in the longitudinal direction. Substantial reductions of dose and acquisition time were observed for MV-Topogram. Challenges of employing bony anatomy for Topogram alignment were the relatively poor contrast and image artifacts caused by small dose rate fluctuations. Improving the linear accelerator dose stability would improve the ability to employ MV Topograms for patient alignment.
Read full abstract