we have students. Often we have disagreements among professionals concerning most effective methodologies or materials or technologies for in struction. However, some significant issues appear to stay with us unresolved decade after decade. In May of 2007 the Executive Council of the MLA released the document Languages and Higher Education: New Structures for a Changed World, based on the work of an ad hoc committee on foreign languages, which had been appointed by the council in 2004 to study the mat ter. This document points at agenda items that continue to present themselves in the areas of pol icy, research, institutional organization, curricu lum, and pedagogy. In this document before the Modern Language Journal readership, Transform ing Collegiate Foreign Language Departments, the committee made specific recommendations in the areas of research, coalition building, advo cacy, and configuration of foreign language de partments in American colleges and universities. The numerous institutions of higher education present many models of language departments in terms of organizational structure, curriculum, size, faculty, institutional requirements, finances, administrative support, technological sophistica tion, pedagogical emphases, and student out comes. The kaleidoscope of settings thus provides an infinite number of variations and possibilities for language learning. Having spent the last 4 decades primarily in the community college en vironment, my view is necessarily formed by the colors and patterns of the 2-year college setting. Change does not have to be large and dramatic in order to effect a difference in the environ ment. One click of the wheel of a kaleidoscope can produce a fantastic new image with a great modification in impact for the viewer. Likewise, a single change in a department can make a dra matic difference to the faculty and students in that institution.
Read full abstract