College Of Emergency Medicine Research Articles

Airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society (DAS), Association of Anaesthetists (AoA), British Society of Orthopaedic Anaesthetists (BSOA), Intensive Care Society (ICS), Neuro Anaesthesia and Critical Care Society (NACCS), Faculty of Prehospital Care and Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM).

There are concerns that airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury may exacerbate an existing neurological deficit, cause a new spinal cord injury or be hazardous due to precautions to avoid neurological injury. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines for practicing clinicians to support safe and effective airway management in this setting. An expert multidisciplinary, multi-society working party conducted a systematic review of contemporary literature (January 2012-June 2022), followed by a three-round Delphi process to produce guidelines to improve airway management for patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury. We included 67 articles in the systematic review, and successfully agreed 23 recommendations. Evidence supporting recommendations was generally modest, and only one moderate and two strong recommendations were made. Overall, recommendations highlight key principles and techniques for pre-oxygenation and facemask ventilation; supraglottic airway device use; tracheal intubation; adjuncts during tracheal intubation; cricoid force and external laryngeal manipulation; emergency front-of-neck airway access; awake tracheal intubation; and cervical spine immobilisation. We also signpost to recommendations on pre-hospital care, military settings and principles in human factors. It is hoped that the pragmatic approach to airway management made within these guidelines will improve the safety and efficacy of airway management in adult patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury.

How consistent are pre-alert guidelines? A review of UK ambulance service guidelines.

Ambulance pre-alerts are used to inform receiving emergency departments (EDs) of the arrival of critically unwell or rapidly deteriorating patients who need time-critical assessment or treatment immediately upon arrival. Inappropriate use of pre-alerts can lead to EDs diverting resources from other critically ill patients. However, there is limited guidance about how pre-alerts should be undertaken, delivered or communicated. We aimed to map existing pre-alert guidance from UK NHS ambulance services to explore consistency and accessibility of existing guidance. We contacted all UK ambulance services to request documentation containing guidance about pre-alerts. We reviewed and mapped all guidance to understand which conditions were recommended for a pre-alert and alignment with Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) and Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) pre-alert guidance. We reviewed the language and accessibility of guidance using the AGREE II tool. We received responses from 15/19 UK ambulance services and 10 stated that they had specific pre-alert guidance. We identified noticeable variations in conditions declared suitable for pre-alerts in each service, with a lack of consistency within each ambulance service's own guidance, and a lack of alignment with the AACE/RCEM pre-alert guidance. Services listed between four and 45 different conditions suitable for pre-alert. There were differences in physiological thresholds and terminology, even for conditions with established care pathways (e.g. hyperacute stroke, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction). Pre-alert criteria were typically listed in several short sections in lengthy handover procedure policy documents. Documents appraised were of poor quality with low scores below 35% for applicability and overall. There is a clear need for ambulance services to have both policies and tools that complement each other and incorporate the same list of pre-alertable conditions. Clinicians need a single, easily accessible document to refer to in a time-critical situation to reduce the risk of making an incorrect pre-alert decision.

Managing magnets: An audit of introduction of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine Best Practice Guideline.

To evaluate management of children and young people presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with magnet ingestion before and after new guidance. In May 2021, a National Patient Safety Agency and Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) Best Practice Guideline about management of ingested magnets was published. This was implemented in our department. Children and young people presenting after magnet ingestion were identified from SNOMED (coded routinely collected data) and X-ray requests between January 2016 and March 2022. Management was compared to national guidance. There were 138 patient episodes of magnet ingestion, with a rising incidence over the 5-year period. Following introduction of the guideline, there was a higher incidence of admission (36% vs. 20%) and operative intervention (15.7% vs. 8%). Use of follow-up X-ray increased from 56% to 90%. There was substantial variation in the management prior to guidance which reduced after introduction of the RCEM guidance. Management of magnet ingestion has become more standardised since introduction of the National RCEM Best Practice Guideline, but there is still room for improvement.

Refreshing the emergency medicine research priorities

BackgroundThe priorities for UK emergency medicine research were defined in 2017 by a priority setting partnership coordinated by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine in collaboration with the James Lind...

Developing the Royal College of Emergency Medicine's advanced clinical practitioners in the Wessex region: design, implementation and review of a regional training programme

Background: Since 2015, the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) has championed an advanced clinical practitioner (ACP) credentialling process for clinicians working in advanced practice roles in the emergency department. While this process ensures a standard of advanced practice that is both governable and robust, it requires structure and support to complete successfully. This article reports the design and implementation of a regional programme aimed at supporting trainees through the RCEM ACP training process to the point of credentialling. Methods: A regional training programme was implemented and a mixed-methods approach (that included a quantitative analysis of training programme completion rates and a qualitative review of trainee feedback) was used to analyse the outcomes. The programme incorporated a structured educational programme, educational supervision and annual review, alongside integration into the deanery school board and facilitation of training time. Results: Between 2016 and 2022, a total of 46 trainee RCEM ACPs were recruited to the programme. Of these, 19 had credentialled by spring 2022 and 20 were in ongoing training, aiming for credentialling. During this time, these participants accounted for 19% of the nationally credentialled ACP workforce (19 of 99). Since 2020, the first pass rate for programme trainees has been 71%, compared to the national average of 38%. Credentialled ACPs, when asked how well the programme prepared them to credential with the RCEM, responded positively, with most scoring the programme between 4 and 5, with 5 being marked as ‘excellent’. Free text comments in feedback on the programme were collated and reviewed for common themes resulting in key themes of ‘supportive’, ‘excellence’ and ‘adequate preparation for credentialling’. Conclusion: Meeting the criteria for RCEM credentialling as an ACP is a demanding process that requires support and structure. The development and implementation of a regional training programme not only meets these requirements but yields higher credentialling success rates and creates trainee satisfaction in the process.

Pediatric Magnet Ingestion, Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention: A European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Position Paper.

Magnet ingestion is a special category of foreign body ingestion associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly if it is associated with staggered ingestion of multiple magnets or with simultaneous ingestion of other metallic foreign bodies, especially button batteries. A special category of magnet ingestion is the ingestion of earth magnets, which have higher levels of magnetism and therefore, potentially, carries a worse outcome. Legislative bodies, scientific Societies and community-led initiatives have been implemented worldwide with the aim of mitigating the effects of this growing, yet avoidable potential medical emergency. A scoping literature review summarized epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and prevention, including an algorithm for the diagnosis and management of magnet ingestion is presented and compared to previously published reviews and position papers (North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, National Poison Center, Royal College of Emergency Medicine). The main emphasis of the algorithm is on identification of staggered/multiple magnet ingestion, and early joint gastroenterology and surgical consultation and management.

Management of transgender patients in critical care.

As clinicians working in critical care, it is our duty to provide all of our patients with the high-quality care they deserve, regardless of their gender identity. The transgender community continues to suffer discrimination from the media, politicians and general public. As healthcare workers we often pride ourselves on our ability to safely care for all patients. However, there remains a distinct lack of understanding surrounding the care of critically ill transgender patients. This is likely in part because the specific care of transgender patients is not included in the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine's, Royal College of Anaesthetists', Royal College of Physician's, or Royal College of Emergency Medicine's curriculum. There are several important considerations relevant for transgender patients in critical care including anatomical changes to the airway, alterations to respiratory and cardiovascular physiology and management of hormone therapy. Alongside this, there are simple but important social factors that exist, such as the use of patient pronouns and ensuring admittance to correctly gendered wards. In this review we will address the key points relevant to the care of transgender patients in critical care and provide suggestions on how education on the subject may be improved.

BACCN position statement on non‐medical prescribing in critical care

AbstractBackgroundThe British Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) published its first position statement on non‐medical prescribing (NMP) in critical care in 2009 (Bray et al., Nurs Crit Care. 2009;14:224‐234). Over the years, more nurses and other health care professionals have become non‐medical prescribers, and the BACCN have thus revisited and updated the statement.AimTo update the 2009 position statement on NMP in critical care to reflect contemporary guidance and practice.Study designA working group was established following an expression of interest to BACCN members, and the original BACCN position statement and literature review were updated using key databases. An electronic questionnaire was developed by the working group to describe current NMP practises and the authorization and prescribing of blood and blood components. It was distributed via email to 1861 BACCN members and on BACCN social media in October and November 2021.ResultsTwo hundred and fifty nine health care professionals from the four countries of the United Kingdom completed the survey, and of these 136 (52.5%) respondents were BACCN members. One hundred and five (40.4%) of the respondents described themselves as non‐medical prescribers, and of these, 57 (54.8%) were independent prescribers and 47 (45.2%) were supplementary and independent prescribers, with one respondent not revealing. The remaining 154 (59.4%) respondents were not registered as non‐medical prescribers. Ninety‐one (86.7%) of the respondents who were non‐medical prescribers reported making prescribing decisions on every clinical shift, and 67 (64.4%) of these audited their prescribing practises. Of the 105 who described themselves as non‐medical prescribers, 71 (67.6%) had been in their area of practice for more than 5 years before they became non‐medical prescribers, with 3 (2.8%) being in the practise area for less than 1 year.All seven statements from Bray et al's (2009) position statement were revised and updated following the survey results and review of the literature search.ConclusionsThe updated position statement is based upon new policy documents from a range of sources, including the Nursing and Midwifery Council, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. It takes account of the adult critical care patient pathway before, during and after an admission to critical care.Relevance to clinical practiceNon‐medical prescribing (NMP) should only be implemented to improve the safety and quality of care for the critically ill or deteriorating patient. The requirement for NMP needs to be determined locally by organizations, ensuring that the care of the critically ill and deteriorating patient is the main reason. NMP must not be used as a substitute for unsafe medical practice or poor medical prescribing practice. Non‐medical prescribers must adhere to the current Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Prescribing Competency Framework and must be registered with their professional regulatory body. Non‐medical prescribers must audit and evaluate their practice as well as ensuring continuing professional development. Non‐medical prescribers in critical care must consider how their own professional codes of conduct, scope of practice, standards and guidelines impact their prescribing decisions. Non‐medical prescribers must work collaboratively to ensure that continuity and transfer of care between care settings consider deprescribing and medicines reconciliation.

Step up to ST3 emergency medicine simulation course

The UK Emergency Medicine training pathway has three phases; Core (CT1-2), Intermediate (ST3), and Higher (ST4-6) [1]. The transition from Core to ST3 can be daunting – whilst not ‘registrars’, ST3s are often on ‘middle grade’ rotas. Trainees are expected to manage complex adult and paediatric cases with new portfolio requirements to demonstrate these competencies. They further develop leadership skills when supporting junior doctors and managing the department [2]. An ‘Introduction to ST3’ course was developed initially in the North West Deanery to address this transition. Using the original concepts, course content and format were adjusted for a Merseyside step up course. The redesigned three-day course contained workshops including ST3 challenges, paediatrics, night shifts, and wellbeing. 12 scenarios were organised into ‘leadership’ (sick medical and trauma patients), paediatrics (including major trauma and safeguarding), and ‘challenges’ (e.g. behavioural disturbance, burns, managing conflict with colleagues and supporting juniors). They took place in a simulation suite with either manikins or simulated patients. Data were analysed pre-course, post-course, and at one to two years post-course with thematic analysis used for free-text responses. 47 candidates took part in 2019–2021. Pre-course questionnaires showed a key concern was caring for paediatric patients. Other themes were supporting juniors, management skills, being an isolated leader, and confidence. Contemporaneous feedback showed the simulations and talks were rated positively throughout. Simulations were challenging and rated as a useful aspect. The highest rated talks have been night shift work (9.78/10, n=18), supervising others (9.67/10, n=12), and paediatrics (9.67/10, n=12). Improved confidence particularly in challenging situations has been a common theme. Lower rated talks from 2019 were replaced subsequently, and the course remains receptive to feedback. In 2021, ‘The Floor’ game [3] was incorporated for departmental management skills and participants found this particularly useful. One to two years later, candidates reiterated the importance of the course in their transition, particularly regarding paediatric cases. They highlighted the benefit of discussing portfolio requirements and the value of networking with peers. The step up course has been an important aid when transitioning to ST3 with feedback consistently positive at the time of the course and subsequently. Analysis of this feedback has informed improvements for the 2022 iteration happening shortly, and reinforced aspects including ‘The Floor’, to provide a supportive transition for trainees. As one trainee reported, the course ‘made me excited for ST3, [a] reminder why I’m an ED trainee’. 1. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine, 2021. Curriculum 2021. 2. Walthall K, editor. Introduction to ST3; Course Guide. 2019. 3. Focus Games, 2022. The Floor Game.

'Just in time' teaching using department internet searches.

Emergency departments (ED) are fast paced environments that cater for a wide range of medical conditions. The scope of information needed by emergency medicine (EM) physicians is broad, and decisions are time sensitive. This raises the question of how best to educate EM trainees so that they are comfortable when treating wide ranging conditions in time pressured situations? Curriculum-based teaching has been adopted by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) to facilitate a centralised approach to EM training. Although this model provides explicit and clearly identified learning outcomes, RCEM acknowledges it is deficient in ‘just in time’ and ‘on the job’ training for doctors. RCEM has expressed the need for innovative education strategies to help identify and address EM trainee's knowledge gaps. Our aim was to design education sessions that focused on our trainees needs rather than following a broad curriculum. The internet is the primary means by which EM doctors seek information for clinical questions, while working and emergency physicians average 1.35 internet searches per patient encounter.1 Knowing this, we went about analysing clinically relevant internet searches on our department computers to try and identify our doctor's frequently encountered knowledge gaps. Using this information, we were able to design half hour weekly education sessions. The education sessions involved a ‘rapid revision’ of the most frequently searched clinical topics from the previous week and one high acuity, low occurrence (HALO) topic. The session was delivered by a consultant using a blended approach of didactic lectures and practical demonstrations. To assess participant satisfaction, we adapted a validated questionnaire designed by the Centre for Advanced Learning and Teaching. We successfully facilitated focused revision of 28 topics over a 6-week period. Participant's satisfaction was evident by the fact that we saw global improvements in all of the post intervention questionnaire scores when compared with pre-intervention scores. Participants commented that it was ‘A very novel idea, content very relevant to everyday working practice’, ‘Great recap of topics and cases seen daily. Amazing new addition to the teaching session’ and ‘targeted and concise teaching’. Although this has been a very beneficial teaching practice, we did learn some lessons. The filtering and analysis of the internet search histories is very labour intensive and requires a team of educators to sustain long term. ED computers are used by nursing staff and non-EM medical staff. This meant that some of the searched topics were less relevant to EM doctors. Another issue with data capture is that doctors can use their phones to search clinical topics and therefore we will not pick up all clinical searches. Although we have shown that this form of ‘just in time’ teaching is feasible and enjoyable for participants, we have not been able to assess whether this form of teaching leads to improved knowledge acquisition or retention and we propose this should be next research question in this area.

'Better together: collaborative working between emergency medicine and critical care': 1 year on, is this framework still relevant?

In 2021 the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine collaborated to launch the 'Better together' framework to improve outcomes for critically unwell patients in the resuscitation room. One year on from the launch, it remains more relevant than ever.

91 Can ‘Pop-Up’ Style Simulation Teaching Improve The Care That Our Children and Young People’s Emergency Department Team Provide for Children Presenting with Fever?

We wanted to use simulation teaching to improve our multi-disciplinary team’s (MDT) management of children who presented to our Children and Young People’s ED (CYPED) with fever.The aims of the study were: first, to use simulation teaching to train the MDT in our CYPED, to improve the care delivered to children presenting with fever, measured as an improvement in our compliance with the Royal College of Emergency Medicine’s (RCEM) standards For cycle one of our audits, we looked at a sample of 136 children who presented to our CYPED with fever; 61 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included. To improve compliance to the RCEM standards Staff’s self-rated knowledge of the RCEM standards ‘Pop-up’ style simulation teaching can be used to improve the care that we offer our patients, as reflected by an improvement in staff’s confidence and in the department’s compliance with RCEM standards

EP.TH.507An Audit of Consent Documentation and Chaperone Use in Patients Presenting to Acute Settings with Breast Complaints

Abstract Aim To compare current practice of documenting consent and offering chaperones when performing breast examinations in the acute setting, with standards set by regulatory bodies (General Medical Council, Royal College of Emergency Medicine and Royal College of Surgeons). Method Data was collected retrospectively from all patients presenting with breast complaints to either the emergency department (ED) or the surgical assessment unit (SAU) over a 34-month period. From the clerk-in notes, the role (Dr/Nurse), grade (FY1 to consultant) and gender of the examiner was noted, as well as whether consent was documented and if a chaperone was offered. Results Of the 64 patients presenting in this time frame, consent was documented in 7 sets of notes (11%). Furthermore, 17 were offered a chaperone (27%), of which examiners correctly documented the name and role of the chaperone on 11 occasions. Results also demonstrated that ED trainees were most likely to offer a chaperone and GP trainees were the best at recording consent. It also revealed that although male examiners offered a chaperone 50% of the time compared to 6% of female examiners, women examiners were better at documenting consent when compared to their male counterparts. Conclusion The audit results indicate that there is significant room for improvement across all roles, grades and genders with regards to documentation of consent and the use of chaperones within the acute setting, in order to meet current standards of practice as set out by regulatory bodies.

285 Improving the Identification of Symptomatic or Ruptured AAA in The Emergency Department

Abstract Background rAAA is a life-threatening emergency. Without early treatment, it can be fatal. Patient > 50 presented with abdominal/back pain &hypotension or collapse a diagnosis of rAAA should be considered. Aortic ultrasound is recommended as it is the standard technique used in clinical practice and the screening program. Objective The project aimed to determine the number of patients who were screened for rAAA according to Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) guidelines and increase the adherence in clinical practice in the emergency department. Method Retrospective baseline data were obtained for 40 patients >50 with abdominal/back pain, hypotension and collapse between 1st of November to 31st of December 2019. Re-auditing was conducted after the first intervention (phase one), which included informing colleagues about RCEM guidance via emails and paper forms to record the scans’ results. In August 2020, a final cycle (phase two) was performed after educational posters were put up in the department. Results Baseline showed that out of the 40 patients only 10% of them received the U/S scan. After phase one, the audit demonstrated an increase in screening to 42%, and in the final cycle, the percentage improved to 53%. Conclusions Routine screening of rAAA were minimal in the emergency department. As a result of the project, more patients received the U/S screening and adherence to RCEM guidelines improved.

The use of a formative OSCE to prepare emergency medicine residents for summative OSCEs: a mixed-methods cohort study

BackgroundThe objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a part of emergency medicine (EM) examinations such as the Masters of Medicine in Emergency Medicine (MMed) examination and the equivalent Member of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (MRCEM) examination. The use of formative OSCEs to prepare EM residents for summative OSCEs has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the role of formative OSCEs in preparing EM residents for the MMed and MRCEM OSCE.MethodsThis was an observational, retrospective, mixed-methods cohort study. We analysed data from formative OSCEs conducted by the National Healthcare Group EM residency programme from 2013 to 2019, and from a questionnaire distributed to all residents during the study period. Residents’ formative OSCE participation and scores were compared with first-attempt summative OSCE success. Qualitative analysis of residents’ opinions on the usefulness of the formative OSCE was performed.ResultsForty-three of the 50 (86.0%) residents attended at least one formative OSCE. Of the 46 who responded to the questionnaire, 40 (87.0%) had attempted and succeeded in the MMed or MRCEM OSCE, of whom 35 (87.5%) had succeeded on the first attempt. Residents who succeeded in the summative OSCE on the first attempt tended to have higher proximate (mean = 70.6, SD = 8.9 vs mean = 64.3, SD = 10.8) and mean (mean = 67.4, SD = 7.1 vs mean = 62.8, SD = 7.3) formative OSCE scores. All 8/40 (20.0%) residents who attended more than three formative OSCEs succeeded in the summative OSCE on their first attempt. Residents’ formative OSCE scores tended to improve with successive formative OSCEs, demonstrating a positive training effect. All residents felt that the formative OSCE was useful in preparing them for the summative OSCE.ConclusionsParticipation in multiple formative OSCEs was beneficial in preparing residents for the summative OSCE. The formative OSCE was useful in familiarising residents with the examination, giving them an opportunity to perform in near-examination conditions, and providing feedback to residents and faculty about their progress. Our findings may support the implementation of formative OSCEs in other training programmes to prepare learners for high-stake summative OSCEs.

Rapidly established guidelines for the diagnosis and management of vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT)-a double-edged sword?

Rapidly established guidelines for the diagnosis and management of vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT)-a double-edged sword?

The Royal College of Emergency Medicine's curriculum in the UK.

The Royal College of Emergency Medicine's curriculum in the UK.

UK multisite evaluation of the impact of clinical educators in EDs from a learner’s perspective

BackgroundIn England, demand for emergency care is increasing while there is also a staffing shortage. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) suggested that appointment of senior doctors as clinical...

“Are they medically fit?” - clinical audit on the physical assessment of mental health patients in A&E

AimsA&E departments are busy places; with quick triage decisions required to prioritise urgent care to those who need it. This requires the use of predictions based on past experiences and probabilities. However, this runs the risk of patients being categorised by the prejudices and stigmas associated with their conditions; particularly in the case of mental health patients and the assumption they are otherwise ‘medically fit’. This is especially of concern when considering that mental health often deteriorates during acute physical illness.Following a number of dangerous ‘near misses’, this audit was conducted to review the practice of triage and physical assessment of patients presenting to A&E with mental health symptoms. The aim was to compare practice against the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) guidelines, to identify repeated issues and systemic vulnerabilities which endangered patients through a lack of appropriate assessment.MethodUsing the online Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system, the notes of 100 patients referred to the Bolton Mental Health Liaison Team (MHLT) from Bolton A&E were reviewed. They were assessed for whether or not the patients had been appropriately physically assessed, according to the RCEM guidelines, before being referred to the MHLT. These results were analysed anonymously.ResultThe findings showed that less than half (44%) of all referred patients had physical observations taken at all, and even fewer (37%) received the full, physical assessment before referral. Out of the patients identified as having abnormal physical observations only 58% were acted on. Many patients had no history or triage assessment completed; with triage referrals consisting of only the words “mental health”. Most importantly, the audit identified this lack of adequate physical assessment resulted in a 2% ‘near miss’ rate, including a missed diabetic ketoacidosis and delayed treatment for a missed overdose.ConclusionFollowing this audit and the above result, it is clear that triage and physical assessment of mental health patients attending A&E is inadequate; with resulting risk of severe consequences to patients. It is therefore recommended to co-develop joint guidelines and teaching to guide A&E and MHLT practitioners on the process of completing the physical assessment prior to referral. It is also recommended to repeat this audit throughout other hospital trusts, in order to review the local referral pathways to ensure adequate physical assessment to avoid any ‘near misses’ or serious incidents.

Cliff Mann: instrumental in developing new clinical standards for urgent and emergency care

Photo credit: Richard Smith Asked by The BMJ who was the person in his life whom he would most like to thank, Clifford Mann named his first comprehensive school form...