Reviewed by: Remembering the Roman Republic: Culture, Politics, and History under the Principate by Andrew B. Gallia Katherine Liong Andrew B. Gallia. Remembering the Roman Republic: Culture, Politics, and History under the Principate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Pp. xiv + 319. US $95. ISBN 9781107012608. Interest in applying social theories of memory to the study of the ancient world has gained pace steadily since Jan Assmann introduced the concept of kulturelle Gedächtnis to the field nearly 30 years ago.1 Andrew Gallia’s book, which is an expanded version of his doctoral dissertation (University of Pennsylvania, 2003), joins a growing body of work on public memory in Rome, including Alain Gowing’s similarly themed monograph Empire and Memory (2005).2 In contrast to Gowing’s focus on individual authors/texts and two architectural exemplars from the period ad 14–117, Gallia traces the mnemonic subtexts of architecture, coin types, literature, moral reforms, and rhetoric in the five decades following the overthrow of Nero. His efforts to understand “the interaction of social memory and cultural identity in the face of profound historical change” (7) yield a fascinating and provocative insight into Imperial Rome’s often uneasy relationship with its Republican heritage. The discussion consists of six case studies that represent the time period in question evenly (Gowing passes over Flavian Rome). An introduction describes the connection between cultural memory and a society’s understanding of its past. The methodological framework is provided by Maurice Halbwach’s theory of collective memory, Pierre Nora’s concept of lieux de mémoire, and Assmann’s model of cultural memory.3 Chapter 1, “Freedom,” examines the prominence of libertas as a political catchword in the turmoil of ad 68–69. Gallia demonstrates that the ideal of libertas both polarized the conflict by rousing culturally habituated opposition to slavery and tyranny and provided legitimacy to Vindex’s rebellion (and, subsequently, to Galba’s accession) by furnishing continuity with Republican libertas and the “restored” libertas first promoted by Augustus. Chapter 2, “Rebuilding,” concerns Vespasian’s reconstruction of the Capitoline temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus following the [End Page 263] fire of ad 69. Here the malleability of public memory is revealed by Vespasian’s successful downplaying of the temple’s association with Republican libertas in favour of Jupiter’s imperial attributes and the Flavians’ proven military prowess. Chapters 3, 4, and 5 explore the changing nature of the remembered Republic during the reigns of Domitian and Trajan, in the areas of religion/morality, oratory, and warfare, respectively. In Chapter 3, “Control,” Gallia evaluates Domitian’s controversial execution of the Vestal Virgin Cornelia for (alleged) incest. The analysis is framed by Pliny the Younger’s damning account of the incident in the Epistles (4.11), which places the episode in the broader context of Domitian’s unpopular moral reforms. Gallia’s rationalization of Domitian’s severitas steers his argument toward precedent rather than memory proper, but his observation of the competing traditions at stake—Domitian’s mandate as pontifex maximus, the sanctity of the Vestals, and the emperor’s supreme potestas— illustrates well how multiple memories could operate simultaneously. The state of the aristocratic tradition of oratory is the subject of Chapter 4, “Persuasion,” which surveys the attitudes expressed in Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus. This chapter is the only direct overlap with Gowing (Chapter 4), but whereas Gowing emphasizes how Cicero is remembered in the dialogue, Gallia is interested in how Maternus separates past and present. In addition to being the only interlocutor to view the Republic as a bygone era, Maternus consigns Republican-style oratory to the political upheaval of that period and proposes “nothing less than a new model for the Principate” (169). Gallia’s reading of Maternus’ retirement from oratory to poetry as a political act (in light of Tacitus’ association of libertas with the freedom to offend—see, for example, Dial. 10.8), is perceptive and shows how strongly the Imperial elite identity remained bound up in Republican customs and values, even after the traditional structures had lapsed. The literary theme continues into Chapter 5, “Inscription,” where Silius Italicus’ Punica and Frontinus’ Strategemata are examined as literary monuments to Republican warfare. Authorial memory...
Read full abstract