Collaborative Quality Initiative Research Articles

The Michigan Collaborative for Type 2 Diabetes (MCT2D): Development and implementation of a statewide collaborative quality initiative

BackgroundType 2 diabetes (T2D) is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases worldwide and a leading cause of cardiorenal disease and mortality. Only one-third of individuals with T2D receive care as recommended by the American Diabetes Association’s clinical practice guidelines. Effective strategies are needed to accelerate the implementation of guideline concordant T2D care.MethodsThe Michigan Collaborative for Type 2 Diabetes (MCT2D) is a statewide population health collaborative quality initiative (CQI) developed to improve the care of all people with T2D in Michigan. MCT2D has developed a learning health system with physician organizations and their constituent practices to support quality improvement initiatives focused on (1) improving use of guideline-directed pharmacotherapy to improve cardiorenal outcomes, (2) increasing evidence-based use of continuous glucose monitoring, and (3) supporting use of lower carbohydrate eating patterns.ResultsBetween 2021 and 2022, MCT2D recruited 28 of the 40 Michigan-based physician organizations participating in Blue Cross’ Physician Group Incentive Program with 336 constituent practices and 1357 physicians in primary care (304), endocrinology (21) and nephrology (11). In January 2022, baseline data included a sample of 96,140 unique individuals with T2D. The baseline HbA1c was ≤ 7.0% for 66.3% of patients (n = 32,787), while 14.9% of patients had a most recent HbA1c ≥ 8.0% (n = 7,393). The most recent body mass index (BMI) was ≥ 30.0 for 64.8% of patients (n = 38,516).DiscussionMCT2D has organized a statewide collaborative to recruit and engage a diverse and large set of physician organizations and their constituent practices. This is a promising opportunity to accelerate adoption of guideline-concordant care for people with T2D and may be a model for other state or regional collaboratives. Future directions include specific evidence-based interventions targeted at reducing diabetes-linked comorbidities and associated healthcare costs as well as strategies focused on T2D prevention among at-risk populations.

The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Survivorship: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Database Analysis

BackgroundThe utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has remained low when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), possibly due to higher rates of revision and reoperation. This study aimed to quantify surgeon UKA case-volumes and measure the effect of surgeon volume on early revision. We hypothesized that surgeons who have high case volumes would have lower revision rates compared to medium- and low-volume surgeons. MethodsPrimary UKAs were performed between February 2012 and November 2021, and associated revisions were identified utilizing the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. Surgeon information, including total cases and annual UKA volume, was collected. Case volume per year was stratified as High (≥ 35 cases per year), Medium (15 to 34 cases per year), and low (< 15 cases per year). ResultsThere were a total of 15,542 UKAs performed. Of these, 701 (4.5%) were revised, and 412 (58.8%) revisions occurred within 2 years. Of the 287 surgeons who performed an UKA in the registry, 237 (82.6%) were low-volume surgeons, 36 (12.5%) were medium-volume, and 14 (4.9%) were high-volume. High-volume surgeons were more likely to operate on older patients (P < 0.01), Medicare patients (P < 0.01), and patients who had American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of III and IV (P < 0.01). High-volume surgeons had significantly lower 5-year revision rates compared to medium and low-volume surgeons (high: 4.3% (95% confidence interval: 3.7 to 4.9), medium: 5.2% (4.4 to 6.1), low: 7.2% (6.4 to 8.0); P < 0.001). In comparison, the 5-year revision rate for TKA in Michigan was 3.0% (95% confidence interval: 2.9 to 3.1). ConclusionsWhen UKAs were performed by high-volume surgeons in the state of Michigan, there was better survivorship when compared to low-and medium-volume surgeons. High-volume surgeons were more likely to perform UKA on older patients, Medicare patients, and patients who had American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of III and IV. The revision rate for the high-volume surgeons still exceeded the 5-year revision rate for TKA in Michigan.

The role of subcutaneous fat and BMI in predicting surgical outcomes and patient reported outcomes in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess if subcutaneous fat (SCF) or BMI is a predictor of surgical complications and patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsPatients who underwent robotic-assisted primary THAs at one institution between 2018 and 2020 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Prior to surgery, computed tomography (CT) was used to measure SCF in the posterolateral quadrant of the hip. SCF was measured 3 centimeters (cm) proximal to the greater trochanter (PGT) and 3 cm inferior to the distal tip of the greater trochanter (DGT).Measurements were normalized to the size of the patient's bony anatomy by dividing the subcutaneous fat area measurement by the transverse diameter of the femur 10 cm inferior to the tip of the greater trochanter. Patients were divided into quintiles determined by SCF distribution around the mean (groups 1-5) and BMI (BMI<25, BMI 25-29.9, BMI 30-34.9, BMI 35-39.9, and >40). Ninety day outcomes and PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information System) scores were acquired from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) database preoperatively, at 14-112 days post-operative and at the latest follow up. ResultsThere were 175 patients identified with a mean age of 63.83 years (range 27-89) and a mean BMI of 30.73kg/m2 (range 18.2-48.4). Interclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.9 in all PGT, DGT, and GT measurements. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) found there was a significantly shorter time from incision to closure in quintiles 1 and 3 when compared to the SCF quintile 5 (p<0.05) and that there was a significantly shorter time from incision to closure in BMI categories 1, 2, and 3 when compared to BMI category 5 (BMI > 40). There were no differences between SCF and BMI as predictive of length of stay, transfusion status, infection, or PROMIS scores. ConclusionIt can be concluded that hip SCF on axial CT images can reliably measure SCF and is predictive of time from incision to closure, but it does not show a significant difference in predicting the length of stay, infection, or PROMIS scores when compared to BMI.

Developing a manual clinical trials screening process in a diverse southern gynecologic oncology practice in the Deep South.

e23209 Background: At this time, there is no standard clinical trial screening process or definition that has been adopted within Gynecologic Oncology. In our low resource, highly diverse Gynecologic Oncology patient population, we sought to create an equitable, adaptable, manual screening process that better reflected our patient population. Our objective is to describe our clinical trial screening process and our success in improving trial enrollment and a matched trial portfolio. Methods: An IRB-approved, QI project was implemented in July 2022 to evaluate trial access for Gyn Onc patients. First, screenable events were defined as: the start of one’s first scheduled visit, bi-monthly tumor boards, weekly pre-op meetings, and by keeping track of on a shared Epic list. Potential patients were those with a screenable event: new patients or diagnoses, regimen changes, progressions, and recurrences. Events were categorized into screen positive or screened no trial available. Screen positives were further categorized as screen fail, screen positive, enrollment failure, or enrolled. Data about patients was collected via weekly research team meetings. Monthly meetings occurred to review progress. This data was compared to trials available, number of patients with trail available, and those that enrolled. Reasons for enrollment fails were tracked to improve access and anticipate barriers. Results: Overall demographic data of patients was collected. The average age of participants was 60.67 years (SD = 13.45), and the average distance to a treatment center was 59.27 miles (SD = 137.43). Other demographics are presented in Table 1. For each month, the percentages of “screen no trial available (SNTA)” events and patients who screened positive and did enroll on trial were recorded. Over time, SNTA rates stayed stable, but enrollment increased. Patient preference accounted for 32.8% of enrollment fails (n = 42), pre-existing symptoms/conditions accounted for 23.4% (n = 30), and distance/location accounted for 21.1% (n = 27). During a time of high employee turnover in the summer months of 2023, there was a rise in enrollment fails due to staffing (n = 6, 4.7%). Conclusions: Through a collaborative quality initiative, we describe an effective process of clearly defining and tracking our patient population and ‘screenable events’ for which all patients are screened and offered trial participation if eligible. We show that we improved understanding of the patient population, built a clinical trial portfolio better matched to population served, exceeded national averages for enrolling patients on trials, and are moving toward improved number eligible over time. [Table: see text]

Improving outcomes in emergency general surgery: Construct of a collaborative quality initiative.

Emergency general surgery conditions are common, costly, and highly morbid. The proportion of excess morbidity due to variation in health systems and processes of care is poorly understood. We constructed a collaborative quality initiative for emergency general surgery to investigate the emergency general surgery care provided and guide process improvements. We collected data at 10 hospitals from July 2019 to December 2022. Five cohorts were defined: acute appendicitis, acute gallbladder disease, small bowel obstruction, emergency laparotomy, and overall aggregate. Processes and inpatient outcomes investigated included operative versus nonoperative management, mortality, morbidity (mortality and/or complication), readmissions, and length of stay. Multivariable risk adjustment accounted for variations in demographic, comorbid, anatomic, and disease traits. Of the 19,956 emergency general surgery patients, 56.8% were female and 82.8% were White, and the mean (SD) age was 53.3 (20.8) years. After accounting for patient and disease factors, the adjusted aggregate mortality rate was 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-3.7), morbidity rate was 27.6% (95% CI, 27.0-28.3), and the readmission rate was 15.1% (95% CI, 14.6-15.6). Operative management varied between hospitals from 70.9% to 96.9% for acute appendicitis and 19.8% to 79.4% for small bowel obstruction. Significant differences in outcomes between hospitals were observed with high- and low-outlier performers identified after risk adjustment in the overall cohort for mortality, morbidity, and readmissions. The use of a Gastrografin challenge in patients with a small bowel obstruction ranged from 10.7% to 61.4% of patients. In patients who underwent initial nonoperative management of acute cholecystitis, 51.5% had a cholecystostomy tube placed. The cholecystostomy tube placement rate ranged from 23.5% to 62.1% across hospitals. A multihospital emergency general surgery collaborative reveals high morbidity with substantial variability in processes and outcomes among hospitals. A targeted collaborative quality improvement effort can identify outliers in emergency general surgery care and may provide a mechanism to optimize outcomes. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

What are the features of high-performing quality improvement collaboratives? A qualitative case study of a state-wide collaboratives programme

ObjectivesDespite their widespread use, the evidence base for the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives remains mixed. Lack of clarity about ‘what good looks like’ in collaboratives remains a persistent problem....

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Outcomes and Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Neighborhood Deprivation Indices.

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are important factors in the delivery of orthopaedic care. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and both the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) database was utilized to identify TKA cases for inclusion. Demographic characteristics and medical history were documented. The SVI, its subthemes, and the ADI were analyzed. Outcome data included length of stay, discharge disposition, postoperative change in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), 90-day incidences of emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, death, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), periprosthetic fracture, implant failure, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and all-cause reoperation. Database cross-referencing was completed to document aseptic and septic revisions beyond 90 days postoperatively. Bivariate quartile-stratified and multivariable analyses were used to associate deprivation metrics with outcomes. A total of 19,321 TKA cases met inclusion criteria. Baseline patient characteristics varied among the SVI and/or ADI quartiles, with patients of non-White race and with a greater number of comorbidities noted in higher deprivation quartiles. Higher SVI and/or ADI quartiles were correlated with an increased rate of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (p < 0.05). A higher SVI and/or ADI quartile was associated with increased incidences of ED visits and readmissions postoperatively (p < 0.05). DVT and/or PE and long-term aseptic revision were the complications most strongly associated with higher deprivation metrics. Upon multivariable analysis, greater length of stay and greater incidences of ED visits, readmissions, DVT and/or PE, and aseptic revision remained significantly associated with greater deprivation based on multiple metrics. Greater deprivation based on multiple SVI subthemes, the composite SVI, and the ADI was significantly associated with increased length of stay, non-home discharge ED visits, and readmissions. The SVI and the ADI may be important considerations in the perioperative assessment of patients who undergo TKA. Prognostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Modern robotics platform associated with reduced 90-day complications in hospital setting

BACKGROUND: Early complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) associated with modern robotics platforms integrated with digital balancing technology have not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare 90-day complication rates between a manual technique and a modern robotic-assisted ligament balancing TKA platform. METHODS: 895 primary TKA procedures from a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed (614 manual TKA, 281 using a modern robotics platform with an integrated digitally controlled ligament balancing device). Post-operative complications within the 90-day episode of care were recorded by the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. Differences in complication rates between techniques were further divided into inpatient hospital, outpatient hospital, and ambulatory surgery center (ASC) cohorts. RESULTS: In the pooled hospital cohort and inpatient hospital cohort, ‘Return to OR’ was significantly lower for the robotic assisted group (1.3% vs 5.2% and 0% vs 4.9%, respectively, p&lt; 0.0370). Specifically, the need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) was reduced for the robotics group (0.0% vs 2.5%, p= 0.0352). No differences in overall complication rate or cause of complication was found between manual and robotics cases for the hospital outpatient and ASC cohorts (p⩾ 0.68). CONCLUSION: Within the hospital setting, robotic assisted ligament balancing technology was associated with reduced 90-day postoperative complications for ‘Return to OR’ and MUA.

Institutional Structures and Processes to Support Sepsis Care: A Multihospital Study.

To identify opportunities for improving hospital-based sepsis care and to inform an ongoing statewide quality improvement initiative in Michigan. Surveys on hospital sepsis processes, including a self-assessment of practices using a 3-point Likert scale, were administered to 51 hospitals participating in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium, a Collaborative Quality Initiative sponsored by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, at two time points (2020, 2022). Forty-eight hospitals also submitted sepsis protocols for structured review. Multicenter quality improvement consortium. Fifty-one hospitals in Michigan. None. Of the included hospitals, 92.2% (n = 47/51) were nonprofit, 88.2% (n = 45/51) urban, 11.8% (n = 6/51) rural, and 80.4% (n = 41/51) teaching hospitals. One hundred percent (n = 51/51) responded to the survey, and 94.1% (n = 48/51) provided a sepsis policy/protocol. All surveyed hospitals used at least one quality improvement approach, including audit/feedback (98.0%, n = 50/51) and/or clinician education (68.6%, n = 35/51). Protocols included the Sepsis-1 (18.8%, n = 9/48) or Sepsis-2 (31.3%, n = 15/48) definitions; none (n = 0/48) used Sepsis-3. All hospitals (n = 51/51) used at least one process to facilitate rapid sepsis treatment, including order sets (96.1%, n = 49/51) and/or stocking of commonly used antibiotics in at least one clinical setting (92.2%, n = 47/51). Treatment protocols included guidance on antimicrobial therapy (68.8%, n = 33/48), fluid resuscitation (70.8%, n = 34/48), and vasopressor administration (62.5%, n = 30/48). On self-assessment, hospitals reported the lowest scores for peridischarge practices, including screening for cognitive impairment (2.0%, n = 1/51 responded "we are good at this") and providing anticipatory guidance (3.9%, n = 2/51). There were no meaningful associations of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Management Bundle performance with differences in hospital characteristics or sepsis policy document characteristics. Most hospitals used audit/feedback, order sets, and clinician education to facilitate sepsis care. Hospitals did not consistently incorporate organ dysfunction criteria into sepsis definitions. Existing processes focused on early recognition and treatment rather than recovery-based practices.

Impact and value of olanzapine as part of a 4-drug regimen in patients receiving high emetic risk chemotherapy.

293 Background: The Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium, MOQC, has increased the use of olanzapine as part of a 4-drug antiemetic regimen for high emetic risk chemotherapy in many of its 50 practices across Michigan. The purpose of this project was to estimate the impact of olanzapine prescribing on health care utilization and subsequent savings in healthcare utilization payments in patients with breast cancer on (neo)adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) for breast cancer. Methods: Multipayer claims data were used from the Michigan Value Collaborative (MVC), a collaborative quality initiative of over 100 hospitals and 40 physician organizations with the goal of improving healthcare value. We identified a cohort of female patients with a 90-day episode of care for breast cancer resection between 2016-2021 who received chemotherapy with AC as (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were covered by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan insurance plans or Medicare. Each patient was attributed to one practice using National Provider Identifiers on professional claims. Facility claims were used to identify inpatient admissions and emergency department (ED) visits across the patient’s course of chemotherapy, up to 21 days following final chemotherapy. Practice-level use of olanzapine abstracted by MOQC as part of ASCO’s Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI™) data collection was used to determine whether each patient's chemotherapy treatment began when the practice had “high” (≥25%) or “low” (&lt;25%) rates of olanzapine use for high emetic risk chemotherapy. We compared healthcare utilization among patients treated by high- vs. low-prescriber practices and calculated the estimated differences in price-standardized payments attributed to olanzapine use. Results: We identified 1,891 total patients attributed to 45 MOQC practices; 922 patients were attributed to 15 practices that eventually became high prescribers. Patients treated by a high olanzapine prescribing practice had significantly lower hospitalization rates (10%) during chemotherapy compared to patients treated when their attributed practice was a low olanzapine prescriber (15%, p=0.02). There was no difference in the proportion of patients visiting the ED. The mean per-patient price-standardized insurance payment for inpatient hospitalization for this cohort was $12,007. Increased use of olanzapine led to an estimated payment savings of $334,095 in prevented hospitalizations among 525 patients treated when their attributed practice had a high olanzapine prescribing rate. Conclusions: In this patient sample, practice use of olanzapine in ≥ 25% of patients on high emetic risk chemotherapy was associated with significant reductions in the risk of hospitalization. As the proportion of patients receiving olanzapine increases, we expect even greater reductions in the risk of hospitalization and greater cost savings.

Use and Outcomes of Peripheral Vasopressors in Early Sepsis-Induced Hypotension Across Michigan Hospitals: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundVasopressors are traditionally administered via central access, but newer data suggest peripheral administration may be safe and avoid delays and complications associated with central line placement. Research questionHow commonly are vasopressors initiated through peripheral IVs in routine practice? Is vasopressor initiation route associated with in-hospital mortality? Study design and methodsThis retrospective cohort study included adults hospitalized with sepsis (11/2020-9/2022) at 29 hospitals in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium, a Collaborative Quality Initiative sponsored by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. We assessed route of early vasopressor initiation, factors and outcomes associated with peripheral initiation, and timing of central line placement. Results594 patients received vasopressors within 6 hours of hospital arrival and were included in this study. Peripheral vasopressor initiation was common (400/594, 67.3%). Patients with peripheral vs central initiation were similar; body mass index was the only patient factor independently associated with initiation route (aOR of peripheral initiation [per 1 kg/m2 increase]: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.97-1.00, p=0.015). Hospital had a large impact on initiation route (median OR: 2.19, 95%CI: 1.31-3.07). Compared to central, peripheral initiation was faster (median 2.5 vs 2.7 hours from hospital arrival, p=0.002) but associated with less initial norepinephrine use (84.3% vs 96.8%, p=0.001). We found no independent association between initiation route and in-hospital mortality (32.3% vs 42.2%, aOR 0.66, 95%CI: 0.39-1.12). There was no documented tissue injury from peripheral vasopressors. Of patients with peripheral initiation, 135/400 (33.8%) never had a central line placed. InterpretationPeripheral vasopressor initiation was common across Michigan hospitals and had practical benefits, including expedited vasopressor administration and avoidance of central line placement in one-third of patients. However, there was wide practice variation not explained by patient case-mix and lower use of first-line norepinephrine with peripheral administration, suggesting additional standardization may be needed.

The Differential Effect of COVID on Total Joint Arthroplasty Between Hospital and Ambulatory Surgery Centers/Hospital Outpatient Departments: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Analysis.

Coronavirus disease (COVID) created unprecedented challenges, especially for high-volume elective subspecialties like total joint arthroplasty. Limited inpatient capacity and resource conservation led to new outpatient selection criteria and site of service changes. As a Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Quality Collaborative Initiative quality project, demographic changes, complications, and differential effects on inpatient vs outpatient centers pre- and post-COVID were analyzed. The registry identified all total joint arthroplasty at hospitals and ASCs/HOPDs between 07/2019-12/2019 and 07/2020-12/2020. These intervals represented pre-COVID and post-COVID elective surgery shutdowns. Case volumes, demographics, and 90-day complications were compared. Comparing 2020 to 2019, hospital volumes decreased (-9% total hip arthroplasty [THA],-17% total knee arthroplasty [TKA]), and ambulatory surgery center (ASC)/hospital outpatient department (HOPD) increased (+84% THA,+125% TKA). Entering 2020, ASC/HOPD patients were older (P= .0031, P < .0001: THA, TKA), had more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 (P= .0105, P= .0021), fewer attended joint class (P < .0001, P < .0001), and more hips were women (P= .023). Hospital patients had higher preoperative pain scores (P= .0117, P < .0001; THA, TKA), less joint education attendance (P < .0001, P < .0001), younger TKAs (P= .0169), and more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 (0.0009). After propensity matching, there were no significant differences between site of service for 90-day fractures, deep vein thromboses or pulmonary embolisms, infection, or hip dislocations. Hospital THAs had higher readmissions (P= .0003) and TKAs had higher 30-day emergency department visits (P= .005). ASC/HOPD patients were prescribed higher oral morphine equivalents (P < .0001, P < .0001; THA, TKA). COVID's elective surgery shutdown caused a dramatic site of service shift. Traditional preoperative education was negatively impacted, and older and sicker patients became outpatients. But short-term complications were not increased in ASCs/HOPDs. These site of service and associated patient demographic changes may be safely sustained.

Does Anesthesia Quality Improvement Participation Lead to Incremental Savings in a Surgical Quality Collaborative Population? A Retrospective Observational Study.

The Anesthesiology Performance Improvement and Reporting Exchange (ASPIRE) Collaborative Quality Initiative (CQI) was launched as a partnership among hospitals to measure quality, review evidence-based practices, and improve anesthesia-related outcomes. Cost savings and improved patient outcomes have been associated with surgical CQI participation, but the impact of an anesthesia CQI on health care cost has not been thoroughly assessed. In this study, we evaluated whether participation in an anesthesia CQI led to health care savings. We hypothesized that ASPIRE participation is associated with reduced total episode payments for payers and major, high-volume procedures included in the Michigan Value Collaborative (MVC) registry. In this retrospective observational study, we compared MVC episode payment data from Group 1 ASPIRE hospitals, the first cluster of 8 Michigan hospitals to join ASPIRE in January 2015, to non-ASPIRE matched control hospitals. MVC computes price-standardized, risk-adjusted payments for patients insured by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Preferred Provider Organization, Blue Care Network Health Maintenance Organization, and Medicare Fee-for-Service plans. Episodes from 2014 comprised the pre-ASPIRE time period, and episodes from June 2016 to July 2017 constituted the post-ASPIRE time period. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis to evaluate whether ASPIRE implementation was associated with greater reduction in total episode payments compared to the change in the control hospitals during the same time periods. We found a statistically significant reduction in total episode (-$719; 95% CI [-$1340 to -$97]; P = .023) payments at the 8 ASPIRE hospitals (N = 17,852 cases) compared to the change observed in 8 matched non-ASPIRE hospitals (N = 12,987 cases) for major, high-volume surgeries, including colectomy, colorectal cancer resection, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, pancreatectomy, hysterectomy, joint replacement (knee and hip), and hip fracture repair. In secondary analyses, 30-day postdischarge (-$354; 95% CI [-$582 to -$126]; P = .002) payments were also significantly reduced in ASPIRE hospitals compared to non-ASPIRE controls. Subgroup analyses revealed a significant reduction in total episode payments for joint replacements (-$860; 95% CI [-$1222 to -$499]; P < .001) at ASPIRE-participating hospitals. Sensitivity analyses including patient-level covariates also showed consistent results. Participation in an anesthesiology CQI, ASPIRE, is associated with lower total episode payments for selected major, high-volume procedures. This analysis supports that participation in an anesthesia CQI can lead to reduced health care payments.

A Statewide Quality Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Antibiotic Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria

Hospitalized patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) often receive unnecessary antibiotic treatment, which increases antibiotic resistance and adverse events. To determine whether diagnostic stewardship (avoiding unnecessary urine cultures) or antibiotic stewardship (reducing unnecessary antibiotic treatment after an unnecessary culture) is associated with better outcomes in reducing antibiotic use for ASB. This 3-year, prospective quality improvement study included hospitalized general care medicine patients with a positive urine culture among 46 hospitals participating in a collaborative quality initiative, the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium. Data were collected from July 1, 2017, through March 31, 2020, and analyzed from February to October 2022. Participation in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium with antibiotic and diagnostic stewardship strategies at hospital discretion. Overall improvement in ASB-related antibiotic use was estimated as change in percentage of patients treated with antibiotics who had ASB. Effect of diagnostic stewardship was estimated as change in percentage of patients with a positive urine culture who had ASB. Effect of antibiotic stewardship was estimated as change in percentage of patients with ASB who received antibiotics and antibiotic duration. Of the 14 572 patients with a positive urine culture included in the study (median [IQR] age, 75.8 [64.2-85.1] years; 70.5% female); 28.4% (n = 4134) had ASB, of whom 76.8% (n = 3175) received antibiotics. Over the study period, the percentage of patients treated with antibiotics who had ASB (overall ASB-related antibiotic use) declined from 29.1% (95% CI, 26.2%-32.2%) to 17.1% (95% CI, 14.3%-20.2%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.94 per quarter; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96). The percentage of patients with a positive urine culture who had ASB (diagnostic stewardship metric) declined from 34.1% (95% CI, 31.0%-37.3%) to 22.5% (95% CI, 19.7%-25.6%) (aOR, 0.95 per quarter; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97). The percentage of patients with ASB who received antibiotics (antibiotic stewardship metric) remained stable, from 82.0% (95% CI, 77.7%-85.6%) to 76.3% (95% CI, 68.5%-82.6%) (aOR, 0.97 per quarter; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01), as did adjusted mean antibiotic duration, from 6.38 (95% CI, 6.00-6.78) days to 5.93 (95% CI, 5.54-6.35) days (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.99 per quarter; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00). This quality improvement study showed that over 3 years, ASB-related antibiotic use decreased and was associated with a decline in unnecessary urine cultures. Hospitals should prioritize reducing unnecessary urine cultures (ie, diagnostic stewardship) to reduce antibiotic treatment related to ASB.

Electronic phenotyping of community-acquired pneumonia: A tool for inpatient syndrome-specific antimicrobial stewardship

Background: Using patient data from the electronic health record (EHR) and computer logic, an “electronic phenotype” can be created to identify patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in real time to assist with syndrome-specific antimicrobial stewardship efforts.1 We adapted and validated the performance of an inpatient CAP electronic phenotype for antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Methods: An automated scoring system was created within the EHR (Epic Systems) to identify hospitalized patients with CAP based on the variables and logic listed in Fig. 1B. We adapted a score used by the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium (HMS) to identify patients with CAP, with additions made to improve sensitivity (Fig. 1).1 The score can be displayed in a column within the EHR patient list (Fig. 2). We validated the electronic phenotype via chart review of all hospitalized patients on systemic antimicrobials admitted to a medicine team consecutively between November 8 and 18, 2021. Patients who were readmitted within the validation time frame were excluded. We assessed the performance of the electronic phenotype by comparing the score to manual chart review, where “CAP diagnosis” was defined as (1) mention of “pneumonia” or “CAP” as part of the differential diagnosis in the admission documentation, (2) antimicrobials were started within 48 hours of admission, and (3) radiographic findings were suggestive of pneumonia. After initial evaluation, the scoring system was adjusted, and performance was re-evaluated during prospective audit and feedback performed on EHR CAP–positive patients over 13 days between July 2022 and December 2022. Results: We included 191 patients in our initial validation cohort. The CAP score had high sensitivity (95.83%), specificity (92.2%), and negative predictive value (99.35%), though lower positive predictive value (63.89%) was noted (Table 2). The rules were further refined to include bloodstream infection only with Haemophilus influenza or Streptococcus pneumoniae in rule 2B, and azithromycin was removed from “CAP antibiotics.” After these changes, repeated evaluation of 88 patients with positive CAP EHR score was performed, and only 20 (23%) were considered false-positive results. Conclusions: Electronic phenotypes can be used to create automated tools to identify patients with CAP with reasonable performance. Data from this tool can be used to guide more focused antimicrobial stewardship interventions and clinical decision support in the future. Reference: Vaughn VM, et al. A statewide collaborative quality initiative to improve antibiotic duration and outcomes in patients hospitalized with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2022;75:460–467.Disclosures: None

Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Implant Revision Risk to 5 Years From a State-wide Arthroplasty Registry in Michigan.

Information on the revision risk of implants is useful for improving the quality of care for elective hip and knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to report on the revision risk of implants using a state-wide registry in the United States. The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative systematically collects data on elective primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty cases in Michigan. It contained data on 139,970 hip and 245,499 knee arthroplasty cases from February 15, 2012, to December 31, 2021. Kaplan-Meier estimates of revision risk were computed using time to first revision as the dependent variable, and the results were computed and expressed as the cumulative percent revision (CPR). CPR estimates were computed for all implants having at least 500 cases in the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative dataset. At 5-years postoperatively, elective primary conventional total hip arthroplasty implant stem/cup combinations had CPR values from 0.95% (0.39%-2.30%, 95% confidence intervals [CI]) to 5.77% (4.22%-7.85%, 95% CI), and elective primary total knee arthroplasty CPR ranged from 1.10% (0.64%-1.89%, 95% CI) to 12.52% (8.37%-18.50%, 95% CI). Unicondylar knee arthroplasty CPR at 5-years went from 4.23% (3.54%-5.06%, 95% CI) to 7.13% (6.20%-8.20%, 95% CI). The wide variation in CPR points to the need for surgeons to choose implants wisely to improve quality of care.

Off-clamp Versus On-clamp Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity-matched Analysis

BackgroundPartial nephrectomy is the preferred treatment option for the management of small renal masses. On-clamp partial nephrectomy is associated with a risk of ischemia and a greater loss of postoperative renal function, while the off-clamp procedure decreases the duration of renal ischemia, leading to better renal function preservation. However, the efficacy of the off- versus on-clamp partial nephrectomy for renal function preservation remains debatable. ObjectiveTo compare perioperative and functional outcomes following off- and on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Design, setting, and participantsThis study used the prospective multinational collaborative Vattikuti Collective Quality Initiative (VCQI) database for RAPN. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe primary objective of this study was the comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes between patients who underwent off- and on-clamp RAPN. Propensity scores were calculated for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), renal nephrometry score (RNS) and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results and limitationsOf the 2114 patients, 210 had undergone off-clamp RAPN and others on-clamp procedure. Propensity matching was possible for 205 patients in a 1:1 ratio. After matching, the two groups were comparable for age, sex, BMI, tumor size, multifocality, tumor side, face of tumor, RNS, polar location of the tumor, surgical access, and preoperative hemoglobin, creatinine, and eGFR. There was no difference between the two groups for intraoperative (4.8% vs 5.3%, p = 0.823) and postoperative (11.2% vs 8.3%, p = 0.318) complications. Need for blood transfusion (2.9% vs 0, p = 0.030) and conversion to radical nephrectomy (10.2% vs 1%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the off-clamp group. At the last follow-up, there was no difference between the two groups for creatinine and eGFR. The mean fall in eGFR at the last follow-up compared with that at baseline was equivalent between the two groups (–16.0 vs –17.3 ml/min, p = 0.985). ConclusionsOff-clamp RAPN does not result in better renal functional preservation. Alternatively, it may be associated with increased rates of conversion to radical nephrectomy and need for blood transfusion. Patient summaryWith this multicentric study, we noted that performing robotic partial nephrectomy without clamping the blood supply to the kidney is not associated with better preservation of renal function. However, off-clamp partial nephrectomy is associated with increased rates of conversion to radical nephrectomy and blood transfusion.

Building Better Patient Care in Mississippi Radiation Oncology: Why Mississippi Needs a Collaborative Quality Initiative

Cancer is an insidious and devastating disease that affects many people. Progress in mortality rate has not been realized universally across the United States, and challenges remain in how to best make up the ground that has been lost in these areas, one of which is Mississippi. Radiation therapy is a significant contributor to cancer control rates and certain challenges exist specifically regarding this treatment modality. The challenges of radiation oncology in Mississippi have been reviewed and discussed, with the proposal of a potential collaboration between clinical practitioners and payors to provide optimal and cost-effective radiation therapy to patients in Mississippi. A similar model to that proposed has been reviewed and evaluated. This model is discussed based on its potential validity and usefulness in Mississippi. Significant barriers exist in the state of Mississippi to patients receiving a consistent standard of care, regardless of their location and socioeconomic status. A collaborative quality initiative has been shown to be a boon to this endeavor elsewhere and stands to have a similar impact in Mississippi.

How Much Perioperative Pain and Dysfunction Underlie the HOOS JR and KOOS JR?

The Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) scores represent pain and dysfunction as a single number ranging from 0 (extreme pain and dysfunction) to 100 (no pain or functional limitations). However, scores between 0 and 100 lack a simple interpretation because they reflect varying combinations of pain levels and dysfunction. Given that most adverse events and improvement occur within the first 90 days after surgery, a deeper understanding of the level of pain and dysfunction may reveal missed opportunities for patient care. (1) What does a given preoperative or postoperative HOOS JR and KOOS JR score indicate about pain and ability to perform daily activities? (2) How much of a change in score (that is, delta) is needed to indicate significant improvement in pain control and daily functioning? The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative contains more than 95% of THAs and TKAs performed in Michigan. Between January 2017 and March 2019, 84,175 people in the registry underwent primary THA or TKA and were potentially eligible for this retrospective, comparative study of the first 90 postoperative days. Eighty-four percent (70,608 of 84,175) were excluded because their surgeons did not attain a target survey collection proportion of 70% and another 6% (5042) were missing covariate information or surveys, leaving 10% (8525) for analysis. The mean age and percentage of women were 65 ± 11 years and 55% (2060 of 3716), respectively, for patients undergoing THA and 67 ± 9 years and 61% (2936 of 4809), respectively, for those undergoing TKA. There were no clinically meaningful differences between patients who were analyzed and those who were excluded except for lower representation of non-White patients in the analyzed group. For interpretation, patient responses to Question 7 (pain) and Question 6 (function) from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System global items (PROMIS-10) were dichotomized into "much pain" (rating of pain 4 to 10 of 10) versus "less pain" (rating of ≤ 3) and "good function" (able to perform most activities) versus "poor function" (not able to perform most activities) and combined into four pain-function categories. We examined the mean preoperative and postoperative HOOS JR and KOOS JR scores for each pain-function category, adjusted for patient characteristics. We calculated the size of the delta associated with an increase to a more favorable category postoperatively (versus staying in the same or worse category) via multivariable logistic regression that controlled for patient characteristics. Patients in the least favorable "much pain, poor function" category preoperatively had adjusted mean scores of 40 (95% confidence interval 39 to 41) for both the HOOS JR and KOOS JR. Those with mixed levels of pain and function had mean scores between 46 and 55. Those in the most favorable "less pain, good function" category had means of 60 (95% CI 58 to 62) and 59 (95% CI 58 to 61) for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR, respectively. The adjusted delta to achieve a pain level of ≤ 3 or the ability to perform most activities was 30 (95% CI 26 to 36) on the HOOS JR and 27 (95% CI 22 to 29) on the KOOS JR scales. These adjusted means of the HOOS JR and KOOS JR provide context for understanding the levels of pain and dysfunction for individuals as well for patients reported in other studies. Potential quality improvement efforts could include tracking the proportion of patients with THA or TKA who achieved a sufficient delta to attain pain levels of ≤ 3 or the ability to perform most activities. Future studies are needed to understand pain and function represented by the HOOS JR and KOOS JR at 1 to 2 years, how these may differ by patient subgroups, and whether scores can be improved through quality improvement efforts. Level III, therapeutic study.

Early Survivorship of Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Varies by Age and Sex Based on Data From the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative

BackgroundOutcome data for newer uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs has been mixed. Registry studies showed worse survivorship, but clinical trials have not demonstrated differences compared to cemented designs. There has been renewed interest in uncemented TKA with modern designs and improved technology. The utilizations of uncemented knees in Michigan, 2-year outcomes, and the effects of age and sex were evaluated. MethodsA statewide database from 2017 through 2019 was analyzed for incidence, distribution, and early survivorship of cemented versus uncemented TKAs. There was 2-year minimum follow-up. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to generate time to first revision cumulative percent revision curves. The impacts of age and sex were examined. ResultsUse of uncemented TKAs increased from 7.0 to 11.3%. Uncemented TKAs were more commonly men, younger, heavier, American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2, and opioid users (P < .05). At 2 years, overall cumulative percent revision was higher in uncemented (2.44% [2.00, 2.99]) versus cemented (1.76% [1.64, 1.89]), particularly in women uncemented (2.41 [1.87, 3.12]) versus cemented (1.64 [1.50, 1.80]). Revision rates were greater with uncemented women >70 years (1.2% 1 year, 1.02% 2 years) versus < 70 years (0.56%, 0.53%), notably uncemented were inferior in both groups (P < .05). Men, regardless of age, had similar survivorships with both cemented and uncemented designs. ConclusionThe use of an uncemented TKA had an increased risk of early revision compared to cemented. This finding, however, was only apparent in women, especially those >70 years old. Surgeons should consider cement fixation in women >70 years.