Cold Snare Polypectomy Research Articles

Concordance Between Trainee Self-Assessment and Expert Assessment of Cold Snare Polypectomy Competence: Results From a Randomized Clinical Study.

Many trainees lack competence in performing cold snare polypectomy (CSP), and longer observation periods using assessment tools, such as the Cold Snare Polypectomy Assessment Tool (CSPAT), may be required. However, these tools are not commonly used in busy academic endoscopy practices. This study evaluates the concordance between trainee self-assessment of CSP with expert assessment and assesses factors associated with concordance. Consecutive CSPs performed by gastroenterology trainees from 2 institutions were video recorded and rated by 8 blinded experts from 4 different academic institutions in the United States and Singapore using the CSPAT from August 2017 to February 2020. Trainees self-assessed competence for each CSP immediately after the procedure. Concordance between trainee and trainer was reported as percentage of agreement in competence (score of 3 or 4) or not yet competent (score of 1 or 2). Twenty-two trainees performed 765 colonoscopies with 2,267 CSPs. Concordance was found between expert and trainee assessment of competence for 1,380 CSPs (60.9%; 95% CI, 58.8%-62.9%; weighted κ = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.16). Trainees underassessed competence for 541 CSPs (23.9%; 95% CI, 22.1%-25.7%) and overassessed competence for 326 CSPs (15.3%; 95% CI, 13.8%-16.8%). Career plan of private practice general gastroenterology (adjusted odds ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.92) and lower colonoscopy volume before study (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.22-0.62) were independently associated with lower likelihood of concordance between expert and trainee assessment of competence. Structured feedback was not associated with concordance, and there was no change as trainees gained experience; however, feedback decreased the proportion of overassessments. There is poor concordance between trainee self-assessment and trainer assessment of CSP. Self-assessment can be used as an initial part of competency assessment, which should then be reconciled with external assessments to improve concordance in assessments.

Survey of the Actual Practices Used for Endoscopic Removal of Colon Polyps in Korea: A Comparison with the Current Guidelines.

We investigated the clinical practice patterns of Korean endoscopists for the endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps. From September to November 2021, an online survey was conducted regarding the preferred resection methods for colorectal polyps, and responses were compared with the international guidelines. Among 246 respondents, those with <4 years, 4-9 years, and ≥10 years of experience in colonoscopy practices accounted for 25.6%, 34.1%, and 40.2% of endoscopists, respectively. The most preferred resection methods for non-pedunculated lesions were cold forceps polypectomy for ≤3 mm lesions (81.7%), cold snare polypectomy for 4-5 mm (61.0%) and 6-9 mm (43.5%) lesions, hot endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for 10-19 mm lesions (72.0%), precut EMR for 20-25 mm lesions (22.0%), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for ≥26 mm lesions (29.3%). Hot EMR was favored for pedunculated lesions with a head size <20 mm and stalk size <10 mm (75.6%) and for those with a head size ≥20 mm or stalk size ≥10 mm (58.5%). For suspected superficial and deep submucosal lesions measuring 10-19 mm and ≥20 mm, ESD (26.0% and 38.6%) and surgery (36.6% and 46.3%) were preferred, respectively. The adherence rate to the guidelines ranged from 11.2% to 96.9%, depending on the size, shape, and histology of the lesions. Adherence to the guidelines for endoscopic resection techniques varied depending on the characteristics of colorectal polyps. Thus, an individualized approach is required to increase adherence to the guidelines.

Mechanism behind reduced resection ability of bent snares during cold snare polypectomy

Accidental bending of the snare sheath occasionally occurs during cold snare polypectomy (CSP). We aimed to demonstrate whether snare bending reduces resection ability and, if it does, what causes this reduction. Using currently available CSP snares and prototype snares, we investigated changes in the resection ability of bent snares as well as the stiffness of their sheaths and wire spindles. Furthermore, to evaluate the performance of the bent snares, we measured the completion rate of CSP for 5-mm-diameter pseudo-lesions on the porcine rectal mucosa. Snare bending significantly decreased resection ability and wire spindle stiffness. Compared with bending the snares once, bending the snares five times further decreased the resection ability and wire spindle stiffness. A strong correlation was observed between wire spindle stiffness and resection ability after snare bending (correlation coefficient = 0.82; P < 0.001). Additionally, snare bending reduced the completion rate of CSP. Bending a CSP snare causes decreased wire spindle stiffness, thereby reducing its resection ability and potentially lowering the resection completion rate. The resection ability cannot be restored; therefore, snare replacement is recommended.

Endoscopic hemostasis with a self-assembling peptide gel during endoscopic submucosal dissection and cold-snare polypectomy in the duodenum: Prospective exploratory study (with video).

A novel self-assembling peptide gel (SAPG) was recently developed for hemostasis during endoscopic resection (ER) as an alternative for electrocoagulation and clip placement. Therefore, this exploratory study aimed to evaluate the hemostatic effect of SAPG on bleeding during ER of the duodenum. Patients with superficial duodenal epithelial tumors who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or cold-snare polypectomy (CSP) between June 2022 and October 2023 were enrolled in the study. SAPG was used for hemostasis of the intraprocedural bleeding when spontaneous hemostasis was essential for the continuation of ESD or was not achieved within 30 s after CSP. The primary outcome was a successful hemostatic rate using SAPG. Among the included patients, 15 and 8 underwent ESD and CSP, respectively. Forty-two points of intraoperative bleeding were noted during ESD, of which 39 (92.9%) and 3 (7.1%) were oozing and nonspurting bleedings, respectively. Successful hemostatic rates were 84.6% and 0% in the oozing and nonspurting bleedings, respectively. All nonspurting bleedings were weakened after SAPG use. Of the 70 CSPs, 60 were oozing bleedings (85.7%), which were successfully stopped with SAPG. The median time to hemostasis from SAPG application was 30 s (interquartile range [IQR] 17-40 s) and 25 s (IQR 10-33 s) during ESD and CSP, respectively. No adverse event was observed in any of the cases during the perioperative period. Self-assembling peptide gel has an acceptable effect of successful hemostasis for intraoperative oozing bleeding during duodenal ESD and CSP.

Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is routinely performed for small colorectal polyps (≤10 mm). However, challenges include insufficient resection depth and immediate bleeding, hindering precise pathological evaluation. We aimed to compare the outcomes of cold endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) with that of CSP for colorectal polyps ≤10 mm, using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Multiple databases were searched in December 2023 for RCTs reporting outcomes of CSP versus CEMR for colorectal polyps ≤10 mm in size. Our primary outcomes were rates of complete and en-bloc resections, while our secondary outcomes were total resection time (seconds) and adverse events, including immediate bleeding, delayed bleeding, and perforation. The complete resection rates did not significantly differ (CSP, 91.8% vs. CEMR 94.6%), nor did the rates of en-bloc resection (CSP, 98.9% vs. CEMR, 98.3%) or incomplete resection (CSP, 6.7% vs. CEMR, 4.8%). Adverse event rates were similarly insignificant in variance. However, CEMR had a notably longer mean resection time (133.51 vs. 91.30 seconds). Our meta-analysis of seven RCTs showed that while both CSP and CEMR are equally safe and effective for resecting small (≤10 mm) colorectal polyps, the latter is associated with a longer resection time.

Underwater Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Diving into the Depths

The endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tract lesions embraces different types of techniques, ranging from conventional polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to the field of third-space endoscopy, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), full-thickness resection and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Parallelly, the advent of underwater techniques has served as an add-on for both basic and advanced procedures, since its first report in 2012. We aimed to provide a comprehensive update on the state of the art about the feasibility of underwater basic and advanced techniques for GI endoscopy. Underwater EMR (U-EMR) has proved effective and safe in treating &gt; 10 mm sessile or flat or all-size recurrent colonic lesions. Conversely, although data show good effectiveness and safety for &lt;10 mm lesions, it is preferred when high-grade dysplasia is suspected, favouring cold snare polypectomy for all other cases. Moreover, promising data are emerging regarding the feasibility of U-ESD for difficult-to-resect colonic lesions. U-EMR represents a standard of care for treating &lt; 25 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours. Data regarding oesophageal, gastric and ampullary lesions remains limited to small cohorts. Finally, using water immersion for POEM has shown a reduction in procedure time compared to the CO2 insufflation technique for vessel coagulation, albeit in a single-centre experience. Based on these results, U-EMR has become a standard for treating intermediate-size colonic and non-ampullary duodenal lesions, as highlighted also in the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. Promising results have been shown in third-space endoscopy studies, even though further prospective studies are awaited to standardise the technique for both ESD and POEM.

A case of gastrointestinal perforation following transarterial embolization for an intramural hematoma after cold snare polypectomy of an adenoma in the transverse colon.

We encountered a case of a large hematoma developing with perforation shortly after a cold snare polypectomy for a colorectal adenoma. The patient underwent cold snare polypectomy for a 3-mm type Is lesion in the transverse colon at another facility. Two hours later, she visited the emergency room due to abdominal pain. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a 70 mm, high-intensity mass in the transverse colon with contrast extravasation. We attempted transcatheter arterial embolization to stop the bleeding. Several hours later, the anemia had not worsened, but the severe abdominal pain persisted. Urgent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was performed due to the possibility of gastrointestinal perforation. The surgery was successfully completed. Pathology reports confirmed the presence of an intramural hematoma in the proximal transverse colon with hemorrhagic infiltration of all layers, along with extensive ischemic changes. A perforation was identified in this area, with mucosal defects observed near the hole, possibly due to cold snare polypectomy.

Survival and Endoscopic/Clinical Features of Patients with Colorectal Cancer Resected by Cold Snare Polypectomy: The Importance of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Colorectal polyps resected by cold snare polypectomy (CSP) are rarely diagnosed as colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to investigate the prevalence, clinical features, and prognosis of patients with CRC resected by CSP. Patients with colorectal polyps treated with CSP between 2018 and 2022 were enrolled and regularly followed up (median observation period: 30.6 months). Logistic regression analysis and decision tree analysis were employed to investigate the clinical features of the patients. A total of 5,064 colorectal polyps from 2,530 patients were resected by CSP. Of these, 0.24% were diagnosed as CRC; however, no patients died due to CRC. eGFR was an independent risk factor for the presence of CRC (unit 10, OR 0.716, 95%CI 0.525-0.973, P=0.0323) and its optimal cut-off value was 59.9 mL/min/1.73 m2. The decision-tree analysis revealed that 2.03% of patients with creatinine ≥ 1.0 mg/dL had CRC. CRC was diagnosed in 0.24% of the polyps; however, no patients died due to CRC. eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and creatinine >1.0 mg/dL were associated with CRC. Thus, colorectal polyps should be carefully examined in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Risk factors for unclear margin in cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyp.

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a common, simple, and safe procedure; however, it has a high rate of unclear margins. We analyzed the risk factors for unclear margins of colorectal polyp. We retrospectively investigated colorectal polyps treated with CSP between July 2021 and July 2022, excluding those that could not be retrieved or pathologically nonneoplastic and hyperplastic polyps without margin evaluation. The clinicopathological features and risk factors for unclear margins were analyzed. Furthermore, the polyps were divided into two groups: those resected by experts and those resected by trainees. A 1 : 1 propensity score matching was performed. After matching, the risk factors for unclear margins in each group were analyzed as secondary outcomes. We analyzed 237 patients with 572 polyps; the margins were negative in 58.6% (negative group) and unclear in 41.4% (unclear group). The unclear margin was significantly higher at straddling folds ( P = 0.0001), flexure points ( P = 0.005), and in the procedures performed by trainees ( P < 0.0001). Altogether, 198 propensity score matched pairs were explored for secondary outcomes. There were no significant differences in risk factors for unclear margins in the expert group, while in the trainee group, the unclear margin was significantly higher at the straddling folds ( P = 0.0004) and flexure points ( P = 0.005). We demonstrated that straddling folds, flexure points, and procedures performed by the trainees were significant risk factors for unclear margins, and we hypothesized that the rate of unclear margins will reduce as the trainees accumulate experience at difficult sites.

Prediction of immediate bleeding after cold snare polypectomy: A prospective observational study.

The risk factors for immediate post-polypectomy bleeding (IPPB) after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) are not well-known. We sought to define such risk factors and develop a predictive risk-scoring model. This prospective observational study included 161 polyps (4-9 mm in diameter) that were removed via CSP from 118 patients during the period from June to September 2019 in 2 tertiary hospitals. IPPB was defined as post-polypectomy bleeding within 24 hours or grade 3 or 4 intraprocedural bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis. IPPB incidences according to grade were 13.0% (21/161) (grade 3) and 0% (grade 4). Univariate analysis showed that the polyp size and morphology, as well as iatrogenic ulcer size and shape, were significantly associated with IPPB. Multivariate analysis showed that polyp size [6-9 mm vs 4-5 mm, odds ratio (OR) 3.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-10.79], polyp morphology (polypoid vs non-polypoid, OR: 3.93, 95% CI: 1.22-12.64), and iatrogenic ulcer size (≥10 vs ≤ 9 mm, OR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.04-9.38) were significantly associated with IPPB. We created a four-marker risk-scoring model to predict IPPB after CSP; we summed the points assigned for the 4 factors. At a cutoff of 2, the sensitivity was 85.7% and the specificity was 65.0%; at a cutoff of 3, the sensitivity was 65% and the specificity was 90.0%. Polyp size and morphology, as well as iatrogenic ulcer size and shape, were associated with IPPB after CSP. The four-marker risk-scoring model appears to effectively predict IPPB after CSP (Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0004375).

Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.

An increasing number of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) have been detected recently owing to the development of endoscopic imaging technology and increased awareness of this disease. Endoscopic resection is the first-line treatment for SNADETs, with methods including cold snare polypectomy (CSP), conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (cEMR), underwater EMR (uEMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Here, we review the current status and recent advances in endoscopic resection for SNADETs. Endoscopic resection in the duodenum is more difficult and has a higher risk of adverse events than that in other organs owing to specific anatomical disadvantages. SNADETs ≤10 mm in size are candidates for CSP, cEMR, and uEMR. Among these lesions, suspected carcinoma lesions should not be treated using CSP because of their low curability. cEMR or uEMR is considered for lesions sized 10 to 20 mm, whereas piecemeal EMR or ESD is considered for tumors >20 mm in size. In particular, ESD or surgical resection should be considered for suspected carcinoma lesions >30 mm in size. The treatment plan should be selected on a case-to-case basis, considering the balance between the risk of adverse events and the necessity of en bloc resection.

Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial

Incomplete resection rates vary among endoscopists performing cold snare polypectomy. Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) is the technique of cold resection after submucosal injection to reduce incomplete resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CS-EMR for small colorectal polyps compared to hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR). Preplanned sample size required 70 polyps to CS-EMR group or HS-EMR group, respectively. Patients with polyps sized 6–9 mm were randomly allocated to either the CS-EMR or the HS-EMR group. The primary outcome was residual or recurrent adenoma (RAA) rate. A total of 70 and 68 polyps were resected using CS-EMR and HS-EMR, respectively. In the intention-to-treat population, the RAA rate was 0% in the CS-EMR group and 1.5% in the HS-EMR group (risk difference [RD], − 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] − 4.34 to 1.39). En bloc resection rate was 98.6% and 98.5% (RD, − 0.04; 95% CI − 4.12 to 4.02); the R0 resection rate was 55.7% and 82.4% (RD, − 27.80; 95% CI − 42.50 to − 13.10). The total procedure time was 172 s (IQR, 158–189) in the CS-EMR group and 186 s (IQR, 147–216) in the HS-EMR group (median difference, − 14; 95% CI − 32 to 2). Delayed bleeding was 2.9% vs 1.5% (RD, 1.37; 95% CI − 3.47 to 6.21) in both groups, respectively. CS-EMR was non-inferior to HS-EMR for the treatment of small colorectal polyps. CS-EMR can be considered one of the standard methods for the removal of colorectal polyps sized 6–9 mm.

High‐Performance Dedicated Snares with Tip Attachments can Overcome Current Disadvantages in Cold Snare Polypectomy

High‐Performance Dedicated Snares with Tip Attachments can Overcome Current Disadvantages in Cold Snare Polypectomy

Adverse Events after Different Endoscopic Resection Procedures for Small and Intermediate-Sized Colorectal Polyps

Introduction: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) have been developed recently, in addition to conventional methods, but adverse events of each method have not been fully clarified. We compared the outcomes of each method for the appropriate choice. Methods: Patients who underwent CSP, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)/hot snare polypectomy (HSP), or UEMR for small and intermediate-sized colorectal polyps between April 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively examined. The rate of adverse events and recurrences due to each method were determined as the main outcomes. Clinical factors related to adverse events were examined. Results: A total of 1,025 patients with 3,163 polyps underwent polypectomy using any of the methods. CSP, EMR/HSP, and UEMR were performed for 704 (22.2%), 2,145 (67.8%), and 314 polyps (9.9%), and the median size for each method was 4, 6, and 7 mm, respectively. Delayed bleeding for CSP, EMR/HSP, and UEMR was 0%, 0.2%, and 0.6% (p = 0.15), and perforation was 0%, 0.1%, and 0%, respectively (p = 0.62). Recurrence after CSP, EMR/HSP, and UEMR was 0.3%, 0.09%, and 1.3%, respectively (p < 0.01). Recurrence for UEMR was significantly higher in the early stage of procedure introduction (p = 0.015). Oral anticoagulants were the risk factor for delayed bleeding (p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: There was no significant difference regarding adverse events among each method for small and intermediate-sized polyps, although the recurrence rate after UEMR was higher than other methods.

Risk factors and prediction model for delayed bleeding after cold snare polypectomy: a retrospective study

BackgroundDelayed bleeding (DB) is a serious complication after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for polyps in the colon. The present study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of DB after CSP and to develop a risk-scoring model for predicting DB.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in four Chinese medical institutions. 10650 patients underwent CSP from June 2019 to May 2023. The study analyzed the rate of DB and extracted the general clinical information and polyp-related information of patients with postoperative DB. As a control, non-DB patients who received CSP at the same 4 hospitals were analyzed. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to develop the prediction model. The model was further validated using a Kaplan–Meier log-rank analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) plot and risk plot.ResultsIn our study, we found a 0.24% rate of DB and the risk factors were history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, antithrombotics use, antiplatelet use, anticoagulant use, abdominal operation, sigmoid colon lesion, hematoma, cold snare defect protrusion, polyp size, wound size, the grade of wound bleeding, and morphology of Ip. These factors were incorporated into the prediction model for DB after CSP. For 1, 3, and 5 days of bleeding, the AUC of the ROC curve was 0.912, 0.939, and 0.923, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the high-risk group had a significantly higher risk of DB than the low-risk group.ConclusionsThis study screened the risk factors and established a prediction model of DB after CSP. The results may help preventing and reducing the DB rate after CSP of colorectal polyps.

Outcome of Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors ≤ 10 mm.

Guidelines suggest endoscopic resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNETs) < 10 mm, but the most appropriate resection technique is unclear. In real-life clinical practice, the endoscopic removal of unrecognized rNETs can take place with "simple" techniques and without preliminary staging. The aim of the current study is to report our own experience at a referral center for both neuroendocrine neoplasms and endoscopy. Retrospective analyses of polypectomies were performed at the Humanitas Research Hospital for rNETs (already diagnosed or previously unrecognized). A total of 19 patients were included, with a median lesion size of 5 mm (range 3-10 mm). Only five lesions were suspected as NETs before removal and underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) before resection, being removed with advanced endoscopic techniques. Unsuspected rNETs were removed by cold polypectomy in eleven cases, EMR in two, and biopsy forceps in one. When described, the margins were negative in four cases, positive in four (R1), and indeterminate in one. The median follow-up was 40 months. A 10 mm polypoid lesion removed with cold snare polypectomy (G2 R1) needed subsequent surgery. Eighteen patients underwent EUS after a median time of 6.5 months from resection. The EUS identified local recurrence after 14 months in a 7 mm polypoid lesion removed with cold snare polypectomy (G1 R1); the lesion was treated with cap-assisted EMR. For all the other lesions, the follow-up was negative. When rNETs are improperly removed without prior staging, caution must be exercised. The data from our cohort suggest that even if inappropriate resection had happened, patients may be safely managed with early EUS evaluation.

Endoscopic techniques for management of large colorectal polyps, strictures and leaks

The implementation of screening colonoscopy with polyp removal has significantly decreased mortality rates associated with colorectal cancer (CRC), although it remains a major cause of cancer-related deaths globally. CRC typically originates from adenomatous polyps, and increased removal of these growths has led to reduced CRC incidence and mortality. Endoscopic polypectomy techniques, including hot and cold snare polypectomy, play a pivotal role in this process. While both methods are effective for small polyps (<10 mm), recent evidence favors cold snare polypectomy due to its superior safety profile and comparable complete resection rates. Large polyps (>10 mm), particularly those with advanced features, pose increased cancer risks and often require meticulous assessment and advanced endoscopic techniques, including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), for resection.This chapter also provides a practical overview of endoscopic techniques for managing colonic obstructions and pericolonic fluid collections, detailing their indications, advantages, disadvantages, and complications. The goal is to improve understanding and application in clinical practice. Additionally, we provide a summary of endoscopic closure techniques that have revolutionized the management of perforations and fistulas, offering safe and effective alternatives to surgery.

Cold sub-mucosal injection versus traditional cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: Asystematic review and meta-analysis.

The guidelines recommend conventional cold snare polypectomy (C-CSP) for diminutive and small colorectal polyps (≤ 10mm). However, it remains unclear whether CSP with sub-mucosal injection (SI-CSP) achieves comparable efficacy to C-CSP for managing these lesions. This study compares SI-CSP with C-CSP for patients with diminutive and small colorectal polyps. An electronic literature search was conducted to retrieve articles comparing resection outcomes between SI-CSP and C-CSP in diminutive and small colorectal polyps (registration number INPLASY2023100096). Our primary outcomes of interest were the complete resection rate (CRR), complications (namely immediate bleeding, delayed bleeding and perforation) and polypectomy time. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were employed for continuous variables, while odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated for categorical variables. Data was analyzed using a random effects model and the I2 test was utilized to assess heterogeneity. Eight studies involving 1470 patients with 2223 polyps were included in our analysis. The CRR was not significantly higher in the SI-CSP group, with an OR of 95% CI 0.50 (0.22, 1.15). The incidences of immediate bleeding (OR 95% CI 0.60 [0.26-1.40]) and delayed bleeding (OR 95% CI 0.88 [0.32-2.42]) did not differ significantly between the two groups. On average, the mean polypectomy time was 64.75seconds shorter in the C-CSP group (95% CI, - 102.96 to - 26.53). Notably, no perforation events were reported in the included studies. The use of SI-CSP was not superior to C-CSP in managing diminutive and small colorectal polyps and the procedure required significantly more time.

Management of colorectal neoplasia in IBD patients: current practice and future perspectives.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at increased risk of developing colorectal neoplasia (CRN). In this review, we aim to provide an up-to-date overview and future perspectives on CRN management in IBD. Advances in endoscopic surveillance and resection techniques have resulted in a shift towards endoscopic management of neoplastic lesions in place of surgery. Endoscopic treatment is recommended for all CRN if complete resection is feasible. Standard (cold snare) polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection should be performed depending on lesion complexity (size, delineation, morphology, surface architecture, submucosal fibrosis/invasion) to maximize the likelihood of complete resection. If complete resection is not feasible, surgical treatment options should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team. While (sub)total and proctocolectomy play an important role in management of endoscopically unresectable CRN, partial colectomy may be considered in a subgroup of patients in endoscopic remission with limited disease extent without other CRN risk factors. High synchronous and metachronous CRN rates warrant careful mucosal visualization with shortened intervals for at least 5 years after treatment of CRN.

Bleeding Risk of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Measuring 10 mm or Less: Subgroup Analysis of a Large Randomized Controlled Trial.

Concerns regarding bleeding remain in cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for small pedunculated (0-Ip) polyps. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of CSP and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for such lesions. Data on 0-Ip colorectal polyps ≤10 mm were extracted from a large, pragmatic, randomized trial. Immediate postpolypectomy bleeding (IPPB), defined as the perioperative use of a clip for bleeding, was evaluated through polyp-level analysis. Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB), defined as bleeding occurring within 2 weeks postoperatively, was assessed at the patient-level among patients whose polyps were all ≤10 mm, including at least one 0-Ip polyp. A total of 647 0-Ip polyps (CSP: 306; HSP: 341) were included for IPPB analysis and 386 patients (CSP: 192; HSP: 194) for DPPB analysis. CSP was associated with a higher incidence of IPPB (10.8% vs 3.2%, P < 0.001) but no adverse clinical events. The procedure time of all polypectomies was shorter for CSP than for HSP (123.0 ± 117.8 vs 166.0 ± 237.7 seconds, P = 0.003), while the procedure time of polypectomies with IPPB were similar (249.8 ± 140.2 vs 227.4 ± 125.9 seconds, P = 0.64). DPPB was observed in 3 patients (1.5%) in the HSP group, including one patient (0.5%) with severe bleeding, but not in the CSP group. Despite CSP being associated with more IPPB events, it could be timely treated without adverse outcomes. Notably, no delayed bleeding occurred in the CSP group. Our findings support the use of CSP for 0-Ip polyps ≤ 10 mm.