Coin Rotation Research Articles

Coin Rotation Task (CRT): A New Test of Motor Dexterity

Coin-rotation task (CRT), a measure of rapid, coordinated finger movements, was devised as a convenient, easily administered bedside test of motor dexterity; however, very little psychometric data exist regarding this task. The current project was undertaken to (a) provide preliminary normative data, (b) examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the task when compared with other standardized motor measures, and (c) examine the diagnostic accuracy of the CRT. The sample of 86 male participants included 60 controls and 26 patients with unilateral lesions of the left (n = 13) and right (n = 13) hemispheres. The CRT was not significantly correlated with age or education; non-adjusted left- and right-hand normative data are provided. The CRT demonstrated good convergent and divergent validity when compared with other standardized motor measures. The CRT was successful in differentiating control and brain damaged groups with mild motor impairment, and demonstrated an overall classification rate of 84.9%. Levels of sensitivity and specificity of the CRT were comparable with or better than other standardized tests of manual dexterity. The CRT offers a valid, quick, and convenient bedside measure of subtle motor impairment.

Poor dopaminergic response of impaired dexterity in Parkinson's disease: Bradykinesia or limb kinetic apraxia?

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) often show impaired manual dexterity even when being only minimally bradykinetic, suggesting that they may have limb kinetic apraxia (LKA), that is, a loss of fine motor skill not explained by elemental motor deficits. To explore this dissociation, we investigated the differential dopaminergic responsiveness of dexterity and bradykinesia in PD. Twelve patients with PD (4 women, age 64.4 +/- 8.3, mean + SD) and 12 matched healthy controls (64.8 +/- 8.9) were tested twice in ON vs. OFF and 1st vs. 2nd trial, respectively. A coin rotation (CR) task was applied to assess dexterity and a finger tapping (FT) task to assess bradykinesia. Performance was followed by video recording and analyzed by measuring the frequency of CR and FT during three 10-second periods. Statistical analysis was done by a mixed factorial design with group (PD vs. controls) as between-subject factor and medication (ON- vs. OFF-state or 1st vs. 2nd trial), task (FT vs. CR), and handedness (dominant vs. nondominant) as within-subject factors. In patients with PD, regardless of hand involved, dopaminergic treatment only mildly improved CR performance, in contrast to the strong increase in FT scores (up to the level of controls), as demonstrated by the significant triple interaction of the factors group, medication, and task (F(1,22) = 7.9, P = 0.01; eta(2) = 0.26). Furthermore, CR scores were considerably lower, both in OFF and ON, than in normal controls, pointing to a substantial impairment of dexterity in PD (P < 0.001). In conclusion, impaired manual dexterity showing significantly diminished response to dopaminergic treatment suggests that dextrous deficits in PD are related to LKA rather than bradykinesia.

Limb-kinetic apraxia in Parkinson disease

To learn if limb-kinetic apraxia (LKA) is associated with Parkinson disease (PD), participants with PD (on medications) and control subjects performed finger tapping (FT), measuring movement speed, and performed coin rotation (CR), measuring precise coordinated but independent finger movements and speed. There were no group differences in FT, a measure of bradykinesia-rigidity, but CR rotation was impaired in PD. Thus, LKA, not related to bradykinesia-rigidity, is associated with PD.

Ipsilateral motor activation during unimanual and bimanual motor tasks

ObjectiveTo test for the presence and possible asymmetry of ipsilateral motor activation during unimanual and bimanual motor tasks. MethodsTwelve right-handed healthy subjects underwent motor evoked potential (MEP) measurement of one hand (target-hand) while the other hand (task-hand) performed different motor tasks. The target-hand was either at rest (first experiment) or performed a Perdue PegBoard task (second experiment). The task-hand was either at rest, performed a simultaneous pegboard task, or rotated a coin (second experiment). ResultsIn the first experiment, the motor task resulted in significant increase in MEP area in the target-hand, regardless which hand was the task-hand, with a greater increase when the left hand was the task-hand. In the second experiment, ipsilateral motor activation was not present for either hand, however, when the right hand was the task-hand, performance of continuous coin rotation by the right hand resulted in a significant decrease in the MEP area of the left hand. ConclusionsHemispheric asymmetry and task-dependence of ipsilateral motor cortex activation supports the postulate that motor activity may start bilaterally with subsequent interhemispheric inhibition. Furthermore, in right-handers, the left motor cortex is either more active in ipsilateral hand movements or exerts more effective inhibitory control over the right motor cortex than vice versa. SignificanceWe suggest that hemispheric asymmetry in ipsilateral motor control is a factor in determining motor dominance in right-handed individuals.

Lateralised motor control: hemispheric damage and the loss of deftness

Objective: To learn if the left compared with the right hemisphere of right handed subjects exerts bilateral compared with contralateral motor control when performing precise and coordinated finger movements. Methods:...

The coin rotation task: A convenient and sensitive measure of fine motor control

The coin rotation task: A convenient and sensitive measure of fine motor control

The coin rotation task: A convenient and sensitive measure of fine motor control

The coin rotation task: A convenient and sensitive measure of fine motor control