The hippocampal formation appears to play an important role in the ability of rats and other mammals to perform sophisticated spatial tasks, beyond simply following a familiar route or approaching a visible cue. Evidence for this role came from the observation of selective spatial deficits after hippocampal lesions (O'Keefe et al., 1975; O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978; Morris et al., 1982; Sutherland et al., 1982) and from the spatially selective firing of hippocampal complex spike cells (O'Keefe and Dostrovsky, 1971; McNaughton et al., 1983; Muller et al., 1987) (place cells), and led to the suggestion that the hippocampus was the locus of a map in the mammalian brain (O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978). The hippocampus is thought to have a broader mnemonic function in higher mammals like monkeys and humans, (Scoville and Milner, 1957), such as episodic memory (Kinsbourne and Wood, 1975; O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978; Tulving, 1983). The extensive electrophysiological data available from studies in freely moving rats raise the possibility that the functional properties of the neural machinery of the hippocampus might be unders tood in the spatial domain, which could also shed light on other putative hippocampal functions for which there are fewer neuronal data. In this issue of The Journal of General Physiology, Muller et al. (1996) present a model in which the synaptic efficacies of the recurrent collaterals in the CA3 region of the hippocampus form a cognitive graph. They initially demonstrate that CA3 has properties adequate to support a directed connected graph, and they go on to outline their model. In this model, the net resistance of the synaptic connect ion between two place cells increases monotonically with the time taken to move between the corresponding firing fields (place fields), and, hence, on their separation. The graph is built as the animal moves around the environment and longterm potentiat ion (LTP) causes synapses between place cells with overlapping place fields to strengthen much more than synapses between cells with well separated fields, because of the increased chance of both cells firing within the LTP-permissive time window. Once the graph is formed, such that the connections between cells within it effectively code for the distance between their place fields, it can be used as follows. If one place cell represents a start location and another represents the goal location, then the chain of place cells between them that involves the strongest synapses (i.e., path of minimum resistance through the network) corresponds to a good route between the start and goal locations (traced out by the place fields along the chain). How this route might be read by the rest of the brain is not explicitly simulated. This simple model has many attractive features. For example, rats exhibit latent learning, in which they clearly learn about the layout of an environment in the absence of goals or motivation, helping them to navigate once a goal is provided. This is reflected in the way in which the graph is automatically constructed during exploration. Similarly, the ability to perform detours and shortcuts exemplifies the type of navigation impaired by hippocampal lesions and can be naturally incorporated in the model. Detours occur because placing an obstacle on or near a place field tends to inhibit the firing of the place cell, thus taking that cell out of the path-planning process. Shortcuts can be found because, while place cells with fields on ei ther side of a barrier will tend to have weak synaptic connect ion because of the time taken to travel f rom one field to the other, the rat will tend to explore the area if the barrier is removed and will pass directly from one to the other, causing the connect ion to strengthen. Another strength of the model is that the directional modulat ion of place cell firing that occurs when a rat is constrained to run along restricted paths does not destroy the model. However, directional firing would tend to exaggerate the problem of the animal's exploratory behavior, biasing the representat ion of distance in the graph, for example, so as to underest imate distances along familiar routes compared with unfamiliar ones (see below). The graph model appears to work well; indeed, it is reminiscent of a successful path-planning scheme based on resistive grids (e.g., see Connelly et al., 1990) that has been extensively studied in robotics