Cognitive Dual Task Research Articles

Developing the Freezing of Gait Severity Tool: A Delphi consensus study to determine the content of a clinician-rated assessment for freezing of gait severity

Objectives There is no standardisation of tasks or measures for evaluation of freezing of gait severity in people with Parkinson's disease. This study aimed to develop a clinician-rated tool for freezing of gait severity (i.e. Freezing of Gait Severity Tool), through determining clinicians’ ratings of the most important triggering circumstances to be examined and aspects of freezing of gait to be measured. Design A three-round, web-based Delphi study. Participants Healthcare professionals, with at least five years’ experience in managing freezing of gait in people with Parkinson. Main outcome measures Round 1 required participants (n = 28) to rate items on a 5-point Likert scale, based on priority for inclusion in the Freezing of Gait Severity Tool. In Round 2, participants (n = 18) ranked the items based on priority for inclusion. In Round 3, participants (n = 18) confirmed or rejected the shortlisted items by judging their ability, on a binary scale, to screen for freezing of gait, detect changes in freezing severity, and discriminate between degrees of severity. Results Participants agreed with the triggering circumstances of turning hesitation, narrow space hesitation, start hesitation, cognitive dual-tasking, and open space hesitation should be assessed; and the aspects of gait freezing to be measured included freezing type, number of freezing episodes during a task, and average duration of freezing episodes. Conclusions This study attained a consensus for the items to be included in a clinician-rated tool for freezing of gait severity. Future studies should investigate psychometric properties and clinical feasibility of the Freezing of Gait Severity Tool.

Cognitive-motor interference in people with mild to moderate multiple sclerosis, in comparison with healthy controls

BackgroundReduced motor and cognitive dual-task capacity is found to be more common among people with multiple sclerosis (MS), than among healthy populations. However, studies in larger samples of MS conducted using a more stringent methodology, which includes comparisons to healthy controls, are needed. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to explore the effects on motor and cognitive dual-tasking in people with mild to moderate overall MS-disability, in comparison to healthy controls. A second aim was to explore the differences in dual-task performance on a cognitive task between two motor tasks in people with mild to moderate MS and healthy controls. MethodsThis case-control study evaluated dual-task performance of the motor tasks standing with eyes closed (hereafter standing) and walking and a cognitive task assessing selective executive functions (auditory-Stroop test). Fifty-five people with MS (mild MS, n = 28; moderate MS, n = 27), and 30 healthy controls participated. Standing and walking were assessed using wireless inertial measurement unit sensors (APDM). Standing (three 30 s trials) was measured using sway area and root mean square sway, while walking (2 min) was measured using speed, stride length, and step time. Auditory-Stroop was measured using accuracy and response time. During dual-task assessments, each subject was instructed to pay equal attention to both tasks. Statistical significance was considered if p < .05. ResultsInstanding no significant within-group differences in the standing measures were found between single-task and dual-task performance. However, dual-task performance differed significantly between all groups (moderate MS > mild MS > healthy controls), except between mild and moderate MS in sway area. Inwalking, all groups slowed down speed and shortened stride length during dual-task condition compared to single-task condition. Moderate MS performed significantly poorer than mild MS and healthy controls in dual-task walking, but mild MS did not differ from healthy controls. In thecognitivetask only mild MS increased significantly in auditory-Stroop response time during walking. In healthy controls, the performance of auditory-Stroop was not affected by dual-tasking. Moderate MS had significantly longer response time in dual-task auditory-Stroop compared to the other groups, but no differences were observed between mild MS and healthy controls. Only mild MS had significantly longer response time during walking than during standing. ConclusionThis study showed that cognitive-motor interference in people with MS is present also in the early phases of the disease. This was shown during dual-tasking with slower walking and a longer response time in the cognitive task compared to healthy controls. Moderate MS performed poorer in almost every aspect of the motor and cognitive assessments in dual-task condition, compared to mild MS and healthy controls. Furthermore, during standing, people with MS performed poorer in standing measures compared to healthy controls. Additionally, healthy controls showed no cognitive interference during motor tasks.The results suggest that standardized regular assessment of dual-tasking in MS care might increase the individual's knowledge of dual-task capacity and contribute to understanding of possible related consequences. However, feasible assessment equipment and specific motor-cognitive dual-task training interventions for people with MS need to be developed.

Evaluation of a Novel Step Training Mobile App Intervention in Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation: A Single-Arm Prospective Cohort Study

Objective: To establish the usability, acceptability, safety, and exercise adherence of a step training mobile app. Design: A single-arm prospective cohort study. Setting: Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia. Subjects: Twenty-six cardiopulmonary rehabilitation participants. Intervention: Twelve weeks of step training using the mobile app Clock Yourself. Participants used Clock Yourself at home and during cardiopulmonary rehabilitation sessions, prescribed for a total of 15-20 minutes three times a week. Main Measures: The primary outcomes of interest were usability and acceptability and were measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Attitudes to Falls-Related Interventions Scale (AFRIS) questionnaire, respectively. Safety and adherence were measured by self-report and participant diary, respectively. Secondary outcomes measuring changes in stepping, gait, balance, and physical performance included Manual test of Choice Stepping Reaction Time (CSRT-M), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Gait speed with and without a cognitive dual task (DT) and Timed Up and Go with and without a cognitive DT (TUG and TUGcog). Results: Twenty-one participants completed the study. Clock Yourself was considered highly useable (SUS [median] = 82.5/100; interquartile range [IQR, 67.5-95], equating to an "A" rating [A-F scale]) and acceptable (AFRIS [median] = 38/42 [IQR, 31-41]). Participants practiced Clock Yourself for a median of 18.29 minutes per week and no adverse events were reported. At 12 weeks, mean change in CSRT-M, SPPB, gait speed, DT gait speed, TUG, and TUGcog were all statistically significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Twelve weeks of mobile app-based step training was safe and considered usable and acceptable by participants. On average, participants did not meet the prescribed practice dosage. Statistically significant changes were observed in all physical measures; however, results are confounded by participation in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and lack of control group.

Comparative Effects of Motor and Cognitive Dual- Task Gait Training on balance and mobility in persons with Intellectual Disabilities

Background: Dual tasks fall into two main groups: motor dual tasks, which require performance of a motor task and a postural control task at the same time; and cognition dual task that require performance of a cognition task and postural control task at the same time. Aim: To focus on comparative effects of motor and cognitive dual-task gait training on balance and mobility in persons with intellectual disabilities Methodology: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 52 subjects (n=26) in a District Headquarter Hospital, Mirpur AJK. Fifty-two patients were randomly allocated in two groups as Group A received motor dual task and Group B received cognitive dual task training. Total duration of study was three weeks and assessment done before treatment and after every week. Rancho Los Amigos Cognitive Functional Scale (RLACF), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Walking While Talking Test (WWT) and Stair Climb Test (SCT) for the assessment of the patient’s improvement in skills, balance and mobility. Results: The results of the study concluded that Rancho Los Amigos Cognitive Function Scale, Berg Balance Scale, Walking While Talking Test and Stair Climb Test scores were improved in both groups significantly. But on comparison; Cognitive dual task training significantly produce better results in improving the balance and mobility in the person with intellectual disability as compared to Motor dual task training with p value&lt;0.005. Conclusion: The study concluded that Cognitive dual task training is statistically and clinically more significant in improving the balance and mobility in the intellectual disable persons as compared to Motor dual task training. Key words: Cognitive dual task, Intellectual disabilities, Motor and cognitive dual-task gait training.

The Coronavirus Footprint on Dual-Task Performance in Post-Acute Patients after Severe COVID-19: A Future Challenge for Rehabilitation.

Recent studies suggest that also the non-critical form of COVID-19 infection may be associated with executive function impairments. However, it is not clear if they result from cognitive impairments or by COVID-19 infection per se. We aimed to investigate if patients in the post-acute stage of severe COVID-19 (PwCOVID), without manifest cognitive deficits, reveal impairments in performing dual-task (DT) activities compared to healthy controls (HS). We assessed balance in 31 PwCOVID vs. 30 age-matched HS by stabilometry and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test with/without a cognitive DT. The DT cost (DTC), TUG test time and sway oscillations were recorded; correct cognitive responses (CCR) were calculated to evaluate cognitive performance. Results show a significant difference in overall DT performance between PwCOVID and HS in both stabilometry (p < 0.01) and the TUG test (p < 0.0005), although with similar DTCs. The main difference in the DTs between groups emerged in the CCR (effect size > 0.8). Substantially, PwCOVID gave priority to the motor task, leaving out the cognitive one, while HS performed both tasks simultaneously. Our findings suggest that PwCOVID, even without a manifest cognitive impairment, may present a deficit in executive function during DTs. These results encourage the use of DTs and CCR in PwCOVID.

Validation of Pressure-Sensing Insoles in Patients with Parkinson's Disease during Overground Walking in Single and Cognitive Dual-Task Conditions.

There is a need for unobtrusive and valid tools to collect gait parameters in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). The novel promising tools are pressure-sensing insoles connected to a smartphone app; however, few studies investigated their measurement properties during simple or challenging conditions in PD patients. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of gait parameters computed by pressure-sensing insoles (FeetMe® insoles, Paris, France). Twenty-five PD patients (21 males, mean age: 69 (7) years) completed two walking assessment sessions. In each session, participants walked on an electronic pressure-sensitive walkway (GaitRite®, CIR System Inc., Franklin, NJ, USA) without other additional instructions (i.e., single-task condition) and while performing a concurrent cognitive task (i.e., dual-task condition). Spatiotemporal gait parameters were measured simultaneously using the pressure-sensing insoles and the electronic walkway. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlation coefficients and Bland–Altman methodology. Test–retest reliability was examined by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and minimal detectable changes (MDC). The validity results showed moderate to excellent correlations and good agreement between the two systems. Concerning test–retest reliability, moderate-to-excellent ICC values and acceptable MDC demonstrated the repeatability of the measured gait parameters. Our findings support the use of these insoles as complementary instruments to conventional tools during single and dual-task conditions.

Apathy exacerbates postural control impairments in stroke survivors: The potential effects of cognitive dual-task for improving postural control

Apathy is a stressor and debilitating common condition for both stroke survivors and their caregivers. However, its effects on the postural control of these patients have not yet been investigated. Improved postural stability through withdrawing attention from postural control by concurrent cognitive task (i.e. dual-task condition) has been reported previously, but the effect of apathy, as a confounding factor, remains unknown. This study aimed to examine the effects of apathy and dual-task condition on postural control of chronic stroke survivors from biomechanical and neurophysiological perspectives. Twenty non-apathetic stroke survivors, 20 apathetic stroke survivors, and 20 sex-, age-, weight-, and height-matched healthy subjects were assessed using different postural sway measures and electromyography activity of ankle and hip muscles while quietly standing on rigid and foam surfaces under single-task, easy dual-task, and difficult dual-task conditions. The results showed postural instability and neuromuscular stiffening of stroke survivors, particularly apathetic stroke survivors, compared with healthy controls as evidenced by significantly greater postural sway measures and increased co-contraction of ankle muscles as well as hip muscles. Notably, concurrently performing a cognitive task significantly reduced postural instability and neuromuscular stiffening in chronic stroke survivors even in those with apathy. In conclusion, apathy exacerbates postural control impairments in chronic stroke survivors promoting an inefficient conscious mode of postural control. It is recommended that distracting the attention away from postural control by performing a concurrent cognitive task can be considered an effective strategy while designing interventions for improving postural control in apathetic stroke survivors.

Standing Posture in Motor and Cognitive Dual-Tasks during Smartphone Use: Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Postural Control.

Analysis of the center of pressure (CoP) during cognitive or motor dual-tasking is widely used to characterize postural control. Most studies use traditional measures of CoP to quantify postural control, but given its complexity, nonlinear analysis of CoP is of growing interest in the area. This study aims to analyze CoP behavior in healthy young adults during standing posture performance while simultaneously performing motor or cognitive tasks on a smartphone, using linear and nonlinear analysis of CoP. Thirty-six healthy participants (23.08 ± 3.92 years) were found eligible for this study. They performed a single task (ST), cognitive dual-task (cog-DT), and motor dual-task (mot-DT). The total excursion of CoP, displacement of CoP in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions, mean total velocity of CoP, and mean anterior-posterior and medial-lateral velocities of CoP were measured with a force plate. Approximate entropy (ApEn) of the anterior-posterior (ApEn-AP) and medial-lateral (ApEn-ML) displacement of CoP were also calculated. The results showed that dual-task costs for the total excursion, displacement in the anterior-posterior direction, mean total velocity, and mean anterior-posterior velocity of CoP were greater during the cog-DT than the mot-DT (p < 0.05). In the nonlinear analysis of the CoP, there was no difference (p > 0.05) between the cog-DT and mot-DT for ApEn values of the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral time series of the CoP. Both linear and nonlinear analyses showed differences between the cog-DT and ST (p < 0.05), revealing a decline in postural control during the cog-DT compared with the ST. In conclusion, performing a cog-DT causes sway impairments and lower postural control efficacy compared with motor single and dual-tasks. Furthermore, both linear and nonlinear analyses were able to distinguish between conditions.

이중과제 적용 댄스스포츠 프로그램 참가가 경도인지장애 노인의 뇌파변화와 인지기능 및 심리적 행복감에 미치는 영향

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of a dance sports program as a cognitive exercise dual task training for the elderly with mild cognitive impairment(MMSE-K : 20-23). They were divided into two experimental groups and one control group. The data was analyzed with reliability analysis and covariate analysis. Followings are the results of this study. First, that participation in a dance sports program has a significant effect on brain waves, cognitive function and psychological Happness. Second, it was found that participation in a dual task dance sports program had a more significant effect on brain waves, cognitive function and psychological well-being than participation in a single task dance sports program.

Do the dual-task “8-foot up and go” tests provide additional predictive value for early detection of cognitive decline in community-dwelling older women?

BackgroundThe 8-Foot Up and Go (8UG) test is a widely used mobility assessment. Some dual-task mobility assessments have been developed to help detect cognitive decline.AimsThis study developed a dual-task version of 8UG test to investigate the dual-task 8UG performance and to evaluate the ability of dual-task 8UG test in detecting cognitive decline.MethodsA total of 101 eligible community-dwelling women aged 60–74 years were grouped into the mild cognitive impairment group (MCI, n = 49) and the non-cognitive impairment group (NCI, n = 52). The 8UG tests under single-task (ST), manual dual-task (MT), and cognitive dual-task (CT) conditions were performed respectively. The dual-task cost (DTC) and the correct response rate (CRR) were calculated to quantify the dual-task interference.ResultsParticipants spent more time in performing the 8UG test under dual-task conditions. No differences were observed between NCI and MCI groups for 8UG parameters under ST and MT conditions (p > 0.05). When executing CT, significant differences were found in the number of correct answers and CRR (p < 0.05). CRR showed the strongest ability to predict MCI with a cut-off point of 0.50 (71.2% sensitivity and 61.2% specificity).DiscussionBoth manual and cognitive dual-task were found to interfere with the 8UG performance. CRR with cutoff point of 0.50 could be a potential predictor of MCI in community-dwelling older women.ConclusionsThe CRR of the cognitive dual-task 8UG test could be recommended as a potential predictor for the early detection of MCI in community-dwelling older women.

A New Motor and Cognitive Dual-Task Approach Based on Foot Tapping for The Identification of Mild Cognitive Impairment.

This study investigates the adoption of innovative Motor and Cognitive Dual-Task (MCDT) based on the combination of increasing motor and cognitive tasks to discern between subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Cognitively Normal Adults (CNA). We aim to adopt new MCDT protocols and to compare their performance against the gold standard (a walking based MCDT, called GAIT). 27 older adults have been assessed through a customized wearable system during 4 MCDTs. We developed as many pooled indices (PIs), based on MCDTs perfomance, demographic data, and clinical scores. We use these parameters as regressors in 4 different logistic regression models. The regression models that encompassed features from innovative MCDT overcame the gold standard classification performance. In particular, models based on the heel tapping and the alternate heel-toe tapping reach the best outputs, namely +8% of accuracy if compared to the gold standard (a walking task). The use of logistic regression models based on MCDT PI have been effective in discerning between CNA vs MCI. Our results suggest that the gold standard MCDT may represents a too demanding exercise to highlight differences between CNA and MCI. It seems that MCDT based on an intermediate level of motor difficulty could represent the sweet spot for the identification of MCI against CNA. Clinical relevance- The combination of innovative digital devices and innovative approach on data analysis (PIs) opened a new scenarios to the early detection and prediction of dementia. Their use would standardize the assessment procedure, lightening the physician from the burden of cumbersome testing sessions. This study suggests that a broader framework for MCDT, which should encompass an ampler selection of motor tasks with different possibilities in terms of difficulties levels, could provide clinicians with a new appropriate set of tools for the early detection of dementia.

Comparing the effects of cognitive dual tasking on balance and gait motor performance in people with mild multiple sclerosis and healthy individuals

Background/Aims People with multiple sclerosis show both cognitive and postural impairment, and various static and dynamic postural activities may be affected under conditions of cognitive distraction. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of cognitive dual tasking on the balance and gait motor performance of people with mild multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 2.0 ± 1.3) and healthy people and to compare these two groups in terms of performing single and dual tasks. Methods People with mild multiple sclerosis (n=39) and healthy individuals (n=33) performed static balance tests (Romberg's Test, tandem stance test, single-legged stance test) and dynamic balance tests (Functional Reach Test, Four Square Step Test, Timed Up and Go Test, 10-Metre Walk Test), with and without a word list generation test (single and dual tasks). Independent t-tests were used to evaluate differences between the two groups, and paired t-tests were used for single or dual tasks for all static and dynamic tests. The magnitude of differences in tasks between measures was expressed as Cohen's d. Results Dual task effects were more evident during dynamic balance tests in participants with multiple sclerosis and healthy participants (specifically the Timed Up and Go Test and 10-Metre Walk Test) (P&lt;0.001). There was a significant difference between both groups only in terms of static balance (P&lt;0.001). Conclusions Dynamic balance and gait were shown to be more affected when performing the dual cognitive task than static balance in people with multiple sclerosis. Dual tasks should be included in diagnoses.

Normative values of functional reach test, single-leg stance test, and timed “UP and GO” with and without dual-task in healthy Iranian adults: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundBalance impairment is a common problem in all age groups. There are several tools to assess balance. Functional reach test (FRT), single-leg stance (SLS) test, timed up and go (TUG) test, and TUG with the cognitive dual-task (TUGcog) are commonly employed balance tests. The current study aimed to determine the normative values of FRT, SLST, TUG, and TUGcog across age groups and genders in healthy Iranian adults. MethodsWe designed a cross-sectional study, and 240 healthy adults (120 males and 120 females) in six age groups (18–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, ≥70 years) completed FRT, SLST, TUG, and TUGcog based on the Persian version of BESTest instructions. ResultsThere were significant age-specific declines in balance performances. Gender had effects on 18–29 years and older adults (≥60 years), and males performed better than females. Male and females had similar performance on the TUG and TUGcog tests in 60–69 years (p > 0.05). ConclusionsThe normative values of FRT, SLS, TUG, and TUGcog provided for healthy Iranian adults increase the clinical utility of tests, and serve as a reference to estimating the individuals’ balance performance across age and gender groups.

Influence of Different Dual-Task Conditions During Straight or Curved Walking on Gait Performance of Physically Active Older Women With Cognitive Decline.

Real-world walking requires shifting attention from different cognitive demands to adapt gait. This study aims to evaluate the effect of dual tasking on spatiotemporal gait parameters of older adults. Participants were asked to perform a primary complex single-walking task, consisting of a fast-paced linear and a curved gait. Primary task was performed separately and simultaneously with different motor and cognitive secondary tasks. Spatiotemporal gait parameters, walk ratio, and walk stability ratio were measured. Apart from stride length, which stood relatively unchanged, gait speed and cadence were strongly affected by cognitive dual tasking. Cadence seems to be the most impacted by dual tasking during curved gait as it combines challenges of both primary and secondary tasks. Also, during curved phase, walking ratio was significantly lower and stability ratio was greater demonstrating that participants adopted a cautious gait where maintenance of stability took preference over efficiency.

A pilot investigation of reliability and validity of balance and gait assessments using telehealth with healthy older adults.

The use of telehealth has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the lack of reliable and valid tools to measure balance and gait remotely makes assessing these outcomes difficult. Thus, we investigated whether balance and gait measures used in clinical practice are reliable and valid when assessed remotely through telehealth. In this pilot study, we investigated 15 healthy older adults who performed validated tests: Timed Up and Go simple, dual cognitive and motor tasks; Berg Balance Scale; Functional Gait Assessment and Dynamic Gait Index. The tests were assessed on two dates: (i) face-to-face, (ii) and remotely, via videoconference between 7 and 14days after the initial assessment. Participants also undertook the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA) to assess their risk of falling. Reliability was measured using intraclass correlation (ICC) two-way mixed with absolute agreement to contrast the score of the assessments undertaken face-to-face and remotely in real-time and recorded. We also assessed inter-rater reliability. Criterion validity was measured using Pearson correlation between the tests that were undertaken remotely and PPA. All tests showed good reliability between face-to-face and real-time telehealth (ICC=0.79-0.87) and face-to-face and recorded telehealth (ICC=0.78-0.88) assessments and good to excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.80-1.00). Correlation between the tests and PPA were significantly (p<0.05) moderate for real-time (r=-0.68-0.64) and recorded (r=-0.69-0.71) telehealth assessments. The good reliability between face-to-face and remote measurements together with moderate validity of these measures to assess fall risk suggest that health professionals could use these measures to evaluate the balance and gait of healthy older adults remotely.

Does secondary cognitive task affect knee force production sense in young male soccer players?

Objective: The aim of the present study is to compare the knee force production sense error (KFPSE) of young soccer players under single and dual-task conditions. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four young male soccer players with a soccer license participated in this study. Knee force production sense (KFPS) was evaluated using a biofeedback device. In order to compare the KFPSE first, the bilateral KFPS of the participants was evaluated. Then the same assessment was performed concurrently with a cognitive dual task (five countdowns from 200). Results: The results revealed that, compared with the single-task condition, players had higher absolute error under the dual-task condition for both extremities (p˂0.05). Conclusion: Secondary cognitive task may be a possible critical factor reducing the accuracy of the force (re)production sense. A secondary cognitive task may adversely affect the KFPS.

Effects of different dual task training on dual task walking and responding brain activation in older adults with mild cognitive impairment

The concurrent additional tasking impacts the walking performance, and such impact is even greater in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) than in healthy elders. However, effective training program to improve dual task walking ability for the people with MCI is not immediately provided. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effects of cognitive and motor dual task walking training on dual task walking performance and the responding brain changes in older people with MCI. Thirty older adults with MCI were randomly allocated to receive 24 sessions of 45-min cognitive dual task training (CDTT, n = 9), motor dual task training (MDTT, n = 11), or conventional physical therapy (CPT, n = 10). Gait performance and brain activation during single and dual task walking, and cognitive function assessed by trail-making test (TMT-A, B) and digit span test were measured at pre-, post-test, and 1-month follow-up. Both CDTT and MDTT improved dual task walking with responding activation changes in specific brain areas. The improvements in motor dual task walking performance after both dual task trainings were significantly better than after CPT in the older adults with MCI. Both cognitive and motor dual task training were feasible and beneficial to improve dual task walking ability in older adults with MCI.Trial Registration: The trial was registered to Thai Clinical Trial Registry and the registration number is TCTR20180510002 (first registration date: 10/05/2018).

Effect of individualized cognitive and postural task difficulty levels on postural control during dual task condition

BackgroundPrevious dual task studies suggested that the difficulty of the concurrent cognitive and motor tasks may not be challenging to the same degree for each person. This study approaches this problem by setting individualized difficulty levels for tasks to examine the dual task interference. Research questionDo the features of postural sway depend on increased individualized difficulty levels of concurrent cognitive and postural activities? Methods20 young healthy participants (10 male, 10 female) took part in the study. Before the experiments, cognitive task difficulty (No-, Medium-, High) has been set individually. Subjects performed postural tasks (quiet stance, voluntary sway) concurrently with or without a cognitive task which based on simple arithmetic calculations. Postural sway features were examined. ResultsPostural sway features were affected by individualized difficulty level of concurrent cognitive and postural activities. In voluntary sway, as a more challenging postural task, higher reductions were observed for such sway features as COP velocity and range in AP direction. SignificanceThis study signaled task-specific changes in postural sway features. When the difficulty levels were set individually, the effect of motor and cognitive dual task was more apparent when the balance requirement of the primary motor task increased.

Dual-Task Abilities During Activities Representative of Daily Life in Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Study.

BackgroundIn addition to several physical skills, being able to walk in the community, walking independently and safely in the community requires the ability to divide attention between walking and other tasks performed simultaneously. The aims of the present pilot study were to measure cognitive-locomotor dual-task (DT) abilities during activities representative of daily living in stroke survivors and to compare them with age- and gender-matched healthy individuals.MethodsTo assess DT abilities, all participants walked along a virtual shopping mall corridor and memorized a 5-item shopping list. Two levels of task complexity were used for the walking task (with or without virtual agents to avoid) and the cognitive task to recall a list of items (with or without a modification at mid-course). The assessment was conducted using an omnidirectional platform and a virtual reality (VR) headset. Locomotor and cognitive DT costs (DTC) were calculated as the percent change from single-task (ST) performance. Walking speed and minimal distance between the participant and the virtual agents were used to characterize locomotor performance. Cognitive performance was assessed by the number of correctly recalled items. One-sample Wilcoxon tests were used to determine the presence of DTCs and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to compare DTCs between the 2 groups.ResultsTwelve community-dwelling stroke survivors [60.50 years old (25-75th percentiles: 53.50–65.75); 5 women; 13.41 months post-stroke (5.34–48.90)] and 12 age- and gender- matched healthy individuals were recruited. Significant cognitive or mutual (cognitive and locomotor) interferences were observed in participants with stroke in all DT conditions, except the simplest (no virtual agents, no modifications to the list). For the control group, significant mutual interferences were only observed during the most complex DT condition. A group difference was detected in cognitive DTCs during the most complex DT condition (virtual agents and list modifications; p = 0.02). Stroke survivors had greater cognitive DTCs than the control group.ConclusionsUsing an ecological perspective contributes to understanding behavior of stroke survivors in daily activities. Virtual scenarios appear to be an interesting avenue for a more comprehensive understanding of DT abilities during activities representative of daily living in stroke survivors. The usability and feasibility of such an approach will have to be studied before considering implementation in rehabilitation settings.

The effects of a visuo-motor and cognitive dual task on walking adaptability in children with and without Developmental Coordination Disorder

BackgroundChildren with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD-C) have motor coordination deficits which lead to difficulties in sports and play activities that require adaptations of the walking pattern. Sports and play often involve performing dual tasks, which affects performance in DCD-C more than in typically developing children (TD-C). So far, testing the impact of dual tasking on walking adaptability in DCD-C has received little scientific attention. Research questionWe tested the hypothesis that 6–12 year old DCD-C will show lower levels of walking adaptability than TD-C, and that due to problems with automatization this difference will increase when they are forced to divide their attention between tasks when a concurrent visuo-motor or cognitive task is added. MethodsTwenty-six DCD-C and sixty-nine TD-C were included in this cross-sectional study. They performed a challenging walking adaptability (WA) task on a treadmill as a single, a visuo-motor dual and a cognitive dual task at a pace of 3.5 km/h. Repeated measures ANCOVAs were performed with condition (single/dual task) as within-subjects factor, group (TD/DCD) as between-subjects factor, and age as covariate. ResultsDCD-C performed poorer on the WA task than TD-C. The group differences increased when a concurrent visuo-motor task was added, but not when adding a concurrent cognitive task. A significant effect of age was found with younger children performing worse on all tasks. SignificanceThe results highlight the problems DCD-C have with walking adaptability and dual tasks, which capacities are essential for full participation in sports and play activities. Future research should investigate whether DCD-C may benefit from task-specific walking adaptability training.