Adolescence can be called as the start of an emotionally charged period of transition and transformation. It is observed that when placed into a co-educational setting adolescent students rather than concentrating on the classroom activities are more concerned about their looks and behavior. Instead of focusing on achieving, students focus more on not failing in front of the opposite which distracts them from the learning process. Parents who believe in the ideology of following single education want to follow it for their adolescent children especially for girls. Where adolescent girls are concerned,it also depend upon their perspective of co-education and how it affects their confidence level.lt is mainly because of the strict roles framed by the society for both the sexes which block their vision for other opportunities considered fit for the other sex.Learning takes place in social contexts both inside and outside the classroom (Hoffman, Hoffman & Guldemond, 2001), with the climate of the school and classroom impacting significantly on student learning (Fraser, 1994). Comparisons of achievement levels in single and co-ed schools typically shows that the academic and personal achievement of females are substantially higher in single schools than in co-ed schools (Marsh, 1989).Three longitudinal studies of the changeover from single to coeducation have indicated no adverse effects on student academic achievement (Marsh, 1989; Marsh, Smith, Marsh & Owens, 1988), academic selfconcept (Marsh et al., 1988; Smith, 1996; Jackson & Smith, 2000) and explanatory style (Yates, 2000).Bandura's (1977) concept of self-efficacy as a plausible mechanism for the effectiveness of single colleges.Bandura suggested that self-efficacy involves knowing one's goals clearly, knowing the steps necessary to achieve each goal, and confidence in one's ability to meet each goal.Self-efficacy specifies a clear-cut relationship between institutional structure, self variables and the positive outcomes that are seen in single institutions. Gender role stereotypes affect how individuals see themselves, as well as how others see them (Hoffman, Powlishta & White, 2004).Gender roles may be defined as expectations about what is appropriate behavior for each sex (Weiten, 1997) It is the expectations held about appropriate personality characteristics for each sex. Gender role socialization is deeply ingrained in the fabric of our society, and yet much of the perceptions that fuel our practice are rooted in habitual and stereotypical thinking. If a woman displays a task-oriented style of leadership that violates the gender norm of modesty she will suffer isolation and incur low social attraction, although she may be viewed as competent. Men displaying the same characteristics, however, are given high leadership and likeabuity ratings (Sue & Sue, 2008).Traditionally, our society has defined femininity as the qualities of emotionality, sensitivity, and nurturance (Cook, 1990). Masculinity is defined as possessing a competitive orientation that views relationships from a functional and outcome-based perspective, is achievement and task driven,and is somewhat restrictive in its view of emotionality and personal attachment (Leaper & Van, 2008). One study examined college students gender role perceptions of the ideal man, ideal woman, most men, most women and themselves (Street & Meek, 1980). It was found that both the female and male students rated the ideal woman as androgynous, women preferred an androgynous ideal man, and men preferred a masculine ideal man. Both female and male students rated most women and men in terms of stereotypical gender roles. Lengua and Stormshak (2000) report that people who are the best adjusted in terms of mental health are those that have a balance of so-called masculine (i.e., competitive) and feminine (i.e., nurturing) traits working on their behalf. Problems with gender role identification appear to intensify most during adolescence, a time when social pressures for gender differentiation increases (Hill &Lynch, 1982). …
Read full abstract