The scientific article is dedicated to highlighting the peculiarities of bringing to justice the refusal to provide public services in Ukraine. Administrative liability for refusal to provide public services is the application to persons who have violated not only the procedure of submission and receipt of a certain administrative legal act, but also the procedure of handling the object of high risk, etc., administrative penalties, which entail negative consequences for these persons and are imposed by authorized bodies or officials on the grounds established by the norms of administrative legislation. From this definition we can conclude that the administrative liability for the offense - refusal to provide public services - is divided into: violation of the order of rendering public services; violation of the procedure for obtaining public services; violation of the procedure of handling high-risk objects that are the object of public services. It is emphasized that the administrative responsibility and the mechanism of application of administrative penalties for committing offenses for refusal to provide public services are regulated along with the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses and other normative legal acts. Most of them are by-laws and have departmental orientation, which complicates the process of their implementation. Only an official may be the subject of an administrative offense involving a breach of public service. Officials are subject to administrative responsibility not so much for the violation of certain rules by their own actions, but for the irregularity, failure to enforce these rules by other persons, in particular subordinates. In this regard, the literature proposed to amend the legislation, eliminating the administrative responsibility of officials in the case of direct orders (orders) of the immediate or superior manager without signs of contradiction of the law and if the official took all possible measures to prevent violation of established rules, although in such cases it is possible to speak about absence of guilt of the official. An administrative offense committed by an official is also a disciplinary misdemeanor, since it violates the rules which ensure the performance of his duties. In this case, the presence of the ideal population is recognized by the majority of administrative scientists.
Read full abstract