Cochlear Nerve Function Research Articles

Long-Term Outcomes of Jugular Paragangliomas Undergoing Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: A Single Center Experience.

Jugular paragangliomas (JPG) pose a surgical challenge because of their vascularity and complex location. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a minimally invasive management for patients with JPG. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for the treatment of JPG over the long term. We reviewed our 3.5-decade 17 800 patients' GKRS database. Clinical behavior, treatment parameters, tumor control, complications, and functional status were assessed. Forty patients (median = 56 years [range, 18-88], women = 24) with 40 JPG were included. There were 28 primary and 12 adjuvant GKRS. The median margin dose was 13.5 Gy (range, 12-18) delivered at 50% isodose line. Among patients with adjuvant GKRS, there were more staged-volume SRS (2 sessions) (n = 1 vs n = 3, P = .035) associated with larger tumor volume [3.5 cc (1.1-26.7) vs 10.2 cc (3.3-45.9), (P = .038) and increased V12Gy (P = .031). Better House-Brackmann grade (P = .008) and Gardner-Robertson hearing class (P < .001) before GKRS correlated with better facial nerve function and unchanged cochlear nerve function after treatment, respectively. During an overall median follow-up of 69.7 months (range, 6.0-339.3 months), symptom control and preserved functionality were achieved in 39 patients (97.5%). Tumor control was obtained in 38 patients (95%) (regression = 23, stable = 15) after SRS. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year progression-free survival rates were all 100% after primary GKRS and 91.7%, 83.3%, and 83.3% for adjuvant GKRS (P = .101). Larger (≥10 cc) tumor volumes (HR: 1.35 [95% CI: 1.11-1.70], P = .013) and mFisch Di2 (HR: 1.40 [95% CI: 1.18-1.64], P = .016) were associated with worse progression-free survival. One patient required a second GKRS after asymptomatic progression with no further growth. One patient with 2 failed surgical resections died 8 months after adjuvant GKRS related to tumor progression and hydrocephalus. As a minimally invasive management, GKRS proved to be a safe and effective treatment of JPG. GKRS should be considered both as an optimal primary management and as an early adjuvant strategy for residual or recurrent tumors after initial resection.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Translabyrinthine IAC Tumor Removal With Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation.

To evaluate the long-term hearing outcome after translabyrinthine resection of tumors within the internal auditory canal (IAC) with simultaneous cochlear implantation (CI). Prospective study. Tertiary referral center. Thirty-seven patients with tumors of the IAC undergoing translabyrinthine tumor surgery as a first-line therapy. Intraoperatively, electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry (eABR) was performed in all patients to assess cochlear nerve (CN) integrity. In case of preserved CN function after tumor removal, CI was subsequently performed. Postoperatively, patients were regularly followed up to evaluate pure-tone hearing as well as speech recognition with a monosyllabic word comprehension test. Postoperative hearing thresholds and word recognition scores. Of 37 included patients, 22 (59.46%) had positive eABR responses after tumor removal. Twenty-one of these underwent simultaneous CI directly after tumor surgery and were followed-up for 24.24 ± 19.83 months after surgery. Hearing of these patients significantly improved from 73.87 ± 21.40 dB preoperatively to a mean pure-tone average of 41.56 ± 18.87 dB 1 year (p = 0.0008) and 34.58 ± 2.92 dB 3 years after surgery (p = 0.0157). Speech recognition significantly recovered from 13.33 ± 25.41% to 58.93 ± 27.61% 1 year (p = 0.0012) and 51.67 ± 28.58% 3 years postoperatively (p = 0.0164). Regardless of tumor histopathology, CI is an effective option to restore patients' hearing after translabyrinthine tumor surgery. After CI, patients hearing can be restored over a long-term period of a minimum of 3 years post-surgery. Furthermore, eABR proves to be a practical tool to evaluate CN function and screen for patients eligible for CI.

Novel standardized indexes of brainstem auditory evoked potentials for predicting hearing preservation in vestibular schwannomas

Hearing preservation (HP) during vestibular schwannomas (VSs) surgery poses a significant challenge. Although brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) on the affected side are commonly employed to monitor cochlear nerve function, their low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) renders them susceptible to interferences, compromising their reliability. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent tumor resection, while binaural brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) were simultaneously recorded during surgery. To standardize BAEPs on the affected side, we incorporated the synchronous healthy side as a reference (interval between affected and healthy side ≤ 3 min). A total of 127 patients were enrolled. Comparison of the raw BAEPs data pre- and post-tumor resection revealed that neither V-wave amplitude (Am-V) nor latency (La-V) could serve as reliable predictors of HP simultaneously. However, following standardization, V-wave latency (STIAS-La-V) and amplitude (STIAS-Am-V) emerged as stable predictors of HP. Furthermore, the intraoperative difference in V-wave amplitude (D-Am-V) predicted postoperative HP in patients with preoperative HP and remained predictive after standardization. The utilization of intraoperative synchronous healthy side BAEPs as a reference to eliminate interferences proves to be an effective approach in enhancing the reliability of BAEPs for predicting HP in VSs patients.

"To implant or not to implant": electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry for decision-making in vestibular schwannoma resection with CI.

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are often associated with debilitating hearing loss. Therefore, preservation and rehabilitation of hearing have become major therapeutic goals of VS management. Recently, cochlear implantation (CI) has been established as an effective treatment option for VS-associated hearing loss. Nevertheless, the integrity and proper function of the cochlear nerve must be evaluated before conducting CI to ensure optimal CI outcomes. Various methods to determine cochlear nerve integrity and functionality have emerged in the last few years. Of these, the use of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry (eABR) in particular has been proven to be ameaningful tool for monitoring cochlear nerve health during VS surgery. Here, the cochlear nerve can be electrically stimulated using an intracochlear test electrode before, during, and after tumor extirpation. Subsequently, the resulting brainstem responses can be measured and interpreted accordingly to obtain direct information on the cochlear nerve function. This allows for continuous monitoring of cochlear nerve function throughout the course of VS surgery and aids in the decision-making for CI candidacy. Finally, in the case of preserved brainstem responses, CI can be performed instantly after VS extirpation. This simultaneous approach offers several advantages over two-staged procedures and has been shown to be an efficient and safe procedure for restoring hearing after VS removal.

Preserved Auditory Steady State Response and Envelope-Following Response in Severe Brainstem Dysfunction Highlight the Need for Cross-Checking.

Commercially available auditory steady state response (ASSR) systems are widely used to obtain hearing thresholds in the pediatric population objectively. Children are often examined during natural or induced sleep so that the recorded ASSRs are of subcortical origin, the inferior colliculus being often designated as the main ASSR contributor in these conditions. This report presents data from a battery of auditory neurophysiological objective tests obtained in 3 cases of severe brainstem dysfunction in sleeping children. In addition to ASSRs, envelope-following response (EFR) recordings designed to distinguish peripheral (cochlear nerve) from central (brainstem) were recorded to document the effect of brainstem dysfunction on the two types of phase-locked responses. Results obtained in the 3 children with severe brainstem dysfunctions were compared with those of age-matched controls. The cases were identified as posterior fossa tumor, undiagnosed (UD), and Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-Like Disease. The standard audiological objective tests comprised tympanograms, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), and ASSRs. EFRs were recorded using horizontal (EFR-H) and vertical (EFR-V) channels and a stimulus phase rotation technique allowing isolation of the EFR waveforms in the time domain to obtain direct latency measurements. The brainstem dysfunctions of the 3 children were revealed as abnormal (weak, absent, or delayed) ABRs central waves with a normal wave I. In addition, they all presented a summating and cochlear microphonic potential in their ABRs, coupled with a normal wave I, which implies normal cochlear and cochlear nerve function. EFR-H and EFR-V waveforms were identified in the two cases in whom they were recorded. The EFR-Hs onset latencies, response durations, and phase-locking values did not differ from their respective age-matched control values, indicating normal cochlear nerve EFRs. In contrast, the EFR-V phase-locking value and onset latency varied from their control values. Both patients had abnormal but identifiable and significantly phase-locked brainstem EFRs, even in a case with severely distorted ABR central waves. ASSR objective audiograms were recorded in two cases. They showed normal or slightly elevated (explained by a slight transmission loss) thresholds that do not yield any clue about their brainstem dysfunction, revealing the method's lack of sensitivity to severe brainstem dysfunction. The present study, performed on 3 sleeping children with severe brainstem dysfunction but normal cochlear responses (cochlear microphonic potential, summating potential, and ABR wave I), revealed the differential sensitivity of three auditory electrophysiological techniques. Estimated thresholds obtained by standard ASSR recordings (cases UD and Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-Like Disease) provided no clue to the brainstem dysfunction clearly revealed by the click-evoked ABR. EFR recordings (cases posterior fossa tumor and UD) showed preserved central responses with abnormal latencies and low phase-locking values, whereas the peripheral EFR attributed to the cochlear nerve was normal. The one case (UD) for which the three techniques could be performed confirms this sensitivity gradient, emphasizing the need for applying the Cross-Check Principle by avoiding resorting to ASSR recording alone. The entirely normal EFR-H recordings observed in two cases further strengthen the hypothesis of its cochlear nerve origin in sleeping children.

Intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas: facial and hearing outcomes according to the location of the tumor in relation to the nerves of the internal auditory canal.

The objective was to evaluate whether the position of the nerves within the internal auditory canal (IAC) has any effect on preoperative and postoperative cochlear and facial nerve function in patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma (VS) resected through the retrosigmoid transmeatal approach. Forty-four patients with sporadic intracanalicular VS, from a series of 710 patients with VS who underwent operations from January 1993 to April 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. The pattern of displacement of the cranial nerves and tumor within the IAC was recorded. Tumors were divided into 2 types: type T1A lesions had only anteriorly displaced nerves, and type T1B had posteriorly displaced vestibular nerves and anteriorly displaced facial and cochlear nerves. Differences in surgical outcomes between groups in terms of facial nerve function and hearing preservation were evaluated. Thirty-five cases (79.5%) were T1A tumors and 9 were T1B (20.5%). Gross-total resection and anatomical preservation of the facial and cochlear nerves were achieved in all patients. Postoperatively, all patients with T1A VS maintained normal facial nerve function; however, among T1B VS patients, 6 (67%) retained House-Brackmann grade I, 2 worsened to grade II, and 1 worsened to grade III at 6 months (p = 0.006). The 27 T1A VS patients with serviceable hearing maintained this status, and an additional patient with nonserviceable hearing improved to serviceable hearing; among T1B VS patients, only 2 of the 5 patients with serviceable hearing remained as such, 2 evolved to nonserviceable hearing, and 1 lost hearing after surgery (p = 0.0022). T1B VS patients had a 24-fold risk of facial nerve deterioration (relative risk [RR] 25.2, 95% CI 1.42-448.57, p = 0.028) and a 32-fold risk of hearing deterioration (RR 32.7, 95% CI 1.93-553, p = 0.016) after surgery. In intracanalicular VS, postoperative cochlear and facial nerve function are directly related to the location of the tumor in relation to the nerves, with worse outcomes in cases where the tumor is located between the vestibular and facial-cochlear nerves.

Electrical promontory stimulation test using a portable peripheral nerve stimulator with an ear canal electrode

ObjectiveAn intact cochlear nerve is necessary for successful cochlear implantation (CI). Although the promontory stimulation test (PST) using a promontory stimulator (PS) and a transtympanic needle electrode is invasive, it is still commonly used to verify cochlear nerve function. PSs are currently unavailable because they are no longer manufactured; however, considering that PST continues to be beneficial in certain situations, alternative equipment is needed. The PNS-7000® (PNS) was developed as a neurologic instrument for stimulating the peripheral nerves. This study investigated the usefulness of the ear canal stimulation test (ECST) using PNS with a silver ball ear canal electrode, which is a new noninvasive alternative technique to the PST. MethodsECST was performed from November 2013 to December 2018 using PS and PNS for patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The electrical threshold, most comfortable loudness level, uncomfortable loudness level, dynamic range, and gap detection were measured in the ECST. The results of these measured PNS items were compared with PS. ResultsECST was performed in 61 ears of 35 patients (age, 59.9 ± 20.1 years) using PS and PNS. The sound sensation was elicited in 51 (83.6%) and 52 (85.2%) ears with PS and PNS, respectively. All items excluding GAP were measured in 46 (75%) and 43 (70%) ears at 50 and 100 Hz, respectively. GAP was measured in 33 ears by the ascending and descending methods using PS and PNS. Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient revealed a significant positive linear correlation between the PS and PNS results in all measurements. No significant difference was found between the PS and PNS thresholds in all measured items. ConclusionsPNS is a useful instrument for performing ECST as a new alternative to PS. ECST using a silver ball electrode is a less invasive and easier test than PST.

Salvage radiosurgery following subtotal resection of vestibular schwannomas: does timing influence tumor control?

The goal of microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS) is gross-total resection (GTR) to provide oncological cure. However, a popular strategy is to halt the resection if the surgical team feels the risk of cranial nerve injury is imminent, achieving a maximally safe subtotal resection (STR) instead. The tumor remnant can then be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) once the patient has recovered from the immediate postoperative period, or it can be followed with serial imaging and treated with SRS in a delayed fashion if residual tumor growth is seen. In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of this multimodality approach, particularly the influence of timing and dose of SRS on radiological tumor control, need for salvage treatment, and cranial nerve function. VS patients treated with initial microsurgery and subsequent radiosurgery were retrospectively included from two tertiary treatment centers and dichotomized depending on whether SRS was given upfront (defined as before 12 months) or later. Radiological tumor control was defined as less than 20% tumor volume expansion and oncological tumor control as an absence of salvage treatment. Facial and cochlear nerve functions were assessed after surgery, at the time of SRS, and at last follow-up. Finally, a systematic literature review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 110 VS patients underwent SRS following microsurgical resection, with a mean preradiosurgical tumor volume of 2.2 cm3 (SD 2.5 cm3) and mean post-SRS follow-up time of 5.8 years (SD 4.1 years). The overall radiological tumor control and oncological tumor control were 77.3% and 90.9%, respectively. Thirty-five patients (31.8%) received upfront SRS, while 75 patients (68.2%) were observed for a minimum of 12 months prior to SRS. The timing of SRS did not influence the radiological tumor control (p = 0.869), the oncological tumor control (p = 0.560), or facial nerve (p = 0.413) or cochlear nerve (p = 0.954) function. An escalated marginal dose (> 12 Gy) was associated with greater tumor shrinkage (p = 0.020) and superior radiological tumor control (p = 0.020), but it did not influence the risk of salvage treatment (p = 0.904) or facial (p = 0.351) or cochlear (p = 0.601) nerve deterioration. Delayed SRS after close observation of residuals following STR is a safe alternative to upfront SRS regarding tumor control and cranial nerve preservation in selected patients.

Functional Outcome After Simultaneous Vestibular Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation With Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring.

Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry has emerged as a suitable option to intraoperatively assess cochlear nerve function during vestibular schwannoma resection. This study aimed to analyze the functional outcome and implant usage of patients with preserved auditory nerve responses after simultaneous translabyrinthine schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation. Prospective study. Tertiary referral center. Patients with unilateral sporadic vestibular schwannoma underwent translabyrinthine tumor resection. Intraoperatively, electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry was performed before and after tumor removal. Cochlear implantation was carried out if positive responses were detected after tumor removal indicating cochlear nerve function. Postoperatively, patients were biannually followed-up to assess aided sound field audiometry and word recognition as well as implant usage. Overall, 26 patients with vestibular schwannoma underwent translabyrinthine schwannoma resection. Out of these patients, 15 had positive cochlear nerve responses after tumor removal and concurrently received a cochlear implant. In 13 patients with histologically confirmed vestibular schwannoma, hearing improved by 23.7 ± 33.2 decibels and word recognition by 25.0 ± 42.4% over a mean follow-up period of 18 months. Overall, 12 included patients were regular cochlear implant users. Patients with vestibular schwannoma can benefit substantially from cochlear implantation. Intraoperative assessment of cochlear nerve function using electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry can help to better identify individuals eligible for simultaneous vestibular schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation.

Intra-Operative Cochlear Nerve Function Monitoring in Hearing Preservation Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

With the recent scientific and technical developments, hearing preservation surgery is becoming a growing objective in inner ear pathologies, especially for vestibular schwannomas. In this review, we aim to describe the pros and cons of the following cochlear nerve monitoring techniques: ABRs (auditory brainstem responses), DENM (direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring), EcochG (electrocochleography), CNAP (cochlear compound nerve action potentials), DPOAE (distortion product otoacoustic emissions), PAMRs (postauricular muscle responses). The Cochrane library, Scopus, DynaMed, and PubMed databases were screened to obtain any relevant papers from October 2009 to the present day. Due to the heterogeneity of the existing studies in the literature, there is no way to tell whether a technique is better than another. All authors reported satisfactory outcomes with the cochlear nerve monitoring techniques tested, either alone or in combination.

Value of Preoperative Imaging Results in Predicting Cochlear Nerve Function in Children Diagnosed With Cochlear Nerve Aplasia Based on Imaging Results.

This study aimed to assess the function of the cochlear nerve using electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) for children with cochlear implants who were diagnosed with cochlear nerve aplasia and to analyze the correlation between preimplantation imaging results and ECAP responses. Thirty-five children diagnosed with cochlear nerve aplasia based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. Preimplantation MRI and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images were reconstructed, and the width of the bone cochlear nerve canal (BCNC), the diameter of the vestibulocochlear nerve (VCN), and the diameter of the facial nerve (FN) were measured. ECAP input/output (I/O) functions were measured at three electrode locations along the electrode array for each participant. The relationship between ECAP responses (including ECAP threshold, ECAP maximum amplitude, and slope of ECAP I/O function) and sizes of the BCNC and VCN was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Our analysis revealed that ECAP responses varied greatly among individual participants. Overall, ECAP thresholds gradually increased, while maximum amplitudes and ECAP I/O function slopes gradually decreased, as the electrode location moved from the basal to the apical direction in the cochlea. ECAP responses exhibited no significant correlations with BCNC width or VCN diameter. The ratio of the VCN to FN diameters was significantly correlated with the slope of the ECAP I/O function and the maximum amplitude. BCNC width could not predict the function of the cochlear nerve. Compared with the absolute size of the VCN, the size of the VCN relative to the FN may represent an indicator for predicting the functional status of the cochlear nerve in children diagnosed with cochlear nerve aplasia based on imaging results.

Endoscopic-assisted microsurgical resection of giant vestibular schwannoma in semi-sitting position.

The main objectives of microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma are total tumor removal and preservation of facial and cochlear nerve function. For giant tumors, total tumor removal and facial nerve function preservation are challenging. The semisitting position has some advantages. In this video the authors show the removal of a giant vestibular schwannoma with the patient in a semisitting position. They demonstrate the advantages of the semisitting technique, such as the two-handed microsurgical dissection technique and a clear operative field. Finally, a small residual tumor in the internal auditory canal was removed by endoscopy. The patient’s facial function was House-Brackmann grade I at discharge.The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2021.7.FOCVID2176

Prophylactic nimodipine treatment for hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery: study protocol of a randomized multi-center phase III trial\u2014AkniPro 2

BackgroundA previously performed phase III trial on 112 subjects investigating prophylactic nimodipine treatment in vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery showed no clear beneficial effects on preservation of facial and cochlear nerve functions, though it should be considered that protection of facial nerve function was the primary outcome. However, the risk for postoperative hearing loss was halved in the nimodipine group compared to the control group (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.18–1.30; p = 0.15). Accordingly, this phase III extension trial investigates the efficacy and safety of prophylactic nimodipine for hearing preservation in VS surgery.MethodsThis is a randomized, multi-center, two-armed, open-label phase III trial with blinded expert review and two-stage with interim analysis. Three hundred thirty-six adults with the indication for microsurgical removal of VS (Koos I–IV) and serviceable preoperative hearing (Gardner-Robertson scale (GR) 1–3) are assigned to either the therapy (intravenous nimodipine 1–2 mg/h from the day before surgery until the fifth postoperative day and standard of care) or the control group (surgery only and standard of care). The primary endpoint of the trial is postoperative cochlear nerve function measured before discharge according to GR 1–3 versus GR 4–5 (binary). Hearing function will be determined by pre- and postoperative audiometry with speech discrimination, which will be evaluated by a blinded expert reviewer. Furthermore, patient-reported outcomes using standardized questionnaires will be analyzed.DiscussionProphylactic parenteral nimodipine treatment may have a positive effect on hearing preservation in VS surgery and would improve patient’s quality of life. Further secondary analyses are planned. Except for dose-depending hypotension, nimodipine is known as a safe drug. In the future, prophylactic nimodipine treatment may be recommended as a routine medication in VS surgery. VS can be considered as an ideal model for clinical evaluation of neuroprotection, since hearing outcome can be classified by well-recognized criteria. The beneficial effect of nimodipine may be transferable to other surgical procedures with nerves at risk and may have impact on basic research.Trial registrationEudraCT 2019-002317-19, DRKS00019107. 8th May 2020.

A novel scoring system based on small vestibular schwannomas to determine consideration for cochlear implantation.

Simultaneous translabyrinthine tumor resection and cochlear implantation is a promising treatment method with hearing rehabilitation for sporadic vestibular schwannomas. Size of vestibular schwanomma, distance to modiolus, residual hearing and promontory stimulation electrical brainstem response audiometry are important preoperative predictive factors for determining a positive post tumour resection electrically evoked auditory brain stem response. The presence of an electrically evoked auditory brain stem response with an intracochlear test electrode after tumour resection was used to determine whether a patient received a cochlear implant Positive electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with an intracochlear test electrode after tumour resection seem to correlate well with auditory perception with a cochlear implant.

FEASIBILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF RETROSIGMOID APPROACH IN VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA SURGERY

FEASIBILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF RETROSIGMOID APPROACH IN VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA SURGERYPurpose: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the lateral suboccipital retrosigmoid approach in the surgical management of vestibular schwannoma.Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective hospital-based case series conducted on 356 patients during the period from May 2018 to May 2020 in collaboration with the neurosurgery department, Sohag University hospital, and Tokyo Medical University Hospital. Patients included who were undergoing surgical intervention for vestibular schwannoma (VS) through retrosigmoid approach. All patients in our study were followed up for a minimum of four months. For each patient intraoperative tumor resection volume was recorded, postoperative complications, facial and cochlear nerve functions were assessed.Results: Enrolled in this study 356 cases, the majority (54.8%) of patients were females; while (45.2%) were males were included with a mean age (42.57 ± 12.3) years. We achieved a mean follow-up of 6.2 months; ranging (4-9 months). Postoperative scoring of facial nerve function was a good outcome in 79.4%, fair outcome in 17.5%, and poor outcome in 3.1%.Conclusion: We assessed the results of surgery using a retrosigmoid approach in 356 patients with VS. Surgical management of VS using retrosigmoid approach is safe and effective but after the advancement of microsurgical techniques like drilling and neurophysiological monitoring especially for seventh and eighth cranial nerves, the possibility of preserving the facial and cochlear functions became more feasible with excellent results.

Perioperative Nimodipine to Improve Cranial Nerve Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nimodipine has emerged as a promising strategy for protection of cranial nerves following vestibular schwannoma (VS) resections. Our goal was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of clinical studies to determine the therapeutic efficacy of nimodipine in improving facial nerve and cochlear nerve function. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Clinical Trial Registry, Clinicaltrials.gov, World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and EU Clinical Trials Registry to identify clinical studies up to May 11, 2020. We included studies evaluating perioperative administration of nimodipine as a strategy to prevent or treat facial nerve or cochlear nerve dysfunction following VS resections. Primary outcomes included preservation or recovery of House-Brackman scale for facial nerve function and Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for cochlear nerve function at the latest follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and administration strategies of nimodipine. Nine studies (603 patients) met inclusion, of which seven studies (559 patients) were included in the quantitative analysis. Overall, nimodipine significantly increased the odds of cranial nerve recovery compared with controls (odds ratio [OR] 2.87, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [2.08, 3.95]; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that nimodipine was only effective for cochlear nerve preservation (OR 2.78, 95% CI [1.74, 4.45]; I2 = 0%), but not for facial nerve function (OR 4.54, 95% CI [0.25, 82.42]; I2 = 33%). Although there is evidence supporting the perioperative role of nimodipine for VS resections, more studies are warranted to help clarify the effects of nimodipine therapy on cranial nerve preservation.

Impact of vestibular nerve preservation on facial and hearing outcomes in small vestibular schwannoma surgery: a technical feasibility study.

Management of small vestibular schwannomas (VSs) remains controversial. When surgery is chosen, the preservation of facial and cochlear nerve function is a priority. In this report, we introduce and evaluate a technique to anatomically preserve the vestibular nerves to minimize manipulation and preserve the function of the facial and cochlear nerves. The vestibular nerve preservation technique was prospectively applied to resect small VS tumors in patients with serviceable preoperative hearing (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) class A or B). Clinical and radiological data were recorded and analyzed. Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age was 40.4 (12.5) years. Follow-up ranged from 6weeks to 2years. The maximum tumor diameter parallel to the internal auditory canal ranged from 10 to 20mm (mean, 14.9 (3.1) mm). There were three Koos grade 3 and seven Koos grade 2 tumors. Gross total resection was achieved in all cases. Both the facial and cochlear nerves were anatomically preserved in all cases. Postoperatively, 7 patients (70%) remained in the AAO-HNS class A or B hearing category. None of the patients had new vestibular symptoms, and all had House-Brackmann grade 1 facial function. Nervus intermedius dysfunction was observed in 1 patient preoperatively, which worsened postoperatively. Two patients had new nervus intermedius symptoms postoperatively. Improvement of facial nerve and hearing outcomes is feasible through the intentional preservation of the vestibular nerves in the resection of small VSs. Longer follow-up is required to rule out tumor recurrence.

Microvascular decompression for typical trigeminal neuralgia: Personal experience with intraoperative neuromonitoring with level-specific-CE-Chirp® brainstem auditory evoked potentials in preventing possible hearing loss.

Background: Permanent hearing loss after posterior fossa microvascular decompression (MVD) for typical trigeminal neuralgia (TTN) is one of the possible complications of this procedure. Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) are used for monitoring the function of cochlear nerve during cerebellopontine angle (CPA) microsurgery. Level-specific (LS)-CE-Chirp® BAEPs are the most recent evolution of classical click BAEP, performed both in clinical studies and during intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of acoustic pathways during several neurosurgical procedures.Methods: Since February 2016, we routinely use LS-CE-Chirp® BAEPs for monitoring the function of cochlear nerve during CPA surgery, including MVD for trigeminal neuralgia. From September 2011 to December 2018, 71 MVDs for TTN were performed in our department, 47 without IONM of acoustic pathways (Group A), and, from February 2016, 24 with LS-CE-Chirp BAEP (Group B).Results: Two patients of Group A developed a permanent ipsilateral anacusia after MVD. In Group B, we did not observe any permanent acoustic deficit after surgery. In one case of Group B, during arachnoid dissection, intraoperative LS-CE-Chirp BAEP showed a temporary lag of V wave, resolved in 5 min after application of intracisternal diluted papaverine (0.3% solution without excipients).Conclusion: MVD is widely considered a definitive surgical procedure in the management of TTN. Even though posterior fossa MVD is a safe procedure, serious complications might occur. In particular, the use of IONM of acoustic pathways during MVD for TTN might contribute to prevention of postoperative hearing loss.

Interpreting auditory brainstem evoked responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in diabetic patients with normal hearing

ObjectiveHearing impairment is a reported late complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Previous studies have suggested that microangiopathic complications may cause cochlear nerve function deterioration. We evaluated the auditory brainstem evoked responses (ABRs) and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) results according to the presence of DM in subjects with normal hearing. MethodsA cross-sectional comparative study was conducted from January 2016 to January 2018. Auditory function tests including ABR and DPOAE were performed for outpatients complaining of unilateral tinnitus. All of analyses were conducted in ears without tinnitus on contralateral side of tinnitus ears. We included subjects showing hearing thresholds within 25 dB at 0.5, 1k, 2k, and 4k on pure tone audiometry. 45 ears in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 85 ears in non-diabetic patients were finally enrolled in our study. ResultsDiabetic subjects showed significantly more prolonged absolute peak latencies (I, III, V) and inter-peak latencies (I–V, III–V) than non-diabetic subjects. However, there was no significant difference in the inter-peak latency (I–III) between these two groups. Diabetic subjects also showed significantly lower amplitudes at f2 frequencies of 1001, 1200, 1587, 4004, 5042, and 6348 Hz than non-diabetic subjects. Additionally, the prevalence of a DPOAE response, defined as 3 dB above the noise floor, was significantly lower in diabetic subjects than that in non-diabetic subjects. ConclusionDiabetic patients with normal hearing can still have abnormal ABR and DPOAE results due to diabetic neuroangiopathy. ABR and DPOAE assessments can help in detecting subclinical auditory dysfunction, which precedes the manifestation of hearing impairment in diabetic patients.

Prophylactic nimodipine treatment improves hearing outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery in men: a subgroup analysis of a randomized multicenter phase III trial

A 2016 published randomized multicenter phase III trial of prophylactic nimodipine treatment in vestibular schwannoma surgery showed only a tendency for higher hearing preservation rates in the treatment group. Gender was not included in statistical analysis at that time. A retrospective analysis of the trial considering gender, preoperative hearing, and nimodipine treatment was performed. The treatment group received parenteral nimodipine from the day before surgery until the seventh postoperative day. The control group was not treated prophylactically. Cochlear nerve function was determined by pure-tone audiometry with speech discrimination preoperatively, during in-patient care, and 1 year after surgery and classified according to the Gardner-Robertson grading scale (GR). Logistic regression analysis showed a statistically significant effect for higher hearing preservation rates (pre- and postoperative GR 1–4) in 40 men comparing the treatment (n = 21) and the control (n = 19) groups (p = 0.028), but not in 54 women comparing 27 women in both groups (p = 0.077). The results were also statistically significant for preservation of postoperative hearing with pre- and postoperative GR 1–3 (p = 0.024). There were no differences in tumor sizes between the treatment and the control groups in men, whereas statistically significant larger tumors were observed in the female treatment group compared with the female control group. Prophylactic nimodipine is safe, and an effect for hearing preservation in 40 men with preoperative hearing ability of GR 1–4 was shown in this retrospective investigation. The imbalance in tumor size with larger tumors in females of the treatment group may falsely suggest a gender-related effect. Further investigations are recommended to clarify whether gender has impact on nimodipine’s efficacy.