Cochlear Implantation In Children Research Articles

Electric Auditory Brainstem Response (EABR) as A predictor of Speech Perception Outcome in Cochlear Implanted Children

Electric Auditory Brainstem Response (EABR) as A predictor of Speech Perception Outcome in Cochlear Implanted Children

Psychophysical and Electrophysiological Parameters of the Auditory Analyzer as Indicators of the Effectiveness of Cochlear Implantation in Children with Bilateral Deafness

Background. The results of rehabilitation of patients with deafness after cochlear implantation (CI) depends on many factors related on both the individual characteristics of the patient and the technical parameters of auditory nerve stimulation — fitting of the CI system processor. Article presents the results of a study of the relationship between psychophysical (subjective) auditory sensations and electrophysiological (objective) responses of the structures of the auditory analyzer to electrical stimulation. Aims — to evaluate the relationship between the electrophysiological responses of the auditory analyzer and the psychophysical parameters of the thresholds of sound perception and speech intelligibility in patients with deafness after CI. Methods. The study involved 88 patients with IV bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, borderline with deafness, aged 6 to 17 years 11 months, among whom 54.5% (n = 48) of girls and 45.5% (n = 40) of boys. Of the patients included in the follow-up, 40% (n = 35) underwent unilateral CI; 60% (n = 53) of children underwent bilateral sequential CI. In our study, slightly more than half of the patients (51.1%) had experience using the CI system for more than 5 years. At the first stage of the study, we studied the relationship between sound perception thresholds (tonal audiometry in a free field) and registered ASSR (auditory steady state response) thresholds in patients with deafness receiving rehabilitation after CI surgery. The relationship between behavioral and electrophysiological (objective) thresholds was assessed by comparing the results of tonal threshold audiometry and the responses received during ASSR registration to acoustic stimulation in a free field. At the second stage, patients with indications for processor fitting (decreased speech intelligibility, uncomfortable sensations) underwent speech audiometry, evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) registration, according to the results of which the parameters of the CI processor were changed. Results. Research data showed the effectiveness of the approach of including the ECAP registration test, followed by the creation of a fitting card and correction of the level of auditory nerve stimulation under the control of speech audiometry in the protocol of fitting the CI processor. Conclusions. The results of the conducted studies allow us to recommend the use of the developed method of objective recording of sound perception thresholds in patients with CI as one of the indicators of the effectiveness of CI in the early period of auditory-speech rehabilitation in patients with undeveloped speech skills and when it is impossible to conduct objective tests accompanied by supra-threshold stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Cochlear Implantation in Children Affected by Single-Sided Deafness: A Comprehensive Review.

Children with single-sided deafness (SSD) may experience delays in language and speech development. Reduced speech discrimination and poor sound localization abilities in young SSD patients may result in greater cognitive efforts required to focus and process auditory information, as well as increased listening-related fatigue. Consequently, these children can have a higher risk of academic failure and are often in need of extra help at school. Recently, cochlear implants (CIs) have been introduced as a rehabilitative option for these children, but their effectiveness is still a topic of debate. A literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, searching the Medline database from inception to October 2023. The research identified nine papers that met the inclusion criteria. Data extracted from the selected studies included 311 children affected by SSD and cochlear implants. The reported audiological outcomes were further analyzed. Overall, a high level of satisfaction was described by parents of children with SSD and CI, and those who received a CI under the age of 3 presented better results. However, a proportion of patients did not use the device daily. Our review highlights the possible, and still controversial, role of CI for the hearing rehabilitation of children with unilateral deafness, underlining the need for further research in this field. To date, careful and comprehensive counseling with the child and the family is necessary before considering this option.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Single-Sided Deafness: Preoperative Assessment and Device Use

Objectives: To characterize the first cohort of cochlear implanted pediatric patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Data includes etiology, age at implantation, balance testing, and language assessment prior to implantation as well as data log of Cochlear Implant usage. Methods: Clinical data from 34 children with SSD (21 females (62%) and 13 males (38%)), implanted with Cochlear Implant (CI) during 2018-2023, was analyzed. Results: Acquired prenatal and postnatal sensory disorders toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex (TORCH) risk factors were associated with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in 19 cases (56%). Congenital Cytomegalovirus (cCMV) DNA was diagnosed in 17 samples (50%). The cause of the SNHL remained unknown for 11 (32.4%) children. In 6 (66.7%) of the cases with unknown etiology, CT scan showed inner ear malformations (IEM). The mean (SD) age for implantation was 4.2 ± 3.5 years. For the children with congenital SNHL, the mean (SD) age for implantation was 2.6 ± 1.6 years. For the children with acquired SNHL, the mean (SD) age for implantation was 6.9 ± 4.3 years. Data log showed that children with SSD and CI wore their processor 6.2 ± 3.73 (1 SD) h/day. Conclusions: Further work is needed in order to assess how etiology, age at implantation, and device use affect outcome. Understanding of the long-term outcomes associated with CI in children with SSD can contribute to more thorough counselling on outcome expectations and the best auditory rehabilitation.

Electrically evoked late latency response using single electrode stimulation and its relation to speech perception among paediatric cochlear implant users.

Aided auditory late latency response (LLR) serves as an objective tool for evaluating auditory cortical maturation following cochlear implantation in children. While aided LLR is commonly measured using sound-field acoustic stimulation, recording electrically evoked LLR (eLLR) offer distinct advantages, such as improved stimulus control and the capability for single electrode stimulation. Hence, the study aimed to compare eLLR responses with single electrode stimulation in the apical, middle, and basal regions and to evaluate their relationship with speech perception in paediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients. eLLR responses with single electrode stimulation were measured in 27 paediatric unilateral CI users with an active recording electrode placed at Cz. The stimuli consisted of 36 msec biphasic pulse trains presented across three electrode sites (apical-E20, middle-E11, and basal-E03). eLLR responses were compared across these electrode sites, and the relationship between speech recognition scores in quiet and age at implantation with eLLR components was evaluated. eLLR responses were detected in 77 out of 81 tested electrodes of all participants combined (27 for apical, 26 for middle, and 24 for basal stimulation). There were no significant differences in P1, N1 latencies and P1 amplitude across electrode site. However, significantly larger N1 and P1-N1 amplitudes were observed for apical stimulations compared to basal stimulations. No differences in N1 amplitude were found between middle and apical stimulations, and the P1-N1 amplitude was significantly larger for middle compared to basal electrode stimulation, with no difference between the apical and middle electrodes stimulation. A moderate positive correlation was present between speech recognition scores in quiet and both N1, P1-N1 amplitudes for apical stimulation. Age at implantation was negatively correlated with N1 amplitude for the apical and P1-N1 amplitude for basal stimulation. eLLR responses could be elicited in majority of paediatric CI users across electrode sites. Variations in eLLR responses across electrode sites suggest disparities in auditory cortical maturation. The findings underscore the significance of the N1 biomarker in evaluating higher-order auditory cortical development. Therefore, utilizing eLLR with single electrode stimulation may serve as a valuable tool for assessing post-cochlear implantation maturational changes in paediatric populations.

Acute mastoiditis in cochlear implanted children: A single-centre experience

BackgroundAcute mastoiditis (AM) is the most common complication of acute otitis media and primarily affects children under the age of two; current data on its prevalence in paediatric patients with cochlear implant (CI) are still scant. Proper management of AM in CI children is crucial in order to avoid the implications (financial and emotional) of an explant.Aim of this paper is to describe the cases of AM occurred among young patients with CI in follow up at our department, also in order to evaluate its prevalence, potential predisposing factors, clinical course and therapeutic strategies. Patients and methodsRetrospective study. Medical records of all paediatric patients with CI, who had at least one year of follow-up, were searched aiming to identify those who developed AM, from January 1st 2002 to January 31st 2022. The following data were collected and analysed: demographic features, implant type and side, interval between CI surgery and AM, treatment, laboratory tests, clinical course, vaccination history, associated diseases. ResultsAM was developed by six (1.3%) of the 439 children with CI (541 implanted ears). In total, 9 episodes (2.05 %) were recorded, as three patients reported two consecutive infections. Average time interval between CI surgery, to the first or only AM diagnosis, was 13.8 months (range 3–30 months). Furthermore, 3/6 of patients had a history of recurrent acute otitis media; 2/6 an autism spectrum disorder, associated to a combined immune deficiency in one case. All patients were hospitalized and promptly treated by intravenous antibiotic therapy; 4/6 also underwent a mastoidectomy. CI was not explanted in any cases of this series. ConclusionsOver a 20-year period, AM rate in CI children was 1.3%, which is consistent with the current literature rates of 1–4.7%. All cases were successfully treated, preserving the integrity of the device. In our experience, the early parenteral antibiotic therapy and, when necessary, surgical treatment were adequate to eradicate the infection.

Cochlear Implantation in Children Under 9 Months of Age: Safety and Efficacy.

To assess the safety of cochlear implants (CIs) in children under 9 months of age to better understand expected postoperative complication rates, and to provide a preliminary look at efficacy. Single-center retrospective review. Tertiary referral center. Children 5 to 8 months of age who received a CI between 2011 and 2021. Therapeutic-CI. The primary outcome was 6-month postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, device explantation/reimplantation, rehabilitation supports, and hearing and language outcomes. Complications of children implanted under than 9 months of age was compared with a cohort of children implanted 9 to 18 months of age between the years 2011 and 2016 using a chi-squared test ( p < 0.05). One hundred six children under 9 months of age were implanted (204 CIs) at a mean age of 6.6 months (range: 5-8). Postoperative complications occurred in 28 patients (26%) and were often minor. There were no mortalities. There was no statistically significant difference in complications, including reimplantation rates, between patients implanted under 9 months of age and those implanted 9 to 18 months of age. Speech discrimination outcomes were excellent, and mean spoken language outcomes were near normative for typically developing children. Cochlear implantation can be a safe and effective treatment option for children 5 to 8 months of age. Early hearing screening and referral for infants to receive appropriate intervention will continue to play a critical role in optimizing speech and language outcomes.

Cochlear Implantation in Children With a Long Average Duration of Single Sided Deafness.

Previous research has shown the positive effects of cochlear implantation in children with a short duration of single sided deafness (SSD). This case series assessed the impact of cochlear implantation in a cohort of children with a longer average duration of SSD. A retrospective chart review of 6 children who received a cochlear implant for SSD. The mean age at time of cochlear implantation was 14.7 years old (median = 15.5, interquartile range (IQR) = 2.5) and mean duration of hearing loss before cochlear implantation was 10.8 years (median = 11.5, IQR = 5.3). Pre- and post-operative audiometric data for aided speech perception testing, sentence recognition in quiet, sentence recognition in noise, and word recognition scores were analyzed. When compared to preoperative hearing aid scores a 24% significant increase in median word score and a 64% significant increase in median sentence recognition score in quiet was observed at 12 months post-op. Cochlear implantation in children with a longer duration of SSD can provide benefit to speech recognition. This retrospective case series of children with prolonged single sided deafness demonstrated an improvement in word and sentence recognition within 12 months of receiving a cochlear implant.

Bilateral simultaneous cochlear implants in children: Best timing of surgery and long-term auditory outcomes

PurposeEvaluate the hearing outcomes of bilateral deaf children implanted simultaneously and define the most appropriate timing for surgery. Materials and methodsAudiological CI results were retrieved in both the short-term and long-term period and compared by stratifying the patients into different subcohorts according to their age at surgery. Additional data collected were age at implant activation, etiology and timing of onset of deafness, presence of psychomotor delay. Resultsfifty-six bilaterally implanted children were included. The short-term outcomes differed significantly when comparing groups of different ages at implantation: younger patients achieved better aided pure tone audiometry results. Considering long-term follow-up, a significant correlation was identified between an early age at implantation and the hearing outcome at ages 2 to 5 years. Perceptive levels were better at 4 years of age in the younger group. No significant differences were found between children implanted at before 12 months and between 12 and 16 months of age. ConclusionsThe results of the analyzed follow-up data support the hypothesis that children implanted at before 24 months are expected to have better hearing performances. Nevertheless, these results are referred to a widely heterogeneous group of patients and the duration of auditory deprivation should be considered.

Indicators for cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: A systematic review.

ANSD refers to a group of auditory diseases demonstrating intact outer hair cells and desynchronized neural firings of the auditory nerve. A cochlear implant is a promising intervention strategy for severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, due to its variable outcomes in children with ANSD, a consensus has yet to be reached on its performance. This study aimed to review the literature to determine the efficacy of cochlear implants in children with ANSD and to determine prognostic indicators. The study identifies the pre-operative and post-operative predictors of success for CI in children with ANSD. The review was carried out using PRISMA guidelines. This resulted in 9630 topic-related articles. Among these, 17 articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were included for the study. The quality and potential risks associated with each article were evaluated using the quality impact assessment protocol (QUIPS) tool. A review of 17 articles was conducted to highlight these predictors. Most selected studies included case reports, case series, cohorts, and comparisons between children with ANSD and SNHL. Assessment of study quality reported an overall low risk of bias. The overall result showed cochlear implant would be an effective option for children with ANSD. However, there are specific prognostic indicators about which clinician needs to be aware before recommending CI for children with ANSD. Our review study identified a set of pre-operative and post-operative indicators that predicted speech and auditory performance and gave some insight into the lesion site in ANSD individuals. This review concludes CI is an effective option for children with ANSD. However, before recommending CI, a detailed assessment is required from different perspectives, which could serve as predictors of postoperative outcomes. This review highlights the need to include more precise tools, such as genetic testing to describe the lesion site to choose the most appropriate management strategy for children with ANSD. Knowledge about the prognostic indicators and the effective assessment protocols would help clinicians for the better candidacy selection.

Quality of Life after Cochlear Implant in Children with Prelingual Hearing Loss: A cross sectional study

Quality of Life after Cochlear Implant in Children with Prelingual Hearing Loss: A cross sectional study

Executive functions in preschool and school-age cochlear implant users: do they differ from their hearing peers? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Executive functions (EF) play a fundamental role in planning and executing goal-driven behaviours. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate EF skills mastered by preschool/school-age cochlear implanted children (CIC) without morpho-functional abnormalities and to compare their outcomes with typically hearing children (THC). Bibliographic search for observational studies of any language/date up to 16 December 2022 was performed with the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. After removal of duplicates, 2442 records were subjected to a three-stage screening process and 83 potentially eligible articles were identified. A total of 15 studies was included in the final analysis: 9 articles directly meeting the eligibility criteria plus 6 more studies thanks to the authors sharing their data set, specifically for participants who met present inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference only for verbal short-term memory, whereas group differences for visuospatial short-term memory and verbal/visuospatial working memory were not significant. For fluency skills, meta-analysis revealed statistical significance for the semantic fluency task but not for the rapid naming test. Qualitative analysis reflected group similarities in flexibility but CIC's difficulties in auditory attention/planning skills. Controversial findings for inhibitory control skills were observed. EF performance comparisons between CIC and THC show inter-skill and inter-test variances. Due to the paucity of existing studies, present findings should be interpreted with caution. Future research in this domain is strongly recommended.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Additional Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

This study examines the last 10 years of medical literature on the benefits of cochlear implantation in children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with additional disabilities. The most recent literature concerning cochlear implants (CIs) in DHH children with additional disabilities was systematically explored through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from January 2012 to July 2023. Our two-stage search strategy selected a total of 61 articles concerning CI implantation in children with several forms of additional disabilities: autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, motor disorders, developmental delay, genetic syndromes, and intellectual disability. Overall, many children with additional disabilities benefit from CIs by acquiring greater environmental sound awareness. This, in turn, improves non-verbal communication and adaptive skills, with greater possibilities to relate to others and to be connected with the environment. Instead, despite some improvement, expressive language tends to develop more slowly and to a lesser extent compared to children affected by hearing loss only. Further studies are needed to better appreciate the specificities of each single disability and to personalize interventions, not restricting the analysis to auditory and language skills, but rather applying or developing cross-culturally validated instruments able to reliably assess the developmental trajectory and the quality of life of DHH children with additional disabilities before and after CI.

Surgical and audiologic outcomes following revision cochlear implantation in children

IntroductionThe incidence of cochlear implantation failure is rare; however, complications can arise in which revision surgery becomes necessary. The purpose of this study is to review our institutional experience with revision cochlear implantation to further understand the surgical and audiological outcomes after cochlear implant failure. MethodsThis is a retrospective review of patients who underwent revision cochlear implantation from 2014 to 2022 at a single institution. ResultsTwenty-one patients required reimplantation within the 8-year study period. During this time frame, a total of 202 cochlear implants were implanted in 171 pediatric patients, resulting in a reimplantation rate of 5.9 %. Our reimplantation patient population were majority white (61.9 %), female (52.4 %), and insured by Medicaid (61.9 %). The average age at implantation was 54.8 months ±47.5 months and the average age at reimplantation was 100.1 months ±55.9 months. The average time between initial implantation and reimplantation was 46.2 months ±30.2 months. The most common sign of failure was abnormal impedances (47.6 %). Reimplantation was required more often for hard failure (76.2 %), which occurred secondary to trauma in 56.3 % of patients, and occurred more frequently in those ages 5–7. Operative findings were unremarkable in 81 % of patients. Those with audiologic data were noted to have stable or improved thresholds after their revision surgery. Three of the 21 patients discontinued use of their processor on the revised ear. Of these, two had known trauma associated with implant failure that was not immediately addressed. ConclusionWe noted increased rates of hard failure, most commonly secondary to trauma. We noted that majority of those who discontinued use of their implant after revision surgery had associated traumatic injuries that ultimately delayed their presentation and surgery.

Long-Term Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Congenital, Perilingual, and Postlingual Single-Sided Deafness.

We investigated the long-term outcomes of children with single-sided deafness (SSD) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery, during and after rehabilitation, and compared the results of children with congenital, perilingual, and postlingual SSD. We evaluated the impact of SSD at age at onset and duration of deafness on their performance. Thirty-six children with SSD treated with CI participated in the study: 20 had congenital, seven perilingual (defined: >0 to 4 years), and nine had postlingual deafness (defined as >4 years of age). Their outcome with CI were measured on both subjective and objective scales: duration of device use, speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet, bilateral hearing and localization ability, quality of life and hearing, presence and loudness of tinnitus, and hearing ability of the better hearing ear. After a mean follow-up time of 4.75 years, 32 of the 36 children used their CI on a regular basis. The remaining four children were nonusers. These children had congenital SSD and were older than three years at the time of CI surgery. Overall, for congenital/perilingual and postlingual SSD, speech intelligibility in noise and the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) speech subscore were significantly improved, as were their subjective and objective localization ability and hearing-related quality of life. Children with postlingual SSD benefited from the CI with regard to speech intelligibility, SSQ speech/spatial/total score, and localization error, and children with congenital SSD showed better results with a short duration of deafness of less than 3 years compared with those with a longer deafness period. Cochlear implantation is a successful treatment for children with congenital/perilingual or postlingual SSD. Results largely differed with respect to the onset and duration of deafness, and better outcomes were achieved by children with postlingual SSD and with a short duration of deafness. Our data also confirmed that children with congenital SSD should be implanted with a CI within three years of age.

Acute mastoiditis in cochlear implanted children: A single-centre experience

BackgroundAcute mastoiditis (AM) is the most common complication of acute otitis media and primarily affects children under the age of two; current data on its prevalence in paediatric patients with cochlear implant (CI) are still scant. Proper management of AM in CI children is crucial in order to avoid the implications (financial and emotional) of an explant.Aim of this paper is to describe the cases of AM occurred among young patients with CI in follow up at our department, also in order to evaluate its prevalence, potential predisposing factors, clinical course and therapeutic strategies. Patients and methodsRetrospective study. Medical records of all paediatric patients with CI, who had at least one year of follow-up, were searched aiming to identify those who developed AM, from January 1st 2002 to January 31st 2022. The following data were collected and analysed: demographic features, implant type and side, interval between CI surgery and AM, treatment, laboratory tests, clinical course, vaccination history, associated diseases. ResultsAM was developed by six (1.3%) of the 439 children with CI (541 implanted ears). In total, 9 episodes (2.05 %) were recorded, as three patients reported two consecutive infections. Average time interval between CI surgery, to the first or only AM diagnosis, was 13.8 months (range 3–30 months). Furthermore, 3/6 of patients had a history of recurrent acute otitis media; 2/6 an autism spectrum disorder, associated to a combined immune deficiency in one case. All patients were hospitalized and promptly treated by intravenous antibiotic therapy; 4/6 also underwent a mastoidectomy. CI was not explanted in any cases of this series. ConclusionsOver a 20-year period, AM rate in CI children was 1.3%, which is consistent with the current literature rates of 1–4.7%. All cases were successfully treated, preserving the integrity of the device. In our experience, the early parenteral antibiotic therapy and, when necessary, surgical treatment were adequate to eradicate the infection.

Cochlear Implants for Children with Unilateral Hearing Loss: Debunking the Myths

Cochlear implants (CIs) have revolutionized the field of audiology, providing a life-changing solution for children with bilateral profound hearing loss. Expanding criteria has allowed children with significant unilateral hearing loss (UHL) to benefit from this technology as well. The practice is not without controversy, however. While we have known since 1984 that children with UHL face educational challenges (Bess &amp; Tharpe, 1984, 1986), watchful waiting until a child is old enough to be fitted with a Contralateral Routing of Signal (CROS) device has been the status quo (Bagatto, 2020; Bagatto et al., 2019). While research has continued to establish the benefits of cochlear implantation in this population, it has yet to become the standard of care. As is inherent in controversial practices, several myths and misconceptions surrounding the use of CIs for children with UHL pervade clinical hearing care systems. Here, we will debunk these myths by examining the evidence-based benefits and considerations associated with cochlear implantation in children with UHL. Through an analysis of current research and clinical evidence, we will highlight the potential advantages of CIs as a viable treatment option, promoting informed decision-making and improving the quality of life for children with UHL.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Meningitis: A Multicenter Study on Auditory Performance and Speech Production Outcomes.

This study aims to evaluate speech production outcomes and auditory performance in children with post-meningitis deafness who were treated with cochlear implants. Additionally, the study assesses the impact of electrode insertion depth on surgical outcomes.". We conducted a study on 66 pediatric patients with bilateral postmeningitis hearing loss who were being prepared for cochlear implantation at four tertiary referral academic institutions. The speech intelligibility rating (SIR) and categories of auditory performance (CAP) were evaluated after the first and second years following implantation. The patients were divided into two groups based on electrode insertion depth: one group had full electrode insertion (more than two-thirds), while the other had partial electrode insertion (less than two-thirds). We compared the SIR and CAP scores between the two groups to assess the impact of electrode insertion depth on outcomes. Before implantation, the median CAP score was one, but it improved significantly to six within two years after the procedure (P-value < 0.001). Similarly, the median SIR score before implantation was one, but it improved significantly to three within two years after surgery (P-value < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the partial and full electrode insertion groups in terms of CAP and SIR scores during the follow-up evaluations conducted after the first and second years. The study found that cochlear implantation significantly improved speech production skills and auditory performance in children with postmeningitis deafness. Importantly, the amount of electrode insertion at the time of implantation did not have a significant impact on the outcomes.

Development and Standardization of Low-Verbal Material for Assessment of Central Auditory Processing in Arabic Language

Development and Standardization of Low-Verbal Material for Assessment of Central Auditory Processing in Arabic Language

Cochlear Implants for Children with Developmental Delays

Cochlear Implants for Children with Developmental Delays