Cobalt-chromium Everolimus-eluting Stent Research Articles

Effectiveness and Safety of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-known risk factor for adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Limited data are available on the relative performance of different types of contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) for diabetic patients. The authors investigated the effectiveness and safety profiles of several contemporary DES in patients with DM in a "real-world" clinical setting. Among 24,516 patients enrolled in a multicenter, prospective registry, 7,823 patients with DM were treated with 4 contemporary DES: 2,877 with a cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (EES), 789 with a biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent, 2,286 with a platinum chromium-EES, and 1,871 with a Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization). The median follow-up duration was 2.9 years. Observed 3-year rates of TVF were not significantly different according to different DES types. On multigroup propensity-score analysis, the adjusted HRs for TVF were similar in between-group comparisons: biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent (HR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.76-1.16; P=0.57), platinum chromium-EES (HR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.81-1.09; P=0.41), and Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (HR: 1.01; 95%CI: 0.86-1.18; P=0.93) compared with the cobalt chromium-EES (reference). This trend was maintained in patients with non-insulin- and insulin-treated DM. In this multicenter clinical-practice PCI registry, no significant between-group differences were found for a 3-year risk of TVF in patients with DM undergoing PCI with various types of contemporary DES. (Evaluation of the First, Second, and New Drug-Eluting Stents in Routine Clinical Practice [IRIS-DES]; NCT01186133).

Thinner Strut Sirolimus-Eluting BRS Versus EES in Patients With CoronaryArtery Disease: FUTURE-II Trial.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of thinner strut Firesorb (100/125μm) sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES) in patients with coronary artery disease. First-generation thicker strut BRS were associated with unexpected device-related adverse outcomes at long-term follow-up. Eligible patients with 1 or 2 de novo noncomplex coronary lesions were randomized to the Firesorb BRS group or CoCr-EES group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was 1-year angiographic in-segment late loss (LL), powered for noninferiority testing. The key secondary endpoint was the 1-year proportion of covered struts assessed on optical coherence tomography, powered for noninferiority and subsequent superiority testing. A total of 433 participants from 28 Chinese centers were randomized to the Firesorb BRS group (n=215) or CoCr-EES group (n=218). Patient-level 1-year in-segment LL was 0.17 ± 0.27mm in the Firesorb BRS group and 0.18 ± 0.37mm in the CoCr-EES group (difference-0.01mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]:-0.07 to 0.06; pnoninferiority< 0.0001) in the intention-to-treat population and was 0.17 ± 0.27mm in the Firesorb BRS group and 0.19 ± 0.37mm in the CoCr-EES group (difference-0.005mm; 95%CI:-0.07 to 0.06; pnoninferiority< 0.0001) in the per-protocol set. The proportion of covered struts was 99.3% in the Firesorb BRS group and 98.8% in the CoCr-EES group (difference 0.8%; 95%CI:-0.5% to 2.1%; pnoninferiority< 0.0001; psuperiority=0.21). One-year clinical outcomes were similar between groups. The thinner strut Firesorb BRS was noninferior to the CoCr-EES for the primary endpoint of 1-year angiographic in-segment LL and the key secondary endpoint of 1-year proportion of covered struts by optical coherence tomography. (A Trial of Firesorb in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: FUTURE-II [FUTURE-II]; NCT02890160).

Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors after revascularization of patients with left main coronary artery disease.

There is a paucity of data regarding the effect of inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We sought to examine long-term outcomes of patients with left main coronary disease (LMCAD) randomized to PCI with fluoropolymer-based cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents or CABG according to treatment at discharge with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in the large-scale, multicenter, randomized EXCEL trial. EXCEL randomized 1905 patients with LMCAD of low and intermediate anatomical complexity (visually-assessed SYNTAX score ≤32) to PCI (n = 948) versus CABG (n = 957). Patients were categorized according to whether they were treated with ACEI/ARB at discharge; their outcomes from discharge to 5 years were examined using multivariable logistic regression with an offset for follow-up time. Among 1775 patients discharged alive with known ACEI/ARB treatment status, 896 (50.5%) were treated with one of these agents. Among those treated with ACEI/ARB, the 5-year rate of all-cause death was similar after PCI or CABG (10.7% versus 9.8% respectively, adjOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.56-1.57) in contrast to patients not treated with ACEI/ARB (15.0% versus 7.8%, respectively, adjOR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.32-3.67) (Pinteraction = 0.02). Significant interactions between treatment arm (PCI versus CABG) and ACEI/ARB treatment status were also found for cardiovascular death (Pinteraction = 0.03), ischemia-driven revascularization (Pinteraction = 0.03), target vessel revascularization (Pinteraction = 0.007) and target vessel failure (Pinteraction = 0.0009). In the EXCEL trial, the postdischarge rates of death and revascularization after 5 years were similar after PCI and CABG in patients with LMCAD treated with ACEI/ARB at discharge. In contrast, event rates were higher after PCI versus CABG in those not so treated.

Very Short Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients Who Underwent Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insight From the STOPDAPT-2 Trial

Safety and efficacy of clopidogrel monotherapy after very short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is uncertain in patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis based on the complexity of PCI in the STOPDAPT-2 trial (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2), which randomly compared 1-month DAPT followed by clopidogrel monotherapy with 12-month DAPT after cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent implantation. Complex PCI was defined as any of the following: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents, >60 mm total stent lengths, and target of chronic total occlusion. The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular (cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/definite stent thrombosis/stroke) and bleeding (TIMI [Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction] major/minor) end points. The major secondary end points were the cardiovascular and bleeding end points. Among the 3009 study patients, there were 509 patients (16.9%) with complex PCI (1-month DAPT: N=245, and 12-month DAPT: N=264) and 2500 patients (83.1%) without complex PCI (1-month DAPT: N=1255, and 12-month DAPT: N=1245). There were no significant interactions between the complexity of PCI and the effects of 1-month DAPT versus 12-month DAPT on the primary end point (complex PCI: 1.67% versus 5.32%, hazard ratio, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.10–0.92], P=0.04, and noncomplex PCI: 2.50% versus 3.35%, hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.47–1.20], P=0.23; Pinteraction=0.14), and on the major secondary cardiovascular end point (complex PCI: 1.67% versus 3.04%, hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.16–1.79], P=0.31, and noncomplex PCI: 2.02% versus 2.39%, hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.50–1.47], P=0.58; Pinteraction=0.49). The cumulative 1-year incidence of the major secondary bleeding end point was significantly lower in the 1-month DAPT group than in the 12-month DAPT group regardless of the complexity of PCI (complex PCI: 0% versus 2.29%, log-rank P=0.02, and noncomplex PCI: 0.48% versus 1.38%, log-rank P=0.02). The effects of clopidogrel monotherapy after 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT for the primary and major secondary end points were comparable in complex PCI and noncomplex PCI without significant interactions. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02619760.

Intravascular ultrasound predictors of long-term outcomes following ABSORB bioresorbable scaffold implantation: A pooled analysis of the ABSORB III and ABSORB Japan trials

BackgroundThe long-term prognostic impact of IVUS findings following Absorb BVS implantation remains uncertain. This study aimed to identify the IVUS predictors of long-term clinical outcomes following ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation from the pooled IVUS substudy cohorts of the ABSORB III and Japan trials. MethodsA total of 298 lesions in 286 patients were enrolled with 2:1 randomization to ABSORB BVS vs. cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents. This sub-analysis included 168 lesions of 160 patients in the Absorb arm whose post-procedural quantitative IVUS were available. The primary endpoint of this analysis was device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) of target lesion failure, including cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The median follow-up duration was 4.9 [3.1–5.0] years. ResultsDuring follow-up, DOCE occurred in 10.1% of lesions treated with Absorb BVS. Among several post-procedural IVUS indices associated with DOCE, non-uniform device expansion (defined as uniformity index = minimum / maximum device area) (hazard ratio 0.47 per 0.1 increase [95%CI 0.28 to 0.77]; p = 0.003) and residual reference plaque burden (hazard ratio 4.01 per 10% increase [95%CI 1.50 to 10.77]; p = 0.006) were identified as independent predictors of DOCE by Cox multivariable analysis. ConclusionsNonuniform device expansion and substantial untreated residual plaque in reference segments were associated with long-term adverse events following BVS implantation. Baseline imaging to identify the appropriate device landing zone and procedural imaging to achieve uniform device expansion if possible (e.g. through post-dilatation) may improve clinical outcomes of BVS implantation. Clinical trial registrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01751906 (ABSORB III); NCT01844284 (ABSORB Japan).

Correction to: Influence of CYP2C19 genotypes for the effect of 1‑month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy relative to 12‑month dual antiplatelet therapy on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a genetic substudy from the STOPDAPT‑2

The ultra-short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy might be promising after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles have been reported to diminish the effect of clopidogrel, and clopidogrel monotherapy has a concern about the increased ischemic risk for patients with such alleles. STOPDAPT-2 is the multicenter prospective open-label, but adjudicator-blinded randomized control study comparing 1-month DAPT followed by clopidogrel monotherapy with the standard 12-month DAPT after PCI with cobalt–chromium everolimus-eluting stents. Among the participants of STOPDAPT-2, selected patients participated in a substudy of the CYP2C19 gene test. Patients with two CYP2C19*2 or *3 alleles were defined as the poor metabolizer (PM), one allele as the intermediate metabolizer (IM), and no allele as the extensive metabolizer (EM). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular and bleeding events, as defined in STOPDAPT-2. Among 750 (24.9%) patients with known CYP2C19 genotypes, 129 (17.2%) were PM, 367 (49.0%) were IM, and 254 (33.9%) were EM. The hazard ratios of 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT for the primary endpoint in PM, IM, and EM strata were 0.66 (95% CI 0.11–3.94), 1.94 (95% CI 0.60–6.31), and 0.21 (95% CI 0.02–1.78), respectively (P interaction = 0.17), and those for cardiovascular composite endpoint were 1.00 (95% CI 0.14–7.10), 6.10 (95% CI 0.75–49.55), and 0.26 (95% CI 0.03–2.34), respectively (P interaction = 0.12). In conclusion, for the selected patients in STOPDAPT-2 trial, CYP2C19 LOF alleles had no significant, consistent interaction with the effect of 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT for clinical outcomes, although the study was overtly underpowered. STOPDAPT-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02619760.

Influence of CYP2C19 genotypes for the effect of 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy relative to 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a genetic substudy from the STOPDAPT-2.

The ultra-short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy might be promising after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles have been reported to diminish the effect of clopidogrel, and clopidogrel monotherapy has a concern about the increased ischemic risk for patients with such alleles. STOPDAPT-2 is the multicenter prospective open-label, but adjudicator-blinded randomized control study comparing 1-month DAPT followed by clopidogrel monotherapy with the standard 12-month DAPT after PCI with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents. Among the participants of STOPDAPT-2, selected patients participated in a substudy of the CYP2C19 gene test. Patients with two CYP2C19*2 or *3 alleles were defined as the poor metabolizer (PM), one allele as the intermediate metabolizer (IM), and no allele as the extensive metabolizer (EM). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular and bleeding events, as defined in STOPDAPT-2. Among 750 (24.9%) patients with known CYP2C19 genotypes, 129 (17.2%) were PM, 367 (49.0%) were IM, and 254 (33.9%) were EM. The hazard ratios of 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT for the primary endpoint in PM, IM, and EM strata were 0.66 (95% CI 0.11-3.94), 1.94 (95% CI 0.60-6.31), and 0.21 (95% CI 0.02-1.78), respectively (P interaction = 0.17), and those for cardiovascular composite endpoint were 1.00 (95% CI 0.14-7.10), 6.10 (95% CI 0.75-49.55), and 0.26 (95% CI 0.03-2.34), respectively (P interaction = 0.12). In conclusion, for the selected patients in STOPDAPT-2 trial, CYP2C19 LOF alleles had no significant, consistent interaction with the effect of 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT for clinical outcomes, although the study was overtly underpowered. TRIAL REGISTRY: STOPDAPT-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02619760.

Impact of SYNTAX score 2 on 7-year clinical outcomes in patients treated with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent

Abstract Background Impact of SYNTAX score II (SSII) on long-term clinical outcomes after cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) implantation remains unclear. Methods Between February 2010 and May 2011, 1064 consecutive patients with 1440 lesions were treated only with CoCr-EES implantation. Of these, the SSII was calculated in 1013 patients with 1345 lesions. Patients were divided into the tertile group: Tertiles for SSII (low SSII [12–28.9], n=334; intermediate SSII [29–39.1], n=339; and high SSII [39.2–80.8], n=340). We assessed the cumulative 7-year incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CDTLR) based on SSII groupings. Results Cumulative 7-year incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the high SSII group than in the other groups (34.1% vs. 18.6% vs. 17.2%, p&amp;lt;0.001). The cumulative incidence of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis were significantly higher in the high SSII group than in the other groups (22.1% vs. 2.0% vs. 5.3%, p&amp;lt;0.001; 6.6% vs. 4.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.01; 2.9% vs. 1.7% vs. 0.3%, p=0.03, respectively). The cumulative incidence of CDTLR was similar between the groups (15.2% vs. 12.8% vs. 15.7%, p=0.57). High SSII group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.18 [vs. low SS], 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.56–3.06, p&amp;lt;0.001) and diabetes mellitus (HR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.04–1.81, p=0.03) were predictors of 7-year MACE. Conclusions SSII has significantly impact on 7 years clinical outcomes after CoCr-EES implantation. Cumulative incidence of MACE Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Comparison of neointimal coverage between biodegradable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent and durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent using angioscopy for the patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background New-generation biodegradable-polymer platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stent (BP-PtCr-EES) is available, which has different polymer and alloy compare to more established stent design, a durable-polymer cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (DP-CoCr-EES). Purpose To compare neointimal coverage (NIC) between BP-PtCr-EES and DP-CoCr-EES by using coronary angioscopy (CAS). Methods A total of 36 patients (44 stents) with BP-PtCr-EES or DP-CoCr-EES who underwent CAS at 1 year after stenting were investigated. We compared angioscopic findings assessed by angioscopy between BP-PtCr-EES (n=18) and DP-CoCr-EES (n=26). NIC grade and yellow plaque grade (YPG) was adopted from earlier reports from grade 0 to 3. We determined maximum (max-) and minimum (min-) NIC grade and heterogeneity score (HGS = max NIC grade minus min NIC grade). We also assessed YPG and the presence of thrombus (TH). Results Six lesions (33.3%) in BP-PtCr-EES group and 7 (26.9%) lesions in DP-CoCr-EES group were culprit lesions of acute coronary syndrome, which did not statistically differ between the two groups (p=0.74). And there were no significant differences in stent diameter (BP-PtCr-EES: 2.97±0.39 mm vs DP-CoCr-EES: 3.14±0.45 mm, p=0.22) and length (BP-PtCr-EES: 26.9±7.9 mm vs DP-CoCr-EES: 28.4±8.0 mm, p=0.54). In terms of CAS findings, BP-PtCr-EES group has better neointimal coverage than DP-CoCr-EES group (max NIC grade: 2.6±0.7 vs 2.0±0.9, p=0.01. min NIC grade: 1.1±0.8 vs 0.5±0.5, p&amp;lt;0.01), but HGS was almost same (1.6±0.7 vs 1.5±0.9, p=0.70). YPG of BP-PtCr-EES group showed significantly lower than DP-CoCr-EES group (1.0±1.0 vs 1.7±1.0, p=0.02). The rate of TH was significantly lower in BP-PtCr-EES group than DP-CoCr-EES group (25%, n=6, vs 75%, n=18, p=0.03). There were no clinical events such as stent thrombosis or restenosis during the observation period in both stent groups. Conclusion Superior neointimal coverage and less YPG or TH were observed by CAS in the BP-PtCr-EES group at 1 year after stenting. Clinical significance was still unknown because of no clinical events in both groups. Prospective and large populations studies may be required. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Vascular Response Occurring at 3 Months After Everolimus-Eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stent Implantation in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction vs. Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce the incidence of stent thrombosis, even in patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the early local vascular healing after DES implantation in STEMI lesions, which mainly concerns stent thrombosis, is still unclear.Methods and Results:We attempted to determine early local vascular healing 3 months after cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) implantation in STEMI lesions relative to stable coronary artery disease (CAD) lesions. This prospective, multicenter study analyzed 96 total lesions (STEMI=49, stable CAD=51) by frequency domain-optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) performed post-procedure and at the 3-month follow-up. Although CoCr-EES implanted in STEMI were almost entirely covered at 3 months, they had a relatively high incidence of uncovered struts compared with stable CAD (5.5% vs. 1.6%, P<0.001). Intrastent thrombus in the 2 groups was primarily resolved at the 3-month follow-up (STEMI: 91.7%→26.5%, stable CAD: 74.5%→11.8%). Regarding irregular protrusion, complete resolution was observed in stable CAD (21.6%→0%), while a few stents remained in STEMI (79.2%→8.2%). Although there were almost no changes for the serial change of average lumen area in STEMI, there were slight but significant decreases in stable CAD [STEMI 0.08 (-0.44, 0.55) mm2, stable CAD -0.35 (-0.55, 0.11) mm2; P=0.009]. Although strut coverage after CoCr-EES implantation for STEMI lesions was slightly delayed, the healing process appeared to be acceptable in both STEMI and stable CAD.

Scaffold underexpansion and late lumen loss after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: Insights from ABSORB JAPAN trial.

BackgroundDevice underexpansion is associated with late adverse outcomes after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. This study, representing official IVUS results of the ABSORB Japan trial, aimed to characterize IVUS findings, focusing specifically on acute device expansion, and to investigate its impact on late lumen loss (LLL) with Absorb-BVS compared with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES).MethodsABSORB Japan enrolled 148 patients (2:1 randomization) in the IVUS cohort. Serial IVUS was prescheduled at post-procedure and 3 years. Acute device expansion was evaluated with respect to the degree and uniformity of the implanted device.ResultsOverall, Absorb-BVS showed smaller and more nonuniform device expansion at post-procedure, compared with CoCr-EES, which was particularly prominent in small-vessel lesions. In serial analysis, Absorb-BVS showed unique associations of smaller device expansion (r = 0.40, p = 0.001) and more nonuniformity (r = 0.29, p = 0.007) at post-procedure with greater LLL at 3 years, primarily attributable to greater negative remodeling (r = 0.39, p = 0.006). In contrast, acute device expansion showed no relation with subsequent lumen change in CoCr-EES. In Absorb-BVS, ischemic-driven target lesion or vessel revascularization (ID-TLR or ID-TVR) at 3 years occurred more frequently in small- versus large-vessel lesions (12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.04 for ID-TLR and 15.6% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.08 for ID-TVR). Conversely, Absorb BVS had no target lesion nor vessel failure, even in small-vessel lesions, when adequate device expansion was achieved at post-procedure.ConclusionsUnlike CoCr-EES, underexpansion was associated with greater negative remodeling and LLL in Absorb-BVS. This may in part account for the poorer outcomes of Absorb-BVS than CoCr-EES when under-expanded.

Impact of stent designs of second-generation drug-eluting stents on long-term outcomes in coronary bifurcation lesions.

We compared the long-term clinical outcomes of four different types of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) in coronary bifurcation lesions. Clinical outcomes of different designs of second-generation DESs are not well known in bifurcation lesions. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation DESs for coronary bifurcation lesion were enrolled from 21 centers in South Korea. A total of 2,526 patients was evaluated and divided into four treatment groups according to DES type: bioabsorbable polymer biolimus-eluting stent (BP-BES group, n=514), platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES group, n=473), cobalt nickel zotarolimus-eluting stent (CoNi-ZES group, n=736), or cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES group, n=803). Primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to reduce selection bias and potential confounding factors. For 5 years of follow-up, the rates of TLF among the four DES groups were not significantly different (6.2% for BP-BES group, 8.2% for PtCr-EES group, 6.5% for CoNi-ZES group, and 8.6% for CoCr-EES group, p=.434). The results were consistent after IPTW adjustment (6.8, 8.4, 6.0, and 7.5%, respectively, p=.554). In subgroup analysis, the similarity of long-term outcomes among the four different types of second-generation DES was consistent across subgroups regardless of side branch treatment (p for interaction=.691). There seems to be no significant difference in long-term clinical outcomes among patients who received different types of second-generation DES for coronary bifurcation lesion.

Multivariable prediction model to estimate the probability of restenosis at proximal edge after 2nd-generation drug-eluting-stent implantation: development and internal validation using a quantitative coronary angiography from the post-marketing surveillance studies of everolimus-eluting stent in Japan

Edge restenosis has still been reported after second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. It was more likely attributable to post-procedural angiographic results than to the patient's background. The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a prediction model for restenosis in proximal edge after 2nd-generation DES stent implantation using angiographic data. Data were obtained from several post-marketing surveillance (PMS) studies of the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) and platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES), second-generation DES, in Japan. Angiographic analysis was conducted at baseline and after 8 or 12months. We focused on the proximal edge of angiographic analysis. The main outcome was restenosis defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up. The predictive performance of the prediction model based on multivariable logistic regression was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration, which were internally validated by the bootstrap method. We also performed decision curve analysis to assess threshold of predicted probability of restenosis at which additional intervention was considered. Among 2053 lesions in 1860 patients, restenosis rates in proximal edge was 2.8%. The final model was constructed with % post-procedural diameter stenosis (DS) and post-procedural reference diameter (RD) as strong predictors for edge restenosis. Discrimination and calibration were satisfactory with optimism-corrected C-statistics 0.75. Predicted probability between 0.03 and 0.24 was preferable threshold for restenosis treatments. Our prediction model can be used to obtain valid prediction for restenosis in proximal edge, assisting to know complete stent coverage of lesion.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Durable Polymer Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Long-term outcomes in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate long-term adverse events in HBR patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent implantation. We analyzed stratified data from 4 all-comers postapproval registries. Patients with at least 1 of the following criteria were categorized as HBR: age ≥75 years, history of major bleeding (MB), history of stroke, chronic oral anticoagulant use, chronic kidney disease, anemia, or thrombocytopenia. Additionally, in a separate analysis, patients were categorized according to the recently published Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analyses. Coronary thrombotic events (CTE) included myocardial infarction or definite/probable stent thrombosis. MB was defined according to the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) or GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) scales. Impact of CTE and MB on subsequent risk of mortality was assessed using multivariable Cox regression with MB and CTE included as time-updated covariates. Of the total 10 502 patients included, 3507 (33%) were identified as HBR. Compared with non-HBR patients, those at HBR had more comorbidities, higher lesion complexity, and a higher risk of 4-year mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] 4.38 [95% CI, 3.76-5.11]). Results were qualitatively similar when using Academic Research Consortium criteria to define HBR. Risk of mortality was increased after CTE (HR 5.02 [95% CI, 3.93-6.41]), as well as after MB (HR 4.92 [95% CI, 3.82-6.35]). Of note, this effect was consistent across the spectrum of bleeding risk (P-interaction test 0.97 and 0.06, respectively). Compared with the non-HBR population, HBR patients experienced worse 4-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. Both CTE and MB had a significant impact on subsequent risk of mortality irrespective of bleeding risk.

Cut-off value of strut-vessel distance for the resolution of acute incomplete stent apposition in the early phase using serial optical coherence tomography after cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent implantation

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify a cut-off value to predict the resolution of incomplete-stent-apposition (ISA) after cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) implantation at early follow-up. BackgroundTo date, appropriate stent apposition at the acute period using intracoronary imaging has been recommended because persistent ISA is considered to be a risk factor for stent thrombosis. We examined the indices for resolving acute ISA. In particular, we determined the cut-off value for strut vessel distance (SV-distance) as visualized by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 8 months after CoCr-EES implantation. However, the cut-off value of SV-distance for the earlier resolution of ISA is unclear. MethodsA total of 95 cases and 103 stents were registered in the MECHANISM Elective substudy. The SV-distance was measured at the deepest site of the target malapposition and every 1 mm from the proximal edge to the distal edge of the mal-apposed area using OCT. Cut-off values for ISA resolution at 1 and 3 months were estimated by SV-distance using receiver operating characteristic analysis. ResultsThe total number of analyzed struts was 14,418 at the 1-month follow-up and 11,986 at the 3-month follow-up. The optimal SV-distance cut-off values just after stent implantation to predict ISA resolution were 185 µm at the 1-month follow-up and 195 μm at the 3-month follow-up. ConclusionFor resolution of ISA, SV-distance cut-off values of 185 µm at 1 month postimplantation and 195 μm at 3 months postimplantation can be used as the index of endpoint of the percutaneous coronary intervention.

Randomized Comparison Between Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Stent: Multimodality Imaging Through 3 Years

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the vascular responses and fates of the scaffold after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation using multimodality imaging. BackgroundSerial comprehensive image assessments after BVS implantation in the context of a randomized trial have not yet been reported. MethodsIn the ABSORB Japan trial, 400 patients were randomized to a BVS (n = 266) or a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (n = 134). Through 3 years, patients underwent serial angiography and intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography (OCT). ResultsLuminal dimension at 3 years was consistently smaller with the BVS than with the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (mean angiographic minimal luminal diameter 2.04 ± 0.63 mm vs. 2.40 ± 0.56 mm, mean difference −0.37 mm [95% confidence interval: −0.50 to −0.24 mm]; p < 0.001), mainly because of smaller device area (6.13 ± 2.03 mm2 vs. 7.15 ± 2.16 mm2, mean difference −1.04 mm2 [95% confidence interval: −1.66 to −0.42 mm2]; p < 0.001), and larger neointimal area (2.10 ± 0.61 mm2 vs. 1.86 ± 0.64 mm2, mean difference 0.24 mm2 [95% confidence interval: 0.06 to 0.43 mm2]; p = 0.01) by OCT. BVS-treated vessels did not show previously reported favorable vessel responses, such as positive vessel remodeling, late luminal enlargement, and restoration of vasomotion, although the OCT-based healing score was on average zero (interquartile range: 0.00 to 0.00). At 3 years, intraluminal scaffold dismantling (ISD) was observed in 14% of BVS. On serial OCT, ISD was observed in 6 lesions at 2 years, where the struts had been fully apposed at post-procedure, while ISD was observed in 12 lesions at 3 years, where 8 lesions were free from ISD on 2-year OCT. In 5 cases of very late scaffold thrombosis, strut discontinuities were detected in all 4 cases with available OCT immediately before reintervention. ConclusionsIn this multimodality serial imaging study, luminal dimension at 3 years was smaller with the BVS than with the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. ISD, suspected to be one of the mechanisms of very late BVS thrombosis, was observed in a substantial proportion of cases at 3 years, which developed between post-procedure and 2 years and even beyond 2 years. (AVJ-301 Clinical Trial: A Clinical Evaluation of AVJ-301 [Absorb™ BVS] in Japanese Population [ABSORB JAPAN]; NCT01844284)

Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease

BackgroundLong-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents, as compared with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), in patients with left main coronary artery disease are not clearly established.MethodsWe randomly assigned 1905 patients with left main coronary artery disease of low or intermediate anatomical complexity (according to assessment at the participating centers) to undergo either PCI with fluoropolymer-based cobalt–chromium everolimus-eluting stents (PCI group, 948 patients) or CABG (CABG group, 957 patients). The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction.ResultsAt 5 years, a primary outcome event had occurred in 22.0% of the patients in the PCI group and in 19.2% of the patients in the CABG group (difference, 2.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.9 to 6.5; P=0.13). Death from any cause occurred more frequently in the PCI group than in the CABG group (in 13.0% vs. 9.9%; difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.2 to 6.1). In the PCI and CABG groups, the incidences of definite cardiovascular death (5.0% and 4.5%, respectively; difference, 0.5 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.4 to 2.5) and myocardial infarction (10.6% and 9.1%; difference, 1.4 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.3 to 4.2) were not significantly different. All cerebrovascular events were less frequent after PCI than after CABG (3.3% vs. 5.2%; difference, −1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.8 to 0), although the incidence of stroke was not significantly different between the two groups (2.9% and 3.7%; difference, −0.8 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.4 to 0.9). Ischemia-driven revascularization was more frequent after PCI than after CABG (16.9% vs. 10.0%; difference, 6.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.7 to 10.0).ConclusionsIn patients with left main coronary artery disease of low or intermediate anatomical complexity, there was no significant difference between PCI and CABG with respect to the rate of the composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 5 years. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; EXCEL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01205776.)

Impact of Residual Stenosis on the Angiographic Edge Restenosis of a Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent

Edge restenosis has gained attention as a main cause of restenosis after first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of edge restenosis and identify the predictors of edge restenosis after second-generation DES implantation. Data were obtained from several postmarketing surveillance (PMS) studies on a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES; Xience V/PROMUS, Xience Prime, Xience Prime SV, and Xience Expedition SV), a second-generation DES, in Japan. Angiographic analysis was conducted at the baseline and after eight months on the following subsegments: in-stent region, proximal edge, and distal edge. Restenosis was defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis (DS) at follow-up. We used multivariate logistic regression (with lesions as a random effect) to compare the instances of restenosis between the proximal and the distal edges. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the risk factors for restenosis were performed for each subsegment. We analyzed 1,966 lesions in 1,687 patients. The restenosis rates at the in-stent region, proximal edge, and distal edge were 4.4%, 3.0%, and 1.1%, respectively. The risk of restenosis at the distal edge was significantly lower than that at the proximal edge, when adjusted for 13 variables. The predictors of restenosis were postprocedural % diameter stenosis (%DS), postprocedural reference diameter, ≥ 45° bending, stent overlap at the proximal edge, and postprocedural %DS at the distal edge. Our analysis of eight-month angiographic outcomes from CoCr-EES PMS demonstrated that postprocedural %DS is a major predictor of edge restenosis. Edge restenosis is more likely attributable to postprocedural angiographic results than to the patient's background.

Clinical outcomes of contemporary drug-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: Multigroup propensity-score analysis using data from stent-specific, multicenter, prospective registries.

Whether the diabetic status differentially affects the clinical outcomes with different drug-eluting stents (DES) has been controversial. From stent-specific, prospective DES registries, we evaluated 17,184 patients (11,428 in non-diabetics and 5,756 in diabetics) who received several contemporary DES: 3570 sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), 5,023 cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), 2,985 platinum-chromium EES (PtCr-EES), 2,913 Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (Re-ZES), and 2,693 biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES). The primary outcome was patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE, a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization) at 3-year follow-up and target-vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) at 3 years was also evaluated. In non-diabetics, the rates of POCE were not significantly different (CoCr-EES 14.3%, PtCr-EES 13.0%, Re-ZES 14.3%, BP-BES 13.4%, and SES 14.6%; overall p = .39). In diabetics, similar results were revealed (CoCr-EES 18.4%, PtCr-EES 20.3%, Re-ZES 17.3%, BP-BES 17.7%, and SES 17.8%; overall p = .44). In multiple treatment propensity-score weighting analysis, regardless of the diabetic status, the hazard ratios for POCE between-individual comparison were similar. Target-vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) was also comparable except the higher ratio of Re-ZES than PtCr-EES (hazard ratio 1.25, 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.55, p = .048) in patients without diabetes. In this clinical-practice registry study, regardless the diabetic status, the 3-year rates of the primary outcome were similar among different types of DES, suggesting no differential clinical response between contemporary DES in patients with or without diabetes.

Impact of the one-year angioscopic findings on long-term clinical events in 504 patients treated with first-generation or second-generation drug-eluting stents: the DESNOTE-X study.

We aimed to test the hypothesis that the presence of in-stent yellow plaque (YP) assessed by angioscopy would be a risk of very late stent failure (VLSF) of the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) in comparison with first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). DESNOTE-X was a prospective cohort study, an extended study of the DESNOTE study (UMIN000013515). All patients who received successful angioscopic examination at planned one-year follow-up of DES were clinically followed. The primary endpoint was VLSF defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation. A total of 504 patients with 549 lesions were enrolled over a period of 12.5 years. At one-year follow-up, the incidence of YP was significantly higher in the first-generation DES than in the CoCr-EES (199/292 [68%] vs 80/257 [31%], p<0.001). Maximum yellow colour grade on coronary angioscopy at one-year follow-up was an independent predictor of future VLSF in the first-generation DES (HR 2.604 [95% CI: 1.265-5.361], p=0.009), whereas it was not in the CoCr-EES (p for interaction 0.022). The incidence of in-stent atherosclerosis identified as YP on angioscopy was lower and its impact on late clinical events appeared smaller in the CoCr-EES than in the first-generation DES.