D URING the summer of 1940 the author, assisted by Paul Belkin, made 400 collections of fishes from the streams of western Massachusetts, an area including the watersheds of the Connecticut, Hoosic, and Housatonic rivers. In attempting to explain the distribution of these fishes, historical and ecological factors are considered in relation to the habits and habitat preferences of the various species. Prior to 1940, no distribution study had been made, although four lists of fishes were published, as follows: In 1839, David Humphrey Storer published, as a state report, a list of the fishes of Later, between the years 1853 and 1867, he revised, extended, and fully illustrated this report under the title, A History of the of Massachusetts. Eighteen species or subspecies of fresh-water fishes were listed. Previous to Storer's report, Jerome Van Crowningshield Smith published in 1833 a Natural History of the of and also A Catalogue of the Marine taken on the Atlantic Coast of Massachusetts. He recorded 17 freshwater forms. This work was severely criticised by both Storer (1839: 347356) and Gill (1904: 327) for its inaccuracies. In 1879, George B. Goode and Tarleton H. Bean, in a report on the Fishes of Essex County, recorded 20 fresh-water forms. William C. Kendall (1908: 1-152) enumerated 35 species or subspecies for the state that live part or all of their lives in fresh water and 13 of these were from western The study just completed lists 46 species or subspecies of fishes, inclusive of anadromous and catadromous forms (see Table I). Of this number, 12 are classified as introduced and 34 as native, inclusive of the 5 sea-run forms. Contrasting ecological conditions exist between the western and eastern drainage systems of the Connecticut watershed. The Deerfield and Westfield river systems, of the western Connecticut drainage, are influenced by the high, rugged Berkshire Hills in which many of their tributaries rise. As a result, the streams are usually fast-flowing over stream beds of gravel, rubble, and boulders. The Millers and Chicopee river systems, of the eastern Connecticut drainage, rising from ponds and swamps of the relatively low, broad Worcester plateau, tend to be slow-flowing, over stream beds predominantly formed of sand and mud. The smaller tributary streams of the Connecticut, that have their origin in the foothills of the Berkshires and the Worcester plateau, reflect in miniature the typical flow and stream bed of the Connecticut River itself, as it meanders through its flood plain from north to south in The Housatonic and Hoosic river valleys, bordered on the east by the Berkshire Hills and on the west by the Taconic Range, portray all of the varied conditions of the Connecticut River valley. Native stream fishes in western Massachusetts may be classified into four distributional groups: (1) of general distribution, abundantly represented in all of the drainage systems; (2) fishes of general distribution sparsely represented in all of the drainage systems; (3) fishes of restricted
Read full abstract