Coadministration Of Ezetimibe Research Articles

Inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption by ezetimibe is a novel therapeutic target for fatty liver

Ezetimibe is a novel lipid-lowering agent that inhibits intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol. The effects of ezetimibe on low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol were found to generally consistent across all subgroups analyzed, including baseline lipid profile, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and body mass index. Furthermore, recent clinical studies also revealed that co-administration of ezetimibe with on-going statins offered a well-tolerated and efficacious treatment to lower LDL-cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemic patients with diabetes mellitus or the metabolic syndrome. Niemann-Pick C1 like 1 (NPC1L1) protein is recently found to be critical for intestinal cholesterol absorption, and is a target protein for ezetimibe. Human NPC1L1 protein is predominantly expressed in liver, whereas small intestine expression is only about 2-4% of that found in the liver. Thus, NPC1L1 does not function solely in the intestinal cholesterol absorption. Furthermore, loss of NPC1L1 expression has been shown to protect against diet-induced fatty liver. These observations let us to speculate that ezetimibe will become a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver, the hepatic manifestation of insulin resistant patients with the metabolic syndrome. In this paper, we would like to propose the possible ways of testing our hypothesis as follows. (1) Does ezetimibe treatment improve fatty liver in patients with hypercholesterolemia or the metabolic syndrome? If the answers are yes, are these beneficial effects of ezetimibe superior to those of other anti-hyperlipidemic resins with equihypolipidemic properties? (2) Does ezetimibe treatment improve insulin sensitivity in fatty liver patients with the metabolic syndrome? (3) How about the effects of ezetimibe treatment on serum levels of adiponectin, a key adipokine with insulin-sensitizing property? Large clinical trials will provide us with more definite information whether ezetimibe treatment can improve fatty liver and resultantly reduce the risk of progression of liver diseases in patients with the metabolic syndrome.

Supratherapeutic Response to Ezetimibe Administered with Cyclosporine

To report the case of a patient who underwent orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) and demonstrated a supratherapeutic response to ezetimibe when administered with cyclosporine. Ezetimibe 10 mg/day was added to the lipid-lowering regimen (atorvastatin 40 mg/day) of a 64-year-old male patient after OHT to achieve a target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level < or = 97 mg/dL, as recommended by national guidelines. After 2 months of ezetimibe, the patient's LDL-C level had decreased by 60% to 51 mg/dL. Subsequently, the dose of ezetimibe was reduced to 5 mg/day and, after another 2 months, a repeat lipid panel revealed LDL-C 57 mg/dL. Hyperlipidemia is a common problem among heart transplant recipients. Combination therapy using a statin plus ezetimibe appears to be an attractive option to achieve target lipid levels in this population. However, the manufacturer warns that ezetimibe should be administered cautiously in patients concomitantly receiving cyclosporine. Unpublished data suggest a pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and cyclosporine that results in a significant 2.3- to 12-fold increase in exposure to total ezetimibe. An objective causality assessment in this case revealed that this supratherapeutic LDL-C reduction was probably related to coadministration of ezetimibe and cyclosporine. A potential mechanism to explain this interaction might be an alteration in glucuronidation induced by cyclosporine. When ezetimibe is prescribed for patients concomitantly receiving cyclosporine, it should be initiated at a lower than recommended dose (> or = 5 mg/day) and titrated upward. Careful and consistent monitoring of patients on this combination is also advised.

Efficacy and Safety of the Coadministration of Ezetimibe With Fenofibrate in Patients With Mixed Hyperlipidaemia

Efficacy and Safety of the Coadministration of Ezetimibe With Fenofibrate in Patients With Mixed Hyperlipidaemia

Ezetimibe coadministered with fenofibrate: some safety questions

I would like to comment on some questions in reference to the article of Dr Farnier and co-workers on the coadministration of ezetimibe with fenofibrate in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.1 First, criteria of clinical and/or laboratory muscle-related adverse events are not referenced and are not in accordance with the recently published criteria of the ACC/AHA/NHLBI clinical advisory on …

The effect of fluvastatin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ezetimibe

ABSTRACTObjective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects and safety of the co-administration of ezetimibe and fluvastatin in healthy hypercholesterolemic subjects at clinically-relevant doses and to evaluate the potential for a pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ezetimibe and fluvastatin.Methods: In a single-center, evaluator-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, parallel-group study 32 healthy subjects with hypercholesterolemia were randomized to 4 treatments administered once daily for 14 days: ezetimibe 10 mg plus ezetimibe placebo, fluvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe placebo, fluvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg, and ezetimibe placebo. Blood samples were collected to measure serum lipids and to determine steady-state pharmacokinetics.Results: Ezetimibe 10 mg significantly ( p ≤ 0.01) decreased total-cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) concentrations compared to placebo at Day 14. Fluvastatin 20 mg also caused a significant ( p = 0.01) reduction in total-cholesterol and a decrease in LDL‐C at Day 14 compared to placebo, however, the decrease in LDL‐C did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.08). The coadministration of ezetimibe 10 mg and fluvastatin 20 mg caused significantly ( p ≤ 0.01) greater mean percent reductions in LDL‐C and total-cholesterol than fluvastatin 20 mg alone or placebo at Day 14. Fluvastatin had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe. On average, ezetimibe appeared to decrease the rate and extent of fluvastatin bioavailability.Conclusion: Coadministration of ezetimibe and fluvastatin was safe and well tolerated and caused significant incremental reductions in LDL‐C and total cholesterol compared to fluvastatin administered alone. The pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe were not affected by coadministration with fluvastatin. The apparent decrease in fluvastatin exposure on administration with ezetimibe was likely to be due to the parallel study design and two pharmacokinetic outliers and is considered of no clinical significance.

Lipid altering-efficacy of ezetimibe co-administered with simvastatin compared with rosuvastatin: a meta-analysis of pooled data from 14 clinical trials

ABSTRACTObjective: Results of direct comparative studies between ezetimibe/simvastatin and rosuvastatin therapies have not been reported. Both of these treatment options offer significant reductions in LDL-C. To evaluate the lipid efficacy of each of these therapies relative to each other, a meta-analysis of data from 14 randomized, double-blind clinical trials that compared the effectiveness of two new options for cholesterol lowering was performed.Data sources: PubMed, EMBASE and BIOSIS databases were searched up to March 14, 2004.Methods of study selection: Efficacy results from clinical trials with the co-administration of ezetimibe 10 mg with simvastatin or with the ezetimibe/simvastatin combination product (ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/10 mg, 10/20 mg, 10/40 mg, and 10/80 mg) were compared with efficacy results from clinical trials of rosuvastatin 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Trials in healthy patients, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or combined hyperlipidemia, and pharmacokinetic trials were excluded.Data extraction and synthesis: This analysis used pooled data for LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, triglycerides, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein (apo) A-I, and apo B for the two therapies at their lowest doses (ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/10 mg and rosuvastatin 5 mg) through their highest doses (ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/80 mg and rosuvastatin 40 mg), and estimated within-treatment percentage changes in these parameters. Percentage reductions from baseline in LDL-C for the pooled data were 46.2% and 41.8% for ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/10 mg and rosuvastatin 5 mg, respectively; 50.6% and 47.4% for ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg and rosuvastatin 10 mg, respectively; 55.9% and 52.1% for ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg and rosuvastatin 20 mg, respectively; and 59.7% and 58.5% for ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/80 mg and rosuvastatin 40 mg, respectively.Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggest greater LDL-C lowering with ezetimibe/simvastatin compared with rosuvastatin. These results need to be confirmed in a head-to-head comparison of both therapies.

Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe co-administered with ongoing atorvastatin therapy in achieving low-density lipoprotein goal in patients with hypercholesterolemia and coronary heart disease

This randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe (EZE) co-administered with ongoing atorvastatin (ATV) therapy in 450 hypercholesterolemic patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) who had not achieved their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal < or =2.60 mmol/l while on a stable dose of ATV 10 or 20 mg/day for > or =6 weeks. After a 4-week diet/baseline active run-in period, patients with LDL-C >2.60 mmol/l and < or =4.20 mmol/l were stratified by ATV dose and randomised (1 : 1) to EZE 10 mg or PBO for 6 weeks while continuing open-label ATV. Significantly more patients achieved an LDL-C goal < or =2.6 mmol/l with EZE than PBO (81.3 vs. 21.8%; p < or = 0.001). Compared to PBO, co-administration of EZE with ongoing ATV led to significantly (p < or = 0.001) greater reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, triglycerides, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B; HDL-C was significantly (p < or = 0.05) increased. Co-administration of EZE and ATV was well tolerated, with an overall safety profile similar to ATV alone.

LDL-C goal attainment with the addition of ezetimibe to on-going simvastatin treatment in coronary heart disease patients with hypercholesterolemia

ABSTRACTObjective: To evaluate the addition of ezetimibe or placebo to on-going simvastatin treatment on attaining the LDL‐C treatment target of ≤ 2.60 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with hypercholesterolemia.Methods: Patients with documented CHD were recruited if they were on a stable dose of simvastatin 10 mg or 20 mg for at least 6 weeks, had LDL‐C > 2.60 mmol/L and ≤ 4.20 mmol/L (> 100 mg/dL and ≤ 160 mg/dL), triglycerides ≤ 4.00 mmol/L (355 mg/dL) and hepatic transaminases and creatine kinase ≤ 50% above the upper limit of normal. After a 4-week placebo and diet run-in period, eligible patients were randomized to a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study with ezetimibe 10 mg co-administered with on-going simvastatin 10 mg or 20 mg (n = 208) versus placebo to match ezetimibe co-administered with simvastatin 10 mg or 20 mg for 6 weeks (n = 210).Results: When ezetimibe was added to on-going simvastatin therapy, a significantly greater percentage of patients attained the LDL‐C target of ≤ 2.60 mmol/L after 6 weeks of treatment compared to placebo added to on-going simvastatin (80.4% vs. 17.4%, respectively; p ≤ 0.001). When co-administered with on-going simvastatin therapy, mean percentage reduction in LDL‐C from baseline was significantly larger in the ezetimibe group compared to placebo (27.1% vs. 4.1%, respectively; p ≤ 0.001). The co-administration of ezetimibe or placebo to on-going simvastatin treatment was generally well tolerated.Conclusions: Ezetimibe co-administered with on-going simvastatin 10 mg or 20 mg treatment enabled more CHD patients with hypercholesterolemia to attain the LDL‐C treatment target of ≤ 2.60 mmol/L.

Management of mixed hyperlipidaemia

This editorial refers to ‘Efficacy and safety of the coadministration of ezetimibe with fenofibrate in patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia’† by M. Farnier et al. , on page 897 The introduction of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) about 15 years ago has influenced the daily practice of cardiologists and other physicians enormously with respect to preventive strategies of first and second cardiovascular events. These drugs can lower the concentration of LDL-cholesterol by 30–60% and are generally well tolerated. In the last decade, randomized trials with statins have involved more than 90 000 patients, in which the overall safety and efficacy of the statins has been firmly established. The use of statins has, therefore, become the cornerstone of drug therapy in reducing the concentration of LDL-cholesterol and thereby the risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke, even in subjects without high serum cholesterol levels. Despite the success of statins in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, a substantial number of patients continue to have clinical events, which can partly be explained by the fact that other lipoprotein particles in addition to LDL contribute to the risk of cardiovascular disease, such as abnormalities in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (very low-density lipoproteins, chylomicrons, or their remnants) and HDL.1 This is especially the case in … *Corresponding author. Tel: +31 243618819; fax: +31 243541734. E-mail address : a.stalenhoef{at}aig.umcn.nl

Efficacy and safety of the coadministration of ezetimibe with fenofibrate in patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia

To examine the efficacy and safety of coadministered ezetimibe (EZE) with fenofibrate (FENO) in patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia. This was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel arm trial in patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia [LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), 3.4-5.7 mmol/L (2.6-4.7 mmol/L for patients with type 2 diabetes); triglycerides (TG), 2.3-5.7 mmol/L] and no history of coronary heart disease (CHD), CHD-equivalent disease (except for type 2 diabetes), or CHD risk score>20%. A total of 625 patients was randomized in a 1:3:3:3 ratio to one of four daily treatments for 12 weeks: placebo; EZE 10 mg; FENO 160 mg; FENO 160 mg plus EZE 10 mg (FENO+EZE). The primary endpoint compared the LDL-C lowering efficacy of FENO+EZE vs. FENO alone. LDL-C, non-HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B were significantly (P<0.001) reduced with FENO+EZE when compared with FENO or EZE alone. TG levels were significantly decreased and HDL-C was significantly increased with FENO+EZE and FENO treatments when compared with placebo (P<0.001). Coadministration therapy reduced LDL-C by 20.4%, non-HDL-C by 30.4%, TG by 44.0%, and increased HDL-C by 19.0%. At baseline, >70% of all patients exhibited the small, dense LDL pattern B profile. A greater proportion of patients on FENO+EZE and FENO alone treatments shifted from a more atherogenic LDL size pattern to a larger, more buoyant, and less atherogenic LDL size pattern at study endpoint than those on placebo or EZE. All three active therapies were well tolerated. Coadministration of EZE with FENO provided a complementary efficacy therapy that improves the atherogenic lipid profile of patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia.

Long-term safety and, tolerability profiles andlipid-modifying efficacy of ezetimibe coadministered with ongoing simvastatin treatment: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 48-week extension study

Background: Ezetimibe (EZE) is a cholesterol-loweringdrug that inhibits absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol across the intestinal wall without affecting absorption of bile acids, fatty acids, fat-soluble vitamins, or triglycerides. It has a complementary mechanism of action to the statins, which inhibit cholesterol synthesis in the liver. Coadministration of EZE and statins provides inhibition of 2 sources of cholesterol, leading to greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) than with either agent alone. Objectives: This study evaluated the long-term safetyand tolerability profiles and lipid-modifying efficacy of treatment with EZE 10 mg/d plus simvastatin (SIMVA) 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg/d for 48 weeks in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Methods: This was an extension of a multicenter, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled base study in which hypercholesterolemic patients were randomized to receive EZE 10 mg/d or PBO in addition to their current statin for 8 weeks. Patients who successfully completed the base study could enter the extension study if they were willing to switch from their current statin to an approximately equipotent dose of SIMVA for the 54-week study period. After a 6-week open-label SIMVA run-in phase, patients were rerandomized to receive EZE 10 mg/d or PBO in a 4:1 ratio, respectively, for 48 weeks. At each clinic visit, beginning at week 12, the dose of SIMVA was titrated upward until patients reached their National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II LDL-C goal or the maximum SIMVA dose of 80 mg/d. Safety/tolerability and lipid efficacy parameters were assessed at 12-week intervals. Results: Of 433 patients entering the extensionstudy, 355 were randomized to receive EZE and 78 were randomized to receive PBO. Baseline demographic characteristics and lipid levels were similar between treatment groups. Overall, coadministration of EZE + SIMVA was well tolerated. There were no clinically meaningful differences between the EZE and PBO groups with regard to the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (19% vs 17%, respectively), discontinuations due to AEs (7% vs 10%), serious AEs (12% vs 17%), consecutive elevations in liver function tests ≥3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) (0.3% vs 0%), or elevations in creatine kinase ≥10 times the ULN (both, 0%). As in the base study, LDL-C levels were significantly lower with the addition of EZE to SIMVA compared with the addition of PBO (−24% vs 3%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: In these patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, EZE 10 mg/d added to ongoing SIMVA treatment for 48 weeks had a favorable safety and tolerability profile and was more efficacious than SIMVA monotherapy.

Projected coronary heart disease risk benefit with ezetimibe

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and total cholesterol (TC) are the primary clinical parameters of interest for any cholesterol intervention. Clinicians are interested in how the reduction of these lipid parameters as well as increases in high density lipoprotein (HDL) relate to changes in coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. The objective of this analysis was to estimate the additional CHD risk reduction that could potentially be provided by co-administration of ezetimibe with statin therapy. Data from four double-blind placebo controlled clinical trials were used to predict the level of CHD risk reduction that might be achieved by co-administration of ezetimibe with statin therapy when compared to those receiving statin as monotherapy. Patients without a previous history of CHD were included in the analysis. Projected CHD risk reduction was calculated as percent change in projected CHD risk from baseline to 12 weeks based on observed lipid levels at those time points. For all the studies combined greater reductions in percent change in 5-year CHD risk were observed for patients receiving ezetimibe and statin as co-therapy, 53.4%, when compared to those receiving statin alone, 39.7%. Co-administration of ezetimibe with statin therapy provides an additional 13.7% reduction in predicted 5-year CHD risk when compared to statin monotherapy. Reductions in 5-year CHD risk for each of the statin studies ranged from 16.1% for lovastatin to 9.8% for atorvastatin. Co-administration of ezetimibe with statins could significantly reduce CHD events in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

Effects of ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin on C-reactive protein in a large cohort of hypercholesterolemic patients

Objective: This study assessed the effect of coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin on high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in a large subject cohort ( N = 1089). Methods: Data were combined from two nearly identical prospective trials. After dietary stabilization, washout period, and placebo lead-in period, patients with baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 3.75–6.50 mmol/l and triglycerides (TG) ≤ 4.0 mmol/l were randomized to one of the following daily treatments for 12 weeks: ezetimibe 10 mg; simvastatin monotherapy (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg); ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg); or placebo. The primary analysis was the percent change in hs-CRP for the pooled ezetimibe plus simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy cohorts. Results: Ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin more than doubled the hs-CRP reduction compared to simvastatin monotherapy (−33.3% versus −14.3%, p < 0.01). At each individual simvastatin dose level, coadministration therapy exerted significant further incremental hs-CRP reductions compared to simvastatin monotherapy. Similar hs-CRP reductions with coadministered ezetimibe and simvastatin were observed in the major subgroups examined (coronary heart disease, gender, age, baseline LDL-C, and body mass index). Conclusion: In this large subject cohort, ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin significantly reduced hs-CRP, suggesting a possible additional anti-inflammatory/anti-atherosclerotic action of combination therapy compared to simvastatin monotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe co‐administered with simvastatin in thiazolidinedione‐treated type 2 diabetic patients

In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), combination therapy is usually required to optimize glucose metabolism as well as to help patients achieve aggressive targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other lipid parameters associated with cardiovascular risk. The thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are increasingly being used for both their blood glucose-lowering properties and their modest beneficial effects on triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Ezetimibe, an intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, has a mechanism of action that differs from that of statins, which inhibit hepatic cholesterol synthesis. We compared the lipid-modifying efficacy and safety of adding ezetimibe to simvastatin, vs. doubling the dose of simvastatin, in TZD-treated T2DM patients. This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre study in T2DM patients, 30-75 years of age, who had been on a stable dose of a TZD for at least 3 months and had LDL-C > 2.6 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) prior to study entry. Other antidiabetic medications were also allowed. Following 6 weeks of open-label simvastatin 20 mg/day, patients were randomized to the addition of either blinded ezetimibe 10 mg/day (n = 104) or an additional blinded simvastatin 20 mg/day (total simvastatin 40 mg/day; n = 110) for 24 weeks. Patients were stratified according to TZD type and dose (pioglitazone 15-30 vs. 45 mg/day; rosiglitazone 2-4 vs. 8 mg/day). LDL-C was reduced more (p < 0.001) by adding ezetimibe 10 mg to simvastatin 20 mg (-20.8%) than by doubling the dose of simvastatin to 40 mg (-0.3%). Ezetimibe plus simvastatin 20 mg also produced significant incremental reductions in non-HDL-C (p < 0.001), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.05) and apolipoprotein B (p < 0.001) relative to simvastatin 40 mg. There were no differences between the groups with respect to changes in TG and HDL-C levels, and both treatments were well tolerated. Co-administration of ezetimibe with simvastatin, a dual inhibition treatment strategy targeting both cholesterol synthesis and absorption, is well tolerated and provides greater LDL-C-lowering efficacy than increasing the dose of simvastatin in T2DM patients taking TZDs.

Cost-effectiveness of ezetimibe coadministration in statin-treated patients not at cholesterol goal

Despite the growing use of statins, many hypercholesterolaemic patients fail to reach their lipid goal and remain at elevated risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Alternative treatment strategies, such as ezetimibe coadministration and statin titration, can help patients achieve greater lipid control, and thereby lower their CHD risk. But is it cost effective to more aggressively lower cholesterol levels across a broad range of current statin users? Using a decision-analytic model based on epidemiological and clinical trials data, we project the lifetime benefit and cost of alternative lipid-lowering treatment strategies for CHD and non-CHD diabetic patients in Germany, Spain and Norway. It is projected that from 40% to 76% of these patients who have failed to reach their lipid goal with their current statin treatment will be able to reach their goal with ezetimibe coadministration; this represents a gain of up to an additional absolute 14% who will be able to reach their goal compared with a 'titrate to goal' strategy where patients are titrated in order to reach their lipid goal (up to the maximum approved dose). For CHD patients, the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for ezetimibe coadministration is under Euro 18 000 per life-year gained (Euro/LYG) and 26 000 Euro/LYG compared with strategies based on the observed titration rates and the aggressive 'titrate to goal' strategy, respectively; for non-CHD diabetic patients, these ratios are under 26 000 Euro/LYG and 48 000 Euro/LYG for ezetimibe coadministration compared with the two titration strategies. Compared with statin titration, ezetimibe coadministration is projected to be cost effective in the populations and countries studied.

Development and validation of a model to project the long-term benefit and cost of alternative lipid-lowering strategies in patients with hypercholesterolaemia

Patients not currently reaching their lipid goals, even with the use of statins, are at elevated coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Ezetimibe, when coadministered with a patient's current statin, has been shown to effectively reduce cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolaemia. In order to help healthcare decision makers assess the cost effectiveness of this treatment strategy, a model is needed to compare ezetimibe coadministration versus alternative statin titration strategies among patients who have failed to reach their lipid goal with their current statin dose. A flexible decision-analytic model that projects the long-term benefit and cost of alternative lipid-lowering strategies is described. Using a Markov process, the model allows movement from one health state to another based on the predicted risk of CHD events (fatal and nonfatal) and the risk of death from non-CHD causes. Each health state can be assigned a quality-of-life weight and an expected cost in order to determine the total survival time, quality-adjusted survival time and cost associated with the alternative treatment strategies. The accuracy of the model in projecting the percentage of patients who experience fatal and nonfatal CHD events was assessed by using individual baseline patient characteristics from two long-term outcomes trials: the Air Force Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study, a primary prevention trial, and the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study, a secondary prevention trial. Compared with event rates in the two outcome trials, the model appears to underestimate both the absolute risk of nonfatal CHD events and its reduction due to lipid lowering. But the model appears to provide reasonable estimates of the absolute reduction in fatal CHD events following lipid treatment. The model will allow one to assess the cost effectiveness of alternative treatment strategies for hypercholesterolaemia including statin titration and the coadministration of ezetimibe in patients who have failed to reach their lipid goal with a statin. Because the benefit of reducing nonfatal CHD events may be underestimated, the model may overestimate the cost-effectiveness ratio of ezetimibe coadministration.

Achieving lipoprotein goals in patients at high risk with severe hypercholesterolemia: Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe co-administered with atorvastatin

Background Despite the efficacy of statins in lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, many patients who are at high risk for heart disease with hypercholesterolemia require additional LDL-C level reduction. The cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, has been shown to provide significant incremental reductions in LDL-C levels when co-administered with statins. This study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe (10 mg) plus response-based atorvastatin titration versus response-based atorvastatin titration alone in the attainment of LDL-C goals in subjects who are at high risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and are not at their LDL-C goal on the starting dose of atorvastatin. Methods This was a 14-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study conducted in 113 clinical research centers in 21 countries. Participants were adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), CHD, or multiple (≥2) cardiovascular risk factors, and a LDL-C level ≥130 mg/dL after a 6- to10-week dietary stabilization and atorvastatin (10 mg/day) open-label run-in period. Eligible subjects continued to receive atorvastatin (10 mg) and were randomized to receive blinded treatment with ezetimibe (10 mg/day; n = 305) or an additional 10 mg/day of atorvastatin (n = 316). The atorvastatin dose in both groups was doubled after 4 weeks, 9 weeks, or both when the LDL-C level was not at its goal (≤100 mg/dL), so that patients receiving combined therapy could reach 40 mg/day and patients receiving atorvastatin alone could reach 80 mg/day. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects achieving their LDL-C level goal at week 14. A secondary end point was the change in LDL-C level and other lipid parameters at 4 weeks after ezetimibe co-administration with 10 mg/day of atorvastatin versus 20 mg/day of atorvastatin monotherapy. Results The proportion of subjects reaching their target LDL-C level goal of ≤100 mg/dL was significantly higher in the co-administration group than in the atorvastatin monotherapy group (22% vs 7%; P <.01). At 4 weeks, levels of LDL-C, triglycerides, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were reduced significantly more by combination therapy than by doubling the dose of atorvastatin (LDL-C −22.8% versus −8.6%; P <.01). The combination regimen had a safety and tolerability profile similar to that of atorvastatin alone. Conclusions The addition of ezetimibe to the starting dose of 10 mg/day of atorvastatin followed by response-based atorvastatin dose titration to a maximum of 40 mg/day provides a more effective means for reducing LDL-C levels in patients at high risk for CHD than continued doubling of atorvastatin as high as 80 mg/day alone.

Effectiveness and tolerability of ezetimibe add-on therapy to a bile acid resin-based regimen for hypercholesterolemia

Combination lipid-reducing therapy is increasingly used, particularly for the management of severe or combined dyslipidemia in patients at high risk for coronary heart disease. To assess the potential additive effects of combining the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe with a bile acid resin (BAR), a prospective chart review was performed of 40 patients in whom ezetimibe 10 mg/day was added to a stable regimen that included a BAR. At an average follow-up of 107 +/- 57 days, ezetimibe coadministration significantly reduced total cholesterol by 18%, triglycerides by 14%, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 19% (all p < or =0.03), without significantly changing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the combination was well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and lovastatin in healthy volunteers*

SUMMARYBackground: Ezetimibe (Zetia†) is a novel inhibitor of intestinal absorption of cholesterol that is approved for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. In a separate pilot study, co-administration of ezetimibe and lovastatin resulted in a significant pharmacodynamic interaction, leading to an additive reduction in LDL-C. The current study was designed to further investigate the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and lovastatin.Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, 3-way crossover study in 18 healthy adult volunteers. All subjects received the following treatments orally once daily for 7 days: ezetimibe 10 mg, lovastatin 20 mg, or ezetimibe 10 mg plus lovastatin 20 mg. Plasma samples obtained on day 7 were evaluated for steady-state pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe (unconjugated), total ezetimibe (ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide conjugate), lovastatin, and β-hydroxylovastatin.Results: Co-administration of ezetimibe with lovastatin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe. There were no significant differences in the exposure to total ezetimibe, ezetimibe-glucuronide and ezetimibe after co-administration with lovastatin vs. ezetimibe given alone. Co-administration of ezetimibe with lovastatin had no significant effect on the exposure to either lovastatin or β-hydroxylovastatin. The point estimates based on the log-transformed Cmax and AUC values for lovastatin and β-hydroxylovastatin were 113% and 119%, respectively, for co-administration of ezetimibe with lovastatin vs. lovastatin administration alone. Co-administration therapy with ezetimibe and lovastatin was safe and well tolerated.Conclusions: Ezetimibe did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin or β-hydroxylovastatin and vice versa. Co-administration of ezetimibe and lovastatin is unlikely to cause a clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction.

Effects of ezetimibe added to on-going statin therapy on the lipid profile of hypercholesterolemic patients with diabetes mellitus or metabolic syndrome

SUMMARYObjective: To conduct a post-hoc assessment of the lipid-modifying effects of adding the cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, to on-going statin therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or metabolic syndrome (MetS).Research design and methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering efficacy and safety of adding ezetimibe 10 mg/day versus placebo to ongoing, open-label statin treatment for 8 weeks in hypercholesterolemic patients. Qualifying LDL-C levels and target LDL-C goals were based on National Cholesterol Education Program risk categories. The DM subgroup were patients who entered the study with a prior diagnosis of DM. Patients were classified as having MetS if they met 3 or more of the following criteria at baseline: triglycerides (TG) ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.69 mmol/L); high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) < 40 mg/dL (1.04 mmol/L) for men or < 50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) for women; fasting serum glucose (FSG) ≥ 110 mg/dL (≥ 6.1 mmol/L); a diagnosis of hypertension or taking hypertension medication or blood pressure ≥ 130/ ≥ 85 mmHg; waist circumference > 88 cm (women) or > 102 cm (men). DM patients were excluded from the MetS subgroup analysis.Main outcome measures: The objectives were to assess the effects of treatment on plasma concentrations of LDL-C and other lipid variables, and on the percentage of patients achieving LDL-C target levels at the end of the study.Results: Of 769 patients enrolled in the original study, there were 191 (24.8%) with DM and 195 (25.4%) with MetS. Regardless of subgroup, ezetimibe + statin was significantly more effective than statin alone at lowering plasma levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and triglycerides (between-group p < 0.001 for all). For all lipid parameters, the relative treatment effects were generally consistent regardless of DM or MetS status. Significantly more ezetimibe than placebo patients in all subgroups achieved prespecified LDL-C goals ( p < 0.001 for all), and although more patients in the DM and MetS groups, respectively, achieved the goal compared with their non-DM and non-MetS counterparts [83.6% (DM) versus 67.2 (non-DM) and 71.8% (MetS) versus 65.6% (non-MetS)], these differences were not significant after adjusting for differences in baseline LDL-C levels. Ezetimibe was well-tolerated and had a favorable safety profile in all subgroups.Conclusions: The co-administration of ezetimibe with statins, a therapeutic regimen that inhibits both the absorption and synthesis of cholesterol, offers a well-tolerated and efficacious treatment to lower LDL-C in patients with DM and MetS.