Abstract BACKGROUND It is expected that 10-15% of children with CNS tumors have an underlying cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS). This has important implications on treatment, cancer screening and family counseling. There is no published data on this genetic risk from Jordan. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of the Jordanian children <18 years old at the time of diagnosis with CNS tumors, and were treated at King Hussein Cancer Center/Jordan between January 2021 and December 2023. We reviewed their clinical characteristics and tumor diagnoses, then applied the updated Jongmans’ criteria and MIPOGG criteria and linked that with their germline genetic testing result if performed. RESULTS We identified 198 children (53% males); median age at diagnosis was 7years (range, 0-18 years). Consanguinity was found in 30% of families, and 35% had first/second degree relatives with cancer. Most common diagnoses were LGG (41%), HGG (22%) and medulloblastoma (14%). Most tumors were non-metastatic (90%) at initial diagnosis. Fifty-five percent of patients fulfilled the updated Jongmans’ criteria and 36% the MIPOGG criteria, however germline genetic testing was only performed for 34 patients (17%). Pathogenic germline variants were found in 15 patients (44%); 6 LGG (NF1 (3), TSC2, PTPN11, MUTYH), 4 medulloblastoma (SDHB, TP53, BRCA2, CHEK2), 4 HGG (MSH6 (3), TP53), and one had pathogenic NF2 gene. The presence of CPS affected the management received: children with NF1 were treated without tumor biopsy, the child with TSC2 received everolimus, and 3 children with MSH6 received checkpoint inhibitors instead of temozolomide. The underlying CPS also predicted prognosis e.g. rapid clinical deterioration in the TP53-mutated-SHH-medulloblastoma. Partial screening was provided to children with NF1, TSC, NF2, TP53 and BMMRD mutations. CONCLUSIONS High proportion of our patients fulfilled the criteria for referral to genetic clinic, but less than half were referred. Increasing awareness of these criteria is important. Identification of CPS impacted treatment and prognosis, yet families’ perceptions and attitudes toward these CPS need to be captured.