Geometric Mean Ratios Of Cmax Research Articles

Pharmacokinetic Equivalence of the High Dose Strength Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet of Gemigliptin/Metformin Sustained Release (SR) and Individual Component Gemigliptin and Metformin XR Tablets in Healthy Subjects.

BackgroundIn type 2 diabetes mellitus therapy, fixed-dose combination (FDC) can offer not only benefits in glucose control via the combined use of agents, but also increase patient compliance. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of the high dose of the FDC tablet (gemigliptin/metformin sustained release [SR] 50/1,000 mg) and a corresponding co-administered dose of individual tablets.MethodsThis study was randomized, open-label, single dose, two treatments, two-period, crossover study, which included 24 healthy subjects. Subjects received the FDC or individual tablets of gemigliptin (50 mg) and metformin XR (1,000 mg) in each period. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) of the FDC tablet and co-administration of individual tablet for both gemigliptin and metformin were calculated.ResultsThe GMRs (FDC tablets/co-administration; 90% CIs) for Cmax and AUClast of gemigliptin were 1.079 (0.986–1.180) and 1.047 (1.014–1.080), respectively. For metformin, the GMRs for Cmax, and AUClast were 1.038 (0.995–1.083) and 1.041 (0.997–1.088), respectively. The 90% CIs for GMRs of Cmax and AUClast for gemigliptin and metformin fell entirely within bounds of 0.800–1.250. Both administration of FDC tablet and co-administration of individual tablets were well tolerated.ConclusionFDC tablet exhibited pharmacokinetic equivalence and comparable safety and tolerability to co-administration of corresponding doses of gemigliptin and metformin XR as individual tablets.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02056600

Bioequivalence Study of a New Fixed-dose Combination Tablet Containing S-Amlodipine Nicotinate and Olmesartan Medoxomil in Healthy Korean Male Subjects

PurposeA fixed-dose combination (FDC) pill of amlodipine (relatively old calcium channel blocker as dihydropyridine) and olmesartan (relatively new angiotensin II receptor blocker) is used for hypertension that is not adequately controlled with a single-formulation drug. Because the FDC is a one-pill formulation, and amlodipine and olmesartan have different mechanisms of action, it is expected to improve patients’ medication compliance and have an increased blood pressure-lowering efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety profile and the bioequivalence of two different FDC formulations [amlodipine besylate/olmesartan medoxomil 10/40 mg (reference product) and S-amlodipine nicotinate/olmesartan medoxomil 5/40 mg (test product)]. MethodsA randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-way, and 2-period crossover study, including a 3-week washout period, was performed in 32 healthy Korean male volunteers. To analyze the concentration of S-amlodipine or olmesartan, plasma samples were collected up to 144 hours after the dose for S-amlodipine and 48 hours after the dose for olmesartan. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including the Cmax and the area under the curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC0–last) for the time versus concentration plot, were calculated. Analysis of variance for bioequivalence was conducted using Cmax and AUC0–last converted to log scale, and the mean ratios and 90% CIs were determined. Safety data included analysis of adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical examinations, clinical laboratory test, and 12-lead ECGs. FindingsOf the 32 enrolled participants, 29 healthy volunteers completed the study. For both S-amlodipine and olmesartan, the main pharmacokinetic parameters were all within the acceptable range for regulatory bioequivalence. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0–last were 0.8766 to 0.9760 and 0.8288 to 0.9224, respectively, for S-amlodipine and 0.9097 to 1.1229 and 0.8904 to 1.0407, respectively, for olmesartan. Hypotension was the most frequent AE, and it was observed in 4 volunteers with the test product and 7 volunteers with the reference product. Both the test and reference formulations were well tolerated. ImplicationsThe present study demonstrates that the newly developed FDC product (test drug) and the conventional FDC product (reference drug) have comparable pharmacokinetic characteristics in healthy adult male volunteers. Both the test and reference products indicated good tolerance in this population, and no serious AEs were observed.

Comparative double-blind randomized trial of 2 rituximab products in patients with CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

7550 Background: DRL-Rituximab (T) is a proposed biosimilar of the innovator reference rituximab (USA: Rituxan; EU: MabThera). Physicochemical analyses and nonclinical studies have shown T to be comparable with innovator Rituximab. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of T with EU sourced MabThera (R) in DLBCL patients. Methods: Multicentre randomized double-blind 2-arm parallel study conducted in patients aged 18-60 yrs, with a centrally confirmed newly diagnosed CD20+ DLBCL, as first line of treatment. Patients received 6 cycles (C), every 21 days, of either T or R at 375 mg/m2 + CHOP. Primary objective was to compare C1 PK (AUC0-21d & Cmax). Overall Response Rate (ORR) was the key secondary objective, with C6 PK parameters, PD parameters (B-cells measured as CD19+ positive cells in peripheral blood- depletion & repletion), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) as other secondary objectives. PK similarity criterion was 90% CI of geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of AUC0-21d and Cmax in C1, within 80-125%. Results: 151 patients were randomized (T, 76; R, 75). PK similarity criterion was met. The GMR T/R ratios with 90% CIs for AUC0-21d & Cmax were 100.0% (87.7, 114.0) & 96.2% (88.7, 104.4), respectively. Per protocol, ORR with 95% CI was 82.1% (69.6, 91.1) with T and 87.1% (76.1, 94.3) with R. Trough concentration (C5/C6) GMR (90% CI) of 91.3% (86.3, 96.7) for T & 94.0% (88.9, 99.5) for R indicated steady state. C6 AUC0-21d & Cmax GMR (T/R [90% CI]) were 88.9% (80.3, 98.5) and 94.6% (88.1, 101.7), respectively. T and R led to comparable B-cell depletion and repletion. Incidence of all grades of TEAEs were comparable. TEAEs ≥Grade 3 were 80.3% in T (n = 61) and 88.0% R (n = 66). Neutropenia was the most common TEAE (overall: T, 75.0%; R, 73.3% & ≥ grade 3: T, 64.5%; R, 64.0%). No neutralizing antibodies were observed in either of the arms. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that DRL-Rituximab has comparable PK, PD, efficacy, safety and immunogenicity to MabThera. MabThera already has an established efficacy in longer term follow-up. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2012/11/003129.

No clinically meaningful pharmacokinetic interaction between the hepatitis C virus inhibitors elbasvir and grazoprevir and the oral contraceptives ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel.

Oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) are an important element of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in women of childbearing potential. These studies evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetic interactions between elbasvir (EBR) and grazoprevir (GZR) and ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel (EE/LNG). Both studies were open-label, single-site, two-period, fixed-sequence, one-way interaction studies. In period 1, subjects received one tablet of EE/LNG (0.03mg/0.15mg). In period 2, subjects received EBR (50mg once daily) for 13days or GZR (200mg once daily) for 10days, with one tablet of EE/LNG on day 7 (GZR group) or 10 (EBR group). Each study enrolled 20 healthy, nonsmoking adult females. There was no clinically meaningful effect of multiple doses of EBR or GZR on the pharmacokinetics of EE or LNG. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for AUC0-∞ and Cmax in the presence and absence of EBR were 1.01 and 1.10 for EE and 1.14 and 1.02 for LNG, with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) that were contained in the interval [0.80, 1.25]. Similarly, the AUC0-∞ and Cmax GMRs in the presence and absence of GZR were 1.10 and 1.05 for EE and 1.23 and 0.93 for LNG, respectively. The 90% CIs for EE AUC0-∞ and for EE and LNG Cmax were contained in the interval [0.80, 1.25]; however, the 90% CI for the LNG AUC0-∞ [1.15, 1.32] slightly exceeded the upper bound. These results suggest that EBR/GZR can be co-administered to female patients with HCV of childbearing potential who are on OCPs to prevent pregnancy.

A phase 1 study comparing the proposed biosimilar BS-503a with bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers.

This is a randomized, double‐blind, single‐dose, parallel group phase 1 study to assess pharmacokinetic similarity, safety, and tolerability of BS‐503a, a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar. A total of 114 male healthy subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive a single 3 mg/kg intravenous dose of either BS‐503a or bevacizumab (Avastin®). Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples were collected up to Day 78, and serum drug concentrations were measured using a validated enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Pharmacokinetic similarity was evaluated using area under the serum concentration‐time curve from zero to infinity (AUC inf) as a primary PK parameter, and maximum serum concentration (C max) and area under the serum concentration‐time curve from zero to the last measurable time (AUC last) as secondary PK parameters. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of geometric mean ratio of AUC inf ranged 0.980–1.105, which met the predefined criteria of 0.80–1.25. The 90% CIs of geometric mean ratios for C max and AUC last were 1.009–1.125 and 0.982–1.096, respectively, falling into the same criteria. At least one drug‐related treatment emergent adverse event occurred in 18 and 21 subjects treated with BS‐503a and bevacizumab, respectively. The most common adverse events were headache, epistaxis, and rhinorrhea. Most adverse events were mild or moderate; however, one drug‐related serious adverse event of duodenal ulcer perforation was reported by a subject 47 days after treatment of BS‐503a. In conclusion, BS‐503a was demonstrated to have highly similar PK to bevacizumab and adverse events observed were consistent with those observed for bevacizumab.

Pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin and sustained-release metformin fixed-dose combination tablets: two randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover studies in healthy male subjects under fed conditions

Two separate studies were conducted to establish bioequivalence (BE) for two doses of atorvastatin/metformin sustained-release (SR) fixed dose combination (FDC) versus the same dosage of the individual component (IC) tablets in healthy male subjects under fed conditions (study 1, BE of atorvastatin/metformin SR 20/500 mg FDC; study 2, BE of atorvastatin/metformin SR 20/750 mg FDC). Each study was a randomized, open-label, single oral dose, two-way crossover design. Serial blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 36 hours post-dose for atorvastatin and 24 hours for metformin. Plasma concentrations of atorvastatin, 2-OH atorvastatin and metformin were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry. A non-compartmental analysis was used to calculate pharmacokinetic (PK) variables and analysis of variance was performed on the lognormal-transformed PK variables. A total of 75 subjects completed the study 1 (36 subjects) and study 2 (39 subjects). The 90% confidence intervals for the adjusted geometric mean ratio of Cmax and the AUC0-t were within the predefined 0.80 to 1.25 range. The number of subjects reporting at least one adverse event following FDC treatments was comparable to that following IC treatments. The two treatments were well tolerated. Therefore, atorvastatin/metformin SR 20/500 mg and 20/750 mg FDC tablets are expected to be used as alternatives to IC tablets to decrease the pill burden and increase patient compliance.

A Drug-Drug Interaction Study of Ibrutinib with Moderate and Strong CYP3A Inhibitors in Patients with B-Cell Malignancy

Background:Ibrutinib, a potent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, is indicated for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (including 17p deletion), and Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia. Because ibrutinib is extensively cleared by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, concomitant treatment with CYP3A inhibitors has been shown to increase ibrutinib exposure in healthy adults. However, sparse PK data from uncontrolled phase 2 studies with moderate CYP3A inhibitors showed a lower magnitude of drug-drug interactions (DDI) than observed in studies with healthy subjects or in silico simulations under nonfasted conditions (data on file). This phase 1 study was conducted to evaluate potential DDIs between ibrutinib and CYP3A inhibitors in patients with B-cell malignancies and to confirm recommended dose adjustments.Methods: This was an open-label, multicenter, DDI study of ibrutinib with erythromycin (moderate CYP3A inhibitor) and voriconazole (strong CYP3A inhibitor) in patients (≥ 18 years) with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancy. During the first treatment cycle, patients received an oral dose of 560 mg ibrutinib on days 1-4 (steady-state) and days 14-18. On days 5-13 and 19-27, the dose was reduced to 140 mg ibrutinib and combined with erythromycin (500 mg tid on days 5-11) and then with voriconazole (200 mg bid on days 19-25). On PK sampling days (days 4 [alone], 11 [with erythromycin], and 25 [with voriconazole]), ibrutinib was administered 30 min before a standard breakfast. On these PK sampling days, the morning doses of voriconazole and erythromycin were administered 1 hr prior to ibrutinib and together with ibrutinib, respectively.PK samples were taken pre- and up to 24 hr postdose; key PK parameters were summarized for ibrutinib, PCI-45227 (ibrutinib metabolite), erythromycin, and voriconazole. After completion of the DDI assessment during cycle 1, patients continued treatment with ibrutinib monotherapy at therapeutic doses. Safety was evaluated throughout the study.Results:All patients (N = 26) completed the PK assessments in cycle 1; 54% were men, and the median age was 65 years. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) for dose-normalized maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hr (AUC24h) for ibrutinib was 3.35 and 2.99, respectively, when given in combination with erythromycin (Table). When ibrutinib was coadministered with voriconazole, the GMR for Cmax and AUC24h was 6.71 and 5.74, respectively (Table). Four out of 26 patients showed either no interaction between ibrutinib and erythromycin or a lower ibrutinib exposure (AUC ratios 0.27-0.99). Three of these 4 patients also displayed minimal interaction with voriconazole (AUC ratios 1.08-1.96); baseline ibrutinib AUCs for the 3 patients were at the high end of the range, indicating lower CYP3A abundance and thus less impact from CYP inhibition.Physiologically-based PK modeling under fed conditions predicted a 5.5- and 7.1-fold increase in the GMR for ibrutinib Cmax and AUC, respectively, when dosed with erythromycin and an increase of 6.3- and 7.6-fold, respectively, when dosed with voriconazole. The simulated interaction factor for voriconazole is contained in the 90% CI of the observed GMRs (borderline for AUC), whereas the model over-predicted Cmax and AUC by ~50% and ~130%, respectively.Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 22/26 patients (85%); The most common TEAEs (all causality, ≥ 10% of patients) were diarrhea (27%); neutropenia (23%); abdominal pain, fatigue, pyrexia, and thrombocytopenia (15% each); anemia, dry mouth, cough, dyspnea, and hypertension (12% each). Drug-related TEAEs ≥ grade 3 were neutropenia (15.4%); hypertension (7.7%); and diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, herpes zoster, cough, dyspnea, atrial fibrillation, and cardiac failure (3.8% each).Conclusions:PK data indicate that 140 mg ibrutinib, when combined with a moderate or strong CYP3A inhibitor, achieved exposures generally consistent with those after a 560 mg dose given alone. Coadministration of 140 mg ibrutinib with erythromycin or voriconazole demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, and the adverse event profile was consistent with the ibrutinib safety profile at therapeutic doses. These findings support the 140 mg/day ibrutinib dose when given in combination with erythromycin or voriconazole. [Display omitted] Disclosuresde Jong:Janssen: Employment. Hellemans:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. De Wilde:Janssen: Employment. Patricia:Janssen: Employment. Masterson:Janssen: Employment. Osmanov:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Cordoba:Janssen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Panizo:Roche Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de Zwart:Janssen: Employment. Snoeys:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chauhan:Janssen: Consultancy. Jiao:Janssen: Employment. Sukbuntherng:Pharmacyclics, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership; Global Blood Therapeutics: Equity Ownership. Ouellet:Janssen: Employment.

Effect of Resveratrol Treatment on the Pharmacokinetics of Diclofenac in Healthy Human Volunteers

The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of resveratrol (RSV) treatment on the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac (DIC) in healthy human volunteers. The open-label, two period, sequential study was conducted in 12 healthy human volunteers. A single dose of RSV 500 mg was administered daily for 10 days during treatment phase. A single dose of DIC 100 mg was administered during control and after treatment phases under fasting conditions. The blood samples were collected after DIC dosing and analyzed by HPLC. Treatment with RSV significantly enhanced maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) (1.73 to 2.91 µg/mL), area under the curve (AUC) (5.05 to 9.95 g h/mL), half life (T1/2) (1.12 to 1.76 h) and significantly decreased elimination rate constant (Kel ) (0.71 to 0.41 h(-1)), apparent oral clearance (CL/F) (14.58 to 6.48 L/h) of DIC as compared to control. The geometric mean ratios for Cmax, AUC, T1/2, Kel and CL/F of DIC were 1.75, 2.12, 1.65, 0.61 and 0.47, respectively were outside the limits of 0.8-1.25, which indicates clinically significant interaction between DIC and RSV. The results suggest that the altered pharmacokinetics of DIC might be attributed to RSV mediated inhibition of CYP2C9 enzyme. Therefore, combination therapy of DIC along with RSV may represent a novel approach to reduce dosage and results in reduced gastrointestinal side effects of DIC.

Bioequivalence of saxagliptin/dapagliflozin fixed-dose combination tablets compared with coadministration of the individual tablets to healthy subjects.

Saxagliptin and dapagliflozin are individually indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The bioequivalence of saxagliptin/dapagliflozin 2.5/5 mg and 5/10 mg fixed‐dose combination (FDC) tablets compared with coadministration of the individual tablets and the food effect on both strengths of saxagliptin/dapagliflozin FDCs were evaluated in this open‐label, randomized, single‐dose crossover study. Healthy subjects were randomized to saxagliptin 2.5 mg + dapagliflozin 5 mg fasted, 2.5/5 mg FDC fasted, 2.5/5 mg FDC fed (Cohort 1) or saxagliptin 5 mg + dapagliflozin 10 mg fasted, 5/10 mg FDC fasted, 5/10 mg FDC fed (Cohort 2). Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetics of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin were obtained predose and up to 60 h postdose. Bioequivalence of FDC tablets versus individual components was concluded if the 90% CIs for FDC to individual component geometric mean ratios of C max, AUC 0‐T, and AUC inf of both analytes were between 0.80 and 1.25. Seventy‐two subjects were randomized; 71 (98.6%) completed the study. Saxagliptin/dapagliflozin 2.5/5 mg and 5/10 mg FDC tablets were bioequivalent to the individual tablets administered concomitantly. Food had no clinically meaningful effect on saxagliptin or dapagliflozin overall systemic exposure. Saxagliptin/dapagliflozin FDC tablets were bioequivalent to coadministration of the individual components in healthy subjects under fasted conditions and food had no clinically meaningful effect on bioavailability.

Pharmacokinetics of a telmisartan/rosuvastatin fixed-dose combination: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study in healthy Korean subjects.

As hypertension and dyslipidemia are frequent comorbidities, antihypertensive drugs and lipid-lowering agents are often prescribed together for their treatment. Telmisartan and rosuvastatin are widely used together to treat hypertension and dyslipidemia. A combination formulation of these two drugs would improve patient compliance due to ease of dosing. The purpose of this study was to assess bioequivalence of single-dose administration of a newly-developed fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet containing telmisartan/rosuvastatin 80/20 mg (test treatment) and coadministration of a telmisartan 80-mg tablet and a rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet (reference treatment) in healthy Korean male volunteers. This was a single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study enrolling healthy males aged 20 - 50 years with BMI between 18.5 and 25 kg/m2. Each subject received a single dose of the reference and test treatments with a 14-day washout period. Blood sampling was performed at prespecified intervals for up to 72 hours after dosing. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters were Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0-∞ of telmisartan, rosuvastatin, and N-desmethyl rosuvastatin. Bioequivalence was assessed by determining whether the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (test treatment/reference treatment) of these parameters were within the standard range of 80% to 125%. Adverse events were monitored via regular interviews with the subjects and by physical examinations. 60 subjects were enrolled and 55 completed the study. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUClast, and AUC00-∞ were 0.9262-1.1498, 0.9294-1.0313, and 0.9312-1.0320 for telmisartan, 0.9041-1.0428, 0.9262-1.0085, and 0.9307-1.0094 for rosuvastatin, and 0.8718-1.0022, 0.8901-0.9904, and 0.8872-0.9767 for N-desmethyl rosuvastatin, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse events (AEs) (all of which were mild or moderate) between the reference and test treatments. Our findings suggest that the telmisartan/rosuvastatin FDC is bioequivalent to coadministration of separate tablets, and both treatments were safe and well tolerated. Administration of this FDC tablet is expected to improve patient compliance.

Sex and Food Influence on Intestinal Absorption of Ketoprofen Gastroresistant Formulation.

Sixteen healthy volunteers (8 women and 8 men) participated in a 2-period, 2-treatment crossover study. A delayed-release gastroresistant formulation of ketoprofen was administered under fasting and fed conditions. Cmax , AUC, Cmax /AUC, and kel obtained after food coadministration did not differ from those calculated under fasting administration. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for fed/fasting geometric mean ratio of Cmax /AUC and AUC were 0.80-1.14 and 0.80-1.23, respectively. A significant difference (P < .01) was found between lag-time medians (T0 ), with a longer T0 after food intake (5.5 vs 2.5 hours). Also, a significant difference between the medians of Tmax was found (P < .01), being 7.0 hours after food coadministration and 4.0 hours under fasting administration, but this difference disappeared once T0 was subtracted from Tmax . Cmax /AUC, which is related to drug absorption rate, showed significant differences between sexes. Men showed higher (P =.006) Cmax /AUC means (0.468 ± 0.094 vs 0.361 ± 0.087 h(-1) . Tmax was also significantly different (P < .05), being 4.0 (3.0-5.0) hours for men and 8.0 (5.0-10.0) hours for women. In conclusion, men showed a faster intestinal absorption rate with earlier time-to-peak plasma concentration of ketoprofen. Food coadministration extended the gastric residence time of formulation but exerted no effect on its intestinal absorption pattern.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Profile of the Novel Translocator Protein 18 kDa Antagonist ONO-2952 in Healthy Volunteers

PurposeTo investigate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic properties of single and multiple doses of novel translocator protein 18 kDa antagonist ONO-2952 in healthy subjects. MethodsDouble-blind, placebo-controlled single (SAD) and multiple (MAD) dose escalation studies were conducted. Healthy men and women aged 18 to 55 years inclusive and without history of psychiatric disorders were eligible. Forty-eight volunteers received single doses of ONO-2952 (3, 10, 30, 100, 200, or 400 mg) or placebo under fasted conditions (SAD study), and 36 received ONO-2952 (30, 60, or 100 mg/d) or placebo for 21 consecutive days under fed conditions (MAD study). ONO-2952 10 and 200 mg were administered under fasted and fed conditions in the SAD study to investigate the effect of food on the absorption of ONO-2952. Safety assessments included adverse events, vital signs, 12-lead ECGs, and clinical laboratory evaluations. Plasma and urine pharmacokinetic profiles of ONO-2952 were determined. FindingsAcross both studies, mean age ranged from 29.8 to 39.8 years, most participants were white, and the proportion of female volunteers was 52%. No treatment or dose-related trends in adverse events were observed. The most frequent adverse events were headache and presyncope (n = 2 each [SAD study]) and constipation and headache (n = 3 each [MAD study]). All headache and constipation episodes were possibly related to the study drug. Plasma ONO-2952 concentrations peaked 2.5 to 3.5 hours (SAD study) and 3.0 to 4.0 hours (MAD study) postdose. ONO-2952 systemic exposure increased less than dose proportionally under fasted conditions. Fed conditions significantly increased exposure compared with fasted conditions: geometric mean ratios of Cmax (90% CIs) were 229% (176–299 [10 mg]) and 778% (623–971 [200 mg]), and AUClast were 159% (131–192 [10 mg]) and 382% (288–506 [200 mg]). In the MAD study, the systemic exposure of ONO-2952 increased in a slightly greater than dose-proportional manner. Geometric mean accumulation ratios (95% CI) of AUC24 were 2.50 (2.09–2.98 [30 mg]), 2.23 (1.85–2.68 [60 mg]), and 2.73 (2.10–3.55 [100 mg]); and Cmax were 1.65 (1.43–1.90 [30 mg]), 1.56 (1.31–1.85 [60 mg]), and 1.85 (1.38–2.49 [100 mg]). ImplicationsONO-2952 was safe and well tolerated in these early clinical studies investigating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic properties of single and multiple doses. ONO-2952 systemic exposure increased in a less than dose-proportional manner under fasted conditions and in a slightly greater than dose-proportional manner under fed conditions. These results support the progression of ONO-2952 to further studies in humans.SAD study: ClinicalTials.gov identifier: NCT01364441. MAD study: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01489345.

선형혼합모형을 활용한 생물학적 동등성 분석

생동성 시험과 같은 임상약리학분야의 연구는 일반적으로 한 개체 내에서 반복하여 측정된 자료구조를 사용하므로 선형혼합모형을 이용하여 분석하는 것이 보편적이다. 이러한 모형에서 랜덤효과는 개체 내 관측 자료 사이의 상관관계를 설명하고, 공분산행렬은 개체-내 변동을 설명한다. 생동성 분석은 두 약물의 약동학적 변수인 Cmax와 AUC의 기하평균비에 대한 90% 신뢰구간이 동등성 한계인 [0.8, 1.25] 범위에 드는지 알아보는 분석으로, 고정효과에는 시기, 순서군, 치료효과를, 랜덤효과에는 개체효과를 가지는 선형혼합모형을 이용하여 분석한다. 이러한 분석이 적용된 실제 예를 살펴보기 위하여 레보플록사신 연구의 자료를 활용하였다. Linear mixed models are commonly used in the clinical pharmaceutical studies to analyze repeated measures such as the crossover study data of bioequivalence studies. In these models, random effects describe the correlation between repeated outcomes and variance-covariance matrix explain within-subject variabilities. Bioequivalence analysis verifies whether a 90% confidence interval for geometric mean ratio of Cmax and AUC between reference drug and test drug is included in the bioequivalence margin [0.8, 1.25] performed using linear mixed models with period, sequence and treatment effects as fixed and sequence nested subject effects as random. A Levofloxacin study is referred to for an example of real data analysis.

Bioequivalence of fixed-dose combination RIN®-150 to each reference drug in loose combination.

RIN(®)-150 is a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet containing rifampicin (RMP, 150 mg) and isoniazid (INH, 75 mg) developed for the treatment of tuberculosis. This study was conducted at a single center: the Pfizer Clinical Research Unit in Singapore. To demonstrate bioequivalence of each drug component between RIN-150 and individual products in a loose combination. This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover study. Subjects received single doses of RIN-150 or two individual reference products under fasting conditions in a crossover fashion, with at least 7 days washout between doses. The primary measures for comparison were peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Of 28 subjects enrolled, 26 completed the study. The adjusted geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUClast between the FDC and single-drug references and 90% confidence intervals were respectively 91.63% (90%CI 83.13-101.01) and 95.45% (90%CI 92.07-98.94) for RMP, and 107.58% (90%CI 96.07-120.47) and 103.45% (90%CI 99.33-107.75) for INH. Both formulations were generally well tolerated in this study. The RIN-150 FDC tablet formulation is bioequivalent to the two single-drug references for RMP and INH at equivalent doses.

Results of functional testing and pharmacokinetics comparing ABP 215 to bevacizumab.

711 Background: ABP 215 is a biosimilar candidate to bevacizumab (BEV), a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds and inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Biosimilar mAbs are likely to have differences in product quality attributes due to different expression systems, bioprocess and purification, so demonstration of functional similarity and pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence is the foundation for biosimilarity. Objectives: To assess functional similarity and PK equivalence of ABP 215 and BEV sourced from EU and US. Methods: Functional similarity testing included binding to VEGF and VEGF isoforms by surface plasmon resonance and to FcRn and FcγRIIIa. Inhibition of proliferation and VEGFR2 autophosphorylation was compared in endothelial cells. PK equivalence was evaluated in a randomized, single-dose, 3-arm study in healthy adult male subjects. Primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) and maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax). Secondary endpoints were safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Results: ABP 215 and BEV (EU) are functionally similar as previously presented. Binding affinity to VEGF was similar between ABP 215 (117 pM) and BEV (US) (126 pM) as was binding to VEGF165 and VEGF121. Binding to FcRn was similar between ABP 215 (95-102%) and BEV (96-111%). Binding to FcγRIIIa was also similar; ABP 215 (108-115%) and BEV (85-93%). Potency in proliferation inhibition was similar between ABP 215 (91-97%) and BEV (91-96%), as was inhibition of autophosphorylation. After a single dose, geometric mean (GM) of Cmax and AUCinf for ABP 215 were 87.2 µg/mL and 29,400 µg.h/mL, for BEV (US) were 89.1 µg/mL and 29,600 µg.h/mL, for BEV (EU) were 84.7 µg/mL and 30,600 µg.h/mL. The 90% CIs of GM ratio for Cmax and AUCinf were within pre-specified equivalence criterion of 0.80 to 1.25 confirming PK equivalence. There were no adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs leading to study discontinuation. Treatment-related AEs were reported for 22.1% in ABP 215, 16.4% in BEV (US) and 22.4% in BEV (EU) groups; no subjects developed anti-drug antibodies. Conclusions: ABP 215 is similar to BEV in sensitive functional tests and equivalent to BEV based on results of the phase 1 PK study.

Pharmacokinetic Bridging Approach for Developing Biologics-delivery Devices: A Case Study With a Golimumab Autoinjector

PurposeThis Phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) comparability study in healthy subjects was performed to compare the PK properties and tolerability of single-dose golimumab 100 mg delivered subcutaneously by an autoinjector device or by a standard needle and syringe that had been used for the subcutaneous (SC) delivery of golimumab in pivotal Phase 3 studies. MethodsHealthy male subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single injection of SC golimumab 100 mg using either the autoinjector or a standard needle and syringe. The PK parameters of golimumab were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. An ANOVA model was applied to compare the 2 injection methods with regard to golimumab Cmax and the AUC from 0 and 49 days after administration (AUC0–49d). FindingsIn the prespecified evaluable PK population (n = 141), the mean (SD) values for Cmax were 6.6 (3.3) and 6.0 (3.0) µg/mL, and AUC0–49d values were 97.4 (43.2) and 88.9 (36.8) µg·d/mL in the autoinjector and needle/syringe groups, respectively. The 90% CI of the geometric mean ratios of the AUC0–49d values between the 2 delivery methods was 95.17% to 120.55%; the 90% CI of the geometric mean ratio of Cmax was 96.14% to 127.42%. In a post hoc intent-to-treat analysis using data from all 156 subjects, the 90% CIs of both Cmax and AUC0–49d fell within the prespecified range for bioequivalence (80% to 125%). The prevalences of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups. ImplicationsThe totality of the study findings suggests that the PK properties and tolerability of SC administration of golimumab by the 2 delivery methods were comparable. The study results successfully bridged the container-closure change from a liquid-in-vial product to either a prefilled syringe or an autoinjector with the same liquid formulation.

Influence of CYP3A4 Induction/Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of Vilazodone in Healthy Subjects

PurposeVilazodone is a serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT1A partial agonist approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. Vilazodone seems to be metabolized primarily by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 isozyme and non-CYP–mediated pathways; concomitant use of drugs that affect CYP3A4 activity could potentially alter systemic exposure to vilazodone. The present studies evaluated whether CYP3A4 inhibition (study 1) or induction (study 2) affected the pharmacokinetics of vilazodone. MethodsParticipants were healthy adult volunteers. Study 1 was conducted in 2 parts and evaluated the pharmacokinetics of single-dose vilazodone administered with multiple-dose (200 mg once daily) ketoconazole, a CYP3A4 inhibitor. Part 1 was an open-label pharmacokinetic assessment of a single 5-mg vilazodone dose with or without ketoconazole. Part 2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study comparing vilazodone pharmacokinetics after a single 10-mg dose alone or co-administered with ketoconazole or placebo. Study 2 was an open-label, multiple-dose, single-sequence study evaluating the effect of steady-state carbamazepine, a CYP3A4 substrate and inducer, on the pharmacokinetics of steady-state vilazodone (40 mg once daily). Primary pharmacokinetic parameters for both studies were AUC and Cmax for vilazodone. Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction was concluded if the 90% CIs of the ratio of vilazodone plus the CYP3A4 inhibitor/inducer relative to vilazodone alone (or plus placebo) for AUC and Cmax were within the 80% to 125% range. Subject-reported and investigator-identified adverse events (AEs), laboratory values, vital signs, and 12-lead ECG parameters were recorded. FindingsIn study 1/parts 1 and 2 (n = 15 and 22 enrolled, respectively), mean vilazodone AUC increased 42% and 51%, respectively, in the presence of ketoconazole (expected to be at steady state) versus vilazodone alone (part 1) or with placebo (part 2). The upper limit of the 90% CIs for the vilazodone AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios exceeded 125%. In study 2 (n = 30 enrolled), co-administration of vilazodone and the carbamazepine extended-release formulation decreased mean steady-state vilazodone exposure ~45%, and the 90% CIs for the vilazodone AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios were not within the range of 80% to 125%. In both studies, most AEs were of mild intensity, and gastrointestinal AEs predominated. ImplicationsThese results suggest that up to a 50% decrease of vilazodone dosage should be considered when it is given in combination with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors; conversely, increasing the vilazodone dosage up to a maximum of 80 mg/d should be considered when it is given in combination with strong CYP3A4 inducers. (Study registration numbers: SB-659746/029; VLZ-PK-02.)

Linagliptin fixed-dose combination with metformin is bioequivalent to co-administration of linagliptin and metformin as individual tablets.

To demonstrate bioequivalence of linagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets and the corresponding combination of individual tablets taken together, i.e., free-pill (FP) treatment. Three dosing combinations were evaluated in three separate randomized studies: linagliptin 2.5 mg with 500 mg, 850 mg, or 1,000 mg metformin. These studies used a prospective, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover design to evaluate bioequivalence in healthy volunteers (n = 287). After an overnight fast, participants received an FDC tablet once, and on a separate visit received the corresponding FP treatment. The two possible treatment sequences (FDC/FP and FP/FDC) were randomly allocated to the participants. A washout period of 35 days separated the two study treatments. The primary endpoints were maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of linagliptin and metformin, area under the plasma concentration time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUC0-72) for linagliptin, and from 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) for metformin. The 90% confidence intervals of the adjusted geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC (calculated as FDC/ FP) were within the bioequivalence acceptance limits of 80 - 125%. The number of participants reporting at least one adverse event following FDC treatments was comparable to, or less than, that following FP treatments. Evaluation of vital signs and clinical laboratory tests revealed no safety issues. FDC tablets of linagliptin and metformin are bioequivalent to individual tablets of respective dose strengths taken together. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Bioavailability of Two Tablet Formulations of a Single Dose of Moxifloxacin 400 mg: An Open-Label, Randomized, Two-Period Crossover Comparison in Healthy Mexican Adult Volunteers

Moxifloxacin is a synthetic fluoroquinolone with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity. It is indicated for the treatment of respiratory tract, skin and intra-abdominal infections. The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability and to determine the bioequivalence of a test and reference formulation of oral moxifloxacin 400 mg, administered as a tablet, and to generate data regarding the oral bioavailability of this drug in Mexican population. This single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, two-period, crossover study was conducted on a total of 26 healthy Mexican adult subjects of both genders, with an eight-day washout period. Study formulations were administered after a 10-hour overnight fast. For pharmacokinetic analysis, blood samples were drawn at 0 (baseline), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after administration. Plasma concentrations of moxifloxacin were determined using HPLC coupled with a fluorescence detector. The test and reference formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs for the geometric mean test/reference ratios were within a predetermined range of 80% to 125%. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞were 88.67% to 108.70%, 97.44% to 102.50%, and 97.70% to 104.82 %, respectively. In this study a single dose of the test formulation met the regulatory requirements for assuming bioequivalence, based on the rate and extent of absorption.

Effects of ponesimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator, on the pharmacokinetics of a hormonal combination contraceptive

To determine the effects of steady-state concentrations of the selective S1P1 receptor modulator ponesimod on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of a combined oral contraceptive, containing 1mg norethisterone (NET) and 35μg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and to investigate the effects on heart rate at different ponesimod doses within an up-titration regimen prior to co-administration of the contraceptive. Twenty-two healthy women (age: 29-60years) received twice a single oral dose of the combined oral contraceptive, alone or in combination with multiple doses of 40mg ponesimod attained by an up-titration regimen. Heart rate (HR) effects were assessed on the first day of each up-titration level. PK parameters of NET and EE were determined by non-compartmental analysis. Geometric mean ratios (ponesimod and contraceptive / contraceptive alone) of Cmax and AUC0-24 of NET were 0.87 (90% CI: 0.80, 0.94) and 0.84 (90% CI: 0.76, 0.93), respectively. Geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-24 of EE were 0.94 (90% CI: 0.86, 1.03) and 0.95 (90% CI: 0.89, 1.01), respectively. The maximum mean HR reduction after the first dose of 10mg ponesimod was 12.4bpm (SD ± 6.2) at 2.5h post-dose. On Day 4 (first dose of 20mg) and Day 7 (first dose of 40mg) the maximum mean HR reduction was 4.3bpm (SD ± 5.7) and 1.4 (SD ± 6.4), respectively, at 2.5h post-dose compared to baseline. No clinically relevant PK interactions between ponesimod and the combined oral contraceptive were observed, therefore, efficacy of hormonal contraceptives is not expected to be affected by concomitant administration of ponesimod. The up-titration regimen showed that HR reductions are diminished upon repeated ponesimod administration.