The interpretation of unexpected characteristics of Pioneer Venus temperature measurements, and of the large difference between these and the Venera results, is aided by new Venus temperature profiles derived from engineering measurements of the Pioneer Venus Small-Probe Net Flux Radiometer (SNFR) instruments. To facilitate correction of a temperature-dependent radiometric response, these instruments monitored the temperatures of their deployed radiation detectors. The accurate calibration of the temperature sensors, and their strong thermal coupling to the atmosphere, make it possible to deduce atmospheric temperatures within 2°K (at most altitudes) using a simple two-component thermal model to account for lag effects. These independent temperature profiles generally confirm to high accuracy, the small-probe results of A. Seiff, D. B. Kirk, R. E. Young, R. C. Blanchard, J. T. Findlay, G. M. Kelly, and S. C. Sommer (1980a, J. Geophys. Res. 85, pp. 7903–7933) concerning vertical structure and horizontal contrast in the lower atmosphere, although the stable layer below 25 km is found to be slightly more stable (by about 0.4°K/km) and absolute temperatures are an average of 2°K higher. The measured Day-Night thermal contrast is compatible with predicted responses to the diurnal variation in solar heating, except near the cloud base, where 3–5°K differences may be due to thermal radiative heating differences associated with different cloud opacities. Temperature contrasts between latitudes 30 and 60° are roughly consistent with cyclostrophic balance. But pressure and temperature measurements by the Pioneer Venus Sounder probe at 4° latitude, when compared to Small-probe results, imply unreasonably large equatorward accelerations of 100 (m/sec)/day. Poleward accelerations compatible with cyclostrophic balance can be obtained if Sounder-probe temperatures are increased by a scale-factor correction reaching 6–7°K at 13 km.