Clopidogrel Low Response Research Articles

Pantoprazole Does Not Influence the Antiplatelet Effect of Clopidogrel-A Whole Blood Aggregometry Study After Coronary Stenting

Recent attention has been drawn to a potential drug-drug interaction observed between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, this potential interaction may not be a class effect of PPIs. We investigated if pantoprazole, which has a different metabolism than omeprazole, diminishes the effectiveness of clopidogrel. Our study included 336 patients (mean age 64.6 years; 106 women) 48 hours after percutaneous coronary stent implantation with a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel hydrogensulfate and 500 mg aspirin, followed by 75 mg clopidogrel and 100 mg aspirin daily. Whereas 188 patients (59 women) were not given any PPI comedication, 122 patients received pantoprazole and 26 either omeprazole or esomeprazole. The platelet aggregation followed by impedance aggregometry (in Ohm) was induced by 5 mmol/L adenosine diphosphate. The percentage of clopidogrel low-response (CLR) was similar between the non-PPI group [2.75 Ohm (confidence interval, CI: 2.25-3.26); 21.9% CLR] and the pantoprazole group [2.33 Ohm (CI: 1.79-2.87); 16.4% CLR] but higher in patients treated with omeprazole/esomeprazole (3.00 Ohm (CI: 1.49-4.51); 30.8% CLR). Multivariate regression analysis reveals that the risk of CLR in the pantoprazole comedication group was not increased compared with the group without any PPI [odds ratio 0.59 (CI: 0.31-1.13) 0.11]. Our data suggest that pantoprazole does not diminish the antiplatelet effectiveness of clopidogrel early after coronary stenting. Therefore, the use of pantoprazole seems preferable in patients treated with clopidogrel when a concomitant medication with a PPI is indicated.

Variable Response to Clopidogrel in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Antiplatelet drug resistance is a multifactorial phenomenon that affects a large number of cardiovascular patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Although unique definitions for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are missing, there is growing evidence for a clinical importance of response to antiplatelet therapy. The prevalence for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance has been reported to be between 5 and 30% in literature. Moreover, recent data suggest a high rate of dual antiplatelet drug resistance. Although there are convincing data about an association of aspirin resistance and clinical outcome, little is known about the clinical relevance of clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness. This article reviews the evidence for the clinical impact of antiplatelet drug resistance, with particular attention on the clinical outcome of clopidogrel low response according to current clinical data. Additional systematic studies are needed to evaluate the effects of alternative antiplatelet therapies in patients identified as low responders.

Response to aspirin and clopidogrel in patients scheduled to undergo cardiovascular surgery

Recent data indicate that among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention low platelet response to aspirin is associated with clopidogrel low response. It is unclear whether these findings extend to other patient populations. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the relation between response to aspirin and clopidogrel among patients scheduled to undergo cardiac or vascular surgery. Patients who were scheduled for cardiac or vascular surgery and had taken aspirin 81-325 mg daily for at least a week and clopidogrel 75 mg daily for at least 3 days underwent blood testing for platelet function. One hundred patients were included in the current analysis. Platelet function was evaluated by the modified TEG platelet mapping assay with addition of ADP or arachidonic acid (AA), and by the PFA-100 assay with collagen-epinephrine (CEPI) or collagen-ADP (CADP) cartridges. Low response to aspirin or clopidogrel was defined as inhibition < or =20% for TEG-AA or TEG-ADP, respectively. Thirteen patients (13%) were low responders to aspirin and 34 (34%) were low responders to clopidogrel. Eight patients were low responders to both drugs. There were no differences in clinical characteristics between drug low responders versus sensitive patients. Aspirin low responders had lower TEG-ADP inhibition (19.5 +/- 6 vs. 35.8 +/- 3%, P = 0.03) and tended to have lower PFA-CADP time (84.7 +/- 7 vs. 105.6 +/- 5 s, P = 0.1) than aspirin sensitive patients. Clopidogrel low responders had lower TEG-AA inhibition (58 +/- 6 vs. 75.1 +/- 4%, P = 0.01) and PFA-CEPI time (168 +/- 13 vs. 200.4 +/- 10 s, P = 0.07) than clopidogrel sensitive patients. In patients scheduled to undergo cardiovascular surgery low response to aspirin is associated with low response to clopidogrel.