The study was conducted to compare the field performance of rotavator and rotary plough in light, medium and heavy soil taking machine type and soil type as independent parameters and wheel slip (%), fuel consumption (l/h), bulk density of soil (g/cm3, before and after operation of machine), depth of cut (cm), width of cut (cm), field capacity (ha/h) and pulverization index (mm) as dependent parameters. It was found that field capacity of rotary plough was 6.1%, 12.06% and 45.7% lower than the rotavator in light, medium and heavy soil, respectively. The use of rotary plough led to 23.56% and 26.71% higher fuel consumption as compared to commercially available rotavator in light and medium soil, respectively. The pulverization index for rotary plough was 21.3%, 34.85% and 43.46% higher than that of rotavator in light, medium and heavy soil, respectively. Rotavator made smaller size of soil clods as compared to rotary plough, which is favorable for seed germination and crop growth. Tractor wheel slip for rotary plough was positive, whereas, it was negative for rotavator, which revealed that tractor with rotary plough was slipping in the soil while tractor with rotavator was skidding while operation.