Clinical T1N0 Research Articles

Preoperative prediction of central neck metastasis in patients with clinical T1-2N0 papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Central neck metastasis (CNM) is common in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). However, the prediction of CNM risk remains poorly defined, especially for patients with clinically negative lymph nodes. We developed a preoperative clinical nomogram to predict CNM risk in patients with clinical T1-2N0 (cT1-2N0) PTC. Data from 436 patients with unifocal cT1-2N0 PTC were available. We analyzed the association between preoperative variables and CNM using univariate and multivariate logistic regression and developed a clinical nomogram based on the multivariate regression model. The nomogram was validated externally using an independent dataset. The CNM rate was 25.5%. Three clinical variables were associated with CNM, including age, gender, and tumor size. We built a CNM nomogram integrating these three variables. It had a poor index of internal discrimination (C-index, 0.655; 95% CI 0.596-0.715) and a poor index of external discrimination (C-index, 0.690; 95% CI 0.611-0.769). We developed a preoperative nomogram to quantify the risk of CNM in unifocal cT1-2N0 PTC patients. However, our data showed that preoperative clinical parameters were not able to accurately predict the likelihood of CNM. Other variables need to be investigated to improve the prediction capability of this nomogram.

241. A VALIDATED NOMOGRAM PREDICTING LYMPH NODE METASTASIS OF T2N0 ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA FOR CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING

Abstract Clinical T2N0 esophageal cancer is the treatment threshold for neoadjuvant therapy. Because of limitations in the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound and positron emission tomography-computed tomography, a number of these patients were verified to have lymph node involvement after esophagectomy. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting nodal disease and selecting patients eligible for neoadjuvant therapy. A predictive nomogram was constructed using the training cohort. We identified patients who underwent esophagectomy for pT2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in our department from January 2009 to December 2014. Binary logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for lymph node metastasis. We selected predictors considering both statistical significance and clinical importance. Furthermore, bootstrapping was used to assess the predictive accuracy. An independent cohort from the same institution was used to validate this model. This cohort included consecutive patients with cT2N0 who underwent esophagectomy between January 2015 and April 2019. The training cohort comprised 551 patients. Logistic regression identified six variables that were associated with lymph node metastasis, including tumor diameter (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.44–4.09; P = 0.001), tumor length (OR: 10.63, 95% CI: 6.32–17.89; P < 0.001), circumferential involvement (OR: 5.14, 95% CI: 6.3–17.9; P < 0.001), differentiation (OR 3.65, 2.24–5.93; P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (OR 12.18, 95% CI: 5.91–25.21; P < 0.001), and the presence of multifocal tumors (OR: 8.67, 95% CI: 1.47–51.14; P = 0.017). The C-index was 0.914 (95% CI: 0.889–0.938) in the training cohort and 0.962 (95% CI: 0.939–0.985) in the validation cohort. A validated nomogram for patients with clinical T2N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma may aid in assessing the risk of lymph node metastasis. Neoadjuvant therapy is recommended for high-risk patients.

MA04.09 The Incidence and Predictors of Unsuspected Brain Metastases in Patients with Stage IA NSCLC

Pretreatment evaluation for brain metastases with brain MRI is not routinely recommended for patients diagnosed with clinical T1N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the incidence of brain metastases in this patient population is not well known. In this study, we used two large U.S. clinical databases to examine the incidence and predictors of brain metastases among patients with stage IA NSCLC.

Management of Clinical T2N0 Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: What Is the Optimal Treatment?

BackgroundThe current standard of care for locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma includes neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery. The optimal treatment for clinical T2N0M0 (cT2N0) disease is debated. This study aims to determine the optimal treatment in these patients. MethodsThe National Cancer Database was used to identify patients who underwent surgery for cT2N0 esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2017. Patients were grouped into surgery-alone, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and adjuvant therapy (AT) groups. Subgroups of high-risk patients (tumor ≥ 3 cm, poor differentiation, or lymphovascular invasion) and patients upstaged after upfront surgery were identified. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to compare overall survival. ResultsOf 2160 patients included, 957 (44.3%) underwent surgery-alone, 821 (38.0%) underwent NAT and surgery, and 382 (17.7%) underwent surgery and AT. One thousand six hundred nineteen (75.0%) patients had high-risk features. Six hundred fourteen (45.9%) patients were upstaged after upfront surgery. In the overall cohort, AT was associated with improved survival compared to NAT (HR 0.618, p < 0.001) and surgery-alone (HR 0.699, p < 0.001). There was no difference in survival between NAT and surgery-alone (HR 1.132, p = 0.112). Similar results were observed in high-risk patients. Patients upstaged after upfront surgery who received AT had improved survival compared to those initially treated with NAT (HR 0.613, p < 0.001). ConclusionThis analysis suggests that cT2N0 esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinomas may not benefit from the intensive multimodality therapy utilized in locally advanced disease. Selective use of AT for patients who are upstaged pathologically, or have high-risk features, is associated with improved outcomes.

JCOG lung cancer surgery trial series: review and interpretation

Surgery is so far the most effective treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since the 1990s, the pathology spectrum of early-stage lung cancer has gradually changed because of the increased detection of ground-glass opacity (GGO). The findings from preoperative thin-section computed tomography are strong predictors for the invasiveness and lymph node involvement of GGO, and limited surgery is believed to be implemented safely for radiological less invasive lesions, which calls into question the dominance of lobectomy. After the JCOG0201 trial establishing the radiologic criteria of pathological noninvasiveness for lung adenocarcinoma, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) and the West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) have successively carried out a series of prospective imaging-guided trials to investigate the optimal surgical procedure for early-stage lung cancer. JCOG0804, was a single-arm, non-randomized, confirmatory trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sublobar resection (wedge resection and segmentectomy) for GGO dominant peripheral lung cancer. The primary end point was 5-year relapse-free survival. JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, was a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial to investigate if segmentectomy was non-inferior to lobectomy in patients with small-sized peripheral NSCLC. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival. JCOG1211 was also a non-randomized confirmatory trial to confirm the efficacy of a segmentectomy for clinical T1N0 lung cancer with dominant GGO. The primary endpoint was 5-year relapse-free survival. The findings of JCOG0804 and JCOG0802, and the primary analysis results of JCOG1211 have been officially published. This article systematically reviewed and interpreted the results of the JCOG lung cancer surgery trial series.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Patients Aged 85 Years Old or Older Is Associated with a Good Prognosis Compared to Conservative Treatment without Any Invasive Procedure

Introduction: Studies have reported the feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) in elderly people with respect to both short- and long-term outcomes. As the elderly population in society increases, the requirement for managing super-elderly patients aged ≥85 years with EGC will also increase. This study aims to identify the long-term clinical outcomes of ESD for clinical T1N0 EGC in patients aged ≥85 years. Methods: A total of 370 consecutive patients aged ≥85 years with clinical T1N0 EGC who were managed in 11 institutions were reviewed retrospectively. On the basis of treatment strategy, we compared the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) after performing propensity score-matched analysis between patients undergoing ESD (ESD group) and those not undergoing treatment (conservative treatment group). The potential prognostic factors were also investigated in the propensity score-matched patients. Results: After propensity score matching, we found that the 3-year OS and DSS rates were significantly higher in the ESD group than in the conservative treatment group (OS, 82.2% vs. 50.5%; p < 0.001; DSS, 100% vs. 80.1%; p = 0.008). Furthermore, ESD was identified as a significant factor for prolonged OS, whereas Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥3 and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) <36.2 were associated with reduced OS. Conclusion: ESD was associated with improved OS in patients with clinical T1N0 EGC aged ≥85 years compared with the absence of treatment. Furthermore, CCI and PNI were helpful for patient selection.

Blood biomarkers as predictors of pathological lymph node metastasis in clinical stage T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Accurate preoperative evaluation of lymph node (LN) metastasis is important for determining the treatment strategy for superficial esophageal cancer. Blood biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte, platelet-lymphocyte, and lymphocyte-monocyte ratios (NLR, PLR, and LMR, respectively), have clinical applications as predictors of LN metastasis for different cancers. Here, we investigated the use of these ratios as predictors of pathological LN metastasis and prognosis in patients with clinical stage T1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients (n = 185) with cT1N0M0 ESCC who underwent esophagectomy with R0 resection between April 2003 and August 2021 were enrolled. We investigated the ability of pretreatment NLR, PLR, and LMR to predict pathological LN metastasis. The optimal cutoff values of NLR, PLR, and LMR to predict pathological LN metastasis were 2.1, 122, and 4.8, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the primary tumor length, depth of invasion, and NLR were significant predictors of LN metastasis. Furthermore, similar to the 5-year overall survival, the 5-year relapse-free survival was significantly better in the low NLR group than in the high NLR group. The NLR was the most useful predictor of pathological LN metastasis. Patients diagnosed with clinical stage I ESCC and with a high NLR require adequate LN dissection and may be good candidates for preoperative adjuvant therapy.

5: LOCAL ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION IS INFERIOR TO GASTRECTOMY FOR EARLY CLINICAL STAGE T1A AND T1B GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA: A PROPENSITY-MATCHED STUDY

Abstract Background and aim The role of ER in the management of subsets of clinical T1N0 gastric adenocarcinoma remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of endoscopic resection (ER) versus gastrectomy in node negative cT1a and cT1b gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods Data from the National Cancer Database (2010–2015), was used to identify patients with clinical T1aN0 (n = 2,927; ER, n = 1,157; gastrectomy, n = 1,770) and T1bN0 (n = 2,915; ER, n = 474; gastrectomy, n = 2,441) gastric adenocarcinoma. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox multivariable analyses were used to account for treatment selection bias. Results ER for cT1a and cT1b cancers was performed more frequently over time. Rates of node-positive disease in patients with cT1a and cT1b gastric adenocarcinoma were 5% and 18%, respectively. In the matched cohort, gastrectomy was associated with increased survival compared to ER for cT1a cancers (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66–0.95, P = 0.013), and corresponding 5-year survival for gastrectomy and ER were 72% and 66% (P = 0.013), respectively. For cT1b cancers, gastrectomy had a significantly longer survival compared to ER (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63–0.93, P = 0.008) and the corresponding 5-year survival for gastrectomy and ER were 60% and 50% (P = 0.013), respectively. Conclusion This study demonstrates ER inferior long-term survival for clinical T1aN0 and T1bN0 gastric adenocarcinoma, despite current recommendations for ER in cT1 gastric cancers. Future research should seek to identify the subset of T1a and T1b cancers at low risk of nodal metastasis and thus would maximally benefit from ER.

Efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT2N0 distal rectal cancer.

This study was designed to determine the feasibility of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) in patients with clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer. Patients who underwent surgery for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer between January 2008 and December 2016 were included. Patients were divided into PCRT and non-PCRT groups. Non-PCRT patients underwent radical resection or local excision (LE) according to the surgeon's decision, and PCRT patients underwent surgery according to the response to PCRT. Patients received 50.0 to 50.4 gray of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Of 127 patients enrolled, 46 underwent PCRT and 81 did not. The mean distance of lesions from the anal verge was lower in the PCRT group (P=0.004). The most frequent operation was transanal excision and ultralow anterior resection in the PCRT and non-PCRT groups, respectively. Of the 46 patients who underwent PCRT, 21 (45.7%) achieved pathologic complete response, including 15 of the 24 (62.5%) who underwent LE. Rectal sparing rate was significantly higher in the PCRT group (11.1% vs. 52.2%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in 3- and 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival regardless of PCRT or surgical procedures. PCRT in clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer patients increased the rectal sparing rate via LE and showed acceptable oncologic outcomes. PCRT may be a feasible therapeutic option to avoid abdominoperineal resection in clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer.

Is extrathoracic metastasis screening necessary for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer?

Detecting distant metastases when staging lung cancer is critical to avoid unnecessary surgery and provide appropriate multidisciplinary treatment. However, it is controversial as to whether staging studies should be performed routinely for patients with early-stage lung cancer who have no evidence of distant metastasis. Thus, this study aimed to examine the need for extrathoracic metastasis screening in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer, understand the association between extrathoracic metastasis and other clinical features, and evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of imaging screening for preoperative extrathoracic metastasis in patients with early-stage lung cancer. From 2010 to 2019, 510 patients diagnosed with clinical T1N0 lung cancer, excluding contralateral lung metastases, pleural dissemination, malignant pleural effusion, and malignant pericardial effusion, were treated for primary lung cancer. Patients were divided into two groups, and their clinicopathological characteristics were investigated. Five patients (1.0%) had extrathoracic metastases. The histological types were adenocarcinoma in three of the cases, and squamous cell carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in the other two cases. The T factor was T1b in one case and T1c in four cases. Four patients had solid tumors and one had a solid predominant tumor with an average tumor diameter of 23.0 ± 2.9 mm. The size of solid tumors with extrathoracic metastases was larger than their counterparts. When evaluating stage IA non-small cell lung cancer with a solid component diameter < 22 mm, or clinical T1mi-1bN0 in computed tomography evaluation, screening for preoperative extrathoracic metastasis may be omitted.

Patterns of Completion Axillary Dissection for Patients with Clinical T1-2N0 Breast Cancer Undergoing Total Mastectomy with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Patterns of Completion Axillary Dissection for Patients with Clinical T1-2N0 Breast Cancer Undergoing Total Mastectomy with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Optimal Management of Clinical T2n0 Gastric Adenocarcinomas: Surgery or Chemotherapy First?

Optimal Management of Clinical T2n0 Gastric Adenocarcinomas: Surgery or Chemotherapy First?

Management of Clinical T2N0 Lower Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: What Is the Optimal Treatment?

Perez Holguin, Rolfy A. MD; Olecki, Elizabeth J. MD; Stahl, Kelly A. MD; Wong, William G. DO; Dixon, Matthew E.B. MD, FACS; Peng, June S. MD Author Information

ASO Visual Abstract: Optimizing Axillary Management in Clinical T1–2N0 Mastectomy Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes

ASO Visual Abstract: Optimizing Axillary Management in Clinical T1–2N0 Mastectomy Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Optimizing Axillary Management in Clinical T1-2N0 Mastectomy Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes.

Following publication of the AMAROS trial, we sought to optimize axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) + axillary radiation (AxRT) utilization in cT1-2N0 patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after mastectomy. In November 2015, our multidisciplinary group implemented a protocol to omit intraoperative SLN evaluation for mastectomy patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer likely to be recommended PMRT if found to have 1-2 positive SLNs (age ≤ 60 years and/or high-risk features defined as estrogen receptor-negative and/or positive for lymphovascular invasion). We prospectively evaluated axillary management, short-term complications, and oncologic outcomes in patients with 1-2 positive SLNs. From November 2015 to December 2018, 479 of 560 (85%) cT1-2N0 breast cancers treated with mastectomy were potential candidates for PMRT. Intraoperative SLN evaluation was omitted in 344 (72%), thus following the protocol. Overall, 121 cases had 1-2 positive SLNs: 17 (14%) were managed with observation, 5 (4%) PMRT alone, 59 (49%) PMRT + AxRT, 16 (13%) ALND alone, and 24 (20%) ALND + PMRT. Protocol compliance resulted in less ALND (8% vs. 24%) and less ALND + PMRT (9% vs. 41%, p < 0.01). At median follow-up of 24 months, there was one regional and four distant recurrences, with no regional recurrences or differences in disease-free survival in patients treated with ALND versus PMRT + AxRT (100% vs. 98%, p = 0.67). Similarly, there were no differences in complication rates (p = 0.18). Omitting intraoperative SLN evaluation in cT1-2N0 mastectomy patients who would be candidates for PMRT if found to have positive nodes decreased rates of ALND and minimized use of ALND + PMRT without compromising outcomes.

The new perspective of PET/CT for axillary nodal staging in early breast cancer patients according to ACOSOG Z0011 trial PET/CT axillary staging according to Z0011.

Post Z0011 trial, axillary lymph node dissections (ALNDs) can be performed in patients with ≥3 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs). We investigated the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) to predict ≥3 metastasis [high nodal burden (HNB)]. We retrospectively analyzed preoperative FDG PET/CT from January 2010 to June 2012. Patients had clinical T1-2N0 primary invasive breast cancer and underwent breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy ± ALND. All suspicious ALNs were counted considering FDG-avidity with morphologic changes. Images were considered positive if the axillary basin took up more FDG than the surrounding tissue. On CT, abnormal ALNs were round/ovoid or had cortical thickening with contrast enhancement. PET/CT results were compared with the histology and follow-up findings. In total, 221 females with 224 axillae were enrolled; 161 had negative, 53 had 1-2 metastasis [low nodal burden (LNB)] and 10 had HNB. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of PET/CT for HNB were 70, 100, 98.6 and 100%, respectively. There was a correlation between the number of suspicious ALNs on PET/CT and the metastatic nodes on final histology. There were no significant differences in age, tumor size and FDG-avidity between patients with negative or LNB and HNB. During follow-up, 25 patients had a recurrence. The three false-negative patients did not show recurrence. Preoperative PET/CT predicts HNB with high accuracy and is useful for evaluating clinical T1-2N0 invasive breast cancer.

Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines?

BackgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been the standard of care for clinically node-negative women with invasive breast cancer (IBC); however, there is less agreement on whether to perform SLNB when the risk of metastasis is low or when it does not affect survival or locoregional control.MethodsAn Institutional Review Board-approved survey was sent to members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons asking in which scenarios surgeons would recommend SLNB. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were performed using SPSS software.ResultsThere was a 23% response rate; 68% identified as breast surgical oncologists, 6% as surgical oncologists, 24% as general surgeons, and 2% as other. The majority practiced in a community setting (71%) versus an academic setting (29%). In a healthy female with clinical T1N0 hormone receptor-positive (HR+) IBC, 83% favored SLNB if the patient was 75 years of age, versus 35% if the patient was 85 years of age. Academic surgeons were less likely to perform axillary staging in a healthy 75-year-old (odds ratio [OR] 0.51 [0.32–0.80], p = 0.004) or a healthy 85-year-old (OR 0.48 [0.31–0.74], p = 0.001). For DCIS, 32% endorsed SLNB in women undergoing lumpectomy, with breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons being less likely to endorse this procedure (OR 0.54 [0.36–0.82], p = 0.028; and OR 0.53 [0.34–0.83], p = 0.005, respectively).ConclusionsDespite studies showing that omitting SLNB in older patients with HR+ IBC does not impact regional control or survival, most surgeons are still opting for axillary staging. In addition, one in three are performing SLNB for lumpectomies for DCIS. Breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons were more likely to be practicing based on recent data and guidelines. Practice patterns are changing but there is still room for improvement.

Significance of Brain Imaging for Staging in Patients With Clinical Stage T1-2 N0 Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer on Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

BackgroundRoutine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been recommended even for clinical stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In spite of the progress in the screening procedure, and revisions to TNM classification, there is no evidence to support brain imaging screening of patients assessed with the current staging protocol including PET/CT. Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively investigated the frequency of extrathoracic metastasis in 466 consecutive patients with clinical stage T1-2 N0 NSCLC with the complete staging assessment comprised of thin-section CT, PET/CT, and brain contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging between 2008 and 2016. All patients were reclassified according to the eighth edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) classification. ResultsAmong all patients, 70% of the tumors were pure solid and 30% had part-solid ground-glass opacity on thin-section CT, and 388 (83%) and 78 (17%) were classified into clinical stages T1 and T2, respectively. Eight patients (1.7%) had extrathoracic metastasis, including 3 (0.6%) with brain metastasis, and all showed pure-solid tumors. The frequency of extrathoracic and brain metastasis was 1.0% and 0.5% in 388 T1 patients, and 5.0% and 3.0% in 78 T2 patients. Although brain metastases were detected in 2 of 7 patients (29%) with PET/CT detectable extrathoracic metastases and 1 of 459 patients (0.2%) without PET/CT detectable extrathoracic metastasis, there were no neurologically asymptomatic brain metastases in patients with early-stage NSCLC confirmed by PET/CT. ConclusionRoutine screening of brain imaging is unnecessary in patients with early-stage NSCLC, assessed with the current staging protocol including PET/CT.

Is flexible bronchoscopy necessary in the preoperative workup of patients with peripheral cT1N0 subsolid lung cancer? -a prospective multi-center cohort study.

BackgroundNecessity of flexible bronchoscopy (FB) examination as a routine preoperative work-up for peripheral clinical T1N0 subsolid lung cancer was unknown.MethodsThis was a prospective, multi-center clinical trial (NCT03591445). Patients with peripheral GGO nodules (GGNs) who were candidates for surgical resection were enrolled. FB examination was performed preoperatively. Surgical plan could be changed if any aberrant histologic and anatomic findings were detected by FB examination. Primary endpoint was the rate that surgical plan was changed by positive FB findings. Secondary endpoints were rate of positive FB findings and rate of procedural complications.ResultsSix hundred and fifteen patients with peripheral subsolid nodules detected by thoracic CT were enrolled. There were 187 (30.4%) male and 428 (69.6%) female patients, mean age was 54.85±10.41 y (range, 26–78). 262 (42.6%) patients had pure GGNs and 353 (57.4%) patients had part-solid nodules. Mean size of nodules was 13.87±6.37 mm (range, 5–30). FB examinations confirmed one (0.16%) adenocarcinoma, seven (1.14%) bronchial variations, one (0.16%) segmental bronchostenosis, one (0.16%) segmental bronchial occlusion and one (0.16%) bronchial inflammation. No complications of FB examinations occurred. 568 (92.35%) thoracoscopic and 47 (7.65%) open surgeries were performed. No established surgical plan was changed by positive FB findings. Final pathologies revealed 26 (4.2%) adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 240 (39%) minimal invasive adenocarcinomas (MIAs), 343 (55.8%) invasive adenocarcinomas (IADs), one (0.2%) adenosquamous cell carcinoma, one (0.2%) squamous cell carcinoma, two (0.3%) atypical adenoid hyperplasia and two (0.3%) inflammations.ConclusionsFB examination was unnecessary in the preoperative assessment of peripheral clinical T1N0 subsolid lung cancer.

The systemic inflammation response index predicts the survival of patients with clinical T1‐2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma

The systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) is an independent prognostic factor for many malignant tumors. However, the value of this factor in patients with clinical T1-2N0 (cT1-2N0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is still unclear. We calculated SIRI of 235 cT1-2N0 OSCC patients from 2013 to 2017. Multivariate cox regression analysis was applied to verify the prognostic significance of SIRI. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to analyze the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) for cT1-2N0 OSCC patients. According to the optimal cutoff point of SIRI, we divided cT1-2N0 OSCC patients into high SIRI group (SIRI≥1.3) and low SIRI group (SIRI<1.3). SIRI was an independent prognostic indicator for OS (HR=2.87; 95% CI=1.35-6.10; p=.006) and DSS (HR=2.17; 95% CI=1.10-4.27; p=.025). High SIRI had a significantly poorer OS (p=.001) and DSS (p=.007) in survival analysis than the low SIRI. Moreover, the prognostic value of SIRI was significantly stronger than neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR). Preoperative SIRI can be regarded as a meaningful indicator for poor survival of cT1-2N0 OSCC patients, and it is a promising tool to formulate the best individualized treatment for high-risk patients.