Clinical Reasoning Research Articles

Philosophy and Clinical Reasoning in Rehabilitation Sciences: Bridging the Gap

This paper addresses the relatively overlooked field of rehabilitation and physical medicine, offering an epistemological perspective on clinical reasoning in these disciplines, focusing on three different domains: diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Rehabilitation sciences, often overshadowed by medicine and nursing, present unique challenges in terms of clinical reasoning. We explore these challenges, highlighting the distinctive features that set rehabilitation apart from clinical medicine. Notably, rehabilitation focuses on functions, aiming to improve an individual’s quality of life, setting it apart from disease-centered medicine. Drawing also from philosophical insights in nursing literature, we offer a multidisciplinary perspective on the epistemological dimensions of rehabilitation and physical medicine, shedding light on their placement within healthcare disciplines.

Large language models in medical and healthcare fields: applications, advances, and challenges

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly recognized for their advanced language capabilities, offering significant assistance in diverse areas like medical communication, patient data optimization, and surgical planning. Our survey meticulously searched for papers with keywords such as “medical,” “clinical,” “healthcare,” and “LLMs” across various databases, including ACM and Google Scholar. It sought to delve into the latest trends and applications of LLMs in healthcare, analyzing 175 relevant publications to support both practitioners and researchers in the field. We have compiled 56 experimental datasets, various evaluation methods and reviewed cutting-edge LLMs across tasks. Our comprehensive analysis of LLMs in healthcare applications, including medical question-answering, dialogue summarization, electronic health record generation, scientific research, medical education, medical product safety monitoring, clinical health reasoning, and clinical decision support. Furthermore, we have identified the challenges, including data security, inaccurate information, fairness and bias, plagiarism, copyrights, and accountability, and the potential solutions, namely de-identification framework, references,counterfactually fair prompting,opening and ending control codes, and establishing normative standards,to address these open issues,respectively. The findings of this survey exert a profound impact on spurring innovation in practical applications and addressing inherent challenges within the academic and medical communities.

Evaluating the Application of an EMS Clinical Judgment Theoretical Framework

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES Clinical judgment (CJ) encompasses clinical reasoning (process of evaluating a problem) and clinical decision-making (choice made). A theoretical model to better define emergency medical services (EMS) CJ has been developed but its use has not been evaluated in EMS training and assessments. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of this EMS CJ model to assess clinical reasoning and decision-making in a simulated environment. METHODS In this evaluation, EMS clinician teams (2-3 members) were directed to care for a simulated older adult patient in their home following a fall. Simulations were video recorded, clinician team actions coded, and evaluated for whether proper CJ reasoning and decisions were made. We evaluated CJ in two ways: 1) EMS medical directors' (MD) determination of whether the CJ questions were addressed (MD score) and 2) objective rubric evaluation of CJ questions using the EMS CJ model focused on recognition of appropriate cues, performance of actions, and revaluation after action (rubric score). The CJ questions addressed in this simulation included: 1) Is the patient stable/unstable?, 2) Are interventions necessary before movement?, 3) How should the patient be transferred from the floor?, and 4) Does the cause of the fall require hospital evaluation? Descriptive statistics were calculated, and concordance between the two assessments was evaluated (mean, 95% CI). Percent concordance was calculated with a validity threshold set at 70%. RESULTS Four EMS MDs reviewed 20 videos addressing 80 clinical judgment decisions. Overall concordance between MD score and rubric score for CJ decisions was above the threshold at 88.1% (85.0, 91.2). Concordance between MD score and rubric score for each CJ decision was 92.0% (87.3, 96.7) for question 1, 79.9% (71.5, 88.3) for question 2, 95.0% (90.4, 99.6) for question 3, and 85.4% (79.5, 91.2) for question 4. CONCLUSION An objective evaluation of CJ decisions using a rubric derived from an EMS CJ theoretical framework demonstrated high concordance to subjective evaluations of CJ made by EMS MDs. This approach may allow for reproducible and objective CJ evaluations that could be used for competency assessment in EMS.

Exploring context and culture in clinical reasoning medical education: A qualitative exploratory study.

Clinical reasoning processes are complex and interwoven with culture and context. While these relationships have been explored to understand the outcomes of clinical reasoning, there has been little exploration of how to integrate these relationships when teaching and learning clinical reasoning. Using semi-structured interviews, this research explored the role of context and culture in clinical reasoning medical education. Participants were clinical teachers recruited from across Northern Ontario. The data were analysed independently by two reviewers using both thematic analysis and critical discourse analysis, and peer reviewed by a third researcher. The role of context and culture is inherent to the personal, professional and pedagogical aspects of clinical reasoning, especially when teaching about the complexities of Northern Ontario. The major themes that came through were: 1) teaching and learning clinical reasoning needs reflexivity, 2) developing clinical reasoning skills needs time and 3) clinical reasoning pedagogy should acknowledge and encompass practice variation and patient diversity. Teaching clinical reasoning in Northern Ontario involves being aware of the complexities that are inherent in interacting with patients and communities. Through personal, professional and pedagogical models, the students and teachers can address the complexities of cultural and contextual clinical reasoning.

Theory - Practice integration for Chinese Postgraduates in Pathophysiology: Innovative Teaching Strategies

Background: Pathophysiology plays a pivotal role in medical education by bridging basic sciences and clinical medicine. However, traditional teaching approaches in China often lack integration between theory and clinical practice, hampering postgraduates' understanding of disease mechanisms and diagnostic abilities. This study explores innovative strategies to effectively integrate theory and practice, enhancing Chinese medical postgraduates' learning.Methodology: A comprehensive literature review analyzed the current educational landscape and identified innovative teaching strategies aligning theoretical concepts with clinical applications. The implementation methods and potential to foster autonomous and innovative learning were examined.Results: Several student-centred strategies were identified, including problem-based learning (PBL), case-based learning (CBL), flipped classrooms, and integrated teaching models. These approaches emphasize active learning, critical thinking, and applying theoretical knowledge to clinical scenarios. Adopting these strategies can improve postgraduates' learning efficiency, problem-solving abilities, and clinical reasoning skills while promoting self-directed learning and innovative thinking.Conclusion: Integrating theory and practice through innovative teaching strategies is crucial to enhance the quality of pathophysiology postgraduate education in China. Educators should implement student-centred approaches like PBL, CBL, flipped classrooms, and integrated models to stimulate autonomous learning and cultivate innovation. Providing opportunities for active learning and clinical application can significantly improve postgraduates' learning outcomes and preparedness for future practice. Further research evaluating the long-term impact on postgraduate performance and patient care is warranted.

Influence of the use of a tablet-based clinical decision support algorithm by general practitioners on the consultation process: the example of FeverTravelApp

BackgroundDespite the proven positive effects of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) on general practitioners’ (GPs’) performance and patient management, their adoption remains slow. Several factors have been proposed to explain GPs' reluctance to adopt these tools. This study hypothesizes that the influence of CDSSs on patient-physician interactions could be a determining factor. To explore this hypothesis, we utilized the FeverTravelApp, designed to assist GPs in managing patients presenting with fever after returning from the tropics. A case–control study was conducted, observing and analyzing fourteen consultations between seven physicians and three simulated patients. Each physician conducted consultations both with and without the FeverTravelApp. The consultations were video-recorded and analyzed using a custom analysis grid based on three existing tools. Simulated patients completed the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) after each consultation, and each physician participated in a semistructured interview following the use of the app.ResultsThe use of the FeverTravelApp influenced multiple aspects of the consultation, particularly communication. Both patient and GP speaking times decreased, while active silence (no one talking while the GP actively performed a task) increased. GPs focused more on the app, which reduced direct patient interaction. However, this influence seemed to bother GPs more than simulated patients, who rated their GPs equally whether the app was used or not. This could be because patients felt better understood when GPs asked fewer but more specific questions related to travel medicine, thus effectively addressing their concerns.ConclusionsThis study supports the hypothesis that CDSSs influence consultation dynamics, which may contribute to their slow adoption. It is essential to involve clinicians early in the development of CDSSs to adapt them to clinical workflows and ensure system interoperability. Additionally, tools that allow clinicians to follow the entire clinical reasoning process, such as decision trees, are needed. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings in real patient settings and to develop CDSSs that meet both patients’ and GPs’ expectations.

A quality improvement project addressing motion artefact on CTPAs in a district general hospital setting: A complete cycle resulting in changed practice.

Introduction: A still breath hold from the patient is one of the key requirements for a diagnostic computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA). It is important for the timely identification and treatment of patients with life threatening pulmonary emboli (PEs). Motion artefact on CTPA can cause blurring, double borders, shading and streaking in the lungs, which can either obscure PEs or create artefact that mimics PEs. This risks patient harm from delayed diagnoses, missed PEs, false positives and extra radiation and contrast exposure due to repeat studies. Methods: We devised local standards and methodology for assessing the presence and degree of motion artefact on CTs. The study consisted of initial data collection, implementation of changes to clinical practice, and subsequent repeat data collection 3 months after implementation of interventions. For each data collection round, 100 consecutive inpatient and emergency CTPAs performed in a UK District General Hospital were retrospectively identified and images reviewed to categorise each as having either: ‘no significant’, ‘minor’ or ‘major’ motion artefact. There were no exclusions. Interventions after initial data collection included a multidisciplinary meeting with radiographers, department assistants, and radiologists to devise changes to workflow and practices to build in 'rehearsal' of a breath-hold and explanation of breathing instructions with patients before scanning. A prompting phrase for this was added to our CTPA scanning protocol. Results: Initial results demonstrated that 50% of CTPA showed either minor or major motion artefact, while 50% showed no significant motion artefact. For 2% with minor motion, a clinical reason for why this was unavoidable was provided. Therefore 52% of studies met the proposed local standards. In total, 45% of CTPA were assessed to have minor motion and 5% had major motion artefact (non-diagnostic). 18% of CTPA were positive for PE. Following implementation of changes to practice, repeat data collection demonstrated that 67% of CTPA showed no significant motion artefact. 3% with minor motion provided a clinical reason why this was unavoidable. Therefore 70% of studies met the proposed standard. The increase in compliance with local standards was statistically significant (p=0.00906). Conclusion: Our interventions improved compliance with local standards from 52% to 70%. We recommend rehearsal of breath-holding with patients before CTPA scans as a quick and easy way to improve the diagnostic quality of scans. A prompting phrase within the CTPA scanning protocol has proven effective.

Exploring ambulance clinicians’ clinical reasoning when training mass casualty incidents using virtual reality: a qualitative study

BackgroundHow ambulance clinicians (ACs) handle a mass casualty incident (MCI) is essential for the suffered, but the training and learning for the ACs are sparse and they don’t have the possibility to learn without realistic simulation training. In addition, it is unclear what type of dilemmas ACs process in their clinical reasoning during an MCI. With virtual reality (VR) simulation, the ACs clinical reasoning can be explored in a systematic way. Therefore, the objective was to explore ambulance clinicians’ clinical reasoning when simulating a mass casualty incident using virtual reality.MethodsThis study was conducted as an explorative interview study design using chart- stimulated recall technique for data collection. A qualitative content analysis was done, using the clinical reasoning cycle as a deductive matrix. A high-fidelity VR simulation with MCI scenarios was used and participants eligible for inclusion were 11 senior ACs.Results/conclusionAll phases of the clinical reasoning cycle were found to be reflected upon by the participants during the interviews, however with a varying richness of analytic reflectivity. Non-analytic reasoning predominated when work tasks followed specific clinical guidelines, but analytical reasoning appeared when the guidelines were unclear or non-existent. Using VR simulation led to training and reflection on action in a safe and systematic way and increased self-awareness amongst the ACs regarding their preparedness for MCIs. This study increases knowledge both regarding ACs clinical reasoning in MCIs, and insights regarding the use of VR for simulation training.

Assisting the Learning of Clinical Reasoning by Veterinary Medical Learners with a Case Example.

Effective clinical reasoning is essential for veterinary medical education, particularly in managing complex cases. This review explores strategies for learning clinical reasoning by veterinary medical learners, using a case example of mastitis to illustrate key concepts. Clinical reasoning encompasses cognitive, metacognitive, social, and situational activities, yet the literature on practical applications in veterinary education remains limited. The review discusses various stages of clinical reasoning, including data collection, problem representation, differential diagnosis, and management planning. It emphasizes the importance of integrating client-centered care and iterative evaluation into the clinical decision-making process. Key learning strategies include facilitation in using the domains of clinical reasoning-concepts, data collection, and analysis, taking action, and reflection on encounters. This review highlights best practices such as forward and backward reasoning, reflective practice, and the use of practical examples to enhance learners' diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. The insights provided aim to enhance the training of veterinary learners, ensuring they can navigate day 1 as well as complex cases with improved diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

A systematic review of medical practitioners’ retention and application of basic sciences to clinical practice

BackgroundMedical education offers the foundational base for future healthcare professionals, with basic sciences playing a pivotal role in providing essential knowledge and skills for clinical practice. However, the long-term retention and application of this knowledge in clinical practice remain a significant challenge. This systematic review synthesised global evidence from diverse studies on the short / long-term retention and clinical application of basic sciences among medical doctors.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted across six databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, Emcare, and Informit. The review included studies that encompassed a variety of study designs, participant groups, and educational interventions. The Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS) tool was utilised to assess the quality of the reviewed studies.ResultsA total of 10 studies were included in the review. The findings revealed that rehearsals significantly optimise the retention of basic science knowledge among medical practitioners. Retention varied by discipline, with medical practitioners retaining more knowledge in anatomy (mean scores ranging from 45.0 to 82.9%), while microbiology had the lowest retention score (39.1%). Factors influencing retention included age, gender, and curriculum type. Educational interventions such as targeted courses, integration of basic sciences with clinical skills, generative retrieval and continuous quality improvement in the curriculum were found to enhance both knowledge retention and clinical reasoning. The concept of ‘encapsulated knowledge’ demonstrates that integrated basic science knowledge helps in synthesising clinical presentations, reducing the need for detailed recall as clinical experience increases. The reviewed studies primarily involved interns and surgeons, leaving a significant gap in research for specialties like internal medicine and primary care/ general practice.ConclusionDetailed retention of basic science knowledge may diminish over time; however, the conceptual framework remains essential for ongoing learning and clinical reasoning. This review’s findings highlight the need for specialised educational interventions to improve long-term retention. Continuous professional development and targeted educational techniques are vital for maintaining clinical competence and applying basic science knowledge effectively throughout a medical career. Further research is needed to address gaps in specialty-specific knowledge application and the impact of different instructional methods.

Application of AI-empowered scenario-based simulation teaching mode in cardiovascular disease education

BackgroundCardiovascular diseases present a significant challenge in clinical practice due to their sudden onset and rapid progression. The management of these conditions necessitates cardiologists to possess strong clinical reasoning and individual competencies. The internship phase is crucial for medical students to transition from theory to practical application, with an emphasis on developing clinical thinking and skills. Despite the critical need for education on cardiovascular diseases, there is a noticeable gap in research regarding the utilization of artificial intelligence in clinical simulation teaching.ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the effect and influence of AI-empowered scenario-based simulation teaching mode in the teaching of cardiovascular diseases.MethodsThe study utilized a quasi-experimental research design and mixed-methods. The control group comprised 32 students using traditional teaching mode, while the experimental group included 34 students who were instructed on cardiovascular diseases using the AI-empowered scenario-based simulation teaching mode. Data collection included post-class tests, “Mini-CEX” assessments, Clinical critical thinking scale from both groups, and satisfaction surveys from experimental group. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews.ResultsResearch shows that compared with traditional teaching models, AI-empowered scenario-based simulation teaching mode significantly improve students’ performance in many aspects. The theoretical knowledge scores(P < 0.001), clinical operation skills(P = 0.0416) and clinical critical thinking abilities of students(P < 0.001) in the experimental group were significantly improved. The satisfaction survey showed that students in the experimental group were more satisfied with the teaching scene(P = 0.008), Individual participation(P = 0.006) and teaching content(P = 0.009). There is no significant difference in course discussion, group cooperation and teaching style of teachers(P > 0.05). Additionally, the qualitative data from the interviews highlighted three themes: (1) Positive new learning experience, (2) Improved clinical critical thinking skills, and (3) Valuable suggestions and concerns for further improvement.ConclusionThe AI-empowered scenario simulation teaching Mode plays an important role in the improvement of clinical thinking and skills of medical undergraduates. This study believes that the AI-empowered scenario simulation teaching mode is an effective and feasible teaching model, which is worthy of promotion in other courses.

The impact of unfolding case studies combined with think-aloud strategies on the clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities of postgraduate students: A mixed methods study

AimTo conduct unfolding case studies and test their effectiveness in improving clinical reasoning, teamwork and self-directed learning among postgraduate students. BackgroundPostgraduate students, as advanced nursing professionals in clinical settings, are the driving force behind the rapid development of the nursing profession. Effective clinical reasoning is a fundamental nursing skill that postgraduate students must cultivate, having a direct impact on patient health outcomes. The development and usation of unfolding case studies, which reflect the evolving conditions of patients, combined with think-aloud teaching methods, can enhance postgraduate students' clinical reasoning abilities and foster communication and self-reflection, thereby achieving this goal. DesignMixed methods design. MethodsThe Nurses' Clinical Reasoning Scale and the Nursing Students' Self-Directed Learning Ability Scale were used to evaluate the clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities of nursing students. A qualitative exploratory design with a think-aloud interview technique was employed to explore the clinical reasoning process of nursing students in unfolding cases. Twenty-one nursing students completed the questionnaire survey. Data analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Spearman correlations, regressions and inductive content analysis. ResultsAfter implementing the case study, there was a statistically significant improvement in students' clinical reasoning, self-directed learning and teamwork abilities. Think-aloud analysis revealed that the cognitive strategies most employed by students in clinical reasoning were 'Making choices', 'Forming relationships', 'Searched for information' and 'Drawing conclusions'. ConclusionUnfolding case studies combined with think-aloud strategies provide a conducive learning environment for postgraduate students, effectively enhancing their clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities.

Evaluating the effectiveness of illness script teaching on clinical reasoning skills in post-baccalaureate nursing students

BackgroundTypically, nurse education curricula are separated into the teaching of theoretical knowledge and practical skills. This separation may hinder nursing students' development of clinical reasoning skills, making it difficult for them to prioritize tasks and make decisions about interventions. Illness scripts have been shown to help medical students improve their clinical reasoning skills; however, they are rarely used in nurse education. ObjectivesTo evaluate the influence of illness script teaching method on post-baccalaureate nursing students' clinical reasoning skills. DesignThe study adopted a single-arm quantitative pre-experimental research design and incorporated qualitative focus group discussions. Settings/participantsThis study was conducted at a university in northern Taiwan. Participants included 35 post-baccalaureate nursing students who were enrolled in an elective course focused on clinical skills. MethodsTo enhance nursing students' clinical reasoning skills, illness scripts for five clinical scenarios were developed and implemented as part of their curriculum. The Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale was utilized to assess self-rated clinical reasoning abilities, while dual-teacher scoring was used to evaluate clinical reasoning objectively. The VARK learning preference questionnaire was used to examine how learning preferences affect learning outcomes. After the course, semi-structured focus groups were held to collect student feedback on the effectiveness of the teaching methods and the learning outcomes. ResultsThis study's quantitative and qualitative results show that illness script-based teaching improves nursing students' clinical reasoning. Quantitative results showed significant objective reasoning score improvements. However, minimal changes in self-rated scores suggest a learning style-influenced gap between perceived and actual abilities. Qualitative findings showed that students valued linking clinical issues to practical applications but struggled with knowledge gaps and engagement. ConclusionsThe illness script teaching method improved students' understanding of clinical scenarios and enhanced their clinical reasoning abilities. Incorporating illness scripts into nurse education was beneficial for nursing students.

Preliminary Validation of a Clinical Reasoning Theory-Based Assessment Rubric: An e-Delphi Study.

Questions persist regarding the evaluation of cognitive processes related to clinical reasoning when resolving situations in a learning by concordance tool. This Delphi technique study aimed to validate a clinical reasoning assessment rubric based on script theory. Seventeen experts participated in the study. Two rounds of consultation were conducted to obtain a consensus on the accuracy and clarity of the rubric descriptors (clarity index and content validity index ≥ 0.9). The results inform future research procedures and the intended use of the rubric to facilitate evaluator inferences, provide student feedback, and support the development of learners' clinical reasoning.

A combination of case-based learning with flipped classroom improved performance of medical students in nephrology bedside teaching

BackgroundBedside teaching remains a challenging endeavor for clinical doctors and medical students, as the students often encounter difficulties in applying their knowledge to clinical situations. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of combining case-based learning (CBL) with a flipped classroom (FC) approach in nephrology bedside teaching.MethodsA total of 92 medical students were enrolled in this study, including clerks and interns. The students were assigned into two groups. The CBL/FC group students received the combined teaching approach of CBL and FC (CBL/FC). Students who received the traditional lecture-based teaching (LBT) approach were treated as the control group. General knowledge tests, clinical case scenarios, and questionnaires were used to evaluate the teaching efficacy.ResultsNinety-two students were included in this study. Overall, 46 students were assigned to the CBL/FC group, while the other 46 students were assigned to the LBT group. The students in both groups showed comparable performance in the knowledge test. However, in clinical case scenarios, students in the CBL/FC group demonstrated superior performance compared to those in the LBT group. Additionally, the analysis of questionnaires revealed that the CBL/FC group students expressed more positive attitudes toward their proficiency in medical history taking, physical examination, medical record documentation, clinical reasoning, and consideration for patients’ welfare. Moreover, the students from the CBL/FC group regarded the CBL/FC teaching approach as an effective and satisfying method without increasing the learning burden.ConclusionThis study reveals that the CBL/FC combined teaching approach shows promise in nephrology education and provides an effective and alternative format for medical teaching.

Debriefing to nurture clinical reasoning in nursing students: A design-based research study

BackgroundStudents' clinical reasoning can be stimulated by guiding them to use their experiences with patients to develop own illness scripts. Debriefing during hospital shifts invites students to put patient experiences into words, link them to previously acquired knowledge and make connections. ObjectivesTo develop, implement and evaluate a debriefing procedure for nursing internships based on illness script theory and generate corresponding design principles. DesignQualitative design-based research. SettingClinical education in dedicated educational hospital units. ParticipantsNurse educators, nursing students. MethodsFrom a collaboration between nurse educators and a researcher, a short, peer-debriefing procedure was designed, tested and enacted through four cycles of planning, action, evaluation and reflection. Students drew mind maps about patients. Nurse educators and students joined focus group discussions to evaluate outcomes and processes. Mind map and iterative thematic analysis were applied to these data. ResultsAn adjusted design and more extensive design principles resulted. Differences in mind maps were evident over time. Three themes in the process evaluation were established: trigger to reason; energy giving and taking; and form follows function. ConclusionsThis design-based investigation displays how nurse educators could design and implement a debriefing procedure to facilitate students' clinical reasoning skills and how students could learn from this. This method integrates research, innovation and collaboration. The design and enactment under real-life hospital conditions generated design principles for educators and researchers which may be useful for those seeking to improve teaching and learning clinical reasoning in practice. More clarification is needed about the path from design through enactment to real change in practice.

An e-learning platform for clinical reasoning in cardiovascular diseases: a study reporting on learner and tutor satisfaction

BackgroundMedical students gain essential skills through hospital training and internships, which complement their theoretical education. However, virtual patient platforms have been shown to effectively promote clinical reasoning and enhance learning outcomes. This study evaluates a web-based platform designed for learning clinical reasoning in cardiovascular diseases, detailing its functionalities and user satisfaction.MethodsThe Virtual Patient platform presents medical students with clinically valid scenarios, encompassing stages such as patient description, anamnesis, objective examination, presumptive diagnosis, health investigations, treatment planning, complications, differential and final diagnoses, and prognosis. Scenarios are generated either automatically or manually by professors, based on labeled and annotated clinical data. The Virtual Patient contains two types of medical cases: simple scenarios describing patients with one pathology, and complex scenarios describing patients with several related pathologies. The platform was evaluated by a total of 210 users: 178 medical students, 7 professors, and 25 engineering students, using questionnaires adjusted for each evaluation round to assess satisfaction and gather feedback. The evaluation by medical students was performed in four rounds, each round corresponding to successive enhancements of the platform functionalities and addition of new cases, with a total number of 1,098 evaluation sessions.ResultsThe platform was evaluated at different implementation stages, involving simple and complex scenarios for various heart diseases. The majority of students found the platform very useful (82.58%), with significant appreciation for its features and functionalities, for example the dialogue module supporting natural language interactions in Romanian and English or the feed-back obtained during interaction. Professors highly valued the platform’s flexibility in scenario generation, real-time feedback provision, and data management capabilities. They appreciated the possibility to provide feedback and score student performance in real-time or after the session, though some professors suggested improving the explainability of the scores.ConclusionsThe Virtual Patient platform enables medical students to virtually replicate hospital interactions, diagnose patients, and plan treatments in clinically valid scenarios for cardiovascular diseases. User evaluations demonstrated high satisfaction and appreciation for the platform’s features. Future work will focus on expanding medical cases, enhancing the dialogue module, improving scenario generation for complex cases, and extending the synthetic data generation component to produce additional types of medical investigations.

Clinical Reasoning: Hyperventilation-Induced Alternating Hemiplegia With Concomitant Hemispheric EEG Slowing in a 7-Year-Old Girl With Headache.

A 7-year-old right-handed girl presented to the pediatric neurology outpatient clinic after 5 episodes of headache over the previous 3 months. Her family history was positive for migraine in the mother and maternal grandmother and for febrile seizures in the older sister. The neurologic examination and cognitive profile were normal. Five seconds after the end of hyperventilation, video-EEG showed high-amplitude delta waves predominantly over the left hemisphere with concomitant acute aphasia and right-sided weakness. After the event, which self-resolved over 8 minutes, the girl showed intact recall. A second instance of hyperventilation evoked the appearance of pseudo-rhythmic slow activity localized to the right hemisphere, associated with left-sided weakness, 20 seconds after the end of the test. This event spontaneously resolved in 3 minutes and was followed by headache.An exaggerated physiologic response to hyperventilation, the possible epileptic nature of the events, and a migraine variant were all considered in the differential. Nonetheless, the EEG slowing is shorter in duration and generalized in physiologic and paraphysiological conditions. A clear ictal morphology and evolution of the EEG activity were lacking in this case, and migraine attacks induced by hyperpnea have not been reported to date. Instead, EEG alterations similar to that observed in our patient are described in association with vascular abnormalities. We report the clinical presentation and diagnostic workup of a rare cerebrovascular disorder, highlighting the key features in the differential. Our case emphasizes the clinical value of the EEG rebuild-up phenomenon, which can help the clinician in achieving a prompt diagnosis.

Effectiveness of simulation-based augmented reality in enhancing pediatric nursing and clinical reasoning competency among students: A quasi-experimental study

BackgroundThis study developed simulation-based augmented reality (AR) to enhance pediatric nursing and clinical reasoning competency among students in Taiwan. MethodsA quasi-experimental repeated measures study was conducted with 45 participants. The pediatric nursing knowledge test and clinical reasoning scale (CRS) were evaluated three times: pre-test, post-test, and follow-up. ResultsRepeated measures ANOVA showed that pediatric nursing knowledge and CRS both had significant differences in the three time points. The highest-scoring CRS domain was 'awareness of clinical cues' and the lowest was 'conformation of clinical problems'. ConclusionsSimulation-based AR is effective in improving students’ knowledge and clinical reasoning competency.

Clinical Reasoning Skills Among Second-Phase Medical Students in West Bengal, India: An Exploratory Study.

Introduction Proper application of clinical reasoning skills is essential to reduce diagnostic and management errors. Explicit inclusion of training and assessment of clinical reasoning skills is the demand of time. The study intended to measure the clinical reasoning skills of second-phase undergraduate students in a medical college inWest Bengal, India, and its distribution across several individual variables. Methods The clinical reasoning skills of 105 undergraduate medical students were assessed in a cross-sectional exploratory study using key feature questions (KFQs) with the partial credit scoring system. Six case vignettes aligned to the core competencies in the subject of pharmacology, pathology, and microbiology were designed and validated by the subject material experts for this purpose. The responses of the participants were collected through Google Forms (Google, Mountain View, CA) after obtaining written informed consent. The scores obtained in all KFQs were added and expressed in percentage of the maximum attainable score. Results The mean (±SD) clinical reasoning score of the participants was 42.5 (±12.6). Only 29.6% of respondents scored ≥ 50. Students with higher subjective economic status (p-value = 0.01) and perceived autonomy (p-value < 0.001) were more likely to have higher clinical reasoning scores. The marks obtained in previous summative examinations were significantly correlated with clinical reasoning scores. Conclusion Average score < 50.0 and inability to score ≥ 50.0 by more than two-thirds of the participants reflected the deficit in the clinical reasoning skills of second-phase MBBSstudents. The association of clinical reasoning skills with economic status, autonomy, and previous academic performances needs further exploration.