Development Of Clinical Practice Guidelines Research Articles

Evidence‐based veterinary medicine—potential, practice, and pitfalls

AbstractUnderstanding and incorporating evidence‐based veterinary medicine (EBVM) into clinical practice and research continues to pose a challenge for our profession despite over 2 decades of increasing awareness of this concept. Reasons for this include a lack of understanding of its importance to the practice of medicine, veterinary literature that often fails to adhere to evidence‐based standards, inadequate attention to teaching EBVM at the university level, and the inherent reluctance of clinicians to alter historical practice styles. For many practitioners, EBVM continues to be an abstract concept they believe requires advanced training in statistics and epidemiology resulting in them relying on less robust sources for clinical guidance. This unfortunately results in suboptimal care for our patients and delayed medical advancements for our profession. As part of the 20th anniversary of the founding of the Evidence‐Based Veterinary Medicine Association (EBVMA), we are refocusing our efforts to highlight the need for dedicated teaching of EBVM at the university level, for rigorous adherence to established research reporting guidelines, for expansion of EBVM infrastructure, and for the provision of easily accessible tools that permit clinicians to incorporate EBVM into their daily practice. As the quality of veterinary literature improves, so too will development of more effective clinical practice guidelines that ultimately can be widely adopted if they are flexible enough to support the triadic relationship between veterinarians, our clients and our patients. Ultimately, EBVM is not an end unto itself, but rather a means to improve the quality of care we provide our patients.

Physical activity and cardiorenal health - from associations to interventional studies.

Clustering of traditional and kidney-specific risk factors leads to elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk across the trajectory of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and transplantation. As kidney function declines, the prevalence of CVD, cardiovascular events, and mortality increases. This review considers recent evidence for the association between physical activity (PA) and exercise and cardiorenal health, and the effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and management of cardiorenal decline across the CKD spectrum. Evidence supports a beneficial dose-response effect of PA in the prevention of incident CKD, and growing evidence in prevalent CKD patients for the attenuation of kidney function decline, and a reduction in CVD risk, morbidity, and mortality. Broadly speaking, across the trajectory of CKD, the literature supports the efficacy of exercise interventions for improving cardiorespiratory fitness and aspects of cardiorenal health. The mechanisms underlying improvements indicate differential effects on traditional and non-traditional risk factors for CKD progression and CVD. To date, there is limited transfer of these findings into clinical care, although the evaluation of available evidence has led to the development of the first detailed clinical practice guideline for exercise and lifestyle in CKD. There is a lack of large-scale multi-centre randomised controlled trials, and trials exploring hard clinical outcomes and long-term effects of exercise on cardiorenal outcomes. However, research should also address the challenges of implementing programmes of exercise and PA as part of routine care in combination with addressing the shortfall in literature to improve cardiorenal outcomes in all patients with CKD.

Fostering Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Health Care Professionals in Clinical Practice Guidelines: Protocol for a Project to Develop and Test a Tool for Guideline Developers.

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are designed to assist health care professionals in medical decision-making, but they often lack effective integration of shared decision-making (SDM) principles to reflect patient values and preferences, particularly in the context of preference-sensitive CPG recommendations. To address this shortcoming and foster SDM through CPGs, the integration of patient decision aids (PDAs) into CPGs has been proposed as an important strategy. However, methods for systematically identifying and prioritizing CPG recommendations relevant to SDM and related decision support tools are currently lacking. The aim of the project is to develop (1) a tool for systematically identifying and prioritizing CPG recommendations for which SDM is considered particularly relevant and (2) a platform for PDAs to support practical SDM implementation. The project consists of 6 work packages (WPs). It is embedded in the German health care context but has an international focus. In WP 1, we will conduct a scoping review in bibliographic databases and gray literature sources to identify methods used to foster SDM via PDAs in the context of CPGs. In WP 2, we will conduct semistructured interviews with CPG experts to better understand the concepts of preference sensitivity and identify strategies for fostering SDM through CPGs. WP 3, a modified Delphi study including surveys and focus groups with SDM experts, aims to define and operationalize preference sensitivity. Based on the results of the Delphi study, we will develop a methodology for prioritizing key questions in CPGs. In WP 4, the tool will be developed. A list of relevant items to identify CPG recommendations for which SDM is most relevant will be created, tested, and iteratively refined, accompanied by the development of a user manual. In WP 5, a platform for creating and digitizing German-language PDAs will be developed to support the practical application of SDM during clinical encounters. WP 6 will conclude the project by testing the tool with newly developed and revised CPGs. The Brandenburg Medical School Ethics Committee approved the project (165122023-ANF). An international multidisciplinary advisory board is involved to guide the tool development on CPGs and SDM. Patient partners are involved throughout the project, considering the essential role of the patient perspective in SDM. As of February 20, 2024, we are currently assessing literature references to determine eligibility for inclusion in the scoping review (WP 1). We expect the project to be completed by December 31, 2026. The tool will enable CPG developers to systematically incorporate aspects of SDM into CPG development, thereby providing guideline-based support for the patient-practitioner interaction. Together, the tool for CPGs and the platform for PDAs will create a systematic link between CPGs, SDM, and PDAs, which may facilitate SDM in clinical practice. DERR1-10.2196/57611.

Effects of a Revision to the Standard Admission Order Set on Laxative Prescribing for Opioid-Induced Constipation

Purpose: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is highly prevalent in patients with cancer-related pain on opioid analgesics and has negative consequences on physical and psychological well-being and quality of life. Oncology clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the prevention and management of opioid-induced constipation, not stool softeners such as docusate sodium. Prescribing practices continue to fall behind these recommendations. Methods: This quality improvement project revised the laxative options available in the standard admission order set in the electronic medical record. Specifically, docusate sodium was removed and replaced with senna and polyethylene glycol 3350. Results: A total of 2,742 patient admissions preintervention were compared to 2,752 admissions postintervention. The number of orders for docusate (p < .001) and docusate-senna (p = .002) orders decreased significantly after the intervention, in addition to the number of OIC diagnoses (p < .001). However, the number of orders for polyethylene glycol (p = .559), senna (p = .582), other laxatives (p = .245), or functional bowel disorder medications (p = .533) did not change significantly. No significant differences were observed in the frequency of laxative orders placed within 24 hours of an opioid order, number of laxatives prescribed at discharge, admissions related to bowel-related complications, or length of stay. Conclusions: Interventions utilizing the electronic medical record can facilitate evidence-based management of OIC. Development of clinical practice guidelines and tailoring these interventions further is needed to adapt this approach at other institutions and sustain practice change.

Robust Evidence in Integrative Medicine: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions

Integrative Medicine (IM), which includes therapies such as acupuncture, herbal medicine, yoga, and meditation, is gaining attention for managing chronic pain conditions. However, concerns about the quality of evidence supporting the use of these interventions persist. The 5th Annual Jaseng Academic conference 2024, in Seoul, South Korea, themed "Robust Evidence in Integrative Medicine: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions," addressed these concerns by focusing on advancements in study design, evidence synthesis, and open science practices. This conference proceeding summarizes key insights from the conference, emphasizing the role of pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in evaluating real-world effectiveness, and addressing the complexities involved in IM research such as sham controls. The integration of IM therapies into comprehensive pain management strategies (particularly in Korea), supported by government-backed research and policy initiatives was also discussed. Advancements in methodologies were addressed, such as bibliometric analysis, evidence mapping, and the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for integrative therapies. These methodologies offer valuable insights but face challenges due to the heterogeneity of IM interventions, and potential synergistic or antagonistic effects when combined with conventional medicine. Finally, the potential of open science to enhance transparency, reporting, and reproducibility in IM was explored, emphasizing the increased role of adherence to reporting guidelines (CONSORT and PRISMA). The future of IM research is built upon the continued efforts of refined study designs, rigorous evidence synthesis, and the integration of open science principles, for a robust and more credible evidence base.

Survival and Toxicity Outcomes with Radiotherapy Technique and Timing in the Management of Wilms Tumor: a Systematic Review to Inform a National Clinical Practice Guideline Development

Purpose: Wilms tumor (WT) management has evolved into a multimodality paradigm that includes radiotherapy (RT), usually as an adjuvant or consolidative modality. Protocols are refined to maximize cure and compliance while minimizing acute toxicity and long-term effects. RT technique and timing are two factors that could improve these outcomes. We reviewed the evidence on survival and toxicity outcomes among WT patients with conventional versus advanced RT techniques and early versus delayed RT to inform a Department of Health (DOH) commissioned guideline. Materials and Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EuropePMC, EBSCOHost, HERDIN, systematic review and clinical trial registries and official websites of scientific societies for relevant publications and grey literature. Eligibility screening, risk-of-bias assessment and data extraction were performed using a single-reviewer approach. Given the study and data heterogeneity, only a qualitative synthesis was performed. Certainty of evidence assessment was done using the GRADE approach. Results: We screened 314 studies and included seven in the review, including a phase 1/2 trial and six retrospective studies, all from first-world countries (US, France, Netherlands), except one from a newly industrialized country (Brazil). The certainty of evidence on the survival and toxicity outcomes with advanced RT techniques was very low. Moderate-certainty evidence supports that giving RT >14 days after surgery leads to increased mortality. Conclusion: Current evidence does not support the routine use of advanced RT techniques; proper contextualization is necessary. Tertiary centers managing WT should strive to administer RT within 14 days after surgery whenever possible. Keywords: Wilms tumor, nephroblastoma, radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, survival, toxicity

GRADE evidence to decision framework in genomics guidelines: systematic review & appraisal

Abstract Background Transparent development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is important for genomic medicine, as this field promises to partially challenge the traditional hierarchies of evidence. The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework has recently emerged as a transparent and rigorous tool to produce recommendations. Our aim was to survey the genomic CPGs that used the GRADE EtD and appraise the applicability of its criteria and the quality of produced CPGs. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the gray literature till 2023 for relevant CPGs. From each eligible CPG, we extracted the reporting of the GRADE EtD criteria: benefits, harms, resource use, cost-effectiveness, acceptability, feasibility, equity and values. The quality of the CPGs were appraised across various domains using the (AGREE) II instrument. Results Among 1,144 records, 15 CPGs met inclusion criteria between 2018 and 2023, comprising 66 recommendations. Reporting of GRADE EtD criteria varied. Benefits, harms and their balance were addressed in approximately half of the recommendations 48% and 52% respectively. Feasibility, acceptability and values were also 52%, 47% and 40% respectively, resource use 39%, cost-effectiveness 23%. Equity was addressed in 36% of the recommendations. Quality appraisal of the CPGs also varied, domains were reported as follows: scope and purpose, clarity of presentation, editorial independence 86%, 85% and 84% respectively, rigor of development 77%, stakeholder involvement 72%, while applicability was 59%. Conclusions GRADE EtD is applied heterogeneously in genomic medicine CPGs, with difficulty in applying all of its criteria, including benefits and harms. Quality varied across domains with applicability of the CPGs less demonstrated. Key messages • Transparent approaches are needed in developing CPGs for genomic medicine. • Current genomic CPGs fail to address crucial aspects for producing recommendations, including benefits and harms.

Prevalence and Correlates of Cannabis Use among Cancer Survivors

Abstract Background Delaware has legalized marijuana use for both medical and recreational use. This study identified factors associated with cannabis use among adults with chronic relative to individuals without a history of cancer in the First State. Methods Combined data (2020, 2021 and 2022) from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) were analyzed for Delaware. Multivariable logistic regression examined individual-level demographic, socio-economic, clinical, and behavioral predictors associated with marijuana use stratified by history of cancer. Results Cannabis use was lower among cancer survivors compared to individuals with no history of cancer (6.76% vs. 13.43%). However, a higher proportion of cancer survivors reported use for medical purposes (75.13% vs. 64.28%). Marijuana use prevalence decreased with age among cancer survivors. After adjusting for sex, age, educational attainment, self-reported race/ethnicity, mental health status and physical health status, current smoking (odds ratio [OR], 4.24 vs. 2.74) and binge drinking (OR, 2.45 vs. 1.75) were associated with cannabis use in both groups. Conclusions Adults with cancer were more likely to use marijuana. Marijuana use prevalence decreased with age. Public perceptions of marijuana is becoming more acceptable. Risk of medical conditions such as cancer increase with age. As such, older adults might also become consumers of marijuana. Clinicians should screen for marijuana use among patients and initiate open discussions with patients about the benefits and risks associated with marijuana. Key messages • Need for ongoing cannabis research to better understand and inform its use for medical purposes. • Development of high-quality standardized education materials and clinical practice guidelines for marijuana use.

Technical specification for developing a clinical practice guideline for the integration of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine.

Developing a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for integrating traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine (WM) requires the accurate identification, collation, and integration of all available evidence on TCM and WM in a comprehensive, meaningful, and resource-efficient manner. This entails framing appropriate clinical questions, retrieving and synthesizing evidence from multiple resources, and providing concise and complete recommendations for specific diseases. However, some existing CPGs for integrating TCM and WM lack deep and organic integration. As the effective preparation of a CPG for integrating TCM and WM typically involves a complex set of principles, methodology, and steps, we believe that a cohesive, step-by-step guide on how to prepare a CPG for integrating TCM and WM is essential. To facilitate the design and development of a robust CPG, we present a clear and concise methodology, outlining relevant principles and procedures, supported by references for guidance. This technical specification aims to simplify the methodology for preparing a CPG for integrating TCM and WM; provide healthcare professionals and researchers with methodologically sound tools; and enhance the quality of CPGs for integrating TCM and WM. This technical specification may help elucidate this complex process, facilitate evaluation of the quality of published CPGs for integrating TCM and WM, and improve the understanding and application of recommendations for the combined and integrated use of TCM and WM in a new system.

Barriers and facilitators of adherence to clinical practice guidelines in Germany-A systematic review.

Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) represent evidence-based tools designed to assist healthcare practitioners and patients in decisions in clinical practice. Evidence supports the clinical benefits of adhering to CPGs. However, their successful implementation and adherence in clinical settings often encounter challenges. This systematic review aimed to explore barriers and facilitators influencing adherence to CPGs in Germany. The protocol of this study was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF) registry (DOI: 10.17605/OSF. IO/GMFUB). In November 2022 we searched on PubMed and Embase for primary studies employing qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods approaches that focus on barriers or facilitators to CPGs adherence in the Germany. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the studies. The collected data on barriers and facilitators of CPG adherence were systematically categorized and analyzed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). A total of 24 studies were included, mainly focusing on adherence to national CPGs. This review introduces a new domain, guideline characteristics, reflecting the need to address barriers and facilitators to CPG development, implementation, dissemination and format, which couldn't be encompassed within the existing 14 domains of TDF framework. Among healthcare professionals, the most frequently reported influencing factors were related to the environmental context and resources (encompassing aspects such as employer support for CPG utilization), the CPG development and dissemination process (including layout, wording, and interactive tools) and beliefs about consequences (such as contradictions with practical experience). Knowledge (knowledge about the content of CPGs, awareness about published CPGs), primarily as a barrier, and reinforcement facilitators (notably financial support), were also frequently reported. The findings revealed multilevel factors contributing to CPG adherence, with environmental context and resources emerging as the most frequently reported considerations. This systematic review offer holistic insights into the barriers and facilitators of CPG adherence in Germany. The results contribute to a better understanding of the topic and serve as a resource for developing targeted strategies to enhance CPG adherence and implementation within the German healthcare system.

Surgeon Alignment With Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Qualitative Analysis of Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures.

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are developed to guide physicians in providing consistent high-quality care. Despite availability of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of distal radius fractures, prior work suggests many patients receive treatment that is misaligned with the CPG. We sought to explore barriers and facilitators of guideline-aligned care for distal radius fractures. We conducted semistructured interviews of a purposive sample of surgeons who treat distal radius fractures. Our interview guide was based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Interviews were transcribed and coded using a deductive analytical approach within the 14 TDF domains. Belief statements underlying similar codes were developed to describe barriers and facilitators of guideline-aligned care. A content analysis was performed to count the frequency of each TDF domain. We interviewed 14 surgeons. The most common TDF domains were beliefs about consequences (110), knowledge (49), and social influences (29). Belief statements representative of barriers of concordance to the CPGs included, "I am more likely to deviate from the CPGs when the CPGs differ from my professional opinion," which was coded under beliefs about consequences. Similar belief statements were created for each theme within TDF domains. Decision-making for patients with distal radius fractures is driven by beliefs about consequences, knowledge, and social influences. Strategies to address these beliefs in other fields such as including patient factors in a further structured shared decision-making process, developing implementation toolkits as part of the CPG development process, and implementing payment programs may improve CPG alignment.

9255 Use of Race and Ethnicity in Endocrine Clinical Practice Guidelines

Abstract Disclosure: D. Segura Torres: None. K. Raygoza: None. M. Garcia: None. J.P. Brito: None. M.E. McDonnell: None. M. Corrigan: None. C.R. McCartney: None. R. Dhaliwal: None. N.M. Singh Ospina: None. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) improve healthcare quality by guiding decision making. Recent trends in CPG development emphasize incorporating race/ethnicity terms and health equity considerations. However, the appropriateness of how race/ethnicity is utilized remains uncertain. Objective This study seeks to evaluate the use of race/ethnicity in published Endocrine Society (ES) CPG and elucidate the context in which race and ethnicity terms are used. Methods: We identified 30 active clinical practice guidelines from ES up to January 2023. Two reviewers independently and in duplicate: a) located statements addressing race/ethnicity using an electronic search with 24 keywords, b) determined the statements' location within guidelines, and c) classified them based on content using frameworks by Cerdena and Gilliam. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Exclusions were made for statements not addressing race and ethnicity terms in the appropriate context (e.g., “minority” of the panel disagreed), as well as for those in references or duplicates. Results: We reviewed 30 clinical practice guidelines, with 19 of them containing statements related to race or ethnicity. After applying exclusion criteria, we identified a final analytic sample of 114 statements. The majority of these statements were found in the body of the clinical guidelines (79%), followed by the evidence-to-decision framework (14%), and clinical recommendations (7%).The predominant classification were statements in which there was biologization of race/ethnicity 55% (n=63). Discussions on racial/ethnic disparities accounted for 23% (n=26) of the statements, with 31% (n=8) of these including explicit considerations of social context. Additionally, there were descriptions of race-specific treatment or diagnosis/screening in 14% (n=16) and 9% (n=10) of the statements, respectively.Less commonly statements of race/ethnicity reflected the consideration of ancestry as a code for race/ethnicity (n=7, 6%), identified ancestry as a risk factor for disease (n=19, 6%), highlighted racial/ethnic groups as understudied n=6, 5%), normalized findings to the majority group (White centeredness) (n=7, 6%), and other categories (7%). None of the statements employed race/ethnicity terms to emphasize cultural humility or the value of inclusivity in guideline committees. Conclusion: We systematically analyzed how race and ethnicity terms are used in ES CPGs. Our findings align with prior assessments made in non-ES CPG, highlighting the prevalent biologization of race and ethnicity constructs. Addressing this trend and incorporating socio-structural context considerations could bolster the impact of clinical guidelines in promoting health equity. Presentation: 6/1/2024

‘How-To:’ Scoping Review?

Scoping reviews are a type of evidence synthesis that aims to identify and map the breadth of evidence available on a particular topic, field, concept, or issue, within or across a defined context or contexts. Scoping reviews can contribute to clinical practice guideline development, policy making, reduce research waste by eliminating duplication of research effort, and be a precursor to a systematic review. This paper aims to provide a brief introduction of how to conduct and report scoping reviews, their role and value of within the evidence synthesis ecosystem, the differences and similarities between these reviews and other types of evidence syntheses such as systematic reviews, mapping reviews, evidence and gap maps and overviews and how to overcome common challenges often associated in the conduct, reporting and dissemination of scoping reviews.

Guía de práctica clínica para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la endometriosis sintomática en mujeres en edad reproductiva en el Seguro Social de Salud (EsSalud)

Introduction. This article summarizes the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the diagnosis and treatment of women with symptomatic endometriosis in the Social Security of Peru (EsSalud). Objective. The aim is to offer evidence-based clinical recommendations for diagnosing and managing women with symptomatic endometriosis in EsSalud. Methods. A guideline development group (GEG), consisting of medical specialists and methodologists, was established to create this CPG. The GEG formulated six clinical questions that guided the development of the CPG. Systematic searches of systematic reviews and –where applicable– primary studies were carried out in PubMed and CENTRAL between December 2021 and February 2022. Relevant evidence was selected to address each clinical question. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Throughout the CPG development process, the GEG held regular meetings to assess the evidence and formulate recommendations, establish points of good clinical practice, and develop flowcharts. The CPG was formally approved through Resolution No. 62-IETSI-ESSALUD-2022. Results. The CPG addressed six clinical questions, categorized into two primary areas: the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Based on these questions, eight recommendations were developed, comprising one strong recommendation and seven conditional ones. Additionally, 21 good clinical practice points and two flowcharts were created. Conclusion. This article outlines the methodology and evidence-based conclusions of the CPG for the diagnosis and treatment of women with symptomatic endometriosis in EsSalud.

Framework for Successful Integration of Health Services Research Into a Breast Imaging Career.

Health services research (HSR)is a multidisciplinary field of inquiry that examines how health care is structured, providing valuable data on health care outcomes and delivery. Over the past few decades, a shift in the U.S. health care system toward value-based care has placed a priority on health services topics. Health services research has been central to the evolution of breast imaging over this period, with increased emphasis placed on the following: (1) design of appropriate-use criteria for imaging services; (2) determination of cost-effectiveness of imaging protocols and screening regimens guiding policy; and (3) evaluation of policy related to reimbursement for diagnostic imaging and image-guided procedures. Examples of HSR topics that can be applied directly to breast imaging include evaluation of health care availability and accessibility, analysis of health care use patterns, exploration of patient preferences, assessment of technological innovation, development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines and screening strategies, and examination of health care organization and delivery models. Breast imaging radiologists who perform HSR are uniquely positioned to advocate for patients, to promote transformative health care interventions, and to influence policy changes and public health initiatives in breast imaging through analysis of health care data and translation of their research findings. In this Training and Professional Development article, we aim to provide practical approaches to explore interest in HSR and to describe a framework for successful integration of HSR into a breast imaging career.

Quality of Pancreatic Cyst Clinical Practice Guidelines.

There are various published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of pancreatic cystic lesions. However, the quality of these guidelines has not been systematically appraised. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of CPGs published in the last 5 years for the management of pancreatic cysts. A systematic search of the PubMed database for eligible CPGs published between January 1, 2016 and November 17, 2021, using a sensitive filter. The quality of the CPGs was independently evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument, with domain scores considered sufficient quality if >60% and good quality if >80%. The search yielded 4 eligible CPGs out of 426 citations. The scores varied for different domains for each CPG, with the overall median score being 79% for scope and purpose, 26% for stakeholder involvement, 51% for rigor of development, 69% for clarity of presentation, 14% for applicability, and 75% for editorial independence. The study revealed that the quality of the CPGs for pancreatic cyst management in adults remains moderate at best. Patient representatives were not involved in any of the CPG development process. There is a significant scope for improvement in methodological rigor and clarity of presentation.

Improving outcomes for uncomplicated gastroschisis: clinical practice guidelines from the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-based Practice Committee.

The authors sought better outcomes for uncomplicated gastroschisis through development of clinical practice guidelines. The authors and the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidenced-based Practice Committee used an iterative process and chose two questions to develop clinical practice guidelines regarding (1) standardized nutrition protocols and (2) postnatal management strategies. An English language search of PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library Database identified literature published between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 2019, with snowballing to 2022. The Appraisal of Guideline, Research and Evaluation reporting checklist was followed. Thirty-three studies were included with a Level of Evidence that ranged from 2 to 5 and recommendation Grades B-D. Nine evaluated standardized nutrition protocols and 24 examined postnatal management strategies. The adherence to gastroschisis-specific nutrition protocols promotes intestinal feeding and reduces TPN administration. The implementation of a standardized postnatal clinical management protocol is often significantly associated with shorter hospital stays, less mechanical ventilation use, and fewer infections. There is a lack of comparative studies to guide practice changes that improve uncomplicated gastroschisis outcomes. The implementation of gastroschisis-specific feeding and clinical care protocols is recommended. Feeding protocols often significantly reduce TPN administration, although the length of hospital stay may not consistently decrease.

Evaluating the impact of the global evidence, local adaptation (GELA) project for enhancing evidence-informed guideline recommendations for newborn and young child health in three African countries: a mixed-methods protocol

BackgroundPoverty-related diseases (PRD) remain amongst the leading causes of death in children under-5 years in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) based on the best available evidence are key to strengthening health systems and helping to enhance equitable health access for children under five. However, the CPG development process is complex and resource-intensive, with substantial scope for improving the process in SSA, which is the goal of the Global Evidence, Local Adaptation (GELA) project. The impact of research on PRD will be maximized through enhancing researchers and decision makers’ capacity to use global research to develop locally relevant CPGs in the field of newborn and child health. The project will be implemented in three SSA countries, Malawi, South Africa and Nigeria, over a 3-year period. This research protocol is for the monitoring and evaluation work package of the project. The aim of this work package is to monitor the various GELA project activities and evaluate the influence these may have on evidence-informed decision-making and guideline adaptation capacities and processes. The specific project activities we will monitor include (1) our ongoing engagement with local stakeholders, (2) their capacity needs and development, (3) their understanding and use of evidence from reviews of qualitative research and, (4) their overall views and experiences of the project.MethodsWe will use a longitudinal, mixed-methods study design, informed by an overarching project Theory of Change. A series of interconnected qualitative and quantitative data collections methods will be used, including knowledge translation tracking sheets and case studies, capacity assessment online surveys, user testing and in-depth interviews, and non-participant observations of project activities. Participants will comprise of project staff, members of the CPG panels and steering committees in Malawi, South Africa and Nigeria, as well as other local stakeholders in these three African countries.DiscussionOngoing monitoring and evaluation will help ensure the relationship between researchers and stakeholders is supported from the project start. This can facilitate achievement of common goals and enable researchers in South Africa, Malawi and Nigeria to make adjustments to project activities to maximize stakeholder engagement and research utilization. Ethical approval has been provided by South African Medical Research Council Human Research Ethics Committee (EC015-7/2022); The College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee, Malawi (P.07/22/3687); National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (01/01/2007).

Chinese national clinical practice guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer.

The incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) in China are increasing in recent years. The clarified pathogenesis and detectable precancerous lesions of CRC make it possible to prevent, screen, and diagnose CRC at an early stage. With the development of endoscopic and surgical techniques, the choice of treatment for early CRC is also worth further discussion, and accordingly, a standard follow-up program after treatment needs to be established. This clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed following the recommended process of the World Health Organization, adopting Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) in assessing evidence quality, and using the Evidence to Decision framework to formulate clinical recommendations, thereby minimizing bias and increasing transparency of the CPG development process. We used the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) statement and Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) as reporting and conduct guides to ensure the guideline's completeness and transparency. This CPG comprises 46 recommendations concerning prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of CRC. In these recommendations, we have indicated protective and risk factors for CRC and made recommendations for chemoprevention. We proposed a suitable screening program for CRC based on the Chinese context. We also provided normative statements for the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of CRC based on existing clinical evidence and guidelines. The 46 recommendations in this CPG are formed with consideration for stakeholders' values and preferences, feasibility, and acceptability. Recommendations are generalizable to resource-limited settings with similar CRC epidemiology pattern as China.

Guidance on how to efficiently find, choose, and use available systematic reviews was developed

ObjectivesThe aim of this paper is to provide clinicians and authors of clinical guidelines or patient information with practical guidance on searching and choosing systematic reviews(s) (SR[s]) and, where adequate, on making use of SR(s). Study Design and SettingAt the German conference of the Evidence-Based Medicine Network (EbM Network) a workshop on the topic was held to identify the most important areas where guidance for practice appears necessary. After the workshop, we established working groups. These included SR users with different backgrounds (eg, information specialists, epidemiologists) and working areas. Each working group developed and consented a draft guidance based on their expert knowledge and experiences. The results were presented to the entire group and finalized in an iterative process. ResultsWe developed a practical guidance that answers questions that usually arise when choosing and using SR(s). (1) How to efficiently find high-quality SRs? (2) How to choose the most appropriate SR? (3) What to do if no SR of sufficient quality could be identified? In addition, we developed an algorithm that links these steps and accounts for their interaction. The resulting guidance is primarily directed at clinicians and developers of clinical practice guidelines or patient information resources. ConclusionWe suggest practical guidance for making the best use of SRs when answering a specific research question. The guidance may contribute to the efficient use of existing SRs. Potential benefits when using existing SRs should be always weighted against potential limitations.