OBJECTIVE: Clinical outcome of cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET) are comparable to those of fresh IVF-ET. Despite of these advances, there still is considerable disagreement over the optimal embryo stage for cryopreservation. As a routine, our center performs vitrification of embryos on day3 and day 5 according to embryo number and quality. The purpose of this study is evaluated clinical outcomes after transfer of embryos vitrified on day 3 and day 5.DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from Jan 2007 to Dec 2009 in a Mirae and Heemang OB/GYN clinic.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,646 embryos were thawed in 574 CET cycles. Day 3 and day 5 embryos were equilibrated in 7.5% ethylene glycol (EG) + 7.5% DMSO for 15 ∼ 23min and then vitrified in 15% EG + 15% DMSO + 0.5M sucrose within 1 min. The vitrification solution containing embryos was placed onto the pull and cut (PNC) straw, which was designed and made by pulling and cutting of 0.25ml plastic straw, and immediately plunged into the liquid nitrogen. Vitrified embryos were warmed in 1M sucrose at 37°C for 1min, 0.5M sucrose for 3min, and washed twice in PBS. The two groups evaluated were patients with embryos vitrified at the day 3 cleavage (day 3 group, n=456), or blastocyst (day 5 group, n=118) stage.RESULTS: A total of 2,646 embryos were thawed and the survival rate was 80.5%. The survival rate of the day 3 (81.4%) was not significantly different the day 5 group (75.4%). All patients were statistically similar in terms of age (day 3, 33.7 ± 3.4 vs. day 5, 33.6 ± 3.1, respectively). We found that the mean number of transferred embryos was significantly lower in the day 5 (2.4 ± 0.9) than the day 3 group (4.0 ± 0.9) (p<0.05). Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in the day 5 (39.8%) was higher than the day 3 group (33.8%), but it was not statistically significant.CONCLUSION: CPR were not statistically different between embryos vitrified on day 3 or day 5. These data showed that vitrification on either day 3 or day 5 of embryo development is feasible within the human IVF program. OBJECTIVE: Clinical outcome of cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET) are comparable to those of fresh IVF-ET. Despite of these advances, there still is considerable disagreement over the optimal embryo stage for cryopreservation. As a routine, our center performs vitrification of embryos on day3 and day 5 according to embryo number and quality. The purpose of this study is evaluated clinical outcomes after transfer of embryos vitrified on day 3 and day 5. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from Jan 2007 to Dec 2009 in a Mirae and Heemang OB/GYN clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,646 embryos were thawed in 574 CET cycles. Day 3 and day 5 embryos were equilibrated in 7.5% ethylene glycol (EG) + 7.5% DMSO for 15 ∼ 23min and then vitrified in 15% EG + 15% DMSO + 0.5M sucrose within 1 min. The vitrification solution containing embryos was placed onto the pull and cut (PNC) straw, which was designed and made by pulling and cutting of 0.25ml plastic straw, and immediately plunged into the liquid nitrogen. Vitrified embryos were warmed in 1M sucrose at 37°C for 1min, 0.5M sucrose for 3min, and washed twice in PBS. The two groups evaluated were patients with embryos vitrified at the day 3 cleavage (day 3 group, n=456), or blastocyst (day 5 group, n=118) stage. RESULTS: A total of 2,646 embryos were thawed and the survival rate was 80.5%. The survival rate of the day 3 (81.4%) was not significantly different the day 5 group (75.4%). All patients were statistically similar in terms of age (day 3, 33.7 ± 3.4 vs. day 5, 33.6 ± 3.1, respectively). We found that the mean number of transferred embryos was significantly lower in the day 5 (2.4 ± 0.9) than the day 3 group (4.0 ± 0.9) (p<0.05). Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in the day 5 (39.8%) was higher than the day 3 group (33.8%), but it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: CPR were not statistically different between embryos vitrified on day 3 or day 5. These data showed that vitrification on either day 3 or day 5 of embryo development is feasible within the human IVF program.
Read full abstract