Clinical Outcome Measures Research Articles

Correlating survival outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer with novel hyperpolarized 13C MRI metabolic imaging biomarkers.

e15059 Background: Hyperpolarized 13C (HP 13C) MRI is a novel molecular imaging approach that detects aberrant aerobic metabolism, namely elevated rates of pyruvate-to-lactate conversion (kPL), in patients with advanced malignancies. Higher kPL has been shown to correlate with higher tumor grade among patients with localized prostate cancer (PC). This research sought to evaluate the correlation between kPL and clinical outcome measures in patients with advanced PC. Methods: Patients with metastatic or locally advanced PC (castration sensitive or resistant) were prospectively enrolled at our institution and underwent HP 13C MRI of one or more target lesions identified on prior conventional imaging. Voxelwise kPL values were computed in MATLAB using an inputless two site exchange model. kPL,median was defined as the median kPL value per-patient across all target lesions; kPL,kurtosis measured the tailedness of the kPL distribution per-patient. We retrospectively analyzed progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in subgroups divided by metabolic activity below versus above cut-point (kPL,median <0.017 s-1 and ≥ 0.017s-1, respectively). Survival statistics were calculated using the Cox PH model. Results: Sixteen patients (6 with castration-sensitive and 10 with castration-resistant PC) were accrued. With a median follow-up of 22.0 months from the date of MRI, the lower-kPL subgroup had significantly longer median PFS (11.2 vs 0.5 months; p<0.01) and OS (NR vs 18.4 months; p<0.05) compared to the higher-kPL subgroup. By comparison, baseline serum PSA (PFS: p=0.19, OS: p=0.41) and LDH (PFS: p=0.60, OS: p=0.34) did not demonstrate a significant association with clinical outcomes. There was a strong negative correlation between kPL,kurtosis and OS (r = -0.75), and moderate negative correlations between kPL,median and OS (r = -0.45) as well as kPL,max with both PFS (r = -0.48) and OS (r = -0.54). There was no significant kPL,median difference between castration-sensitive and resistant subgroups (0.015±0.011 vs 0.016±0.006 s-1, p>0.8). Conclusions: HP 13C MRI-derived non-invasive metabolic biomarker kPL,median significantly correlated with clinical outcome measures in a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced PC, outperforming established serological prognostic markers PSA and LDH. Limitations include our small sample size, retrospective design, and heterogeneous patient population. Nevertheless, these encouraging preliminary results support further investigation of HP 13C MRI as a prognostic and/or predictive PC biomarker in multi-center prospective imaging trials. [Table: see text]

Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: An Umbrella Review and a Meta-analysis.

Whether endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) versus open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) has superior outcomes remains a controversial topic. Therefore, we sought to perform an umbrella review and meta-analysis to compare ECTR and OCTR with regards to (1) postoperative functional ability, (2) operative outcomes, and (3) time to return to work. A PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane database search was conducted for all meta-analyses comparing ECTR and OCTR performed between 2000 and 2022 in accordance to PRISMA and Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for umbrella reviews. The primary outcomes were as follows: (1) functional ability-symptoms severity, postoperative grip strength, postoperative pinch strength, 2-point discrimination, and pain; (2) operative outcomes-operation time, total complications, nerve injury, and scar-related complication; and (3) time to return to work. Quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews. Pooled analysis was performed to compare several clinical outcome measures between groups, depending on the availability of data using Review Manager Version 5.2.11. A total of 9 meta-analyses were included, 5 were of high quality and 4 were moderate quality. For functional ability, ECTR was associated with better pinch strength after 3 months (0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.00, 1.40, P = 0.05) and 6 months (0.77, 95% CI = 0.14, 1.40, P = 0.02, I2 = 84%). For return to work, OCTR was associated with longer return to work compared with ECTR (-10.89, 95% CI = -15.14, -6.64, P < 0.00001, I2= 83%). There were no significant differences between OCTR and ECTR in the hand function, symptom severity, grip strength, pain, operation time, and total complications. In an umbrella review and meta-analysis of ECTR versus OCTR, ECTR was associated with a higher pinch strength, and a shorter time to return to work. Differences in major complications, such as nerve injury, were unclear due to statistical inconsistency and bias.

Clinical Results of Primary Repair Versus Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Contemporary Trials.

Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair has gained renewed interest in select centers for patients with proximal or midsubstance ACL tears. Therefore, it is important to reassess contemporary clinical outcomes of ACL repair to determine whether a clinical benefit exists over the gold standard of ACL reconstruction (ACLR). To (1) perform a meta-analysis of comparative trials to determine whether differences in clinical outcomes and adverse events exist between ACL repair versus ACLR and (2) synthesize the midterm outcomes of available trials. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. The PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in August 2023 for prospective and retrospective clinical trials comparing ACL repair and ACLR. Data pertaining to tear location, surgical technique, adverse events, and clinical outcome measures were recorded. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models were constructed to quantitatively evaluate the association between ACL repair/ACLR, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. A subanalysis of minimum 5-year outcomes was performed. Twelve studies (893 patients; 464 ACLR and 429 ACL repair) were included. Random-effects models demonstrated a higher relative risk (RR) of recurrent instability/clinical failure (RR = 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.57; P = .032), revision ACLR (RR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.59; P = .039), and hardware removal (RR = 4.94; 95% CI, 2.10-11.61; P = .0003) in patients who underwent primary ACL repair versus ACLR. The RR of reoperations and complications (knee-related) were not significantly different between groups. No significant differences were observed when comparing patient-reported outcome scores. In studies with minimum 5-year outcomes, no significant differences in adverse events or Lysholm scores were observed. In contemporary comparative trials of ACL repair versus ACLR, the RR of clinical failure, revision surgery due to ACL rerupture, and hardware removal was greater for primary ACL repair compared with ACLR. There were no observed differences in patient-reported outcome scores, reoperations, or knee-related complications between approaches. In the limited literature reporting on minimum 5-year outcomes, significant differences in adverse events or the International Knee Documentation Committee score were not observed.

Time-in-Range With Insulin Versus Metformin in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Randomized Control Study at a Tertiary Care Centre in South India.

Background The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing globally. When diet and lifestyle modifications are inadequate for control, managing GDM often involves insulin or metformin. Metformin's oral administration option improves patient compliance and acceptance, but concerns about its use persist, necessitating careful evaluation. Comparative studies between insulin and metformin in GDM are scarce. In pregnancies complicated by diabetes, precise glucose control is crucial for maternal-fetal well-being, and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) plays a valuable role in achieving recommended targets. CGM provides comprehensive glucose profiles, including postprandial glucose excursions and details about time spent in hypoglycemia, euglycemia, and hyperglycemia. The time-in-range (TIR) metric, when used alongside A1C, offers more actionable information than A1C alone. To the best of our knowledge, no published trials compare TIR in GDM with metformin or insulin aspart/detemir, specifically focusing on CGM metrics. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to assess TIR in women with GDM treated with either metformin or insulin. Materials and methods This study was a non-inferiority randomized control trial evaluating TIR in GDM using continuous glucose monitoring with metformin or insulin. Forty-four women with GDM were enrolled. The diagnosis of GDM was based on the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. CGM readings were collected for 14 days after sensor activation. Results In our study, 44 women with GDM completed the protocol, with 22 in the Metformin group and 22 in the Insulin group. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. Age, BMI pre-gravid, BMI at 28 weeks, parity, family history of diabetes mellitus, previous history of GDM, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) at zero hours, one hour, and two hours, as well as gestational weeks, did not significantly differ between the two groups. The metformin and insulin groups did not differ significantly in CGM metrics, including TIR, time above range, time below range, mean glucose, and glucose management indicator. Conclusion Based on our findings, the metformin and insulin groups did not differ in CGM metrics, including TIR, time above range, time below range, mean glucose, and glucose management indicator. In clinical practice, CGM metrics complement fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose, and HbA1c as appropriate and useful clinical targets and outcome measurements. Metformin's oral administration option offers advantages such as improved patient compliance and acceptance in women with GDM.

Updated SEER database study of 21-gene assay to assess breast cancer–specific mortality and benefit of chemotherapy by race and ethnicity.

533 Background: In randomized studies (NSABP B-20, SWOG 8814, TAILORx, RxPONDER), the predictive effect of the 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score assay (RS) on chemotherapy (CT) benefit has been evaluated in patients with node-negative (N0) and node-positive (N+) breast cancer. Retrospective analyses of TAILORx and RxPONDER demonstrated differences in outcome by racial/ethnic groups (RG); however, there were no differences in CT benefit for any of the clinical outcome measures. In this study we characterized the association between the RS result and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) and chemotherapy benefit in BCSM in RG in the recently updated, population-based SEER registries. Methods: Eligible patients were from the SEER 17 registries, November 2022 submission, and had non-metastatic, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node negative (N0) breast cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2019 with a RS result. Analyses were weighted using the inverse of estimated propensity of using CT (yes vs. none/unknown). Prognosis was ascertained by estimating breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) at 9 years among patients with CT recorded as none/unknown by RG. The log-rank test was used to compare BCSM by RG. Multivariable Cox models, including RS result (26-100 vs. 0-25) x CT interaction, were used to assess whether RS result was predictive of CT benefit. Analyses were performed in the overall cohort and in Hispanic (H), non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander (NHAPI), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and non-Hispanic White (NHW) RGs. Results: There were 145,642 eligible patients and 3,212 breast cancer deaths. Median follow-up was 68 months. NHB patients had higher median RS result and CT usage than other groups (p &lt; .001). In N0 patients, higher RS result was associated with lower 9-year BCSS, both overall and by race/ethnicity (p &lt; .001). In Cox multivariable models (Table), the interaction between RS result by CT was significant among all N0 patients (p &lt; .001) and in NHB patients (p = 0.005), NHW patients (p = 0.002), and H patients (p = 0.019), but not in NHAPI patients (p = 0.766). Analyses of patients with N+ disease and more detailed analysis of CT benefit according to RS results by RG are underway and will also be presented. Conclusions: Real-world evidence from the SEER registries in over 145,000 patients confirms the 21-gene assay is prognostic for BCSS in all groups by race and ethnicity. The RS result was predictive of CT benefit in N0 patients overall and in Hispanic, NHB, and NHW patients, but not in NHAPI patients in this analysis. [Table: see text]

Development of a Vitamin B12 Deficiency Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Clinical Practice and Research.

It is difficult to recognize vitamin B12 deficiency and to evaluate the effect of B12 treatment due to a broad range of variable clinical symptoms overlapping with other diseases and diagnostic biomarkers that quickly normalize during treatment. This poses a risk of delay in diagnosis and a challenge to uniformly monitor the effect of B12 treatment. There is a need for a new clinical outcome measure suitable for clinical practice and clinical evaluation studies. To develop a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) which measures the severity of vitamin B12 deficiency symptoms. The B12 PROM was developed by (1) gathering input from experts and literature review to define a construct and develop a conceptual model, (2) processing input from health care providers, scientists, and patients to develop items and response options, and (3) improving items based on the feedback from laypersons, test interviews, semi-structured cognitive interviews with patients, and forward and backward translation (ENG-NL). The B12 PROM includes 62 items grouped into 8 categories of symptoms related to vitamin B12 deficiency (General, Senses, Thinking, In limbs and/or face, Movement, Emotions, Mouth & Abdomen, Urinary tract & Reproductive organs). Cognitive interviews demonstrated good comprehensibility and comprehensiveness. This study is the first step in the development of a disease-specific PROM for vitamin B12 deficiency to measure the burden of symptoms. Further validation and reliability testing are necessary before the PROM can be applied in clinical practice and research.

PERFECTRA: a pragmatic, multicentre, real-life study comparing treat-to-target strategies with baricitinib versus TNF inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after failure on csDMARDs

ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of a strategy administering baricitinib versus one using TNF-inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) failure in a...

Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Hybrid Surgery in a Consecutive Series of Patients with Long-term Follow-up.

This was a retrospective study combined with attempted prospective patient contact to collect current data. The purpose of this study was to investigate long-term clinical outcome of patients undergoing lumbar hybrid surgery (total disc replacement (TDR) at one level and fusion at an adjacent level. Many patients with symptomatic lumbar disc degeneration are affected at more than one level. Lumbar TDR was introduced as a fusion alternative; however, some disc levels are not amenable to TDR and fusion is preferable at such levels. Hybrid surgery was introduced as an option to fusing multiple levels. A consecutive series of 305 patients undergoing lumbar hybrid surgery was identified beginning with the first case experience in 2005. Operative and clinical outcome data including visual analog scales (VAS) assessing back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and re-operations were collected. The mean follow-up duration was 67.1 months. There were statistically significant improvements (P<0.01) in the mean values of all three clinical outcome measures: VAS back pain scores improved from 6.7 to 3.3; leg pain improved from 4.3 to 2.0; and ODI scores improved from 45.5 to 24.6. There were no significant differences in pain and function scores for patients with minimum 10-year follow-up vs. those with shorter follow-up duration. Re-operation occurred in 16.1% of patients, many of which involved removal of posterior instrumentation at the fusion level (6.2% of study group, 38.8% of re-operations). Re-operation involving the TDR level occurred in 9 patients (2.9%), only 3 of which (1.0%) involved TDR removal/revision. This study supports that for many patients with multilevel symptomatic disc degeneration, hybrid surgery is a viable surgical option. Significant improvements were demonstrated in pain and function scores with no diminished improvement in scores among patients with more than 10-year follow-up.

American College of Rheumatology and Food and Drug Administration Summit: Summary of the Meeting, May 17-18, 2022.

The American College of Rheumatology and the US Food and Drug Administration co-sponsored a public meeting in May 2022 about challenges in the clinical development of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), focusing on innovative clinical trial designs, outcome measures, and data collection methods. Recommendations include early dose-ranging studies and use of active comparators. Challenges and opportunities in assessing long-term safety by leveraging real-world data from electronic health records (EHRs) and claims data are discussed, along with insights from European registries and the evolving role of real-world evidence and artificial intelligence in regulatory evaluations. Endpoints for assessing disease activity and outcome measures used in RA and PsA trials are explored, emphasizing challenges in defining remission, assessing clinical response, and evaluating structural progression. The need for outcome measures that better reflect treatment targets and the potential of advanced imaging in future trials are highlighted. Challenges with placebo-controlled trials in RA are discussed and use of non-inferiority clinical trial design, in which new drugs are evaluated with active comparators, is proposed. Pragmatic trials in RA and PsA, employing decentralized approaches, are highlighted for their real-world relevance and administrative efficiencies. Strategies for identifying at-risk populations for RA and the challenges of using EHRs and insurance claims data in drug development are discussed. Registry data and digital health technologies show promise in bridging the gap between clinical trials and real-world effectiveness.

RTMS of the Cerebellum Using an Accelerated Stimulation Protocol Improved Gait in Parkinson’s Disease

Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a nonpharmacological and noninvasive brain stimulation technique that has been proven to be effective in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The combination of rTMS and treadmill training improved gait function in PD greater than treadmill training alone. Objective The aim of our study was to evaluate the combination of a novel high-intensity, short intervention rTMS treatment and a multimodal treatment protocol including of physiotherapy, occupational therapy and language therapy, the so-called Parkinson’s Disease Multimodal Complex Treatment (PD-MCT), to improve motor function. Methods In this randomized double-blind sham-controlled trial rTMS with 48 Hz or sham was applied over the cerebellum 3 times a day for 5 consecutive days. Patients were assessed at baseline (V0), after 5 days of treatment (V1), and 4 weeks later (V2). The primary clinical outcome measure was the motor sum-score of the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRSIII), secondary clinical outcomes were quantitative motor tasks. Results A total of 36 PD patients were randomly allocated either to rTMS (n = 20) or sham (n = 16), both combined with PD-MCT. rTMS improved the UDPRSIII score comparing baseline and V1 in the treatment group by −8.2 points (P = .004). The 8MW and dynamic posturography remained unchanged in both groups after intervention. Conclusion. Compressing weeks of canonical rTMS protocols into 5 days was effective and well tolerated. rTMS may serve as an add-on therapy for augmenting the multimodal complex treatment of motor symptoms, but seems to be ineffective to treat postural instability.

Using the technology acceptance model to assess clinician perceptions and experiences with a rheumatoid arthritis outcomes dashboard: qualitative study

BackgroundImproving shared decision-making using a treat-to-target approach, including the use of clinical outcome measures, is important to providing high quality care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We developed an Electronic Health Record (EHR) integrated, patient-facing sidecar dashboard application that displays RA outcomes, medications, and lab results for use during clinical visits (“RA PRO dashboard”). The purpose of this study was to assess clinician perceptions and experiences using the dashboard in a university rheumatology clinic.MethodsWe conducted focus group (FG) discussions with clinicians who had access to the dashboard as part of a randomized, stepped-wedge pragmatic trial. FGs explored clinician perceptions towards the usability, acceptability, and usefulness of the dashboard. FG data were analyzed thematically using deductive and inductive techniques; generated themes were categorized into the domains of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).Results3 FG discussions were conducted with a total of 13 clinicians. Overall, clinicians were enthusiastic about the dashboard and expressed the usefulness of visualizing RA outcome trajectories in a graphical format for motivating patients, enhancing patient understanding of their RA outcomes, and improving communication about medications. Major themes that emerged from the FG analysis as barriers to using the dashboard included inconsistent collection of RA outcomes leading to sparse data in the dashboard and concerns about explaining RA outcomes, especially to patients with fibromyalgia. Other challenges included time constraints and technical difficulties refreshing the dashboard to display real-time data. Methods for integrating the dashboard into the visit varied: some clinicians used the dashboard at the beginning of the visit as they documented RA outcomes; others used it at the end to justify changes to therapy; and a few shared it only with stable patients.ConclusionsThe study provides valuable insights into clinicians’ perceptions and experiences with the RA PRO dashboard. The dashboard showed promise in enhancing patient-clinician communication, shared decision-making, and overall acceptance among clinicians. Addressing challenges related to data collection, education, and tailoring dashboard use to specific patient populations will be crucial for maximizing its potential impact on RA care. Further research and ongoing improvements in dashboard design and implementation are warranted to ensure its successful integration into routine clinical practice.

Quantitative muscle magnetic resonance imaging in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type R1 (LGMDR1): A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) type R1 (LGMDR1) is the most common subtype of LGMD in Europe. Prospective longitudinal data, including clinical assessments and new biomarkers such as quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI), are needed to evaluate the natural course of the disease and therapeutic options. We evaluated eight thigh and seven leg muscles of 13 LGMDR1 patients (seven females, mean age 36.7 years, body mass index 23.9 kg/m2) and 13 healthy age- and gender-matched controls in a prospective longitudinal design over 1 year. Clinical assessment included testing for muscle strength with quick motor function measure (QMFM), gait analysis and patient questionnaires (neuromuscular symptom score, activity limitation [ACTIVLIM]). MRI scans were performed on a 3-T MRI scanner, including a Dixon-based sequence, T2 mapping and diffusion tensor imaging. The qMRI values of fat fraction (FF), water T2 relaxation time (T2), fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity were analysed. Within the clinical outcome measures, significant deterioration between baseline and follow-up was found for ACTIVLIM (p= 0.029), QMFM (p= 0.012). Analysis of qMRI parameters of the patient group revealed differences between time points for both FF and T2 when analysing all muscles (FF: p< 0.001; T2: p= 0.016). The highest increase of fat replacement was found in muscles with an FF of between 10% and 50% at baseline. T2 in muscles with low-fat replacement increased significantly. No significant differences were found for the diffusion metrics. Significant correlations between qMRI metrics and clinical assessments were found at baseline and follow-up, while only T2 changes in thigh muscles correlated with changes in ACTIVLIM over time (ρ = -0.621, p< 0.05). Clinical assessments can show deterioration of the general condition of LGMDR1 patients. qMRI measures can give additional information about underlying pathophysiology. Further research is needed to establish qMRI outcome measures for clinical trials.

Restoration of normal central pain processing following manual therapy in nonspecific chronic neck pain.

To determine if a 4-week manual therapy treatment restores normal functioning of central pain processing mechanisms in non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP), as well as the existence of a possible relationship between changes in pain processing mechanisms and clinical outcome. Cohort study. Sixty-three patients with NSCNP, comprising 79% female, with a mean age of 45.8 years (standard deviation: 14.3), received four treatment sessions (once a week) of manual therapy including articular passive mobilizations, soft tissue mobilization and trigger point treatment. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and temporal summation of pain (TSP) were evaluated at baseline and after treatment completion. Therapy outcome was measured using the Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC), the Neck disability Index (NDI), intensity of pain during the last 24 hours, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Two sets of generalized linear mixed models with Gaussian response and the identity link were employed to evaluate the effect of the intervention on clinical, psychological and psychophysical measures and the association between psychophysical and clinical outcomes. Following treatment, an increased CPM response (Coefficient: 0.89; 95% credibility interval = 0.14 to 1.65; P = .99) and attenuated TSP (Coefficient: -0.63; 95% credibility interval = -0.82 to -0.43; P = 1.00) were found, along with amelioration of pain and improved clinical status. PPTs at trapezius muscle on the side of neck pain were increased after therapy (Coefficient: 0.22; 95% credibility interval = 0.03 to 0.42; P = .98), but not those on the contralateral trapezius and tibialis anterior muscles. Only minor associations were found between normalization of TSP/CPM and measures of clinical outcome. Clinical improvement after manual therapy is accompanied by restoration of CPM and TSP responses to normal levels in NSCNP patients. The existence of only minor associations between changes in central pain processing and clinical outcome suggests multiple mechanisms of action of manual therapy in NSCNP.

The Development of a European Multidisciplinary Cleft Lip and Palate Registry by the European Reference Network CRANIO: Experiences, Barriers, And Facilitators.

The European Reference Network for Rare Craniofacial Aanomalies and Ear-Nose-Throat disorders aims to improve care for patients with such afflictions, including cleft lip and palate (CL/P) across Europe. Cleft treatment remains varied throughout European centers, inhibiting meaningful comparison of treatment outcomes. To overcome these issues, a European-wide common CL/P dataset and registry was developed, facilitating standardized treatment endpoints and outcome measures for international comparison and benchmarking of CL/P centers. Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used to determine the set-up of the registry. Previous CL/P initiatives were analyzed to create an initial dataset, refined through consensus meetings. In total, 87 cleft specialists working in specialized CL/P centers from 16 European nations participated. Consensus on a common dataset was reached. A "Level 1" dataset, with mandatory clinical and patient-reported outcome measures, and "Level 2" dataset with additional outcome measures. Finally, 2 dashboards were developed for data dissemination. The development of the European CL/P common dataset and registry tackled challenges with resource disparities, variations in specialists within CL/P teams, regulatory differences in patient data usage, patient-reported outcome measures availability in European languages, and use of assessment tools. This study described the successful development of the European Reference Network for Rare Craniofacial Aanomalies and Ear-Nose-Throat disorders CL/P common dataset and registry. This achievement will help improve patient care and outcomes for patients with CL/P in Europe. Furthermore, this study provides useful information for initiatives with similar aims.

TWO-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF 334 THIRD-GENERATION MINIMALLY INVASIVE CHEVRON AKIN OSTEOTOMIES (MICA) IN HALLUX VALGUS SURGERY

BackgroundThere are many different procedures described for the correction of hallux valgus deformity. Minimally invasive surgery has become increasingly popular, with clinical and radiological outcomes comparable to traditional open osteotomy approaches. There is increasing interest in hallux valgus deformity correction using third-generation minimally invasive chevron akin osteotomy (MICA) technique.ObjectiveTo assess the radiographic correction and 2 year clinical outcomes of third-generation MICA using validated outcome measures.MethodsThis is a prospective single-surgeon case series of 420 consecutive feet undergoing MICA surgery between July 2014 and November 2018. Primary clinical outcome measures included the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), EQ-5D, and the Visual Analogue Pain Scale. Secondary outcome measures included radiographic parameters, and complication rates.ResultsPre-operative and 2 year post-operative patient reported outcomes were collected for 334 feet (79.5%). At minimum 2 year follow-up, the MOXFQ scores (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) had improved for each domain: pain; pre-operative 43.9±21.0 reduced to 9.1±15.6 post-operatively (p&lt;0.001), walking and standing; pre-operative 38.2±23.6 reduced to 6.5±14.5 post-operatively (p&lt;0.001) and social interaction; pre-operative 47.6±22.1, reduced to 6.5±13.5 post-operatively (p&lt;0.001). At 2 year follow-up, the VAS Pain score (mean ± SD) improved from a pre-operative of 31.3±22.4 to 8.3±16.2 post-operatively (p&lt;0.001). 1–2 intermetatarsal angle (mean ± SD) reduced from 15.4°±3.5° to 5.8°±3.1° (p&lt;0.001) and hallux valgus angle reduced from 33.1°±10.2° to 9.0°±5.0° post-operatively (p&lt;0.001).ConclusionThird-generation MICA showed significant improvement in clinical outcomes at 2 year follow-up and can be successfully used for correction of a wide range of hallux valgus deformities.

Demographic, pain, and quality of life factors in unilateral and bilateral total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundThe Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute (ABJHI) has a comprehensive registry capturing clinical, demographic, and patient-reported outcome measures on all knee arthroplasties performed in the province of Alberta, Canada. This large database provides an opportunity to study the outcomes of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) in patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral procedures. MethodsPain and quality of life outcomes of 29,157 TKAs performed in 23,033 patients for knee osteoarthritis performed in Alberta, Canada from January 2013 to February 2020 were examined. This study: (1) investigates whether having both knees replaced results in better pain and quality of life outcomes than replacing only one knee (using multivariate analysis of variance) and (2) identifies if pain and quality of life outcomes impact the likelihood of needing surgery in the contralateral knee after a first TKA (using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using questionnaires: the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) to assess knee pain, and the EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D) to assess quality of life. ResultsPatients who had surgery on both knees had approximately 5% better WOMAC (pain) and EQ-5D (quality of life) questionnaire scores 12 months post-surgery than those who had surgery on only one knee. Additionally, for every 1-point higher pre-operative WOMAC pain score (i.e., less pain) there was a 1% decreased likelihood of undergoing a contralateral TKA compared to a 46% decreased likelihood per 1-point improvement in quality of life. Dementia, back pain, and hospital readmission were associated with a 68%, 17%, and 44% decreased likelihood of contralateral TKA respectively. By contrast, patients with obesity were 36% more likely to undergo bilateral TKA (p &lt; 0.05). ConclusionsPreoperative knee pain and quality of life play a statistically significant role in determining which patients undergo bilateral TKA. Additionally, bilateral TKA resulted in better patient-reported outcomes compared to unilateral TKA. Though clinical significance cannot be drawn from the low response rates for the patient-reported outcomes, these findings provide a basis for future research on patient-reported outcomes within the Canadian healthcare system.

The use of accelerometer bracelets to evaluate arm motor function over a stroke rehabilitation period – an explorative observational study

BackgroundAssessments of arm motor function are usually based on clinical examinations or self-reported rating scales. Wrist-worn accelerometers can be a good complement to measure movement patterns after stroke. Currently there is limited knowledge of how accelerometry correlate to clinically used scales. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the relationship between intermittent measurements of wrist-worn accelerometers and the patient’s progression of arm motor function assessed by routine clinical outcome measures during a rehabilitation period.MethodsPatients enrolled in in-hospital rehabilitation following a stroke were invited. Included patients were asked to wear wrist accelerometers for 24 h at the start (T1) and end (T2) of their rehabilitation period. On both occasions arm motor function was assessed by the modified Motor Assessment Scale (M_MAS) and the Motor Activity Log (MAL). The recorded accelerometry was compared to M_MAS and MAL.Results20 patients were included, of which 18 completed all measurements and were therefore included in the final analysis. The resulting Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient showed a strong positive correlation between measured wrist acceleration in the affected arm and M-MAS and MAL values at T1, 0.94 (p < 0.05) for M_MAS and 0.74 (p < 0.05) for the MAL values, and a slightly weaker positive correlation at T2, 0.57 (p < 0.05) for M_MAS and 0.46 − 0.45 (p = 0.06) for the MAL values. However, no correlation was seen for the difference between the two sessions.ConclusionsThe results confirm that the wrist acceleration can differentiate between the affected and non-affected arm, and that there is a positive correlation between accelerometry and clinical measures. Many of the patients did not change their M-MAS or MAL scores during the rehabilitation period, which may explain why no correlation was seen for the difference between measurements during the rehabilitation period. Further studies should include continuous accelerometry throughout the rehabilitation period to reduce the impact of day-to-day variability.

Matched vs Nonmatched Placebos in a Randomized Trial of COVID-19 Treatments

Matched placebo interventions are complex and resource intensive. Recent evidence suggests matched placebos may not always be necessary. Previous studies have predominantly evaluated potential bias of nonmatched placebos (ie, differing on dose, frequency of administration, or formulation) in pain and mental health, but to date no systematic examination has been conducted in infectious disease. To test for differences between nonmatched and matched placebo arms with respect to clinical outcome measures across multiple therapeutics for COVID-19. In a comparative effectiveness research study, a post hoc analysis was conducted of data on individual patients enrolled in a large, multiarm, platform randomized clinical trial in symptomatic adult outpatients with COVID-19 between January 15, 2021, to September 28, 2023, in which the outcomes of both matched and nonmatched placebo groups were reported. Bayesian and frequentist covariate-adjusted techniques were compared with 7 intervention-placebo pairs. Seven matched and nonmatched placebo pairs (for a total of 7 comparisons) were evaluated throughout the primary platform trial. Comparisons were made between treatment and its associated matched (concurrent) placebo, as well as with nonmatched placebo (alone and in combination) assessed at a similar time point. Outcomes assessed included hospitalizations, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-level scores, and PROMIS Global-10 scores. A total of 7 intervention-control pairs (N = 2684) were assessed, including 1620 (60.4%) women, with mean (SD) age, 47 (15.2) years; the most common comorbidities were obesity (41.9%) and hypertension (37.9%). In a meta-analysis with decoupled SEs, accounting for overlapping placebo patients, the overall odds ratio (OR) of nonmatched compared with matched placebo was 1.01 (95% credible interval, 0.77-1.32), with posterior probability of equivalence, defined as 0.8 ≤ OR ≤ 1.2 (a deviation from perfect equivalence ie, OR = 1, by no more than 0.2) of 85.4%, implying no significant difference. Unadjusted analysis of the event rate difference between all nonmatched and matched placebo groups did not identify any notable differences across all 7 treatment-placebo combinations assessed. Similar analysis that was conducted for patient-reported quality of life outcomes did not yield statistically significant differences. In this post hoc study of a randomized clinical platform trial, pooling matched and nonmatched placebo patient data did not lead to inconsistencies in treatment effect estimation for any of the investigational drugs. These findings may have significant implications for future platform trials, as the use of nonmatched placebo may improve statistical power, or reduce barriers to placebo implementation.

Injection therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Various injectants are available for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different injection therapies in alleviating the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Various databases were searched for relevant studies from inception until May 10, 2023. Eligible studies were identified using the patient (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), and outcomes (O) model, which involved (P) participants with carpal tunnel syndrome, (I) an intervention based on injection therapy, (C) the use of placebo or another injectant as a control treatment, and (O) the measurement of clinical and electrodiagnostic outcomes of interest. A total of 18 studies were included in the analysis. The network meta-analysis revealed that platelet-rich plasma is effective in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome in terms of symptom and pain relief and functional improvement in both the short and long term, whereas steroids are effective only in the short term. Additionally, injections of dextrose solution may offer long-term pain relief as well as short- and long-term symptom alleviation and functional improvement. The study findings suggest that platelet-rich plasma should be used as the first-line treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, with dextrose and steroids serving as alternative treatment options.

Comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, and open surgery for lateral lymph-node dissection for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.

This study attempted to compare short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery (LS), robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RS), and open surgery (OS) for lateral lymph-node dissection (LLND) in treatment of rectal cancer through network meta-analysis.Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library databases were searched to collect cohort studies on outcomes of LS, RS, and OS for LLND for rectal cancer. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was utilized to evaluate the quality of cohort studies. Primary outcomes should at least include one of the following clinical outcome measures: operative time, blood loss, total lymph-node harvest, positive resection margin rate, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. A network meta-analysis was conducted using STATA software.Fourteen cohort studies including 8612 patients were eligible for inclusion. The network meta-analysis results showed that, in terms of intraoperative outcomes, the RS group had the longest operative time, while the OS group had the shortest; the LS and RS groups had significantly less blood loss than the OS group. In terms of histological outcomes, there were no significant differences in the total number of lymph nodes harvested and the positive margin rate among the LS, RS, and OS groups (P > 0.05). Regarding postoperative outcomes, the OS group had the highest probability of postoperative complications and the longest hospital stay, followed by the LS group, with the RS group being the lowest.RS was the best method in blood loss, postoperative complication rate, and postoperative hospital stay, followed by LS. OS had the shortest operative time and the highest blood loss.