Clinical Outcomes Of COVID-19 Research Articles

Association of serum ferritin with severity and clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients: An observational study in a tertiary healthcare facility

BackgroundFerritin, an intracellular protein, has a pivotal role in immune dysregulation. Hyperferritinemia has been associated with higher disease severity and adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19, including mortality. We aimed to study the association of serum ferritin levels with disease severity and clinical outcomes and its severity prediction potential in COVID-19 patients. MethodsThis retrospective study included 870 adult patients with symptomatic COVID-19 infection hospitalized between July 1, 2020 to December 21, 2020. All the patients had a positive polymerase chain reaction test result of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). ResultsThe median age was 55 (IQR:40, 65) years with a male predominance [66.32% (n = 577)], among 870 COVID-19. Of these, 413 (47.47%) had mild COVID-19, and 457 (52.53%) had moderate plus severe COVID-19 disease. Median ferritin levels were significantly high in moderate to severe COVID-19 infection compared to mild [545.8 (326.0, 1046.0) vs 97.3 (52.65–155.5) (p = 0.001)], and in patients who developed a complication compared to without complications [380 (177.05, 863.15) vs 290 (110.9, 635) (p = 0.002). A slight elevation in median ferritin levels was observed in patients who had an ICU stay than non-ICU [326 (129.8, 655) vs 309 (119.1, 684) (p = 0.872)]. The cut-off for ferritin was identified at >287.4 ng/ml for mild versus moderate plus severe COVID-19 infections. ConclusionModerate to severe COVID-19 patients have elevated ferritin levels. Patients with more than 287.4 ng/ml ferritin value would have greater chances of developing moderate to severe COVID-19 infections.

COPD, diabetes, lymphopenia, and increased LDH cause higher mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

COPD, diabetes, lymphopenia, and increased LDH cause higher mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Targeting neutrophils extracellular traps (NETs) reduces multiple organ injury in a COVID-19 mouse model

BackgroundCOVID-19 is characterized by severe acute lung injury, which is associated with neutrophil infiltration and the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). COVID-19 treatment options are scarce. Previous work has shown an increase in NETs release in the lung and plasma of COVID-19 patients suggesting that drugs that prevent NETs formation or release could be potential therapeutic approaches for COVID-19 treatment.MethodsHere, we report the efficacy of NET-degrading DNase I treatment in a murine model of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2-infected K18-hACE2 mice were performed for clinical sickness scores and lung pathology. Moreover, the levels of NETs were assessed and lung injuries were by histopathology and TUNEL assay. Finally, the injury in the heart and kidney was assessed by histopathology and biochemical-specific markers.ResultsDNase I decreased detectable levels of NETs, improved clinical disease, and reduced lung, heart, and kidney injuries in SARS-CoV-2-infected K18-hACE2 mice. Furthermore, our findings indicate a potentially deleterious role for NETs lung tissue in vivo and lung epithelial (A549) cells in vitro, which might explain part of the pathophysiology of severe COVID-19. This deleterious effect was diminished by the treatment with DNase I.ConclusionsTogether, our results support the role of NETs in COVID-19 immunopathology and highlight NETs disruption pharmacological approaches as a potential strategy to ameliorate COVID-19 clinical outcomes.

Ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation, intensive care admission, and death: a global systematic review and meta-analysis of over 200 million study participants.

COVID-19 has exacerbated existing ethnic inequalities in health. Little is known about whether inequalities in severe disease and deaths, observed globally among minoritised ethnic groups, relates to greater infection risk, poorer prognosis, or both. We analysed global data on COVID-19 clinical outcomes examining inequalities between people from minoritised ethnic groups compared to the ethnic majority group. Databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library) were searched from 1st December 2019 to 3rd October 2022, for studies reporting original clinical data for COVID-19 outcomes disaggregated by ethnicity: infection, hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality. We assessed inequalities in incidence and prognosis using random-effects meta-analyses, with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) use to assess certainty of findings. Meta-regressions explored the impact of region and time-frame (vaccine roll-out) on heterogeneity. PROSPERO: CRD42021284981. 77 studies comprising over 200,000,000 participants were included. Compared with White majority populations, we observed an increased risk of testing positive for infection for people from Black (adjusted Risk Ratio [aRR]:1.78, 95% CI:1.59-1.99, I2=99.1), South Asian (aRR:3.00, 95% CI:1.59-5.66, I2=99.1), Mixed (aRR:1.64, 95% CI:1.02-1.67, I2=93.2) and Other ethnic groups (aRR:1.36, 95% CI:1.01-1.82, I2=85.6). Black, Hispanic, and South Asian people were more likely to be seropositive. Among population-based studies, Black and Hispanic ethnic groups and Indigenous peoples had an increased risk of hospitalisation; Black, Hispanic, South Asian, East Asian and Mixed ethnic groups and Indigenous peoples had an increased risk of ICU admission. Mortality risk was increased for Hispanic, Mixed, and Indigenous groups. Smaller differences were seen for prognosis following infection. Following hospitalisation, South Asian, East Asian, Black and Mixed ethnic groups had an increased risk of ICU admission, and mortality risk was greater in Mixed ethnic groups. Certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Our study suggests that systematic ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 health outcomes exist, with large differences in exposure risk and some differences in prognosis following hospitalisation. Response and recovery interventions must focus on tackling drivers of ethnic inequalities which increase exposure risk and vulnerabilities to severe disease, including structural racism and racial discrimination. ESRC:ES/W000849/1.

COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause inflammatory and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that might worsen the course of COVID-19. We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022307545) to evaluate the clinical course and complications of COVID-19 in patients with cancer receiving ICI. We searched Medline and Embase through January 5, 2022. We included studies evaluating patients with cancer who received ICI and developed COVID-19. Outcomes included mortality, severe COVID-19, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital admissions, irAEs, and serious adverse events. We pooled data with random effects meta-analysis. Twenty-five studies met study eligibility (n = 36,532 patients: 15,497 had COVID-19 and 3220 received ICI). Most studies (71.4%) had a high risk of comparability bias. There were no significant differences in mortality (relative risk [RR] 1.29; 95% CI 0.62-2.69), ICU admission (RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.71-2.00), and hospital admission (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.79-1.06) when comparing patients treated with ICI with patients without cancer treatment. When pooling adjusted odds ratios (ORs), no statistically significant differences were observed in mortality (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.57-1.60), severe COVID-19 (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.45-2.46), or hospital admission (OR 2.02; 95% CI 0.96-4.27), when comparing patients treated with ICIs versus patients with cancer without ICI therapy. No significant differences were observed when comparing clinical outcomes in patients receiving ICIs versus patients receiving any of the other anticancer therapies. Although current evidence is limited, COVID-19 clinical outcomes of patients with cancer receiving ICI therapy appear to be similar to those not receiving oncologic treatment or other cancer therapies.

Circulating Interleukin-8 Dynamics Parallels Disease Course and Is Linked to Clinical Outcomes in Severe COVID-19.

Severe COVID-19 frequently features a systemic deluge of cytokines. Circulating cytokines that can stratify risks are useful for more effective triage and management. Here, we ran a machine-learning algorithm on a dataset of 36 plasma cytokines in a cohort of severe COVID-19 to identify cytokine/s useful for describing the dynamic clinical state in multiple regression analysis. We performed RNA-sequencing of circulating blood cells collected at different time-points. From a Bayesian Information Criterion analysis, a combination of interleukin-8 (IL-8), Eotaxin, and Interferon-γ (IFNγ) was found to be significantly linked to blood oxygenation over seven days. Individually testing the cytokines in receiver operator characteristics analyses identified IL-8 as a strong stratifier for clinical outcomes. Circulating IL-8 dynamics paralleled disease course. We also revealed key transitions in immune transcriptome in patients stratified for circulating IL-8 at three time-points. The study identifies plasma IL-8 as a key pathogenic cytokine linking systemic hyper-inflammation to the clinical outcomes in COVID-19.

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and methotrexate are associated with decreased COVID-19-related hospitalization: Follow up of “Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients taking tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and methotrexate”

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and methotrexate are associated with decreased COVID-19-related hospitalization: Follow up of “Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients taking tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and methotrexate”

COVID-19 and Acute Ischemic Stroke Mortality and Clinical Outcomes among Hospitalized Patients in the United States: Insight from National Inpatient Sample.

Coronavirus-19, primarily a respiratory virus, also affects the nervous system. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a well-known complication among COVID-19 infections, but large-scale studies evaluating AIS outcomes related to COVID-19 infection remain limited. We used the National Inpatient Sample database to compare acute ischemic stroke patients with and without COVID-19. A total of 329,240 patients were included in the study: acute ischemic stroke with COVID-19 (n = 6665, 2.0%) and acute ischemic stroke without COVID-19 (n = 322,575, 98.0%). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, mechanical thrombectomy, thrombolysis, seizure, acute venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, septic shock, acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, length of stay, mean total hospitalization charge, and disposition. Acute ischemic stroke patients who were COVID-19-positive had significantly increased in-hospital mortality compared to acute ischemic stroke patients without COVID-19 (16.9% vs. 4.1%, aOR: 2.5 [95% CI 1.7-3.6], p < 0.001). This cohort also had significantly increased mechanical ventilation use, acute venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, septic shock, acute kidney injury, length of stay, and mean total hospitalization charge. Further research regarding vaccination and therapies will be vital in reducing worse outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19.

An elevated HScore is associated with poor clinical outcomes in COVID-19.

Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) frequently experience a hyperinflammatory syndrome leading to unfavorable outcomes. This condition resembles Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) described in neoplastic, rheumatic and other infectious diseases. A scoring system (HScore) that evaluates underlying immunosuppression, temperature, organomegaly, cytopenias, ferritin, triglycerides, fibrinogen and AST was validated for sHLH, and recently proposed to evaluate hyperinflammation in COVID-19. To assess the presence of sHLH among patients with COVID-19 admitted for hospitalization and to evaluate Hscore as a prognostic tool for poor outcomes. One hundred forty-three patients aged 21-100 years (64% males) admitted because of COVID-19 were enrolled in a prospective study. HScore was calculated within 72 hours admission. The incidence of sHLH during hospitalization was evaluated. Additionally, the relationship between a HScore ≥ 130 points and either the requirement of mechanical ventilation or 60-days mortality was explored. The median HScore was 96 (33-169). A SHLH was diagnosed in one patient (incidence 0.7%), whose HScore was 169. After adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities and obesity, HScore ≥ 130 was independently associated with the composite clinical outcome (Hazard rartio 2.13, p = 0.022). sHLH is not frequent among COVID-19 patients. HScore can be useful to predict the risk for poor outcomes.

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Semi-Quantitative Levels Is Important In The Management Of COVID-19 Vaccinations In Immunodeficiency Disorder Patients.

The efficacy and durability of SARS-CoV-2 immunological antibody response in Immunodeficiency Disorder (ID) patients (including Primary Immunodeficiency) can be utilized in their clinical management to avoid COVID-19 infection. We correlated SARS-CoV-2 antibody semi-quantitative test results with ID patients’ COVID-19 vaccinations, their timing, IVIG infusions, and clinical outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Ensovibep for Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19.

LettersFebruary 2023Efficacy and Safety of Ensovibep for Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19FREETeluguakula Narasaraju, PhD, Amita Krishnappa, MD, Marko Radic, PhD, Vincent T.K. Chow, MD, PhDTeluguakula Narasaraju, PhDAdichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Karnataka, IndiaSearch for more papers by this author, Amita Krishnappa, MDAdichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Karnataka, IndiaSearch for more papers by this author, Marko Radic, PhDUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TennesseeSearch for more papers by this author, Vincent T.K. Chow, MD, PhDNational University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, SingaporeSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/L22-0455 SectionsAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail TO THE EDITOR: The ACTIV-3/TICO (Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines/Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19) Study Group (1) analyzed the efficacy and safety of ensovibep. This designed ankyrin repeat protein inhibits the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with its host receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This randomized controlled trial was a follow-up of earlier studies that showed antiviral activity of ensovibep in a hamster model of COVID-19 as well as reduced hospitalizations and improved clinical outcomes in outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19. In contrast to those findings, the ACTIV-3/TICO Study Group showed that administration of ensovibep in severely ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 did not exhibit any protection. This trial was prematurely discontinued because it failed early futility assessment and could not establish the power of the primary outcome in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The study design has several shortcomings.First, this trial failed to establish the proof of concept of antiviral efficacy of ensovibep.Second, randomly assigning and blinding participants provide an unbiased approach; however, the 7 ordinal pulmonary or pulmonary-plus outcome scales used are unlikely to provide any direct correlation or clinical signatures specific for ensovibep-mediated effects, including lung viral loads or virus-inflicted alveolar–epithelial cytopathic injury.Third, combining remdesivir with ensovibep in the treatment regimen is unlikely to establish any beneficial effects.Finally, the lack of realistic data on viral replication and kinetics at the onset of treatment raises questions about the rationale for this clinical trial. Several clinical trials that evaluated combinations of monoclonal antibodies (for example, tixagevimab–cilgavimab or sotrovimab and BRII-196 plus BRII-198) in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 on the basis of ordinal outcome scales similarly yielded inconsistent findings and fell short of proving their efficacy in these patients (2, 3).When drugs targeting virus entry or replication in the lungs are evaluated, the inclusion of additional criteria to support the proof of concept is essential. Viral titers in nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal samples unfortunately do not correlate well with viral loads in the deeper lungs, and use of invasive methods to collect lung samples may not be possible in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Instead, measuring plasma viral RNA may be a better indicator to determine the antiviral effects of ensovibep or monoclonal antibodies in these patients (4). In addition, markers of alveolar epithelial injury such as podoplanin (a marker of alveolar type I epithelium) and surfactant protein C (a marker of alveolar type II epithelium) (5) in the plasma or sputum may represent virus-inflicted alveolitis in the lungs. As such, evaluating COVID-19 pathophysiology and clinical outcomes on ordinal outcome scales must be substantiated by more prudent methods that are relevant to drug target–specific signatures.

Maré cohort-profile: a prospective cohort study based in a socially vulnerable community during the COVID-19 pandemic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Background: Socially vulnerable populations were vastly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic significantly impacted Brazil, pressuring its healthcare system for several months, with high mortality rates, even among the youngest population. Cohort studies combining disease surveillance are essential for understanding virus circulation in the community, surrogates of protection, vaccine effectiveness, and demand for health resources. Methods: Here, we present the protocol for a community-based prospective cohort study in the largest complex of favelas (slums) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Complexo da Maré). The study participants are residents initially recruited during a massive vaccination campaign in the community. Five waves of data collection at approximately six-month intervals were planned. The first two waves have been completed at the time of writing this study protocol, and the third is underway. The protocol comprises interviews, blood sampling, and records linkage with secondary data to enrich the profiles of cohort participants and community information. We will describe COVID-19 seroprevalence, socio-demographic characteristics, and the burden of COVID-19, followed by estimating the association of socioeconomic factors and the burden of disease with seroprevalence. Discussion: The primary aims of the study are to assess COVID-19 clinical, epidemiological and genomic profiles and outcomes in residents from Maré, including vaccine effectiveness, surrogates of immune protection, virus transmission in households, and the overall burden of the pandemic.

Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis in COVID-19 clinical characteristics and outcomes: A single-center experience

The aim of this work was to perform a comparative analysis of the prevalence and clinical and laboratory features of the course of COVID-19 infection in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT).&#x0D; Methods. A retrospective analysis of 73 medical records of patients undergoing KRT and infected COVID-19 between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 54 hemodialysis (HD) patients, and the second group included 19 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Routine clinical and laboratory characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19 depending on KRT modality were analysed.&#x0D; Results. The overall prevalence of COVID-19 was 37.63%. Mortality in this cohort of patients was 19.07%, and mortality associated with COVID-19 was 6.19%. Despite the predominance of COVID-19-associated morbidity in HD patients (46.55% vs. 24.36%, p = 0.05), mortality was not statistically significantly different between the studied groups (26.32% in PD patients vs. 12.96% in HD patients, p = 0.17).&#x0D; HD patients had more severe lung injury as measured by SpO2 (p=0.18) and CT (p=0.003), while PD patients had lower hemoglobin (p=0.001), platelet (p=0.001), total protein (p&lt;0.001), and albumin (p&lt;0.001) levels.&#x0D; A direct correlation was found between the percentage of lung injury according to the CT data and the leukocyte count in both the HD (r = 0.24) and PD (r = 0.56) groups. In addition, an inverse correlation between leukocyte and SpO2 values and between the percentage of lung injury according to the CT data and SpO2 indicators was found in the HD (r = -0.51 and r = -0.66) and PD (r = -0.47 and r = -0.63) groups, respectively.&#x0D; Conclusions. The results of our study are in complete agreement with published data and show the same COVID-19-associated mortality in HD and PD patients, with a statistically significantly higher prevalence of COVID-19 in HD patients. The course of COVID-19 in HD patients is characterized by more severe lung injury compared to PD patients, while PD patients had more pronounced anemia and significantly lower platelet, total protein, and blood albumin concentrations.

A Pilot Study of Application of the Stroke Riskometer Mobile App for Assessment of the Course and Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 among Hospitalized Patients

Introduction: Early determination of COVID-19 severity and health outcomes could facilitate better treatment of patients. Different methods and tools have been developed for predicting outcomes of COVID-19, but they are difficult to use in routine clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of inpatients aged 20–92 years, diagnosed with COVID-19 to determine whether their individual 5-year absolute risk of stroke at the time of hospital admission predicts the course of COVID-19 severity and mortality. The risk of stroke was determined by the Stroke Riskometer mobile application. Results: We examined 385 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (median age 61 years). The participants were categorized based on COVID-19 severity: 271 (70.4%) to the “not severe” and 114 (29.6%) to the “severe” groups. The median risk of stroke the next day after hospitalization was significantly higher among patients in the severe group (2.83, 95% CI: 2.35–4.68) versus the not severe group (1.11, 95% CI: 1.00–1.29). The median risk of stroke and median systolic blood pressure (SBP) were significantly higher among non-survivors (12.04, 95% CI: 2.73–21.19) and (150, 95% CI: 140–170) versus survivors (1.31, 95% CI: 1.14–1.52) and (134, 95% CI: 130–135), respectively. Those who spent more than 2.5 h a week on physical activity were 3.1 times more likely to survive from COVID-19. Those who consumed more than one standard alcohol drink a day, or suffered with atrial fibrillation, or had poor memory were 2.5, 2.3, and 2.6 times more likely not to survive from COVID-19, respectively. Conclusions: High risk of stroke, physical inactivity, alcohol intake, high SBP, and atrial fibrillation are associated with severity and mortality of COVID-19. Our findings suggest that the Stroke Riskometer app could be used as a simple predictive tool of COVID-19 severity and mortality.

COVID-19 clinical outcomes by patient disability status: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundPeople with disabilities might experience worse clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but evidence is limited. ObjectiveTo investigate if people with disabilities requiring assistance are more likely to experience severe COVID-19 or death. MethodsData from the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Precision Medicine Analytics Platform Registry (JH-CROWN) included 6494 adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted between March 4, 2020–October 29, 2021. Severe COVID-19 and death were defined using the occurrence and timing of clinical events. Assistive needs due to disabilities were reported by patients or their proxies upon admission. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations between disability status and severe COVID-19 or death. Primary models adjusted for demographics and secondary models additionally adjusted for clinical covariates. ResultsIn this clinical cohort (47–73 years, 49% female, 39% Black), patients with disabilities requiring assistance had 1.35 times (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.01, 1.81) the hazard of severe COVID-19 among patients <65 years, but not among those ≥65 years, equating to an additional 17.5 severe COVID-19 cases (95% CI:7.7, 28.2) per 100 patients. A lower risk of mortality was found among patients <65 years, but this finding was not robust due to the small number of deaths. ConclusionsPeople with disabilities requiring assistance aged <65 years are more likely to develop severe COVID-19. Although our study is limited by using a medical model of disability, these analyses intend to further our understanding of COVID-19 outcomes among people with disabilities. Also, standardized disability data collection within electronic health records is needed.

BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination elicited protective robust immune responses in pediatric patients with inborn errors of metabolism.

SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to a life-threatening acute metabolic decompensation in children with inborn errors of metabolism (IEM), so vaccination is mandatory. However, IEMs can also impair innate or adaptive immunity, and the impact of these immune system alterations on immunogenicity and vaccine efficacy is still unknown. Here, we investigated humoral immune responses to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and clinical outcomes in pediatric IEM patients. Fifteen patients between 12-18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of IEM, and received BNT162b2 were enrolled to the study. Patients with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG concentration >50 AU/mL before vaccination were defined as "COVID-19 recovered" whereas patients with undetectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG concentration were defined as "COVID-19 naïve". Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers were measured to assess humoral immune response. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers and nAb IH% increased significantly after the first dose. The increase in antibody titers after first and second vaccination remained significant in COVID-19 naïve patients. Complete anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity and nAb IH% positivity was observed in all patients after the second dose. Vaccination appears to be clinically effective in IEM patients, as none of the patients had COVID-19 infection within six months of the last vaccination. Humoral immune response after two doses of BNT162b2 in pediatric IEM patients was adequate and the immune response was not different from that of healthy individuals.

Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with chronic diseases.

This study was carried out to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients having chronic diseases (CD) and COVID-19 infection. The study was carried out retrospectively by including 1.516 patients with CDs who applied to two education and research hospitals between June 01, 2021, and August 01, 2021, and were diagnosed with COVID-19. As CDs; cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, rheumatological diseases, malignancy, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic kidney diseases (CKD) were screened and evaluated statistically. A total of 1.516 patients with a mean age of 58.05±18.51 years were included in the study. It has been observed that 68.9% of COVID-19 patients have at least one CD. Women were more tend to have CDs than men (73.8% vs. 64.8%). Patients with a history of CD were significantly older and had a longer hospital stay than those without. Patients with CDs were 5.49 times more likely to be hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) and their death rate was 2.52 times higher than the other patients. After the regression analysis, while hypertension (HT) (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.39), DM (OR: 3.64), and any type of cancer (OR: 2.75) were seen as independent risk factors in hospitalizations in the ICU, cardiovascular diseases (OR: 2.27), CKD (OR: 3.69) and psychiatric disorders (OR: 2.18) were seen as independent risk factors associated with mortality. The follow-up of COVID-19 patients with CDs should be done more cautiously than others. It should be kept in mind that patients with HT, DM, and cancer may need intensive care at any time of hospitalization, while those with cerebrovascular disease, CKD, and psychiatric problems may have a higher mortality rate than other patients.

A multisite exploration of the association between critical care implementation factors and clinical outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Little is known about strategies to implement new critical care practices in response to COVID-19. Moreover, the association between differing implementation climates and COVID-19 clinical outcomes has not been examined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between implementation determinants and COVID-19 mortality rates. We used mixed methods guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with critical care leaders and analyzed to rate the influence of CFIR constructs on the implementation of new care practices. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons of CFIR construct ratings were performed between hospital groups with low- versus high-mortality rates. We found associations between various implementation factors and clinical outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Three CFIR constructs (implementation climate, leadership engagement, and engaging staff) had both qualitative and statistically significant quantitative correlations with mortality outcomes. An implementation climate governed by a trial-and-error approach was correlated with high COVID-19 mortality, while leadership engagement and engaging staff were correlated with low mortality. Another three constructs (needs of patient; organizational incentives and rewards; and engaging implementation leaders) were qualitatively different across mortality outcome groups, but these differences were not statistically significant. Improving clinical outcomes during future public health emergencies will require reducing identified barriers associated with high mortality and harnessing salient facilitators associated with low mortality. Our findings suggest that collaborative and engaged leadership styles that promote the integration of new yet evidence-based critical care practices best support COVID-19 patients and contribute to lower mortality.

P357: Replication of genetic variation associated with COVID-19 clinical outcomes: The GENCOV Prospective Cohort Study

P357: Replication of genetic variation associated with COVID-19 clinical outcomes: The GENCOV Prospective Cohort Study

COVID-19: perfil de trabalhadores brasileiros em uma companhia de mineração e a dinâmica dos casos comunitários

Abstract Objective: to describe the COVID-19 clinical outcomes profile from mining workers and the cases dynamic within the mining units and their respective municipalities. Methods: a cohort and ecological study using workers clinical-epidemiological, sociodemographic, and occupational secondary data of a multinational mining company, and of COVID-19 cases from five municipalities where the mining units were located, in Brazil, between March 2020 to April 2021. We calculated the cases cumulative incidence and the 7-day moving average (MA), and compared at the mining unit and respective municipality. Results: the study included 17,523 workers, 88.4% male, and 22.6% had at least one positive result for COVID-19. The workers most tested, with positive results, placed in quarantine, and with symptoms were female, middle-aged, living and working in Rio de Janeiro state, directly hired by the mining company, in shift-work, and in high-risk occupations. All mining units presented a cumulative incidence higher than their respective municipalities. Three municipalities showed peaks of COVID-19 with MA cases coinciding with an increase in cases among mining workers. Conclusion: approximately one-fifth of workers were diagnosed with COVID-19. The mining units had a similar temporal distribution of COVID-19 cases to the municipalities where they were located.