Clinical Isolates Of Mycobacterium Avium Complex Research Articles

Minimum inhibitory concentrations of azithromycin in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium complex in Japan.

The latest guidelines include azithromycin as a preferred regimen for treating Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease. However, serially collected susceptibility data on clinical MAC isolates are limited, and no breakpoints have been determined. We investigated the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of azithromycin and clarithromycin for all MAC strains isolated in 2021 from a single center in Japan, excluding duplicates. The MICs were determined using a panel based on the microbroth dilution method, according to the latest Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations. The MICs were determined for 318 MAC strains. Although there was a significant positive correlation between the MICs of azithromycin and clarithromycin, the MICs of azithromycin tended to be higher than those of clarithromycin. Among the cases in which the strains were isolated, 18 patients initiated treatment, including azithromycin treatment, after sample collection. Some patients infected with stains with relatively high azithromycin MICs achieved a microbiological cure with azithromycin-containing regimens. This study revealed a higher MIC distribution for azithromycin than clarithromycin, raising questions about the current practice of estimating azithromycin susceptibility based on the clarithromycin susceptibility test result. However, this was a single-center study that included only a limited number of cases treated with azithromycin. Therefore, further multicenter studies that include a greater number of cases treated with azithromycin are warranted to verify the distribution of azithromycin MICs and examine the correlation between azithromycin MICs and treatment effectiveness.IMPORTANCEThe macrolides serve as key drugs in the treatment of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex infection, and the administration of macrolide should be guided by susceptibility test results. Azithromycin is recommended as a preferred choice among macrolides, surpassing clarithromycin; however, drug susceptibility testing is often not conducted, and clarithromycin susceptibility is used as a surrogate. This study represents the first investigation into the minimum inhibitory concentration of azithromycin on a scale of several hundred clinical isolates, revealing an overall tendency for higher minimum inhibitory concentrations compared with clarithromycin. The results raise questions about the appropriateness of using clarithromycin susceptibility test outcomes for determining the administration of azithromycin. This study highlights the need for future discussions on the clinical breakpoints of azithromycin, based on large-scale clinical research correlating azithromycin susceptibility with treatment outcomes.

Accurate subspecies-level identification of clinically significant Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare by whole-genome sequencing

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) isolates in the clinical laboratory setting allows for rapid and reliable subspecies identification of a closely related complex of human pathogens. We developed a bioinformatics pipeline for accurate subspecies identification and tested 74 clinical MAC isolates from various anatomical sites. We demonstrate that reliable subspecies level identification of these common and clinically significant MAC isolates, including M. avium subsp. hominissuis (most dominant in causing lower respiratory tract infections in our cohort), M. avium subsp. avium, M. intracellulare subsp. intracellulare, and M. intracellulare subsp. chimaera, can be achieved by analysis of only two marker genes (rpoB and groEL/hsp65). We then explored the relationship between these subspecies and anatomical site of infection. Further, we conducted an in silico analysis and showed our algorithm also performed well for M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis but failed to consistently identify M. avium subsp. silvaticum and M. intracellulare subsp. yongonense, likely due to a lack of available reference genome sequences; all the 3 subspecies were not found in our clinical isolates and rarely reported to cause human infections. Accurate MAC subspecies identification may provide the tool and opportunity for better understanding of the disease-subspecies dynamics in MAC infections.

Comparative study of in vitro activity of tedizolid and linezolid against Mycobacterium avium complex.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to compare the in vitro activity and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of tedizolid and linezolid against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) strains using a reference broth microdilution assay and a macrodilution assay with the Bactec-MGIT-960. MethodsA total of 37 clinical isolates of MAC were included in the study. Reference broth microdilution was performed according to CLSI guidelines in a range of concentrations from 64 to 0.064 mg/L. Macrodilution was performed with the Bactec-MGIT-960 system. The cut-off points defined by CLSI for linezolid (resistant: > 16 mg/L, intermediate: 16 mg/L, susceptible: <16 mg/L) were used to define clinical categories of this drug. Essential agreement for both linezolid and tedizolid and categorical agreement for linezolid were defined following FDA criteria. ResultsThe MIC50 (16mg/L) and MIC90 (32mg/L) values for linezolid were identical with both methods. However, the MIC50 and MIC90 of tedizolid by microdilution (4 mg/L and 8 mg/L, respectively) were one twofold dilution higher than by macrodilution (2 mg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively). Ninety-four percent and 2.7% of the strains had MICs of tedizolid ≤4 mg/L and ≤ 0.5 mg/L, respectively, by the reference method. The linezolid macrodilution assay showed a categorical agreement of 40.5%, a minor error rate of 56.7% and a major error rate of 2.7% with respect to the reference method. ConclusionsTedizolid showed higher in vitro activity than linezolid against the tested MAC isolates. Macrodilution using the BD Bactec-MGIT-960 system is a practical approach to determine the susceptibility of MAC strains to tedizolid.

In vitro assessment of 17 antimicrobial agents against clinical Mycobacterium avium complex isolates

BackgroundRecently, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections have been increasing, especially in immunocompromised and older adults. The rapid increase has triggered a global health concern due to limited therapeutic strategies and adverse effects caused by long-term medication. To provide more evidence for the treatment of MAC, we studied the in vitro inhibitory activities of 17 antimicrobial agents against clinical MAC isolates.ResultsA total of 111 clinical MAC isolates were enrolled in the study and they were identified as M. intracellulare, M. avium, M. marseillense, M. colombiense, M. yongonense, and two isolates could not be identified at the species level. MAC strains had relatively low (0–21.6%) resistance to clarithromycin, amikacin, bedaquiline, rifabutin, streptomycin, and clofazimine, and the resistant rates to isoniazid, rifampin, linezolid, doxycycline, and ethionamide were very high (72.1–100%). In addition, M. avium had a significantly higher resistance rate than that of M. intracellulare for ethambutol (92.3% vs 40.7%, P < 0.001), amikacin (15.4% vs 1.2%, P = 0.049), and cycloserine (69.2% vs 25.9%, P = 0.004).ConclusionsOur results supported the current usage of macrolides, rifabutin, and aminoglycosides in the regimens for MAC infection, and also demonstrated the low resistance rate against new drugs, such as clofazimine, tedizolid, and bedaquiline, suggesting the possible implementation of these drugs in MAC treatment.

Rational Choice of Antibiotics and Media for Mycobacterium avium Complex Drug Susceptibility Testing.

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommends the use of Mueller Hinton (MH) medium to perform drug susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) using the microdilution method. For MAC, there has been no study on the impact of media on the determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibiotics other than clarithromycin. This study aimed at determining the impact of two media used for DST of MAC and at augmenting the number of pertinent MICs for MAC species encountered in clinical practice. MICs of antibiotics used for the treatment of MAC infections were determined for 158 clinical MAC isolates (80 M. avium, 40 M. intracellulare, 35 M. chimaera, two M. yongonense and one M. timonense) in MH and 7H9 broths using the SLOMYCO SensititreTM system (TREK Diagnostic Systems, East Grinstead, United Kingdom). The modal MICs determined in both media were the same for linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifabutin and amikacin but not for clarithromycin, rifampin and ethambutol. The kappa test for MICs converted to susceptibility categories showed an excellent agreement for clarithromycin, a moderate agreement for linezolid and a weak agreement for moxifloxacin and amikacin. For amikacin, 7H9 allowed a better distinction (fewer intermediate strains) of wild-type populations than MH. Existing breakpoints for linezolid and moxifloxacin are spread through the distribution of MICs for wild-type populations. The only breakpoints that can be used rationally are those for amikacin and clarithromycin. For amikacin, 7H9 performs better than MH, whereas both media perform equally for clarithromycin. Given that testing in 7H9, as opposed to MH, allows easier MIC measurements and yields greater reproducibility, we propose the use of 7H9 medium for DST of MAC.

Minimum inhibitory concentration distributions for Mycobacterium avium complex—towards evidence-based susceptibility breakpoints

Patients with clinical infections caused by the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) are treated for at least 1 year following sputum conversion with a regimen that suffers from a suboptimal cure rate. The correlation between clinical outcome and drug susceptibility testing breakpoints other than for the macrolides is regarded to be poor. A systematic evaluation of clinical breakpoints for MAC has not been performed so far; thus, the aim of this study was to initiate the process by establishing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions. The MICs of the major drugs used in the treatment of MAC infections were determined for 229 clinical MAC isolates in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton II broth. The MIC50 and MIC ranges were established and compared to suggested susceptibility breakpoints for clarithromycin (2; 0.064-128mg/l), rifabutin (0.25; ≤0.25-16mg/l), ethambutol (8; 0.5-32mg/l), amikacin (16; 1-128mg/l), moxifloxacin (2; 0.25-16mg/l), linezolid (32; 1-128mg/l), rifampicin (8; 0.125-16mg/l), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (2/38; 0.125/2-16/304mg/l). These results, together with those from available studies, indicate that MICs are high for drugs such as rifabutin, rifampicin, ethambutol, linezolid, and moxifloxacin used against MAC at levels unlikely to be associated with clinical efficacy at current dosing. This may partly explain the poor correlation between susceptibility testing and clinical outcomes for drugs other than clarithromycin.

Genetic diversity of clinical Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis and Mycobacterium intracellulare isolates causing pulmonary diseases recovered from different geographical regions

Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections are increasing annually in many countries. MAC strains are the most common nontuberculous mycobacterial pathogens isolated from respiratory samples and predominantly consist of two species, Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare. The aim of this study was to analyze the molecular epidemiology and genetic backgrounds of clinical MAC isolates collected from The Netherlands, Germany, United States, Korea and Japan. Variable numbers of tandem repeats (VNTR) analysis was used to examine the genetic relatedness of clinical isolates of M. avium subsp. hominissuis (n=261) and M. intracellulare (n=116). Minimum spanning tree and unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages analyses based on the VNTR data indicated that M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates from Japan shared a high degree of genetic relatedness with Korean isolates, but not with isolates from Europe or the United States, whereas M. intracellulare isolates did not show any specific clustering by geographic origin. The findings from the present study indicate that strains of M. avium subsp. hominissuis, but not M. intracellulare, exhibit geographical differences in genetic diversity and imply that MAC strains may have different sources, routes of transmission and perhaps clinical manifestations.

Evaluation of a rapid detection method of clarithromycin resistance genes in Mycobacterium avium complex isolates

Clarithromycin is the key drug in the various treatment regimens of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) diseases, and is the only drug for which drug susceptibility has been shown to correlate with clinical response in these diseases. A point mutation at either positions 2058 or 2059 of the 23S rRNA gene has been reported to occur in high-level clarithromycin-resistant isolates. In this study, we examined the correlation between the results from a drug susceptibility test and the mutation of the 23S rRNA gene involved in drug resistance in MAC. Furthermore, we adapted a rapid detection method using amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR to identify mutations in the 23S rRNA gene in MAC isolates. Using a microdilution method based on the NCCLS/CLSI recommendation, the MIC of clarithromycin was determined for 245 clinical MAC isolates. Of these, 219 clarithromycin-susceptible and 26 clarithromycin-resistant strains were analysed by sequencing of the 23S rRNA gene and ARMS-PCR. The drug susceptibility test revealed a bimodal distribution of MICs for both the susceptible and resistant strains. Sequence analysis of the 23S rRNA gene revealed that all of the clarithromycin-susceptible strains were wild-type whereas 24 of the clarithromycin-resistant strains were mutant type. The sensitivity of the sequence and ARMS-PCR analyses was 92.3% and 84.6%, respectively, and the specificity of both was 100%. We found a correlation between MICs of clarithromycin and 23S rRNA gene mutations. ARMS-PCR for 23S rRNA mutations of MAC isolates is useful for rapid detection of clarithromycin resistance.

Efficient Differentiation ofMycobacterium aviumComplex Species and Subspecies by Use of Five-Target Multiplex PCR

Infections caused by the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) are on the rise in both human and veterinary medicine. A means of effectively discriminating among closely related yet pathogenetically diverse members of the MAC would enable better diagnosis and treatment as well as further our understanding of the epidemiology of these pathogens. In this study, a five-target multiplex PCR designed to discriminate MAC organisms isolated from liquid culture media was developed. This MAC multiplex was designed to amplify a 16S rRNA gene target common to all Mycobacterium species, a chromosomal target called DT1 that is unique to M. avium subsp. avium serotypes 2 and 3, to M. avium subsp. silvaticum, and to M. intracellulare, and three insertion sequences, IS900, IS901, and IS1311. The pattern of amplification results allowed determination of whether isolates were mycobacteria, whether they were members of the MAC, and whether they belonged to one of three major MAC subspecies, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, M. avium subsp. avium, and M. avium subsp. hominissuis. Analytical sensitivity was 10 fg of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis genomic DNA, 5 to 10 fg of M. avium subsp. avium genomic DNA, and 2 to 5 fg of DNA from other mycobacterial species. Identification accuracy of the MAC multiplex was evaluated by testing 53 bacterial reference strains consisting of 28 different mycobacterial species and 12 nonmycobacterial species. Identification accuracy in a clinical setting was evaluated for 223 clinical MAC isolates independently identified by other methods. Isolate identification agreement between the MAC multiplex and these comparison assays was 100%. The novel MAC multiplex is a rapid, reliable, and simple assay for discrimination of MAC species and subspecies in liquid culture media.

Genetic diversity in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium complex from Guinea-Bissau, West Africa

Isolates of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) were cultured from sputum samples obtained from patients in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa. Twenty-eight isolates hybridising with MAC probe (AccuProbe) were further characterised by different molecular techniques: hybridisation with species-specific probes (AccuProbe) for M. avium and M. intracellulare, partial sequencing of 16S rRNA gene and PCR detection of the DT1–DT6 sequences and the macrophage-induced gene ( mig). Only one of the 28 isolates reacted with the M. avium probe and four with the M. intracellulare probe. Two isolates expressed the DT1 sequence, and three the DT6. The mig was detected in 18 (64%) of the isolates. Sequencing of 16S rRNA had the greatest discriminative power of the typing methods applied, without strong correlation with any other technique. Clinical MAC isolates from Guinea-Bissau demonstrated a wide genetic diversity among the members of M. avium complex that might reflect on biotope variation.

Altered Expression Profile of the Surface Glycopeptidolipids in Drug-resistant Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium aviumComplex

Members of the Mycobacterium avium complex are the most frequently encountered opportunistic bacterial pathogens among patients in the advanced stage of AIDS. Two clinical isolates of the same strain, numbers 397 and 417, were obtained from an AIDS patient with disseminated M. avium complex infection before and after treatment with a regimen of clarithromycin and ethambutol. To identify the biochemical consequence of drug treatment, the expression and chemical composition of their major cell wall constituents, the arabinogalactan, lipoarabinomannan, and the surface glycopeptidolipids (GPL), were critically examined. Through thin layer chromatography, mass spectrometry, and chemical analysis, it was found that the GPL expression profiles differ significantly in that several apolar GPLs were overexpressed in the clinically resistant 417 isolate at the expense of the serotype 1 polar GPL, which was the single predominant band in the ethambutol-susceptible 397 isolate. Thus, instead of additional rhamnosylation on the 6-deoxytalose (6-dTal) appendage to give the serotype 1-specific disaccharide hapten, the accumulation of this nonextended apolar GPL probably provided more precursor substrate available for further nonsaccharide substitutions including a higher degree of O-methylation to give 3-O-Me-6-dTal and the unusual 4-O-sulfation on 6-dTal. Further data showed that this alteration effectively neutralized ethambutol, which is known to inhibit arabinan synthesis. Thus, in contrast with derived Emb-resistant mutants of Mycobacterium smegmatis or Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which are devoid of a surface GPL layer, the lipoarabinomannan from resistant 417 isolate grown in the presence of this drug was not apparently truncated.

Enhanced in vitro activity of WR99210 in combination with dapsone against Mycobacterium avium complex.

WR99210, a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, has promising in vitro activity against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). The in vitro activities of WR99210 alone and in combination with a fixed concentration of dapsone (0.5 microgram/ml) were evaluated against 35 clinical MAC isolates by a broth dilution method. The MIC at which 50% of isolates were inhibited (MIC50) and MIC90 of WR99210 alone were 2 and 8 micrograms/ml, respectively. The MIC50 and MIC90 of WR99210 in combination with dapsone were 0.25 and 4 micrograms/ml, respectively. Overall, 75% of the MAC isolates displayed enhanced susceptibility to the combination.

In vitro activities of PS-15, a new dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, and its cyclic metabolite against Mycobacterium avium complex.

PS-15, a new dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, and its cyclic metabolite were evaluated for in vitro activity against 31 clinical Mycobacterium avium complex isolates. Broth dilution MICs of PS-15 ranged from 16 to 64 micrograms/ml. The cyclic metabolite was three to five times more active than the parent compound. Further evaluation of these compounds in an M. avium-infected murine test system will be of interest.

Intracellular activities of roxithromycin used alone and in association with other drugs against Mycobacterium avium complex in human macrophages

Recent reports have shown that roxithromycin possesses significant activity against atypical mycobacteria, including the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), and that its extracellular anti-MAC activity is further enhanced in two- or three-drug combinations with ethambutol, rifampin, amikacin, ofloxacin, and clofazimine. In accordance with the above data, the anti-MAC potential of roxithromycin used alone and in combination with the above-mentioned antituberculous drugs was screened intracellularly against five clinical MAC isolates (from both human immunodeficiency virus-positive and human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients), phagocytized by human monocyte-derived macrophages. The results showed that roxithromycin used alone and within clinically achievable levels was active against all of the MAC isolates tested. Screening of two-drug combinations showed that both rifampin and clofazimine further increased the intracellular activity of roxithromycin against all five isolates by 35 to 80% (ethambutol, ofloxacin, and amikacin resulted in increased intracellular activity against one, two, and four isolates, respectively). For the three-drug combinations, the combination of roxithromycin plus ethambutol used with rifampin or clofazimine was the most uniformly active against all five MAC isolates, with activity increases of 42 to 90%, followed by roxithromycin plus ethambutol used with amikacin, which resulted in activity increases of 15 to 90%. The overall level of intracellular killing after 5 days of drug addition, in comparison with growth in untreated controls, varied from 1 to 3 log units depending on the individual MAC isolate and/or drug combination used.