Clinical Lumbar Instability Research Articles

Improvement in the Contraction of the Transversus Abdominis Following Lumbo-Pelvic Manipulation – A Case Study

As a clinician, everyone undergoes a difficult time in clinical decision-making when attempting to apply a clinical prediction rule for manipulation (Flynn et al., 2002; Childs et al., 2004) to a patient with a history and physical examination consistent with clinical lumbar instability (Hicks et al., 2005). The effect on neural pathways associated with manipulation has been suggested as one possible mechanism that may improve muscle performance (Pickar, 2002) and patient symptoms. Support exists for an association between spinal manipulation and improved muscle function in the quadriceps (Suter et al., 1999), the erector spinae (Keller and Colloca, 2000), and the deep neck flexors (Sterling et al., 2001). Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that spinal manipulation, by a reflexogenic mechanism, may improve the performance of the deep trunk stabilizers. In turn, improved relaxation and contractility of the lumbar multifidus and the transversus abdominis (TrA) theoretically could lead to improved functional stability of the spine through enhancement of the neurological and active subsystems as defined by Panjabi (1992a, b). This single case study describes changes observed in the TrA musculature pre- to post-manipulation in a patient that presented with a clinical paradox (symptoms suggestive of clinical lumbar instability but also meeting the clinical prediction rule to succeed with lumbar manipulation therapy). Real-time ultrasound imaging (USI) was used to describe the changes in the TrA musculature..

Combining clinical exams can better predict lumbar spine radiographic instability

Background/objectivesSeveral clinical tests have been proposed to diagnose lumbar instability, but their accuracy is still in question. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical lumbar instability tests. The secondary goal was to design a model to detect lumbar instability. DesignA prospective diagnostic cross-sectional study. MethodA sample of 202 patients with chronic low back pain were participated in the study. Five lumbar instability tests including Aberrant movement, Passive lumbar extension, Prone segmental instability, H and I and pheasant tests were compared to flexion/extension radiography as the gold standard for diagnosing lumbar instability using two by two tables. Multiple Logistic Regression analysis was applied to develop a model using demographic information as well as the patients’ pain intensity, disability level, lumbar lordosis and the clinical tests. ResultsAmong the five examined tests, Prone segmental instability, H and I and pheasant tests showed very small likelihood ratios and diagnostic odd's ratio. The largest values were for H and I test with the positive likelihood ratio of 1.28 (95% CI: 0.72 to 2.29) and diagnostic odd's ratio of 1.37 (95% CI: 0.66 to 2.83); the diagnostic accuracy measures were smaller for the other studied clinical tests. The model was developed using weight (t = 1.15, p = 0.03) and lumbar lordosis (t = 3.04, p = 0.00) (which showed a significant relationship with lumbar instability) and prone segmental instability test. The final model has the positive likelihood ratio of 2.07 (95% CI: 1.41 to 3.05) and diagnostic odd's ratio of 3.77 (95% CI: 2.03 to 7.01). ConclusionEach individual test had very small to no power in discriminating patients with lumbar instability. The developed model just slightly improved the accuracy of radiological instability detection.

The Effects of Core Stabilization Exercise with the Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver Technique versus General Strengthening Exercise on Lumbar Segmental Motion in Patients with Clinical Lumbar Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 12-Month Follow-Up.

Trunk stability exercises that focus on either deep or superficial muscles might produce different effects on lumbar segmental motion. This study compared outcomes in 34 lumbar instability patients in two exercises at 10 weeks and 12 months follow up. Participants were divided into either Core stabilization (deep) exercise, incorporating abdominal drawing-in maneuver technique (CSE with ADIM), or General strengthening (superficial) exercise (STE). Outcome measures were pain, muscle activation, and lumbar segmental motion. Participants in CSE with ADIM had significantly less pain than those in STE at 10 weeks. They showed significantly more improvement of abdominal muscle activity ratio than participants in STE at 10 weeks and 12 months follow-up. Participants in CSE with ADIM had significantly reduced sagittal translation at L4-L5 and L5-S1 compared with STE at 10 weeks. Participants in CSE with ADIM had significantly reduced sagittal translations at L4-L5 and L5-S1 compared with participants in STE at 10 weeks, whereas STE demonstrated significantly increased sagittal rotation at L4-L5. However, at 12 months follow-up, levels of lumbar sagittal translation were increased in both groups. CSE with ADIM which focuses on increasing deep trunk muscle activity can reduce lumbar segmental translation and should be recommended for lumbar instability.

Effects of Core Stabilization Exercise versus General Trunk-Strengthening Exercise on Balance Performance, Pain Intensity and Trunk Muscle Activity Patterns in Clinical Lumbar Instability Patients: A Single Blind Randomized Trial

Postural balance is important for activities of daily living. Patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) exhibit balance problems, such as difficulty performing daily activities. Specifically, CLBP patients with clinical lumbar instability (CLI) have demonstrated deep trunk muscular dysfunction that induces poor postural control and may result in a high risk of falling. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a 10-week core stabilization exercise (CSE) regimen versus a strengthening trunk exercise (STE) regimen and conduct a 3-month follow-up on balance, pain, and trunk muscle activity patterns in CLI patients. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was used to compare the effects of CSE and STE on balance, pain, and trunk muscle activity patterns in 38 CLBP patients with CLI. The results of the 5-times-sit-to-stand test (FTSST) and pain intensity revealed significant improvements in both groups after ten weeks of exercise and at the 3-month follow-up point. However, the differences in the FTSST scores and pain intensity between the CSE and STE patients were not significant. Moreover, the CSE group presented significantly greater deep abdominal muscle activation than the STE group after ten weeks of exercise. In addition, both groups exhibited a trend of improvement in terms of deep back muscle activation. Therefore, the current study results suggest that both exercise regimens can improve balance performance and pain intensity. Moreover, the CSE group showed more significant improvements in deep abdominal muscle activation than the STE group.

Clinical utility of a cluster of tests as a diagnostic support tool for clinical lumbar instability

BackgroundNumerous clinical tests have been proposed for the diagnosis of clinical lumbar instability (CLI), but a cluster of clinical tests is still needed to increase the accuracy of CLI diagnosis. ObjectiveTo evaluate a diagnostic support tool intended to identify the presence of CLI using a cluster of clinical tests. DesignAnalytical cross-sectional study. MethodsTwo hundred participants with chronic low back pain (LBP) were diagnosed with or without CLI by an orthopedic surgeon. The orthopedic surgeon made the diagnosis from classic clinical symptoms and signs. The diagnosis was used as the reference standard. An orthopedic physical therapist used four clinical tests to identify CLI in each participant, including the apprehension sign, the instability catch sign with/without the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM), the painful catch sign with/without the ADIM, and the prone instability test. ResultsFor an individual test, the apprehension sign showed a high specificity (92.6%) and a positive likelihood ratio (LR+; 2.4) but a very low sensitivity of 17.4%. A cluster of three of the four examined tests provided the most diagnostic accuracy for CLI, with a high LR+ (5.8) and a high specificity (91.7%) but low sensitivity (47.8%) and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-; 0.6). ConclusionsA cluster of three of the four examined tests was determined to comprise a powerful clinical support tool for the identification of CLI patients as tested against a reference standard diagnosis. Clinical trial registrationName of the registry: Thai Clinical Trials Registry. Registration number: TCTR20190426002.

Effect of increased relative stiffness of the lumbar spine on hamstring muscle stretching in individuals with a history of low back pain suspected to have a clinical lumbar instability: A randomized crossover design

BackgroundTheoretically, lumbopelvic stabilization techniques during hamstring muscle stretching could increase lumbar stiffness relative to hamstring muscle in individuals with a history of low back pain and suspected clinical lumbar instability. However, evidence to support this theory is limited. This study aimed to 1) determine changes in lumbopelvic, lumbar, and hip motions, and hamstring muscle length after stretching exercises with lumbopelvic stiffening or relaxing techniques, and 2) compare those changes between techniques. MethodsThis study used a randomized crossover design. Thirty-two participants with a history of low back pain and bilateral hamstring muscle tightness were recruited. The order of the first technique was randomly assigned. After a 2-day washout, participants were crossed over to the second technique. Motion data during active forward trunk bending and bilateral hamstring muscle length during passive knee extension were collected pre- and post-intervention. FindingsSignificant increases (P < 0.05) were found in bilateral hamstring muscle length for both techniques. However, stiffening technique demonstrated a significant decrease in lumbar motion (P < 0.05) and increase in hip motion (P < 0.05), while relaxing technique demonstrated trends showing increases in lumbar and hip motions (P = 0.134 and 0.115, respectively). The findings showed significantly greater improvement (P < 0.05) in lumbar and hip motions with stiffening technique. InterpretationThe findings suggest increased relative stiffness of the lumbar spine during hamstring muscle stretching can specifically lengthen bilateral hamstring muscle and decrease excessive lumbar motion. This stiffening technique may prevent excessive movement of the lumbar spine, thereby reducing the risk of recurrent low back pain.

Altered postural sway during quiet standing in women with clinical lumbar instability.

[Purpose] The current study aimed to investigate the center of pressure, as an indicator of postural sway, to determine any differences between women with clinical lumbar instability and asymptomatic low back pain. [Participants and Methods] Thirty healthy and fifteen clinical lumbar instability participants were measured for their postural sway in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions. The women were tested for postural sway on a force plate in quiet standing and eyes closed. Center of pressure path length and mean velocity in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions and total area of excursion were measured and analyzed for 30 seconds. [Results] Clinical lumbar instability participants showed a significantly increase when compared with healthy participants, in path length and mean velocity in both directions and total area of excursion. [Conclusion] The findings suggest that chronic low back pain patients with clinical lumbar instability have increased postural sway when vision is deprived. The clinical significance of this has not yet been determined but may provide an opportunity for therapy directed at improving balance control in this patient group.

Clinical Lumbar Instability: Part I

Clinical Lumbar Instability: Part I

Clinical Lumbar Instability and Core Stabilization Exercise: A Literature Review

Clinical lumbar instability is increasingly recognized as one of the significant causes of chronic low back pain. The patients with clinical lumbar instability require the effective exercise intervention to improve the stability of their lumbar spine. This article reveals the etiology and clinical diagnosis of clinical lumbar instability, the effective treatment as core stabilization exercise (CSE) and also provides some relevant researches on CSE for improving outcome measurements in patients with clinical lumbar instability. Commonly, clinical signs and the specific clinical tests including instability catch sign, apprehension sign, painful catch test and prone instability test are considered as clinical diagnostic criteria due to absence of radiological findings in patients with clinical lumbar instability. Moderate to high impacted evidences on the effectiveness of CSE to improve pain-related outcomes and deep trunk muscle activation have been reported in patients with clinical lumbar instability but further studies regarding long-term effectiveness of CSE and the use of precise instrument to detect deep trunk muscle activation are still required.

Clinical Outcome of Simple Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

ment (p<0.001). The mean preoperative ODI score was 29.9, and the mean score checked at the last follow up was 3.5. It thus showed 88.3% improvement (p<0.001). Excellent or good satisfaction was reported by fourteen patients (87.5%), and clinical lumbar instability was identified in one patient (6.3%). Conclusions: Simple discectomy without fusion is one of treatment option for recurrent disc herniation without instability.

Prevalence and individual risk factors associated with clinical lumbar instability in rice farmers with low back pain.

IntroductionClinical lumbar instability (CLI) is one of the subgroups of chronic non-specific low back pain. Thai rice farmers often have poor sustained postures during a rice planting process and start their farming at an early age. However, individual associated factors of CLI are not known and have rarely been diagnosed in low back pain. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and individual associated factors of CLI in Thai rice farmers.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 323 Thai rice farmers in a rural area of Khon Kaen province, Thailand. Face-to-face interviews were conducted using the 13-item Delphi criteria questionnaire, after which an objective examination was performed using aberrant movement sign, painful catch sign, and prone instability test to obtain information. Individual factors such as sex, body mass index, waist-hip ratio, smoking, and number of years of farming experience, were recorded during the face-to-face interview.ResultsThe prevalence of CLI in Thai rice farmers calculated by the method described in this study was 13% (age 44±10 years). Number of years of farming experience was found to be significantly correlated with the prevalence of CLI (adjusted odds ratio =2.02, 95% confidence interval =1.03–3.98, P<0.05).ConclusionThis study provides prevalence of CLI in Thai rice farmers. Those with long-term farming experience of at least 30 years have a greater risk of CLI.

Effect of 10-week core stabilization exercise training and detraining on pain-related outcomes in patients with clinical lumbar instability

Background and aimsClinical lumbar instability causes pain and socioeconomic suffering; however, an appropriate treatment for this condition is unknown. This article examines the effect of a 10 week core stabilization exercise (CSE) program and 3 month follow-up on pain-related outcomes in patients with clinical lumbar instability.MethodsForty-two participants with clinical lumbar instability of at least 3 months in duration were randomly allocated either to 10 weekly treatments with CSE or to a conventional group (CG) receiving trunk stretching exercises and hot pack. Pain-related outcomes including pain intensity during instability catch sign, functional disability, patient satisfaction, and health-related quality of life were measured at 10 weeks of intervention and 1 and 3 months after the last intervention session (follow-up); trunk muscle activation patterns measured by surface electromyography were measured at 10 weeks.ResultsCSE showed significantly greater reductions in all pain-related outcomes after 10 weeks and over the course of 3 month follow-up periods than those seen in the CG (P<0.01). Furthermore, CSE enhanced deep abdominal muscle activation better than in the CG (P<0.001), whereas the CG had deterioration of deep back muscle activation compared with the CSE group (P<0.01). For within-group comparison, CSE provided significant improvements in all pain-related outcomes over follow-up (P<0.01), whereas the CG demonstrated reduction in pain intensity during instability catch sign only at 10 weeks (P<0.01). In addition, CSE showed an improvement in deep abdominal muscle activation (P<0.01), whereas the CG revealed the deterioration of deep abdominal and back muscle activations (P<0.05).ConclusionTen week CSE provides greater training and retention effects on pain-related outcomes and induced activation of deep abdominal muscles in patients with clinical lumbar instability compared with conventional treatment.

Core Stabilization Exercise Improves Pain Intensity, Functional Disability and Trunk Muscle Activity of Patients with Clinical Lumbar Instability:a Pilot Randomized Controlled Study

Core Stabilization Exercise Improves Pain Intensity, Functional Disability and Trunk Muscle Activity of Patients with Clinical Lumbar Instability:a Pilot Randomized Controlled Study

Improved contraction of the transversus abdominis immediately following spinal manipulation: A case study using real-time ultrasound imaging

The authors encountered a clinical dilemma when attempting to apply a clinical prediction rule for manipulation (Flynn et al., 2002; Childs et al., 2004) to a patient with a history and physical examination consistent with clinical lumbar instability (Hicks et al., 2005). Although the patient met four of five criteria predicting short-term success with manipulation, the presence of symptoms suggestive of underlying clinical instability remains a relative contraindication to thrust manipulation (Greenman, 1996; Maitland, 2001). Could the application of both manipulation and stabilization be logically justified in this patient? Despite the widespread use of spinal manipulation, the biological mechanisms by which it produces a beneficial effect in certain patients are not fully understood (Pickar, 2002). There is evidence which supports a reflexogenic effect from manipulation in the paraspinal muscles as one possible mechanism (Herzog et al., 1995, 1999; Lehman et al., 2001; Pickar, 2002). Specifically, several researchers have identified altered motor neuron pool excitability following spinal manipulation (Murphy et al., 1995; Floman et al., 1997; Herzog et al., 1999; Dishman and Bulbulian, 2000). The effect on neural pathways associated with manipulation has been suggested as one possible mechanism that may improve muscle performance (Pickar, 2002) and patient symptoms.

Trunk muscle recruitment patterns in specific chronic low back pain populations

It is hypothesized that injury or degeneration of osteoligamentous spinal structures would require compensation by trunk musculature and alterations in motor control to maintain spine stability. While, biomechanical modeling has supported this hypothesis, studies of muscle recruitment patterns in chronic low back pain patients both with and without significant osteoligamentous damage have been limited. This study utilized a non-randomized case-control design to investigate trunk muscle recruitment patterns around the neutral spine position between subgroups of patients with chronic mechanical low back pain and asymptomatic controls. Twenty subjects with chronic low back pain attributed to clinical lumbar instability were matched to 20 asymptomatic controls. In addition 12 patients with non-specific chronic low back pain were studied. Surface EMG from five trunk muscles was analyzed to determine activation levels and patterns of recruitment during a standing reach under two different loading conditions. The chronic low back pain group with symptoms attributed to clinical instability demonstrated significantly higher activation levels of the external oblique and rectus abdominus muscles and lower abdominal synergist ratios than the control group. No significant differences were found between patient subgroups. While these data demonstrate altered muscle recruitment patterns in patients with chronic low back pain, the changes are not consistent with Panjabi's theory suggesting that these alterations are driven by passive subsystem damage. However, the higher activation of global abdominal musculature and altered synergist patterns may represent a motor control pattern that has consequences for continued dysfunction and chronic pain.

Rehabilitation for Clinical Lumbar Instability in a Female Adolescent Competitive Diver with Spondylolisthesis

Few studies have investigated conservative lumbar stabilization approaches with adolescent athletes, specifically those with radiographic evidence of a unilateral pars interarticularis fracture. The purpose of this case study was to describe a lumbar stabilization strengthening intervention for an adolescent competitive diver. A 12-year-old female was diagnosed with a grade-I, traumatic, unilateral, dysplastic spondylolisthesis, accompanied by ensuing symptoms of lumbar spine instability. Symptom provocation occurred during extension and torsion motions as well as long-term sitting and standing. A comprehensive lumbar stabilization program was associated with a reduction of symptoms, improvement in trunk stabilization, and a quick return to competitive diving. Because the case report involved one highly motivated subject, the results are not generalizable to all adolescent divers. Future studies should investigate the treatment of spine instability on a sample of adolescent athletes.

Evaluation of Clinical Lumbar Instability Using the Treadmill

The physical signs of lumbar instability have not yet been clearly defined. Furthermore, they do not always coincide with the abnormal movement on flexion-extension radiographs. Thus, the treadmill was used to evaluate clinical lumbar instability. The subjects were 82 patients with degenerative lumbar disease aggravated by walking or daily physical activities. The reproduction and provocation of low-back pain or pain in the lower extremities was examined during walking on a treadmill. The responses of the reproduction and provocation of the symptoms were divided into four grades. Fifteen cases were examined again using a treadmill after body casting to determine the indication for fusion surgery. As a result, the responses in the reproduction or provocation test using a treadmill manifest more dominant reflection of clinical symptoms suggesting clinical lumbar instability than the existence of the abnormal movement on flexion-extension radiographs. Reexamination after body casting was useful to determine the indications of fusion operations. The reproduction or provocation test using a treadmill was implied as a possible functional evaluation method of clinical lumbar instability.