Stimulated by both the increased demand for medical care and the rapid growth of medical knowledge, the practice of medicine today, in both small and large medical centers, is involved with fragments of information from a variety of sources. As the patient load grows and the number and variety of tests, procedures, examinations, consultations, etc., increase, it becomes more difficult to manage the large amount of pertinent information accumulated on a single patient. The need for improved information-processing, especially in large medical centers, is increasingly evident. Hospitals have little or no documentation of the cost of their present information-processing technics, but it has been estimated that it may be as much as 25 per cent of a total hospital operating budget (1). The costs are usually not visible, however, and the direct and indirect development and utilization costs of automated information processing are often difficult to justify on economical considerations alone. Presumably better patient care will result, but it is difficult if not impossible to translate this intangible benefit into economic savings. Nevertheless, the spector of increasing proliferation of hospital paperwork and the growing scarcity of both professional and nonprofessional staff forces us to examine and evaluate the use of computer systems in the hope that automated information-processing will provide some alleviation of these problems. For several years our Laboratory of Computer Science has been developing computer systems for clinical data management: to process clinical laboratory information, to obtain patient histories, to generate progress notes, to assist in medical diagnosis and patient treatment-planning, and, most recently, to create x-ray reports. Data are put into the computer system by imposing a structured dialogue on the recording process. Free text can be entered at the end of the report or by subsequent dictation, but in general we prefer that the information enter the computer through words and phrases anticipated and presented by the program. This use of prestructured text provides a significant degree of quality control and facilitates retrieval and analysis of data in a fashion not possible in records composed of unconstrained narrative text. Although our radiology reporting system has been designed to be part of an evolving hospital-wide information system (Fig. 1), it will also operate separately or as a part of a limited information system. Obviously, the radiological consultation is an integral part of the patient's record, and a major weakness of present systems of radiology reporting in most medical centers is the time lag between interpretation of the study and the availability of the report to the interested physician. Although many factors contribute, the delays usually occur in the transcribing, typing, filing, checking, and transportation process.
Read full abstract