Abstract Background There is inconsistent data on the value of baseline and early cardiac function assessment on identifying patients at risk of cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Whether machine learning (ML) approaches applied to cardiac MRI (CMR) images may help risk stratify patients is unclear. Purpose In women with HER2+ breast cancer receiving sequential anthracyclines and trastuzumab we sought to (i) assess if a ML approach applied to pre-cancer therapy and early post anthracycline CMR short axis (SAX) cines can help identify patients at risk for future CTRCD and (ii) whether this approach is superior to using clinical and manual quantitative CMR data. Methods Women with HER2+ breast cancer from the EMBRACE-MRI study underwent 5 CMR studies (pre-cancer therapy, post anthracyclines, 3, 6 and 12 months during trastuzumab). CTRCD was defined using the CREC criteria by end of treatment. Three models were created: 1) clinical data (demographics, cardiovascular risk factors and medications); 2) clinical and manual quantitative CMR data (right and left ventricular volumes and LVEF); and 3) ML model based on SAX cine CMR images only. We focused on the pre-cancer therapy CMR and 1st visit post-anthracycline CMR. All images underwent standardised formatting. A 3D convolutional neural networks model architecture was used. The model consisted of multiple convolutional layers followed by max pooling and global average pooling layers. The output of the convolutional layers were then fed into a dense layer of 128 nodes incorporating an L2 activity regularizer and a subsequent dropout layer. To train and tune the model, the process was iterated 50 times. In each iteration, the patient participant dataset was shuffled, and a random 80% of patients were selected for training and tuning. The tuned model was then applied to the remaining 20% of patients in each iteration, and this entire cycle of shuffling, training, and testing was repeated 50 times with replacement. Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated on the test set and averaged across folds to determine each model’s performance. Results 135 women were included (mean age 51.1±9.2 years) mean doxorubicin equivalent was dose 204.9±12.5mg/m2. Cardiovascular risk factors were prevalent: 33 (24%) had a smoking history; 21 (15%) had hypertension. 37 (27%) developed CTRCD. The ML model using baseline CMR cine data only had a higher AUC (0.84 95% CI [0.83-0.86]) for the detection of CTRCD compared to clinical data (0.62 95% CI [0.59-0.65]) and clinical and CMR data (0.62 95% CI [0.60-0.65]). This further improved with the addition of post-anthracycline CMR data (Table 1). Conclusion A ML model examining early cardiac MRI data with short axis cine CMR images performed better than those using clinical or manual quantitative CMR data for the prediction of CTRCD. Further studies including external validation are needed.Table 1 Mean and 95% CIs