Clinical Staff Research Articles

Australian healthcare workers’ views on artificial intelligence in BreastScreen: Results of a mixed method survey study

IntroductionThe evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine, particularly in radiology and population-based breast cancer screening programs, offers potential accuracy gains and efficiency improvements. However, successful implementation requires understanding of healthcare workers’ views on AI, which this study aims to explore within the Australian BreastScreen program. MethodsAn online survey was distributed to clinical staff involved in breast imaging, collecting responses from November 2022 to April 2023. The survey encompassed demographic information, opinions, and experiences with AI in medical imaging, with questions covering various scenarios of AI integration in BreastScreen ResultsOut of an estimated 350 professionals contacted, 95 responded, with 84.2 % (80/95) being radiologists. Less than half of respondents (44.9 %, 40/89) had worked with artificial intelligence for image classification previously. The majority of radiologists 74.2 % (46/62) thought that the use of AI in reading mammograms for BreastScreen would improve workflow. However, radiologists thought they would behave with increasing caution with scenarios where AI was more autonomous, with the majority of radiologists (63.3 %, 38/60) uncomfortable with holding accountability when the AI was used to triage and remove cases from the workflow. Notably, 60 % of radiologists (36/60) expressed concerns about accountability. DiscussionThe findings suggest an optimistic attitude towards AI among Australian healthcare workers, although when given hypothetical scenarios for the way AI could be integrated into BreastScreen, there was increasing caution with scenarios where AI was more autonomous. This study highlights understanding and concerns of healthcare professionals working in population screening which are important to address when implementing AI into the healthcare system.

Disambiguating Clinical Abbreviations by One-to-All Classification: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Electronic medical records store extensive patient data and serve as a comprehensive repository, including textual medical records like surgical and imaging reports. Their utility in clinical decision support systems is substantial, but the widespread use of ambiguous and unstandardized abbreviations in clinical documents poses challenges for natural language processing in clinical decision support systems. Efficient abbreviation disambiguation methods are needed for effective information extraction. This study aims to enhance the one-to-all (OTA) framework for clinical abbreviation expansion, which uses a single model to predict multiple abbreviation meanings. The objective is to improve OTA by developing context-candidate pairs and optimizing word embeddings in Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers (BERT), evaluating the model's efficacy in expanding clinical abbreviations using real data. Three datasets were used: Medical Subject Headings Word Sense Disambiguation, University of Minnesota, and Chia-Yi Christian Hospital from Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital. Texts containing polysemous abbreviations were preprocessed and formatted for BERT. The study involved fine-tuning pretrained models, ClinicalBERT and BlueBERT, generating dataset pairs for training and testing based on Huang et al's method. BlueBERT achieved macro- and microaccuracies of 95.41% and 95.16%, respectively, on the Medical Subject Headings Word Sense Disambiguation dataset. It improved macroaccuracy by 0.54%-1.53% compared to two baselines, long short-term memory and deepBioWSD with random embedding. On the University of Minnesota dataset, BlueBERT recorded macro- and microaccuracies of 98.40% and 98.22%, respectively. Against the baselines of Word2Vec + support vector machine and BioWordVec + support vector machine, BlueBERT demonstrated a macroaccuracy improvement of 2.61%-4.13%. This research preliminarily validated the effectiveness of the OTA method for abbreviation disambiguation in medical texts, demonstrating the potential to enhance both clinical staff efficiency and research effectiveness.

Take-home naloxone in multicentre emergency settings: the TIME feasibility cluster RCT.

Opioids kill more people than any other drug. Naloxone is an opioid antagonist which can be distributed in take-home 'kits' for peer administration (take-home naloxone). To determine the feasibility of carrying out a definitive randomised controlled trial of take-home naloxone in emergency settings. We used Welsh routine data (2015-21) to test the feasibility of developing a discriminant function to identify people at high risk of fatal opioid overdose. We carried out a cluster randomised controlled trial and qualitative study to examine experiences of service users and providers. We assessed feasibility of intervention and trial methods against predetermined progression criteria related to: site sign-up, staff trained, identification of eligible patients, proportion given kits, identification of people who died of opioid poisoning, data linkage and retrieval of outcomes. This study was carried out in the emergency environment; sites comprised an emergency department and associated ambulance service catchment area. At intervention sites, we invited emergency department clinicians and paramedics to participate. We recruited adult patients who arrived at the emergency department or were attended to by ambulance paramedics for a problem related to opioid use with capacity to consent to receiving the take-home naloxone and related training. Usual care comprised basic life support plus naloxone by paramedics or emergency department staff. The take-home naloxone intervention was offered in addition to usual care, with guidance for recipients on basic life support, the importance of calling the emergency services, duration of effect, safety and legality of naloxone administration. With low numbers of opioid-related deaths (1105/3,227,396) and a high proportion having no contact with health services in the year before death, the predictive link between death and opioid-related healthcare events was weak. Logistic regression models indicated we would need to monitor one-third of the population to capture 75% of the decedents from opioid overdose in 1-year follow-up. Four sites participated in the trial and 299 of 687 (44%) eligible clinical staff were trained. Sixty take-home naloxone kits were supplied to patients during 1-year recruitment. Eligible patients were not offered take-home naloxone kits 164 times: 'forgot' (n = 136); 'too busy' (n = 15); suspected intentional overdose (n = 3). Service users had high levels of knowledge about take-home naloxone. They were supportive of the intervention but noted concerns about opioid withdrawal and resistance to attending hospital for an overdose. Service providers were positive about the intervention but reported barriers including difficulty with consenting and training high-risk opioid users. We were able to calculate costs to train staff at three sites (£40 per AS and £17 in Site 1 ED). No adverse events were reported. Progression criteria were not met - fewer than 50% of eligible staff were trained, fewer than 50% of eligible patients received the intervention and outcomes were not retrieved within reasonable timescales. The take-home naloxone intervention needs to be developed and evaluated in emergency care settings, with appropriate methods. The Take-home naloxone Intervention Multicentre Emergency setting study was interrupted by coronavirus disease. This study did not meet progression criteria for intervention or trial methods feasibility, so outcomes were not followed up and a fully powered trial is not planned. This trial is registered as ISRCTN13232859. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/91/04) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 74. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Occupational stress profiles of prehospital and clinical staff in emergency medicine-a cross-sectional baseline study.

Occupational stress among emergency medical staff remains a central problem. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, many studies were focused on the working conditions of clinical emergency staff, but few examined the occupational stress profiles of prehospital emergency dispatchers (ED). The aim of this study is therefore to provide baseline data on the differences in occupational stress profiles between prehospital and clinical emergency medical staff. ED, emergency nurses (EN), and trauma surgeons on duty (TS) were questioned using the established and validated standardized short version of the instrument for stress-related job analysis for hospital physicians (ISAK-K). Differences between occupational groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Our data indicate significant differences in perception of stressors between professional groups (p < 0.05), with ED showing the highest psychological stress, followed by EN. Social stressors and emotional dissonance were significantly higher in ED and EN compared to TS (p < 0.05). Time pressure was identified as major stressor for ED and TS, but not for EN (p < 0.01). All professions showed moderate high levels of uncertainty and frustration (p = n.s.). Support from colleagues and supervisors was the greatest positive resource for all professional groups (p = n.s.). In accordance with current literature, our results advocate for a re-evaluation of the identified stressors, as ED, EN, and TS continue to show high levels of occupational stress. Training programs for coping with emotional dissonance and social stressors are likely to be crucial for reducing job stress among ED and EN.

PERANCANGAN USER INTERFACE DAN USER EXPERIENCE APLIKASI BERBASIS WEB UNTUK KLINIK TERAPI MENGGUNAKAN METODE USER CENTERED DESIGN (STUDI KASUS: KLINIK RUMAH TERAPI SAHABAT)

Rumah Terapi Sahabat Clinic is located in West Pagesangan, West Nusa Tenggara and has been around for seven years since it was founded in 2015. Based on the results of observations, Focus Group Discussions and interviews, this clinic needs a way to digitize clinical data storage so that it can be accessed easily by clinic staff. In order to meet these needs, a website-based application for clinics is needed with patient and therapist data storage features as well as therapy scheduling. To be able to realize this application, User Interface and User Experience are needed. The method used to do this is User Centered Design. After creating a good User Interface, testing will be carried out using the System Usability Scale and User Experience Questionnaire methods to find out how functional and experienced the clinical staff are while using this Front-end prototype and aspects that can be improved in the future. This research will have results in the form of a front end of a website-based application that suits the needs of clinic staff. While testing using SUS and UEQ, the end result of SUS is 84 or “Acceptable” meanwhile five out of six categories from UEQ are graded “Excellent”

Cardiovascular and fracture events analysis and intervention strategies in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially end-stage renal disease (ESRD), is the most common cause of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), and SHPT is the most severe complication of ESRD. This study aimed to analyze the influencing factors of cardiovascular and fracture events in patients with SHPT which are the leading causes of death in patients with CKD, and provide a reference for selecting patients for whom surgery is more suitable. Patients who underwent parathyroidectomy (PTX) for SHPT at The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from September 2021 to April 2024 were selected as the study object, with the inclusion and exclusion criteria as followed. They were divided into rural and urban residents for comparison as a cross-sectional study. The study evaluated the comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and postoperative complications diagnosed by radiography of patients undergoing surgery for SHPT. A total of 119 patients were included, among whom, 71 were from rural areas and 48 were from urban areas. Compared with urban residents, rural residents had poorer economic conditions, a longer interval from disease onset to PTX, and a higher incidence of cardiovascular and fracture events and concurrent nephrolithiasis, all of which were statistically significant. Multivariate analysis indicated that place of residence, age, and duration of uremia were independent risk factors of cardiovascular/fracture events. Medical staff in ESRD outpatient clinics should pay attention to patients with SHPT. ESRD patients should have better surveillance especially for rural, elder and poor phosphorus control patients, and promptly assess surgical intervention measures.

Improved staffing policies and practices in healthcare based on a conceptual model.

Staffing policies are critical in healthcare facilities. However, problems from a mismatch between staff numbers requirements and offers are frequently encountered. This research examines the joint effects of quantitative and qualitative staff mismatch in a healthcare organization in China to understand how staffing management policies affect staffing adequacy and how staffing adequacy leads to important human resource (HR) outcomes. In a previous study, we identified four dimensions of staffing management policies, namely decision-making, data management, productivity optimization, and title vs. competency. Based on this categorization, an 11-item scale was generated and evaluated for psychometric quality. A quantitative study was conducted with 1,323 healthcare professionals (including clinical and administrative staff) working at the hospital, matched by dyads and teams. A conceptual model with work engagement as a mediator between quantitative staffing adequacy interactions and qualitative staffing adequacy was tested with structural equations. The findings indicate that staffing policies do exert effects on staffing adequacy. These findings further indicate that quantitative and qualitative staffing adequacy interact in explaining work engagement and team performance and that the moderated mediation occurs as hypothesized. Our findings indicate that both types of staffing adequacies contribute to higher team performance via a heightened sense of work engagement from healthcare professionals. Furthermore, a modulation is observed between the two types of staffing adequacies during the promotion of higher team performance. The supported model is helpful in improving staffing management policies and increasing staffing fit so as to improve hospital performance.

Transitioning an implementation research intervention to a sustained clinical service: Telehealth primary care mental health integration implementation in Veterans Health Administration.

Often in implementation science efforts, an intervention originated by research funding does not continue in clinical practice after funding ends, or if it does, the process by which it was sustained remains known only to the implementation research or clinical teams. From 2018 to 2020, we implemented a complex telehealth interdisciplinary behavioral health program supported by research funding. The intervention was Primary Care Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) delivered via televideo from a large parent medical facility to rural satellite clinics (tele-PCMHI) within the Veterans Health Administration. Two implementation facilitators worked closely with clinical leaders and staff to plan, launch, and sustain tele-PCMHI across four sites. The intervention is still maintained by the clinical service and has spread to eight sites. Based on ethnographic and qualitative data collected weekly over 2 years, we categorized sustainment strategies across distinct time periods for this complex program, theoretically grounded in the Dynamic Sustainability Framework, emphasizing changes to adapt intervention fit to rapidly changing context. To contextualize, we identified barriers and strengths, such as difficulty training staff to use new equipment, restructuring clinic workflow, and determining suicide risk management remotely. New barriers arose, and, thus, new strategies were needed to continue implementing at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Different strategies at different stages of implementation allowed sustainment to be a dynamic and evolving process. Plus, proactive and persistent planning for sustainment early in the effort, along with alignment with performance metrics and national policy, supported continued delivery in real-world organized care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

An Exploration Of Delirium Awareness Amongst Clinical Staff Working On The Acute Floor Of A Level Three Hospital

Abstract Background Delirium is an acute change in cognitive function that has an organic cause and is likely to be reversible or preventable (HSE Delirium Algorithm, 2021). The Frailty Intervention Team (FIT) based in the Emergency Department (ED) &amp; Acute Medical Assessment Unit (AMAU) comprises of Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and Dietetics and is supported by an Older Persons Advanced Nurse Practitioner. The 4AT delirium screen is routinely completed by FIT as part of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. FIT observed limited use of delirium screening in ED/AMAU therefore we proposed to explore delirium awareness amongst all clinical staff on the acute floor. Methods All clinical staff in ED/AMAU were invited to complete an anonymised paper questionnaire to explore their awareness of delirium. Basic statistical analysis of data was completed using Excel. Results Over one week twenty-four questionnaires were completed by medical, nursing, allied health and health care assistants. Six questions explored delirium awareness and a seventh question explored the willingness to engage in delirium information sessions if made available to staff locally. On assessment of delirium awareness an average score of 79.3% (range 16.7%-100%) was achieved. Participants scored strongly on potential causes of and screening for delirium. Questions relating to delirium symptoms and potential outcomes of unrecognised delirium had the least correct response rates. 100% of respondents expressed interest in attending delirium information sessions if made accessible to them within ED/AMAU. Conclusion This study identified overall satisfactory delirium awareness amongst clinical staff on the acute floor and all participants expressed interest in expanding their knowledge in this area. Compliance with use of delirium screening tools in clinical practice was not assessed and we also acknowledge the limited number of participants. Future plans include audit of the use of delirium screening tools, delivery of delirium information sessions and provision of accessible delirium resources in ED/AMAU.

Results From A Snapshot Survey Of Delirium Prevalence, Detection And Care In Hospitals In Ireland On World Delirium Awareness Day

Abstract Background Delirium, an acute encephalopathy characterized by acute onset, fluctuation, and attention deficits, is associated with increased mortality and morbidity, and with precipitation or worsening of dementia. Thus, delirium prevention, timely detection, and appropriate management are crucial. Methods On World Delirium Awareness Day (15th March 2023), a global survey was assessed delirium prevalence and care. A senior clinical staff member on each participating ward reported on delirium prevalence at 8AM and 8PM, and on usual ward practice; data was entered into an online survey by a data collector (typically an on-site clinician, visiting several wards to record data). This study reports data from Irish hospitals. Results In total, 132 wards from 15 hospitals across Ireland participated. Delirium prevalence, using a formal assessment tool, was 15.9% across all wards, highest in geriatric wards (20.5%). However, on wards where 'personal judgment' to detect delirium was utilized, the prevalence rate was 11.5%, implying that delirium may be missed on these wards. Intensive care units (76.2%), geriatric wards (70%), and Emergency Departments/Acute Medical Units (ED/AMUA; 66.7%) had the highest rate of written delirium protocols. Similarly, staff training (51.5% overall), was highest in ED/AMAU (88.9%), followed by general surgical (66.7%), and geriatrics wards (60%). In contrast, only 30.8% (4/13) of non-acute wards had provided staff with delirium training in the preceding year. Having at least one training session in the preceding year was associated with higher use of formal delirium tools (18.8% versus 60.3%). Wards reported staff training/educating as the main care improvement priority; 72.7% of wards identified lack of time to train staff as a key barrier. Conclusion Delirium is prevalent in Irish hospitals and appears under-detected without formal screening. Training staff in delirium-related skills, including the use of simple screening tools for delirium detection and causation, could be paramount to improving patient outcomes.

Student drop out and feelings of belonging and mattering in UK undergraduate allied health students

Student belonging is well researched, with links identified between a sense of belonging in students and student experience, satisfaction, and student persistence. Mattering refers to an individual student’s perception that they are noticed and valued, and it is less well researched. This research investigates levels of belonging and mattering across the academic and the clinical environment in undergraduate Allied Health professional students and the correlation with students who have seriously considered dropping out. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was distributed to undergraduate students enrolled on Allied Health programmes at one UK university. The questionnaires utilised four previously validated Likert scales measuring feelings of: mattering in the university environment (Elliott, Kao and Grant, 2004), mattering in the clinical placement environment (Elliott, Kao and Grant, 2004); belonging in the university environment (Yorke, 2016); and belonging in the clinical placement environment using the Belongingness Scale−Clinical Placement Experience (BS−CPE) (Levett-Jones et al., 2009). Participants were also asked whether they had seriously considered dropping out from their studies. An analysis of the 264 completed questionnaires showed that students who had seriously considered dropping out had significantly lower scores for all four scales. This research demonstrates that feelings of belonging and mattering may impact on the student’s intention to persist with their studies. For students attending clinical placement as part of their studies, attention needs to be given to supporting students to feel that they belong in the clinical placement environment and that they matter to clinical staff and their peers during placements.

A Review of Patient Continence and Related Staff Knowledge on Specialist Geriatric Wards

Abstract Background Incontinence is a common and troublesome feature of frailty (NCPOP 2012), routinely examined in a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). It can impact on life quality, mobility, falls and overall care needs. Patients often develop incontinence during hospital admission and staff knowledge of continence status (CS) and efforts to drive improvements are often poor. We sought to explore these issues on our wards. Methods We conducted a point prevalence study, reviewed medical charts and interviewed ward nurses on three specialist geriatric wards. Patients &amp;gt;65y over a six-week period were included. We developed a proforma and recorded current and pre-admission CS, and use of continence wear. Nursing staff awareness of CS was also explored. Results 104 patients (57% female, mean age 81y) were included. Overall, 34 (32.7%) had urinary incontinence (UI), of whom 22 (64%) developed new UI since admission. 27 (25.7%) patients had a urinary catheter inserted, most (23; 85%) for short-term use. Almost half (46; 44.2%) had faecal incontinence (FI), of which 74% was new FI since admission. Overall, 19 patients (18%) were doubly incontinent. Continence wear was also reviewed; 57 (54%) were in full wrap-around continence wear, 28 (27%) in pull-ups. 26 (25%) wore continence wear despite being continent. Only 28 (27%) had a call bell within reach. Nursing awareness was examined, 85 nurses (81.7%) were aware of their patient’s CS, and 15 (14.4%) were partially aware. In all cases, nursing handover documents were consulted. For 35 patients, (33%) CS impacted on their discharge plan. Conclusion Rates of UI and FI were high in our cohort and further increased during hospital admission. Staff knowledge was satisfactory but suboptimal efforts were made to improve CS. Consequently, an education session was delivered to clinical staff to embed continence assessment into CGA. Additionally, continence advocates have been appointed to each ward.

Summary of the Best Evidence for Tube Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Children

Objective: To summarize the evidence of tube feeding intolerance in critically ill children, aiming to provide evidence-based information for clinical nursing staff. Methods: Evidence search was done in Chinese and English databases to guide network and professional associations at home and abroad. The search time limit was from January 2014 to January 2024, nearly 10 years of relevant literature, mainly including guidelines, consensus, expert advice, best practice, evidence summary, system evaluation, and meta-analysis. Literature quality evaluation and evidence extraction were independently performed by two researchers. Results: This paper included 13 articles, including three guidelines, three systematic evaluations, three expert opinions, and four expert consensus. Twenty-six pieces of evidence were summarized from 10 aspects of feeding intolerance definition, team building, nutritional assessment, nutritional preparation, feeding protocol, feeding route, feeding management, pipeline management, gastric residual volume, and drug application. Conclusion: This paper summarized the evidence of tube feeding intolerance in critically ill children, which can provide evidence-based information for clinical practice. The abdominal signs should be closely observed when evaluating feeding intolerance, focusing on the prevention and reduction of feeding interruption.

Analysis on the application of FMEA in 'instrument and equipment surface cleaning and disinfection' in hospitals based on standardization and cleaning and disinfection information system management.

To analyze the application of 'instrument and equipment surface cleaning and disinfection' in hospitals based on standardization and the management of cleaning and disinfection information systems. Employees and all cleaning and disinfected instruments and equipment from 56 inpatient departments in our hospital were selected as the subjects of observation. The period before the intervention (January 2023) was designated as the control group, while the period after the intervention (July 2023) was designated as the study group. In the control group, the instruments and equipment under routine management were disinfected. The research team applied the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method to clean and disinfect the surfaces of instruments and equipment on the basis of standardization and cleaning and disinfection information system management. Employees' theoretical knowledge points and operational skill scores before and after the intervention were compared and evaluated. The changes in the risk priority coefficient (RPN) values of high-risk factors were analyzed. Fifty-six clinical medical staff from 56 inpatient departments in the hospital were selected to evaluate the clinical satisfaction of the cleaning and disinfection management of instruments and equipment before and after the intervention, and the clinical satisfaction of the two groups was compared. The scores of theoretical knowledge and operational skills of the staff in the research group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The passing rates of theoretical knowledge and operational skills in the control group and the research group were 44.64 and 94.64% respectively, and 55.36 and 96.43%, respectively. The qualified rate of theoretical knowledge and operational skills of staff in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The RPN scores of medical personnel, environment, system and system guarantee factors in the control group were 80, 80, 80, and 100, respectively. The RPN scores of medical personnel factors, environmental factors, system factors and system guarantee factors in the research group were 6, 24, 24, and 36, respectively. Through standardization and cleaning and disinfection information system management, the theoretical knowledge and technical operation capabilities of cleaning can be effectively improved.

Quieter Nurse Call System to Reduce Alarm Noise in Hospitals.

Healthcare staff are typically exposed to hundreds of alarms each shift; researchers believe that the number of alarms may be more than 1000 alarms per shift. This may lead to staff becoming desensitised to the alarm, leading to a delayed or inadequate response to the alarm, known as alarm fatigue. Clinical-grade wireless smartphones are now carried by clinical staff to receive calls and notifications from a nurse call system.

Implementation and Evaluation of a Home-Based Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Monitoring Option: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

HIV prevention is a public health priority. Despite progress in recent years, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use remains suboptimal especially among groups disproportionately impacted by new HIV diagnoses such as gender and sexual minorities of color. Multiple barriers including a lack of PrEP providers and challenges with attending quarterly monitoring visits contribute to low PrEP uptake and retention. Home-based PrEP (HB-PrEP) services could reduce stigma, increase convenience, expand health system capacity for PrEP care, and improve PrEP retention. Home Option Testing for PrEP (HOT4PrEP) is a hybrid randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims to examine whether HB-PrEP care is acceptable to PrEP users, feasible to implement in a sexual health clinic setting, and impacts PrEP retention. The RCT will recruit 458 persons currently taking or soon to initiate PrEP at a sexual health clinic in Seattle, Washington, and randomize them to continue the standard of care or have the option to use HB-PrEP for 2 of 3 triannual PrEP follow-up visits. Participants in the intervention arm will be sent home kits containing gonorrhea and chlamydia swabs and Tasso devices for blood self-collection. The primary outcome is PrEP retention between groups at 20 months; secondary outcomes include user satisfaction and acceptability, feasibility, self-reported PrEP adherence, and sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence. Interviews with PrEP users and clinic staff will elucidate barriers and facilitators of implementation. The HOT4PrEP RCT began enrolling in March 2022, was on hold during the height of the US mpox epidemic, then resumed enrollment in December 2022. Of the first 100 enrollees, the median age is 34 years, and most are cisgender gay men (89/100, 89%) with at least some college education (91/100, 91%). Among the 49 participants randomized to the HB-PrEP option, 33 (67%) chose to self-collect samples at home at least once, of whom 27 (82%) successfully returned test kits for HIV and STI testing. Primary PrEP retention and qualitative analyses are ongoing. Implementation of HB-PrEP into a high-volume sexual health clinic seems to be feasible and acceptable to early RCT enrollees. This strategy has the potential to address individual and systemic barriers associated with initiating and persisting on PrEP, such as increasing sexual health agency and expanding clinical capacity to serve greater numbers of PrEP users. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05856942; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05856942. DERR1-10.2196/56587.

Impact of implementing primary care-based medication for opioid use disorder on provider and staff perceptions

Abstract Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is the management of opioid use disorder (OUD) on an outpatient basis with buprenorphine or buprenorphine/naloxone (or methadone, which is limited to federally certified opioid treatment programs). Primary care practices are well poised to provide comprehensive care for patients with OUD, including provision of MOUD. The aim of this study was to assess provider and staff OUD attitudes and role perceptions before and after implementation of a MOUD clinical service line. A survey was distributed to evaluate attitudes and perceptions of patients with OUD and provision of MOUD among providers and staff in an academic family medicine clinic. Surveys were distributed in December 2020 (73% response rate), prior to a substance use disorder educational training and MOUD service line implementation, which provided patients with OUD both primary care services and management with buprenorphine/naloxone. A follow-up survey was distributed in February 2022 (69% response rate).Training and implementation of the MOUD service line demonstrated improvements in the domains of motivation (+0.63), attitudes (+0.32), satisfaction (+0.38), role support (+0.48), role adequacy (+0.39), and safety (+0.79) among surveyed participants. The change in satisfaction and safety domains was statistically significant (P &amp;lt; .05). There was no change in the role legitimacy domain.Implementation of a primary care-based MOUD service line positively affected provider and staff motivation, attitudes, satisfaction, sense of safety, role support, and adequacy when working with patients with OUD. This highlights the benefits of MOUD-specific clinical support to optimize care delivery within primary care.

Strengthening Relationships Within Intensive Psychiatric Care: Staff Perceptions of an Attachment Training Intervention

ABSTRACTIntroductionIntensive psychiatric care units can be challenging environments in which to build strong staff‐patient relationships. Attachment theory may provide a useful model for strengthening relationships in this setting.AimThe aim of this study was to explore staff perceptions of the utility of attachment theory for understanding patient behaviour in the intensive psychiatric care setting.MethodsSemi‐structured interviews were conducted with 11 multi‐disciplinary staff members. Interviews focused on the staff member's experience of learning about attachment theory and applying this perspective to their work on the ward. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsThe analysis led to the development of three themes: engaging the reflective self, new perspective on others and cohesive ward culture.ConclusionStaff reported that learning about attachment theory supported them to better understand patient distress and associated behaviours. Notably, staff also used attachment theory to reflect on both their own internal states and the internal states of their colleagues. These reflections were suggested to bolster staff wellbeing and improve the ward milieu.Implications for PracticeIntegrating attachment theory into team formulation, ward rounds and reflective practice groups could have a benefit for clinical practice, staff wellbeing and team cohesion in this setting.

Abstract B027: Adapting communication resources for clinic staff in a multisite FQHC to improve HPV vaccination encounters with Spanish-speaking parents of adolescents

Abstract Introduction: Adopting evidenced-based strategies (EBS) targeting clinic staff in safety-net settings can improve adolescent HPV vaccination rates. Still, adaptations of EBS are needed to reach racial/ethnic minority patients and families effectively. As part of a larger implementation study on HPV vaccination, we examined and addressed adaptation needs for HPV vaccine communication resources to support clinic staff serving Hispanic adolescent FQHC patients. Methods: In October 2022-January 2023, we partnered with a large multi-site FQHC in Los Angeles, CA to deliver two clinic staff trainings designed to i) improve HPV knowledge and communication strategies; and ii) discuss HPV vaccine workflow. Informed by the Practice Change Model, we completed baseline qualitative interviews with clinic team members (providers, clinic staff, and leadership) and provider and clinic staff surveys to inform the development, implementation, and adaptation of clinic staff training on HPV vaccine knowledge and communication strategies. We then conducted site visits and key-informant interviews with clinic staff immediately post-training. Notes from site visits and key-informant interviews were transcribed to identify potential barriers to adoption and opportunities for adaptation. Results: Baseline data indicated 95% of clinic staff identified as Hispanic and 94% reported speaking a language other than English. Notes from site visits and key-informant interviews with clinic staff indicated clinic staff identified the need for Spanish language messaging to communicate HPV and cancer prevention messages to monolingual Spanish families. As a result, we adapted Spanish-language messages from the 2023 Health Resources and Services Administration toolkit and American Cancer Society to develop a handout with scripts that address top concerns about HPV vaccination with monolingual Spanish-speaking parents of adolescents to that were identified from baseline data collection. Bilingual-bicultural staff then validated messages and confirmed cultural relevance. Developed materials were then presented to clinic leadership to review and suggest further refinement before delivering them to clinic staff. Discussion: Key-informant interviews and post-training site visits played an important role in identifying opportunities to adapt EBS designed to improve HPV vaccination among culturally diverse patients. To better serve diverse communities disproportionately impacted by HPV-associated cancers, clinic staff need resources with HPV vaccine communication messages available in languages that reflect the needs of their patient population. Citation Format: Samantha Garcia, Adrienne Martinez-Hollingsworth, Sheila Salinas Navarro, Sharon Hudson, Zehui He, Emily Dang, Lawrence Palinkas, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati, Jennifer Tsui. Adapting communication resources for clinic staff in a multisite FQHC to improve HPV vaccination encounters with Spanish-speaking parents of adolescents [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B027.

Abstract C132: Building capacity for equitable cervical cancer care in safety-net settings through an FQHC-NCI comprehensive cancer center partnership in Los Angeles

Abstract Introduction: Multilevel barriers to screening and follow-up contribute to persistent disparities in cervical cancer burden, particularly in marginalized communities receiving care in safety-net healthcare settings. While evidence-based interventions (EBIs) exist for improving cancer screening and follow-up, building capacity to identify effective strategies for implementation and alignment of EBIs to the context of safety-net settings and the diverse communities they serve is critical. Methods: Supported by the HRSA Accelerating Cancer Screening Program, Chinatown Service Center, a multi-site Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) serving Chinese and Latino/a populations in Los Angeles, and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center established a new partnership to identify multilevel factors that impact cervical cancer screening, follow-up and referral and inform the implementation of EBIs to improve care. We conducted a mixed methods assessment June-December 2023 to understand care processes through surveys and qualitative interviews (20-30 minutes, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) with providers and clinic staff and medical chart reviews of patients with ≥ 1 cervical cancer screening order January 2020-March 2023. Results: Surveys (n=23) showed higher knowledge of screening guidelines (p&amp;lt;0.05) and more confidence discussing cervical cancer with patients (p&amp;lt;0.05) among providers compared to clinic staff, indicating opportunities for staff training. Qualitative interviews (n=23) identified inner setting barriers such as limited system-level implementation of cervical cancer screening guidelines and limited technology supports to track patients requiring follow-up. At the individual level, older patients and those not sexually active often declined testing and requested gender concordant (female) providers. Motivation for building cervical cancer care capacity within the FQHC were noted, with clinic members highlighting FQHC strengths in addressing cultural barriers, social needs, and community outreach. Several outer setting barriers emerged for referral and follow-up care, including long wait times for referrals, trouble finding language concordant specialists, transportation barriers, and difficulty accessing specialists through their managed care network. Medical chart abstractions (n=1,428) identified opportunities to improve closed-loop communication with specialists and limited ease for clinic staff identify high and low risk screening results for further treatment. Discussion: By establishing a new FQHC-NCI cancer center partnership, we advanced our combined capacity to address cervical cancer care equity in marginalized communities. We identified patient-level (cultural, logistic, social determinants), provider/clinic staff-level (training needs, patient tracking), and system-level (access to and communication with specialists) barriers that will require selection of EBIs and implementation strategies via a partnered approach with local specialists, health systems, payers, and policymakers. Citation Format: Jennifer Tsui, Samantha Garcia, Emily Dang, Alejandra Ramos, Allison Oh, Kathy Lui, Angela Ching, Eugene Hui, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati, Jack Cheng. Building capacity for equitable cervical cancer care in safety-net settings through an FQHC-NCI comprehensive cancer center partnership in Los Angeles [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C132.