Clinical Encounters Research Articles

The impact of updates in headache quality measures on adherence to best practices in a neurology resident clinic: Aquality improvement study.

To apply the 2019 joint American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and American Headache Society (AHS) quality measures for headache management to a cohort of neurology resident physicians and then assess outcomes related to guideline adherence. The optimization of headache management is essential to reduce both the individual and systemic impact of these disorders. In 2014, the AAN developed 10 quality measures for evidence-based management of patients with headache. A workgroup updated and condensed its headache quality measures in 2019, narrowing the set to six measurements, four of which would primarily focus on the management of migraine and two of which would address the management of cluster headache. This quality improvement study was conducted using a pretest-posttest study design. A pre-intervention survey based on retrospective analysis of five clinic notes for adherence to the measures was designed and distributed to all neurology residents (n = 32) at a large, academic tertiary referral center. The intervention included the creation of an electronic medical record template to aid residents in following the measures during clinical encounters, as well as the provision of direct feedback based on pre-intervention results. Finally, a post-intervention survey was distributed for completion based on notes written during the intervention period. Analysis was limited to migraine, given the low percentage of cluster headache seen in clinic. An increase in adherence was seen in three of the four migraine-related quality measures, with the Use of Abortive Medications for Migraine and Documentation of Counseling on Modifiable Lifestyle and Chronification Factors demonstrating statistically significant improvements (75.8% to 88.0% [p = 0.013] and 83.9% to 94.0% [p = 0.029] adherence, respectively). For secondary outcomes, the increase in the utilization of appropriate diagnostic criteria (82.6% to 93.2%, p = 0.018) was significant, and the self-assessed confidence rating for adherence to guidelines was significant (p < 0.001). This study provides evidence that the quality improvement intervention led to increased adherence to the AAN and AHS migraine-related measures. It is anticipated that increased adherence may lead to improved patient outcomes.

Psychological health in Palliative Care: Thematic analysis of a psychiatrist’s and an art therapist’s clinical reflexive journals

Background: Patients receiving palliative care often face psychological distress, which can be challenging for clinicians to manage. Therefore, reflexive and visual journaling can be used as powerful techniques for clinician selfreflection and personal development. These journals are a form of practice wisdom, providing insights into psychological health in palliative care. Aim: This study aims to describe how patients receiving palliative care experience psychological health, explore the meaning of a palliative care clinician’s work and contribute to the understanding of psychological health in palliative care through the reflexive and visual journals of clinicians. Design: Using Gibb’s reflective cycle as a framework for journaling, this study employs reflexive and visual journaling through the lenses of a psychiatrist and an art therapist. Journal data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Setting/participants: The two first authors journaled 107 clinical encounters and created 36 pieces of response art detailing encounters with patients and their families, and clinical conversations in two palliative care centres. Results: Patient attributes and the clinical environment were observed to influence psychological health in palliative care. The patient’s ability to navigate dying, maintain personhood, exert resilience and experience satisfying relationships contribute to psychological health. A clinical environment comprising clinicians with holistic competencies, systems promoting interdisciplinary collaborations and a values-based culture that promotes patient centricity strengthens the delivery of psychological care. Conclusions: Good psychological health in palliative care extends beyond psychopathology and is influenced by the cardinal elements of being human, value systems and systemic elements in the therapeutic environment.

Multidisciplinary assessment and interventions for childhood auditory processing disorder (APD) and listening difficulties (LiD).

Auditory processing disorder (APD) has been studied in both research and clinic settings, but the relation between the two has not been addressed. In a longitudinal research study (SICLiD), we found that children with clinically normal audiometry who had caregiver-reported listening difficulties (LiD), with or without clinically assessed APD, performed poorly on both listening and cognitive tests. Specific questions asked here were, for the children with LiD, what other neurodevelopmental clinical conditions were identified, what interventions were used by different clinical providers, and how clinical practice was predicted by research results. Study setting was a large, research-led, tertiary pediatric hospital. Electronic medical records of 74 children aged 6-13 years, recruited into SICLiD and assigned to an LiD group based on a validated and reliable caregiver report (ECLiPS), were independently reviewed. Focus was on clinical assessments and interventions following appointments provided in the Hospital Divisions of Audiology, Occupational Therapy, Psychology (Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics), and Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), prior to participation in SICLiD. Descriptive statistics on clinical encounters, identified conditions, and interventions were compared with quantitative, standardized performance on SICLiD assessments of listening and cognitive function. SICLiD z-scores were compared for participants with and without each clinical condition using univariate and logistic prediction analyses. Most (86%) of the children with LiD had been evaluated by at least one clinical service. Overall, 24 assessment categories related to LiD, including APD, were identified. Most common conditions were attention (32%), language (28%), hearing (18%), anxiety (16%), and autism spectrum (6%) disorders. Performance on SICLiD measures varied significantly between providers, conditions, and interventions. Significant relationships between SICLiD and clinical conditions were mostly caregiver-reported items from the ECLiPS or the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC-2). Other significant correlations were scarce, but included the SCAN composite score, which predicted clinical language and attention, but not other auditory abilities or APD. SICLiD data combined with caregiver reports provided reliable predictions of all clinical conditions except APD. The variety of disciplines, assessments, conditions and interventions revealed here supports previous studies showing that LiD and APD are multifaceted problems of neurodevelopment. Comparisons between clinical- and research-based assessments suggest a diagnostic path that prioritizes caregiver reports and selected psychometric tests for screening and diagnostic purposes.

Practical or Cultural: American Medical Perceptions of Acupuncture from the Boom of the 1820s to ‘Acupuncture Fever’ of the 1970s

In the United States today, acupuncture and Chinese medicine are so connected that the terms are almost interchangeable. Yet, when acupuncture first came to prominence in the American medical community in the 1820s, it was seen as a European innovation and associated with physicians in Paris and London. In contrast to the cultural models of therapeutic action so prevalent today, medical manuals and textbooks of the nineteenth century tended to classify acupuncture as a form of “practical medicine,” an empirically effective technique without a definitive theoretical basis. This paper traces a genealogy of the different ways in which acupuncture has historically been recognized in the United States. Particular attention is paid to the period of “acupuncture fever” in the 1970s, the appearance of acupuncture in American medical texts in the late nineteenth century, and the initial wave of discourse around acupuncture in the 1820s. This paper demonstrates an ongoing historical tension between framing acupuncture in terms of a complex system of cultural concepts and framing it as a simple and practical therapy whose efficacy is most clearly felt in the space of the clinical encounter.

Regimes of pain: The geopolitics of cancer palliation in Pakistan.

This article examines how militarized regimes of narcotics and price control sustain unpalliated cancer pain in Pakistan. It shows how these regimes of control-reimagined as "regimes of pain"-render morphine, a cheap, effective opiate analgesic, scarce in hospitals. Meanwhile, heroin, morphine's illegal derivative, proliferates in illicit circuits. The article highlights a devastating consequence of the global wars against drugs and "terror": the consignment of cancer patients to agonizing end-of-life pain. Widening the analytic lens upon palliation beyond bodies and their clinical encounters, the article offers a geopolitics of palliation. It shows how narcovigilance targeting illicit drugs has the perverse effect of throttling morphine's licit supply. It shows further how unviably low price ceilings, purported to ensure a poor population's access to morphine, render it scarce on the official market. These mutually reinforcing regimes of control thus thwart their own purported objectives, consigning cancer patients to preventable, yet unpalliated, pain.

Assessing the association between quantity and quality of family caregiver participation in decision-making clinical encounters on patient activation in the metastatic breast cancer setting

ObjectiveCaregivers support individuals undergoing cancer treatment by assisting with activities, managing care, navigating healthcare systems, and communicating with care teams. We explored the quality and quantity of caregiver participation during recorded decision-making clinical appointments in women with metastatic breast cancer.MethodsThis was a convergent parallel mixed methods study that utilized qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. Caregiver participation quality was operationalized using a summative thematic content analysis to identify and sum caregiver actions performed during appointments. Performance of a greater number of actions was considered greater quality of participation. Caregiver participation quantity was measured by calculating the proportion of speaking time. Participation quality and quantity were compared to patient activation, assessed using the Patient Activation Measure 1-month post decision-making appointment.ResultsFifty-three clinical encounters between patients with MBC, their caregivers, and oncologists were recorded. Identified caregiver actions included: General Support; Management of Treatment or Medication; Treatment History; Decision-Making; Insurance or Money; Pharmacy; Scheduling; Travel Concerns; General Cancer Understanding; Patient Specific Cancer Understanding; Caregiver-Initiated or Emphasis on Symptom Severity; and Caregiver Back-Up of Patient Symptom Description. Caregivers averaged 5 actions (SD 3): 48% of patient’s caregivers had low quality (< 5 actions) and 52% had high quality (> 6 actions) participation. Regarding quantity, caregivers spoke on average for 4% of the encounter, with 60% of caregivers speaking less than 4% of the encounter (low quantity) and 40% of caregivers speaking more than 4% (high quantity). Greater quality and quantity of caregiver participation was associated with greater patient activation.ConclusionsCaregivers perform a variety of actions during oncological decision-making visits aiding both patient and provider. Greater participation in terms of quantity and quality by the caregiver was associated with greater patient activism, indicating a need for better integration of the caregiver in clinical decision-making environments.

Follow up care for adults with diabetes treated for severe hypoglycemia by emergency medical Services, 2013–2019

AimsTo capture the types and content of healthcare encounters following severe hypoglycemia requiring emergency medical services (EMS) and to correlate their features with subsequent risk of severe hypoglycemia. MethodsA retrospective cohort was obtained by linking data from a multi-state health system and an advanced life support ambulance service. This identified 1977 EMS calls by 1028 adults with diabetes experiencing hypoglycemia between 1/1/2013–12/31/2019. We evaluated the healthcare engagement over the following 7 days to identify rates of discussion of hypoglycemia, change of diabetes medications, glucagon prescribing, and referral for diabetes. ResultsRates of hypoglycemia discussion increased with escalating levels of care, from 11.5 % after EMS calls without emergency department (ED) transport or outpatient clinical encounters to 98 % among hospitalized patients with outpatient follow-up. EMS transport and outpatient follow-up were associated with significantly higher odds of discussion of hypoglycemia (OR 60 and OR 22.1, respectively). Interventions were not impacted by previous severe hypoglycemia within 30 days. Prescription of glucagon was rare among all patients. ConclusionsInterventions to prevent recurrent hypoglycemia increase with escalating levels of care but remain inadequate and inconsistent with clinical guidelines. Greater attention is needed to ensure timely diabetes-related follow-up and treatment modification for patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia.

Design and pilot test of an implicit bias mitigation curriculum for clinicians.

Clinician implicit racial bias (IB) may lead to lower quality care and adverse health outcomes for Black patients. Educational efforts to train clinicians to mitigate IB vary widely and have insufficient evidence of impact. We developed and pilot-tested an evidence-based clinician IB curriculum, "REACHing Equity." To assess acceptability and feasibility, we conducted an uncontrolled one-arm pilot trial with post-intervention assessments. REACHing Equity is designed for clinicians to: (1) acquire knowledge about IB and its impact on healthcare, (2) increase awareness of one's own capacity for IB, and (3) develop skills to mitigate IB in the clinical encounter. We delivered REACHing Equity virtually in three facilitated, interactive sessions over 7-9 weeks. Participants were health care providers who completed baseline and end-of-study evaluation surveys. Of approximately 1,592 clinicians invited, 37 participated, of whom 29 self-identified as women and 24 as non-Hispanic White. Attendance averaged 90% per session; 78% attended all 3 sessions. Response rate for evaluation surveys was 67%. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the curriculum objectives were met, and that REACHing Equity equipped them to mitigate the impact of implicit bias in clinical care. Participants consistently reported higher self-efficacy for mitigating IB after compared to before completing the curriculum. Despite apparent barriers to clinician participation, we demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of the REACHing Equity intervention. Further research is needed to develop objective measures of uptake and clinician skill, test the impact of REACHing Equity on clinically relevant outcomes, and refine the curriculum for uptake and dissemination.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03415308.

Integrated management of cryptococcal meningitis and concurrent opportunistic infections to improve outcomes in advanced HIV disease: a randomised strategy trial.

Mortality associated with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis remains high even in the context of clinical trials (24-45% at 10 weeks); mortality at 12-months is up to 78% in resource limited settings. Co-prevalent tuberculosis (TB) is common and preventable, and likely contributes to poor patient outcomes. Innovative strategies to increase TB preventative therapy (TPT) provision and uptake within this high-risk group are needed. The IMPROVE trial (Integrated management of cryptococcal meningitis and concurrent opportunistic infections to improve outcomes in advanced HIV disease) is a nested open label, two arm, randomised controlled strategy trial to evaluate the safety (adverse events) and feasibility (adherence and tolerability) of two ultra-short course TPT strategies, in the context of recent diagnosis and treatment for cryptococcal meningitis. We will enrol 205 adults with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis from three hospitals in Uganda. Participants will be randomised to either inpatient initiation (early) or outpatient initiation (standard, week 6) of 1HP (one month of isoniazid and rifapentine). Participant follow-up is to include TB screening, 1HP pill counts and tolerability reviews on alternate weeks until week-18. The trial primary endpoint is TB-disease free 1HP treatment completion at 18-weeks, secondary endpoints: 1HP treatment completion, 1HP discontinuation, grade ≥3 adverse events and serious adverse events, drug-induced liver injury, incident active TB, 18-week survival; rifapentine, fluconazole and dolutegravir concentrations will be measured with intensive sampling in a pharmacokinetic sub-study of 15 eligible participants. The IMPROVE trial will provide preliminary safety and feasibility data to inform 1HP TPT strategies for adults with advanced HIV disease and cryptococcal meningitis. The potential impact of demonstrating that inpatient initiation of 1HP TPT is safe and feasible amongst this high-risk subpopulation with advanced HIV disease, would be to expand the range of clinical encounters in which clinicians can feasibly provide 1HP, and therefore increase the reach of TPT as a preventative intervention. ISRCTN18437550 (05/11/2021).

Recommendations for Faculty Development in Addressing Implicit Bias in Clinical Encounters and Clinical Learning Environments.

Recommendations for Faculty Development in Addressing Implicit Bias in Clinical Encounters and Clinical Learning Environments.

Factors associated with fertility status assessment among female survivors of childhood cancer.

10072 Background: Female survivors of childhood cancer with prior gonadotoxic treatment are at risk for infertility. As such, fertility status assessment (FSA) with ovarian reserve assessment and antral follicle count in consultation with a fertility specialist may be indicated to evaluate options for biological parenthood. FSA is underutilized in this population. This study explored psychosocial, developmental, and clinical factors associated with FSA. Methods: Female survivors (aged 18-29 years, diagnosis &lt; 21 years, &gt; 1 year from treatment completion, prior gonadotoxic treatment) were recruited from four cancer centers in the U.S. Participants reported sociodemographics (race, sexual orientation, gender identity, relationship status), developmental milestones (living and financial independence, full-time employment), reproductive concerns (modified Reproductive Concerns Scale), knowledge of reproductive health, decisional factors, and history of FSA. Clinical characteristics (cancer diagnosis, treatment-related risk for infertility, hormonal testing, clinical encounter with pediatric reproductive health subspecialist [gynecology, endocrinology]) were abstracted from the medical record. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for factors associated with FSA. Results: Of 325 participants, N = 260 completed all survey items of interest. Participants were an average of 23.7±3.1 years, 74% non-Hispanic white, 79% heterosexual and cisgender, and 48% in a committed relationship. Compared with those without FSA (N = 164), participants who completed an FSA (N = 96) reported greater attainment of developmental milestones (OR 2.20, 95%CI: 1.10-3.85, p = .027), greater desire for reproductive information (OR 1.86, 95%CI: 1.2-2.77, p = .001), greater knowledge regarding fertility-related procedures (OR 4.12, 95%CI: 2.36-7.57, p &lt; .001) and fertility preservation (OR 1.76, 95%CI: 1.31-2.44, p &lt; .001), having made an informed decision to pursue FSA (OR 1.82, 95%CI: 1.30-2.59, p = .001), clinical encounter with pediatric reproductive subspecialist (OR 3.37, 95%CI: 1.1-10.9, p = .032), and less knowledge regarding family building options (OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.27-0.79, p = .006). Diagnosis, infertility risk, and hormonal evaluation were not associated with FSA completion. Conclusions: Among emerging adult survivors, psychosocial factors associated with FSA completion include developmental milestones and knowledge of reproductive health. Clinical encounters with pediatric reproductive subspecialists may provide an opportunity for survivors to learn about and receive referrals to a fertility clinic. Psychoeducation is warranted to support survivors’ pursuit of FSA. Integration and consideration of survivor development and knowledge in these clinical encounters should potentiate optimal uptake of FSA.

On Natality: Beginning to Be Limited.

Through the personal reflection on chronic pain, the author engages the question of how clinicians and their patients manage various forms of loss within the clinical encounter. The notion of developmental grief is introduced as a stepping-stone from phallicism to genitality, whereby the capacity to grieve and thus tolerate limitedness enables growth. Hannah Arendt's concept of natality is offered as a hopeful corrective to the resistance to accepting limitations.

Do the teaching, practice and assessment of clinical communication skills align?

BackgroundEvidence indicates that communication skills teaching learnt in the classroom are not often readily transferable to the assessment methods that are applied nor to the clinical environment. An observational study was conducted to objectively evaluate students’ communication skills in different learning environments. The study sought to investigate the extent to which the communication skills demonstrated by students in classroom, clinical, and assessment settings align.MethodA mixed methods study was conducted to observe and evaluate students during the fourth year of a five-year medical program. Participants were videorecorded during structured classroom ‘interactional skills’ sessions, as well as clinical encounters with real patients and an OSCE station calling upon communication skills. The Calgary Cambridge Observational Guides was used to evaluate students at different settings.ResultThis study observed 28 students and findings revealed that while in the classroom students were able to practise a broad range of communication skills, in contrast in the clinical environment, information-gathering and relationship-building with patients became the focus of their encounters with patients. In the OSCEs, limited time and high-pressure scenarios caused the students to rush to complete the task which focussed solely on information-gathering and/or explanation, diminishing opportunity for rapport-building with the patient.ConclusionThese findings indicate a poor alignment that can develop between the skills practiced across learning environments. Further research is needed to investigate the development and application of students’ skills over the long term to understand supports for and barriers to effective teaching and learning of communication skills in different learning environments.

Decisions With Patients, Not for Patients: Shared Decision-Making in Allergy and Immunology

Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is an increasingly implemented patient-centred approach to navigating patient preferences regarding diagnostic and treatment options and supported decision-making. This therapeutic approach prioritizes the patient's perspectives, considering current medical evidence to provide a balanced approach to clinical scenarios. In light of numerous recent guideline recommendations that are conditional in nature, and are clinical scenarios defined by preference-sensitive care options, there is a tremendous opportunity for SDM and validated decision aids.Despite the expansion of the literature on SDM, formal acceptance among clinicians remains inconsistent. Surprisingly, a significant disparity exists between clinicians' self-reported adherence to SDM principles and patients' perceptions of its implementation during clinical encounters. This discrepancy underscores a fundamental issue in the delivery of healthcare, where clinicians may overestimate their integration of SDM, while patients' experiences suggest otherwise.This review critically examines the factors contributing to this inconsistency, including barriers within the healthcare system, clinician attitudes and behaviours, and patient expectations and preferences. By elucidating these factors in the fields of food allergy, asthma, eosinophilic esophagitis, and other allergic diseases, this review aims to provide insights into bridging the gap between clinician perception and patient experience in SDM.Addressing this discordance is crucial for advancing patient-centred care and ensuring that SDM is not merely a theoretical concept but a tangible reality in the practice of Allergy and Immunology.

Development of equity, diversity, and inclusion competencies in residents and faculty in oncology through formal and informal learning.

9053 Background: In recent years, a growing body of literature has suggested that patients need their clinicians to provide culturally competent care. A focus on integrated and longitudinal training within the domains of equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) is needed to equip physicians to meet patients’ needs. Oncology is one such specialty that needs strong skillsets in EDI given its vulnerable and complex patient populations. This study explores how physicians within oncology learn about the domains of EDI through formal and informal learning. Methods: Using constructivist grounded theory (CGT), this study explores EDI competency formation at one academic center – the Juravinski Cancer Center in Hamilton ON, Canada. A purposive sample of 16 staff and resident physicians was taken to incorporate variation sampling - including a variety of ages, genders, and work/training experience. Participants were from both medical and radiation oncology. Semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted. Transcripts were generated, anonymized, and analyzed iteratively. Data analysis followed stages of open, axial, and selective coding through which themes were constructed. Interviews were continued until data saturation was reached. Results: Of the 16 participants, there was an even distribution between men (8) and women (8). Mean age was 43 (range 30-65). There were 5 residents and 11 faculty members. 9 were from medical oncology and 7 from radiation oncology. The major themes generated from the study were: the relationship between EDI competencies and professional identify formation, the role of culture and context in influencing exposure and learning about EDI, and the relationship between formal and informal learning opportunities. Conclusions: This study is the first to explore of how oncologists presently develop EDI competencies through formal and informal learning. The study has discovered the role of professional identify formation as a factor influencing learning, the impact of the culture and context of medicine, and the significant interplay between formal and informal learning in developing EDI skillsets. While much learning takes place informally, informed by clinical encounters and personal experiences, there is a need to marry the informal learning opportunities to more structured formal teaching in the training and clinical environment. [Table: see text]

Addressing misinformation about cancer care in the clinical setting: A pilot study of a conversation guide and training for cancer care providers.

e23250 Background: Medical misinformation about cancer care is understudied despite its pervasiveness and harmful effects on patients. This misinformation causes a) delays in care or forgoing of treatment for curable conditions; b) economic harm such as spending and travel on ineffective or harmful treatments; c) potentially toxic effects of the suggested test/treatment; and d) harmful medical interactions with standard curative treatments. Recently, in an IRB study we surveyed MD Anderson clinicians about their ability to successfully address patients who endorse medical misinformation. We found that ~40% of physicians report success rates below 60% for correcting misinformation. ~50% of respondents answered that they have insufficient resources to address patients who endorse misinformation; ~65% answered that they have insufficient training, and ~50% answered that there is insufficient institutional support. In response to these findings, we developed (as far as we know) the first pilot conversation guide and training to improve provider skills and confidence in addressing misinformation about cancer in clinical encounters. Methods: For our quality improvement project, we partnered with clinicians in integrative oncology and gynecologic oncology to develop the conversation guide. The techniques, strategies, and model dialogue in the guide are adapted from best practices developed for addressing vaccine hesitancy. Before the training, we asked 11 physicians to provide a self-assessment of their comfort, confidence, and competence in addressing patients who endorse misinformation about cancer. Then we provided a 25min training in which participants role-played to learn strategies and model dialogue for four common scenarios. After, we resurveyed participants’ self-assessment measures and assessment of the training’s utility. Results: All participants believed the conversation guide and training will be significantly (82%) or moderately (18%) helpful for correcting patients/families who endorse medical misinformation about cancer. 91% said the conversation guide and training significantly (9% moderately) improved their ability to correct patients/patients’ families who endorse medical misinformation. All participants reported improved comfort, confidence, and competence in their ability to address patients/families who endorse misinformation about cancer care. 100% would recommend the guide and training to their peers. Conclusions: Given the prevalence of medical misinformation generally, the training and resources we have developed will be valuable to clinicians effectively address the growing number of patients who endorse misinformation about their care. Our long-term goal is to conduct a larger study and turn our conversation guide and training into a replicable model available for widespread use.

Predictors of symptom scores in myeloproliferative neoplasms: A real-world retrospective cohort study.

6582 Background: Although high symptom burden indicates poor survival and informs treatment decisions, little is known about the impact of demographic, clinical, and laboratory features on total symptom score (TSS) in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Methods: Patients with MPN (polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF)) were identified from the retrospective chart review. TSS, individual symptom scores (fatigue, early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, concentration problems, fever, night sweats, itching, bone pain, weight loss), demographic characteristics (race, ethnicity, age, gender), clinical features (time since diagnosis, depression status, obesity status, spleen size), laboratory results and season at the time of visit were recorded from the clinical encounter when index assessment of TSS was performed for each patient. Normality was assessed using visual inspection of data distribution, whereas multicollinearity was assessed using various inflation factors. A univariable regression followed by a multivariable regression analysis was conducted using a backward selection approach. A p-value &lt;0.05 indicated a statistically significant association of a given feature with TSS. Results: The chart review identified 252 patients (PV: 78; ET: 81; MF: 93). Mean age was 59 (SD: 17.7), 67 (SD: 13.0), and 68 (SD: 10.9) years for ET, PV, and MF respectively. Most patients were white (PV, MF: 92%; ET: 83%) and females (ET: 75%; PV: 60%; MF: 53%). The TSS of patients was highest with PV (mean: 18.5; SD: 16.9) followed by MF (mean: 18.1; SD: 15.4) and ET (mean: 14.3; SD: 15.9). Fatigue was the most reported symptom whereas the least reported symptoms were fever and weight loss. Univariable regression analyses showed depression (B: 17.7; p=0.02), female gender (B: 10.6; p=0.01), platelet count (B: 0.03; p=0.03), and hemoglobin (Hb) (B: -2.6; p=0.01) in PV patients, depression (B: 19.8, p=2x10-5) in ET patients and depression (B: 11.0, p=0.03), white blood cell (WBC) count (B: 0.2; p=0.01), neutrophil count (B: 0.3, p=0.01), and non-neutrophil WBC count (B: 0.6; p=0.02) in MF patients to have significant association with TSS. Multivariable regression analyses ( Table) showed Hb (B: -2.5; p=0.01) and platelet count (B: 0.02; p=0.03) in PV patients, depression (B: 19.7; p=2x10-5) in ET patients and depression (B: 12.3, p=0.01) and WBC count (B: 0.3; p=0.002) in MF patients to have a significant association with TSS. Conclusions: Depression in ET and MF and low Hb in PV were identified as significant drivers of symptom burden. Identifying and managing patients with these comorbidities could improve their quality of life with a potential survival benefit. [Table: see text]

CSP2023: 26 - Patient perceptions of empathy in clinical encounters with First Contact Physiotherapy Practitioners in Northern Ireland

CSP2023: 26 - Patient perceptions of empathy in clinical encounters with First Contact Physiotherapy Practitioners in Northern Ireland

Effect of black cloth ointment on hypertrophic scar formation: An investigation using integrated network pharmacology and animal assay.

Hypertrophic scars (HS) are a common disfiguring condition in daily clinical encounters which brings a lot of anxieties and concerns to patients, but the treatment options of HS are limited. Black cloth ointment (BCO), as a cosmetic ointment applicable to facial scars, has shown promising therapeutic effects for facial scarring. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects remain unclear. Network pharmacology was first applied to analyze the major active components of BCO and the related signaling pathways. Subsequently, rabbit ear scar model was successfully established to determine the pharmacological effects of BCO and its active component β-elemene on HS. Finally, the molecular mechanism of BCO and β-elemene was analyzed by Western blot. Through the network pharmacology, it showed that β-elemene was the main active ingredient of BCO, and it could significantly improve the pathological structure of HS and reduce collagen deposition. BCO and β-elemene could increase the expression of ER stress-related markers and promote the increase of apoptotic proteins in the Western blot experiment and induce the apoptosis of myofibroblasts. Our findings indicate that the material basis for the scar-improving effects of the BCO is β-elemene, and cellular apoptosis is the key mechanism through which the BCO and β-elemene exert their effects.

Impact of Race in Missed Appointments in Pediatric Neurology Resident Clinic at a Large Tertiary Medical Center.

Missed medical appointments are a common problem across specialties. The discontinuity of care leads to unplanned health care utilization, increased costs, and poor health outcomes. Previous studies evaluating pediatric epilepsy have shown significant socioeconomic barriers to care. In several specialties, resident clinic no-show rates are higher than faculty clinics because of socioeconomic barriers. We sought to understand the relationship between race, socioeconomic factors, and missed appointments in a pediatric neurology resident clinic at a large tertiary care hospital. Resident clinic encounters for 1 year were extracted and analyzed for missed appointments, socioeconomic factors, and health care utilization. We found that missed appointments occur for 1 in 5 patients and correlate with socioeconomic factors (eg, income and insurance) and race. Race was a more significant factor than socioeconomic factors for missed appointments. These results provide areas to target and track interventions to improve health outcomes in children in pediatric neurology clinics.