A warming global earth was recently revealed to hold advantages. Based on state-of-the-art welfare function measurements and economic productivity parameters, the economic gains and productivity-efficiency benefits from a warming earth were captured (Puaschunder, 2017a, b). Contemporary Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measurements served as basis for estimations about the productivity of the agriculture, industry and service sectors around the warming globe. Based on the optimal temperatures for the agriculture, industry and service sectors productivity as well as climate projections of the year 2100 under the business as usual path for each country, climate winners and losers were retrieved around the world from now on until the year 2100 (Puaschunder, 2017b) in order to argue for fair climate change benefits distribution around the globe (Puaschunder, 2017a). The climatorial imperative was defined as ethical obligation to avert climate change concertedly (Puaschunder, 2017c). Even if being in a part of the world that is still gaining from a warming climate, people should be striving to avert actions that cause the earth to warm. Based on the categorical imperative, no one should participate in actions with harmful consequences to others. One should only engage in those activities, which consequences one wishes to incur to oneself. The climatorial imperative serves as basis for climate change benefits transfers around the globe (Puaschunder, 2017a). Climate change gains transfer are meant to compensate for losses in global warming losing territories but also to finance incentives for a transition to renewable energy (Puaschunder, 2017a). In order to manifest the established facts that some parts of the world will be gaining from a warming earth and some are vanishingly melting, the following paper investigates climate-induced migration streams and financial flows. Based on a 187 country-strong dataset and under the implicit assumption of an open economy, a significantly positive inflow of migrants was found into the climate change winner countries. A statistically significant correlation holds that there is a positive Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) remaining financial inflow into the winning countries. As a cross validation of the finding of financial inflows into climate change winner countries, a non-significant correlation and independent t-test reveal that there are no significant financial returns in form of remittances to the climate change loser countries. The results target at underlining the importance of climate change benefits transfers to offset the losses incurred in the global warming-burdened areas of the world. Migration and monetary flows are argued to vividly outline the competitive advantages of the climate change winner countries. The paper innovatively integrates two contemporary societal world-wide crises: climate change and migration in order to retrieve future migrant and financial flow prospect predictions but also global governance recommendations. The paper offers the first introduction of climate-induced financial flows, which serve as unique justification for climate benefits transfers around the globe and recognition of climate refugees under the Geneva Convention in order to ensure climate equality in the 21st century.