Click Auditory Brainstem Response Research Articles

Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses

Several studies have investigated the relationship between click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and loudness growth in human listeners. While some of these studies have reported promising results, showing a correlative relationship between click ABR and loudness growth as a function of level, additional studies are necessary to determine if similar results can be obtained with frequency-specific stimuli and more specific details of the loudness function can be derived from ABR recordings. The aims of this study, therefore, were to (1) develop a fully objective procedure that segments specific features of evoked, tone-burst ABR recordings, (2) investigate the feasibility of using information derived from these recordings for estimating frequency-specific loudness-growth functions, and (3) determine to what extent the loudness-growth estimation performance through ABR can be improved by controlling for residual noise levels and parametric fitting. Results from eight normal-hearing listeners using 1- and 4-kHz stimuli show that the average mean-square error of the loudness-growth estimation obtained through the procedure is comparable to that of standard psychoacoustical procedures used to estimate loudness growth. The data set has been made publicly available at www.physionet.org.

Comparative Study of the Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) and Click Auditory Brainstem Evoked Response (ABR) Thresholds among Filipino Infants and Young Children

Objective: To compare the results of auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and click auditory brainstem response (click ABR) among infants and young children tested at the Ear Unit of a Tertiary General Hospital.
 
 Methods:
 Design: Cross-sectional Study
 Setting: Tertiary General Hospital
 Population: Within-subject comparisons of click auditory brainstem response (click ABR) thresholds and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds among 55 infants and young children, 2 months to 35 months of age referred to the Ear Unit for electrophysiologic hearing assessment.
 Results: Click ABR showed strong positive correlation to all frequencies and averages of ASSR. Highest correlation was noted with the average of 1-4 kHz ASSR results with Pearson r = 0.89 (Spearman r=0.80), the average of 2-4 kHz had strong positive correlation r = 0.88 (0.79). Correlation was consistently strong through all ASSR frequencies (0.5 kHz at r=0.86 (0.74), 1 kHz at r=0.88 (0.78), 2 kHz at r=0. 87 (0.79), 4 kHz at r=0.85 (0.76)). Average differences of click ABR and ASSR thresholds were 8.2±12.9dB at 0.5 kHz, 8.6±12.6dB at 1 kHz, 5.3±11.8dB at 2 kHz and 7.8±13.4dB at 4 kHz. Among patients with no demonstrable waveforms by click ABR with maximal click stimulus, a large percentage presented with ASSR thresholds. Of these, 80.5% (33 of 41) had measurable results at 0.5 kHz with an average of 107.3±11.1dB, 85.4% (35 of 41) at 1 kHz with an average of 110.5±11.8dB, 73.2% (30 of 41) at 2 kHz with an average of 111.2±11.1dB and 63.4% (26 of 41) at 4 kHz with and average of 112.2±8.21dB. Auditory steady-state response results were comparable to auditory brainstem response results in normal to severe hearing loss, and provided additional information necessary for complete audiologic assessment especially among patients with severe to profound hearing loss wherein click ABR showed no responses. Up to 85.4% of patients that would have been noted to have no waveforms by click ABR still demonstrated measurable thresholds by ASSR
 
 Conclusion: Our study suggests that ASSR may be the best available tool for assessing children with severe to profound hearing loss, and is a comparably effective tool in overall hearing assessment for patients requiring electrophysiological testing. The advantages of ASSR over click ABR include: 1) detection of frequency-specific thresholds and; 2) the detection of hearing loss thresholds beyond the limits of click ABR.
 
 
 Key words: Auditory Steady-State Response, ASSR, Auditory Brainstem-Evoked Response, ABR, Hearing Thresholds, Electrophysiologic Testing

Cochlear microphonics in sensorineural hearing loss: Lesson from newborn hearing screening

The diagnostic dilemma surrounding the presence of cochlear microphonics (CM) coupled with significantly elevated auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds in babies failing the newborn hearing screening is highlighted. A case report is presented where initial electo-diagnostic assessment could not help in differentiating between Auditory Neuropathy/Auditory Dys-synchrony (AN/AD) and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). In line with the protocol and guidelines provided by the national Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in the UK (NHSP) AN/AD was suspected in a baby due to the presence of CM at 85 dBnHL along with click evoked ABR thresholds of 95 dBnHL in one ear and 100 dBnHL in the other ear. Significantly elevated thresholds for 0.5 and 1kHz tone pip ABR fulfilled the audiological diagnostic criteria for AN/AD. However, the possibility of a SNHL could not be ruled out as the 85 dBnHL stimuli presented through inserts for the CM would have been significantly enhanced in the ear canals of the young baby to exceed the threshold level of the ABR that was carried out using headphones. SNHL was eventually diagnosed through clinical and family history, physical examination and imaging that showed enlarged vestibular aqueducts. Presence of CM in the presence of very high click ABR thresholds only suggests a pattern of test results and in such cases measuring thresholds for 0.5 and 1 kHz tone pip ABR may not be adequate to differentiate between SNHL and other conditions associated with AN/AD. There is a need for reviewing the existing AN/AD protocol from NHSP in the UK and new research to establish parameters for CM to assist in the differential diagnosis. A holistic audiological and medical approach is essential to manage babies who fail the newborn hearing screening.

Clinical Comparison of the Auditory Steady-State Response with the Click Auditory Brainstem Response in Infants

ObjectivesOur goal was to determine the effectiveness of using the auditory steady state response (ASSR) as a measure of hearing thresholds in infants who are suspected of having significant hearing loss, as compared with using the click-auditory brainstem response (C-ABR).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the audiologic profiles of 76 infants (46 boys and 30 girls, a total of 151 ears) who ranged in age from 1 to 12 months (average age: 5.7 months). The auditory evaluations in 76 infants who were suspected of having hearing loss were done via the C-ABR and ASSR. In addition, for reference, the mean ASSR thresholds were compared to those of 39 ears of infants and 39 ears of adults with normal hearing at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz.ResultsThe highest correlation between the C-ABR and ASSR thresholds was observed at an average of 2-4 kHz (r=0.94). On comparison between the hearing of infants and adults at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, the mean ASSR threshold in infants was 12, 7, 8, and 7 dB higher, respectively, than that in adults.ConclusionASSR testing may provide additional audiometric information for accurately predicting the hearing sensitivity, and this is essential for the management of infants with severe to profound hearing loss.

Auditory Sensitivity in Children Using the Auditory Steady-State Response

To determine the effectiveness of auditory steady-state response (ASSR) as a measure of hearing sensitivity in young children suspect for significant hearing loss. Within-subject comparisons of click auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and ASSR thresholds. The study population comprised 42 children suspect for hearing loss and subsequently referred for hearing assessment using electrophysiologic techniques. Electrophysiologic threshold responses for click ABR and ASSR stimuli (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) for right and left ears. Based on ABR and ASSR thresholds, 50% of the subjects demonstrated significant hearing loss in the severe to profound range. In some subjects, ASSRs were present at higher stimulus levels when click ABRs were absent. Significant correlations (P<.05) were found between high-frequency ASSR and click ABR thresholds for this study sample. For some subjects, ASSR findings suggested differences between ears that were not observable from the no-response click ABR results. Auditory steady-state response testing may provide additional information for children who demonstrate hearing levels in the severe to profound range. This information may be helpful when selecting the ear for cochlear implantation for a young hearing-impaired child. Multiple objective methods, such as ABR and ASSR testing, may be needed to determine accurate hearing sensitivity for young children being considered for sensory devices, and in particular, cochlear implants.

Evaluation of hearing thresholds in 3-month-old children with a cleft palate: the basis for a selective policy for ventilation tube insertion at time of palate repair.

Hearing thresholds in children with a cleft palate prior to cleft palate repair are not widely documented, and audiological criteria for short-term ventilation tube insertion do not exist. The aims of this prospective study are to estimate hearing thresholds in 40 children with a cleft palate by 3-month developmental age with auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) under natural sleep and to estimate a hearing threshold guideline for short-term ventilation tube insertion. Our results show a wide range of air conduction hearing thresholds using click ABRs (2-4 Hz), which ranged from 25 to 102 dBnHL in the left ear and from 25 to 80 dBnHL in the right ear with means of 53 and 49 and standard deviations of 17 and 13 respectively. The bone conduction thresholds ranged from 0 to 55 dBnHL with a mean of 26 and a standard deviation of 13. Eighty-three per cent of children had flat, type B, on high-frequency tympanograms, indicative of middle ear effusion. Thirty per cent of the infants had a cleft palate associated with a known syndrome. Currently, it is the authors' practice to use short-term ventilation tubes on a selective basis at the time of cleft palate repair when there is a conductive hearing loss of more than 55 dBnHL in the better ear as determined by ABR with type B high-frequency tympanograms. This threshold level takes into account electrophysiological and auditory pathway maturation discrepancies. With this as the guideline, between 28% and 35% of the children in this study would be eligible for surgery. This criterion still requires further validation.

Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol

ObjectiveTo determine the clinical usefulness of the dichotic multiple-frequency (MF) auditory steady-state response (ASSR) technique for estimating normal hearing compared to a 0.5-kHz tone burst and broadband click auditory brainstem response (ABR) protocol in a sample of adults.Material and MethodsA comparative experimental research design was selected in order to compare estimations of normal hearing obtained with the dichotic ASSR technique at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz with a 0.5-kHz tone burst and broadband click ABR protocol. The recording times required for each procedure were also compared. Normal-hearing subjects (n = 28) were selected according to immittance values within normal limits and pure-tone behavioural thresholds of < 25 dB HL across frequencies.ResultsThe dichotic MF ASSR estimated normal hearing to be, on average, 30–34 dB HL across the range 0.5–4 kHz. The mean estimate of normal hearing for 0.5 kHz using tone burst ABRs was 30 dB nHL and the mean click ABR threshold was 16 dB nHL, i.e. 14–18 dB better than the ASSR thresholds. The dichotic MFASSR technique recorded 8 thresholds (4 in each ear) in a mean time of 23 min. The ABR protocol recorded 4 thresholds (2 in each ear) in a mean time of 25 min.ConclusionsBoth the dichotic MF ASSR and ABR protocols provided a time-efficient estimation of normal hearing. There was no significant difference between the tone burst ABR and MF ASSR techniques in terms of estimation of normal hearing at 0.5 kHz. The dichotic MF ASSR technique proved more time-efficient by determining more thresholds in a shorter time compared to the ABR protocol.

Hearing screening.

Hearing screening.

State of the art neonatal hearing screening with auditory brainstem response.

The purpose of this paper is to briefly review some of the aspects of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) that are important in its use as a method of screening and assessing hearing in the neonate. The paper starts by considering the technical limitations of click ABR and explores the alternative electrophysiological methods. It then considers where ABR is required in the screening of neonates. The role of bone conduction ABR in estimating the conductive component of any hearing loss is discussed. Finally, the ability of the neonatal ABR to predict the long-term audiometric outcome of permanently hearing-impaired children is considered.

Cochlear microinjection and its effects upon auditory function in the guinea pig

Microinjection through the round window membrane has been found to represent a method for vector delivery in intracochlear gene transfer in animal models but breaches the round window membrane, making it necessary to evaluate animals for possible postinjection hearing loss. In the present study healthy guinea pigs were evaluated for their baseline click auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds. Each animal was then injected with saline via the round window membrane. After 1 week auditory function was evaluated by click ABR. Animals with increased ABR thresholds were retested at 4 weeks. Animals with 1-week postoperative ABRs similar to baseline were not retested. Results showed that postoperative ABR thresholds in five animals (71%) remained unchanged from baseline, while two animals had increases of 20-25 dB in ABRs after 1 week but recovered baseline ABRs after 4 weeks. The mean baseline ABR threshold was 25.7 dB and was 27.9 dB after 1 week after injection. The difference between preoperative and 1-week postoperative averages was not significant (P = 0.707). In this preliminary study saline microinjection through the round window membrane did not cause permanent hearing loss in the guinea pigs tested, and any damage caused by microinjection appeared to be reversible.

Audiometric Manifestations of Waardenburg's Syndrome

We studied 23 patients (from 11 families) who had Waardenburg's syndrome. Patients were evaluated by conventional audiometric methods and by distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to determine the penetrance and the degree and type of hearing loss. Twelve of the patients had the type I form of the syndrome and 11 had type II. Overall, we found hearing loss in 19 of the 23 patients (83%); hearing loss affected nine type I patients (75%) and 10 type II patients (91%). Five type I patients (42%) and eight type II patients (73%) had a hearing loss of > 100 dB. Bilateral symmetrical hearing loss was the most common type of loss, as it was seen in six of the type I patients (50%) and eight of the type II patients (73%). At lower frequencies, distortion-product otoacoustic emission amplitudes were found to be significantly above the noise floor in five of the 11 patients whose hearing thresholds were 60 dB HL or worse by click auditory brainstem response testing. These findings led us to conclude that it is necessary to use otoacoustic emissions in patients with Waardenburg's syndrome in order to provide optimum fitting of hearing aids, especially in children.

In vivo binding and hearing loss after intracochlear infusion of KHRI-3 antibody

The IgG1 mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) KHRI-3, binds to an antigen of 65–68 kDa expressed on inner ear supporting cells in guinea pigs. We previously showed [Nair et al. (1995) Monoclonal antibody induced hearing loss. Hear. Res. 83, 101–113] that mice carrying the KHRI-3 hybridoma develop high frequency hearing loss and loss of hair cells in the basal turn suggesting that this MAb causes immune-mediated sensorineural hearing loss. To evaluate the specificity of this effect, sterile KHRI-3 and control IgG1 preparations were infused directly into the guinea pig cochlea using Alzet® mini-osmotic pumps. Assessments included: (1) hearing, measured by click auditory brain stem responses (ABRs); (2) in vivo antibody binding; and (3) the structural integrity of the organ of Corti. Nine animals were infused with KHRI-3 preparations and 5 controls were infused with control IgG1. Four guinea pigs given KHRI-3 developed 25–55 dB hearing loss. Control animals showed no difference from baseline. In vivo binding of KHRI-3 was detected in the organ of Corti in 6 of the 9 animals, including all 4 that had hearing loss. No staining was observed with control antibody. Confocal microscopy revealed that the in vivo KHRI-3 antibody binding pattern was identical to that obtained by incubating fixed tissue in vitro with KHRI-3. Histologic examination revealed an increased frequency of hair cell loss in KHRI-3 treated ears when compared to either the contralateral ears of the same guinea pigs or the IgG1 treated ears of control animals. The lesions in the infused ears of guinea pigs were scattered throughout the cochlea from base to apex. These experiments demonstrate the following points: (1) Antibodies can be chronically infused directly into the cochlea of living animals. (2) The KHRI-3 antibody binds to live supporting cells within the organ of Corti. (3) Infusion of an inner ear specific antibody affects auditory function. (4) The infusion of irrelevant antibody had no effect on the structure or function of the ear. This system provides an animal model for further studies of antibody-induced sensorineural hearing loss.

Assessment of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity using derived-band ABRs

Ototoxicity is an adverse side effect of numerous therapeutic agents (aminoglycoside antibiotics, blood chelating agents, diuretics and oncologic drugs) used in treatment of both adult and pediatric patients. Recently, there has been increasing interest in using the auditory brainstem response (ABR) to detect both short-term effects of ototoxicity in adults and long-term effects of drug administration on neonates and children. Since click ABRs have relatively poor frequency selectivity they best approximate the pure-tone hearing threshold in the 2000–4000 Hz frequency range. Hearing loss above or below that frequency range can be present without producing significant abnormalities in the ABR waveform parameters. Frequency-specific ABRs can be obtained using the derived response technique. The purpose of this study was to investigate early cisplatin ototoxicity using both the broadband click and derived ABR and to monitor progressive hearing loss with repeated drug trials in 18 patients studied over a 2-year period. ABRs were obtained serially prior to and following intravenous administration of cisplatin. Derived ABRs were found to be more sensitive than broadband click ABR in detecting early high-frequency hearing loss. For click ABRs, the cumulative dosage of cisplatin at age of ABR examination was correlated with hearing loss in only those patients under 3 years of age. No significant correlation was found between cumulative cisplatin dosage when tested and degree of hearing loss in those patients over 3 years of age.

Interaural Attenuation Using Etymotic ER-3A Insert Earphones in Auditory Brain Stem Response Testing

Click interaural attenuation (IA) was measured behaviorally and with the auditory brain stem response (ABR) in two unilaterally deaf adults with Etymotic ER-3A insert earphones, and TDH-39P and TDH-49P supraaural earphones. Stimulus crossover for each set of earphones was also determined with pure-tone audiometry. Pure-tone results agreed with previous research, showing that the ER-3A provided substantially greater IA than the supraaural earphones, particularly for low frequencies. For click stimuli, behavioral and ABR results revealed only modest, if any, improvement in IA with the ER-3A relative to the supraaural earphones. The results of this study suggest that while the ER-3A earphones provide a clear IA advantage for behavioral pure-tone audiometry, they do not eliminate the need for contralateral masking of click stimuli in ABR testing.