Clerkship Assessment Research Articles

Clerkship assessment assessed

This article reviews consistent research findings concerning the assessment of clinical competence during the clerkship phase of the undergraduate medical training programme on issues of reliability, validity, effect on training programme and learning behaviour, acceptability and costs. Subsequently, research findings on the clinical clerkship as a learning environment are discussed demonstrating that the clinical attachment provides a rather unstructured educational framework. Five fundamental questions (why, what, when, how, who) are addressed to generate general suggestions for improving assessment on the basis of the evidence on assessment and clinical training. Good assessment requires a thoughtful compromise between what is achievable and what is ideal. It is argued that educational effects are eminently important in this compromise, particularly in the unstructured clinical setting. Maximizing educational effects can be achieved in combination with improvements of other measurement qualities of the assessment. Two concrete examples are provided to illustrate the recommended assessment strategies.

The Correlation between the Scores of Written Examination, the Clinical Clerkship Examination, the Clinical Skill Assessment, and the Graduation Examination of the Medical Students.

The aim of this study was to investigate correlations between medical student scores on 4 examinations: the written examination, clinical clerkship examination, clinical skill assessment, and graduation examination. Scores for 51 students who entered Daegu Catholic Medical School in 2005 on the written examination, clinical clerkship examination, clinical skill assessment, and graduation examination were included. Correlations between the scores were analyzed statistically. The scores on the written examination showed a strong correlation with those of the clinical clerkship assessment (0.833) and graduation examination (0.821). The clinical clerkship assessment scores correlated significantly with graduation examination scores (0.907). In addition, clinical skill assessment scores correlated with the written examination (0.579), clinical clerkship examination (0.570), and graduation examination (0.465) scores. Overall, the correlation between the scores on the clinical clerkship examination and the written examination was more significant than the correlation between scores on the clinical clerkship examination and clinical skill assessment. Therefore, we need to improve the evaluation method for the clinical clerkship examination and clinical skill assessment.