Background: Globalization has significantly impacted the field of medical education. Medical students need to be more competent to adapt to diverse patient populations and medical practices, understanding the cultural differences, and overcoming the language barriers. While the cognitive domain is important, it cannot fulfill the other domains of learning (affective, psychomotor). Therefore, medical education has to be enhanced to produce well-rounded health-care professionals. Integrating traditional teaching with interactive learning methods can bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. Flipping the classroom is one such interactive teaching method that prioritizes the needs, interests, and autonomy of students. By organizing the students into small teams to solve problems and discuss cases, it additionally encourages accountability within the team, which further enhances enthusiasm and commitment to their studies. Aim and Objective: This team-based learning (TBL) in the settings of the flipped classroom (FCR) model can promote self-directed learning (SDL), critical thinking, and pursuing lifelong learning, which was the objective of the present study. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 200 undergraduate 1st-year MBBS students, 100 each in the study and control groups. The study group was subjected to flipped classroom (FCR) and the control group to traditional large group teaching. A pre-class assessment (pre-test) using Google Forms, including MCQ, open-ended questions, and case-based physiology, was administered to both the study and control groups of students. In the study group, the team test was conducted in the class. Both groups were subjected to a post-test to evaluate the efficacy of the flipped classroom over the traditional lecture. Qualitative feedback and a focus group interview were taken from the study groups to get the insight of the students regarding the flipped classroom. The incorporation of seminars in the study group further enriched the contents with lucidity of concepts. Results: In the comparison of the pre-test and post-test assessment scores, there was a weighty improvement after the post-FCR session among the study group. Furthermore, the comparison of the pre-test and team-test scores revealed the effectiveness of TBL among the study group students. Thus, the amalgamated approach of FCR with TBL enhances student engagement and comprehension of course material. It also boosts SDL, empowering the students to take ownership of their learning journey. Conclusion: Thus, employing a combination of teaching and learning techniques can be more promising than didactic teaching for cultivating medical students with SDL abilities, and certainly flipped classroom and TBL can improve learning outcomes in medical education, creating a more engaging and stimulating learning environment.
Read full abstract