Reviews Rosemary Margaret van Wengen-Shute, George Herbertand the Liturgy of the Church ofEngland. Oegstgeest: Drukkeru de Kempenaer, 1981. 183 pp. paperback (no price given). by Amy M. Charles From their first publication Herbert's poems have been read appreciatively by men and women of all degrees of Christian persuasion, even by some of no Christian persuasion. At times, indeed, one might have said that those beyond the Church of England read Herbert with greaterenthusiasm than those within it; but then, enthusiasm is not necessarily a hallmark of Anglicanism. Herbert's poems fall well within the stated beliefs of the Anglican Church of his day and frequently emphasize Christian doctrines essential to both the Catholic and the Puritan trends of his time. But when one has said all this, it remains true that the capacity for deriving a meaning from one of his poems, no matter what one's own religious orientation, by no means assures that one has derived the full meaning the poet intended: Herbert's apparent (or assumed) simplicity has deceived many a casual reader in the 350 years since the first publication of The Temple. Several years back, in an address to the Friends of the Library at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, O.B. Hardison emphasized how much greater an influence the Book of Common Prayer had had on the language of our forebears than had the Authorized Version of the Bible, simply because of the iteration of the forms used in the daily offices. (The same point would be less valid for the language of the Communion service at a time when the average parish was blessed indeed if it celebrated that sacrament as often as once a month.) For a boy like Herbert, brought up in a godly household that offered its prayers daily, and in Westminster School, which conducted its own services and enhanced worship through the music of the Abbey choristers and its own 37 Amy M. Charles students, the round of Anglican services would have established a rhythm of practice, a cycle of worship, well before he went on to Trinity College, Cambridge, where of course there were again daily services, further emphasis on the language of the Prayer Book, and still furtherenhancement of musical settings of parts of the daily offices and the round of the Church year, to say nothing of his study of the theological matters that lay behind them. The interpretations and attitudes that Hardison's comments helped to identify are best noted with the help of an experienced guide — and it is here that Coleridge describes the general pattern, and Rosemary van Wengen-Shute provides specific details. Heretofore the non-Anglican reader has been hard put to follow precisely what Coleridge had in mind in his remarks (from "Notes on the Temple and Synagogue," found in Pickering's editions of George Herbert's Works): G. Herbert is a true poet, but a poet sui generis, the merits of whose poems will never be felt without a sympathy with the mind and character of the man. To appreciate this volume, it is not enough that the reader possesses a cultivated judgment, classical taste, or even poetic sensibility , unless he be likewise a Christian, and both a zealous and an orthodox, both a devout and a devotional, Christian. But even this will not quite suffice. He must be an affectionate and dutiful child of the Church, and from habit, conviction, and a constitutional predisposition to ceremoniousness, in piety as in manners, find her forms and ordinances aids of religion, not scourges of formality; for religion is the element in which he lives, and the region in which he moves. For the reader in great need of an introduction to Anglican attitudes and characteristics in Herbert, Margaret Bottrall's concise, Anglican chapters "The Country Parson" and "The Christian Poet" have proved a valid and valuable introduction. Heather Asals' recent study Equivocal Predication: George 38 BOOK REVIEWS Herbert's Way to God also develops particular qualities of Herbert'sAnglicanism, and Joseph Summer's perceptive study George Herbert: His Religion and Art provides ample background and application. The understatement, the tendency not to make too much of things...
Read full abstract