Cladribine Tablets Research Articles

Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis with Cladribine Tablets: Literature Review and the Guidance of the Lithuanian Association of Neurologists

Cladribine is a disease-modifying drug used for the treatment of the highly active relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis. Cladribine is a purine nucleoside analogue which selectively targets lymphocyte subpopulations involved in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis, and therefore it is classified as an immune reconstitution therapy drug. Two short courses of cladribine tablets given over two years significantly reduce the multiple sclerosis relapse rate and disability progression. For most patients, the effect persists in the third and the fourth year. This makes cladribine convenient for patients with multiple comorbidities, difficulties in adhering to their prescribed treatment regimen, those planning a pregnancy, or those for whom long-term immunosuppression is undesirable. Cladribine tablets are denoted by good safety characteristics, with the most prominent adverse effect being lymphopenia, which does not lead to an increased risk of infections other than Herpes zoster.However, in clinical practice, there are a number of issues related both to the initial administration of cladribine tablets and the strategy of treatment in different clinical situations during the first-to-fourth years of treatment, and particularly after the fourth year. Although there are no contraindications for additional courses of cladribine tablets, the product information does not provide detailed guidance on their continued use. During more than five years after the approval of the medicinal product, the new clinical trial data and the Real-World Evidence (RWE) on the efficacy and safety of cladribine tablets have become available, based on which, several national and international expert panels, as well as the Lithuanian Association of Neurologists, have issued guidance on the use of cladribine tablets reviewed in this article. Upon reactivation of the disease, additional courses of cladribine tablets or other disease-modifying therapies may be prescribed, depending on various factors related to the severity of the relapse, patient characteristics, and previously used medications. If the patient’s condition remains stable after the fourth year, extension of the treatment-free period with the structured monitoring approach could be appropriate.

Substantial and comparable suppression of disease activity following early initiation of cladribine tablets, ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab as first pharmacologic treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis: A real world study

BackgroundWe describe the efficacy and safety of recent high efficacy disease DMTs in DMT-naive patients with highly active RMS. MethodsThis was a retrospective, cross sectional study from the Kuwait national MS registry. Patients with RMS who received alemtuzumab, cladribine tablets or ocrelizumab as their first DMT for RMS, with ≥2 year of follow up were included. The primary endpoint was the change in relapse rate from treatment initiation to 1 year; changes in disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]), radiologic activity, the proportion with no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3), and the frequency of adverse events were secondary endpoints. ResultsAmong 123 RRMS patients, 59 received ocrelizumab, 32 received cladribine tablets and 32 received alemtuzumab. About two-thirds (65%) were women. Substantial and similar (p>0.05) reductions occurred at the end of follow-up in annual relapse rate (by 93.2% for ocrelizumab, 87.5% for cladribine tablets, and 90.6% for alemtuzumab). The proportion with new T2 of gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesions across the three groups was reduced from 85–100% to 7–13%. Rates of confirmed disability progression were low (ocrelizumab 6.9%, cladribine tablets 3.1%, alemtuzumab 0%; p=0.280); disability was reduced in 15%, 22% and 38%, respectively. NEDA-3 was observed in 89.8%, 87.5%, and 84.4, respectively (p=0.784). No new or unexpected safety issues occurred. ConclusionOcrelizumab, cladribine tablets and alemtuzumab reduced relapse rates and MRI activity, and prevented disease progression, when are initiated early in DMT-naive RMS patients. These data support the early use of high-efficacy DMTs for people with highly active RMS.

Holistic, Long-Term Management of People with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis with Cladribine Tablets: Expert Opinion from France.

Cladribine tablets (CladT) has been available for therapeutic use in France since March 2021 for the management of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). This high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) acts as an immune reconstitution therapy. In contrast to most high-efficacy DMTs, which act via continuous immunosuppression, two short courses of oral treatment with CladT at the beginning of years 1 and 2 of treatment provide long-term control of MS disease activity in responders to treatment, without the need for any further pharmacological treatment for several years. Although the labelling for CladT does not provide guidance beyond the initial treatment courses, real-world data on the therapeutic use of CladT from registries of previous clinical trial participants and patients treated in routine practice indicate that MS disease activity is controlled for a period of years beyond this time for a substantial proportion of patients. Moreover, this clinical experience has provided useful information on how to initiate and manage treatment with CladT. In this article we, a group of expert neurologists from France, provide recommendations on the initiation of CladT in DMT-naïve patients, how to switch from existing DMTs to CladT for patients with continuing MS disease activity, how to manage patients during the first 2years of treatment and finally, how to manage patients with or without MS disease activity in years 3, 4 and beyond after initiating treatment with CladT. We believe that optimisation of the use of CladT beyond its initial courses of treatment will maximise the benefits of this treatment, especially early in the course of MS when suppression of focal inflammation in the CNS is a clinical priority to limit MS disease progression.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence Supporting the Efficacy of Cladribine Tablets in the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Numerous therapies are currently available to modify the disease course of multiple sclerosis (MS). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a pivotal role in assessing treatment response by providing insights into disease activity and clinical progression. Integrating MRI findings with clinical and laboratory data enables a comprehensive assessment of the disease course. Among available MS treatments, cladribine is emerging as a promising option due to its role as a selective immune reconstitution therapy, with a notable impact on B cells and a lesser effect on T cells. This work emphasizes the assessment of MRI's contribution to MS treatment, particularly focusing on the influence of cladribine tablets on imaging outcomes, encompassing data from pivotal and real-world studies. The evidence highlights that cladribine, compared with placebo, not only exhibits a reduction in inflammatory imaging markers, such as T1-Gd+, T2 and combined unique active (CUA) lesions, but also mitigates the effect on brain volume loss, particularly within grey matter. Importantly, cladribine reveals early action by reducing CUA lesions within the first months of treatment, regardless of a patient's initial conditions. The selective mechanism of action, and sustained efficacy beyond year 2, combined with its early onset of action, collectively position cladribine tablets as a pivotal component in the therapeutic paradigm for MS. Overall, MRI, along with clinical measures, has played a substantial role in showcasing the effectiveness of cladribine in addressing both the inflammatory and neurodegenerative aspects of MS.

Sustained effects on immune cell subsets and autoreactivity in multiple sclerosis patients treated with oral cladribine.

Cladribine tablet therapy is an efficacious treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Recently, we showed that one year after the initiation of cladribine treatment, T and B cell crosstalk was impaired, reducing potentially pathogenic effector functions along with a specific reduction of autoreactivity to RAS guanyl releasing protein 2 (RASGRP2). In the present study we conducted a longitudinal analysis of the effect of cladribine treatment in patients with RRMS, focusing on the extent to which the effects observed on T and B cell subsets and autoreactivity after one year of treatment are maintained, modulated, or amplified during the second year of treatment. In this case-control exploratory study, frequencies and absolute counts of peripheral T and B cell subsets and B cell cytokine production from untreated patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and patients treated with cladribine for 52 (W52), 60 (W60), 72 (W72) and 96 (W96) weeks, were measured using flow cytometry. Autoreactivity was assessed using a FluoroSpot assay. We found a substantial reduction in circulating memory B cells and proinflammatory B cell responses. Furthermore, we observed reduced T cell responses to autoantigens possibly presented by B cells (RASGRP2 and a-B crystallin (CRYAB)) at W52 and W96 and a further reduction in responses to the myelin antigens myelin basic protein (MBP) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) after 96 weeks. We conclude that the effects of cladribine observed after year one are maintained and, for some effects, even increased two years after the initiation of a full course of treatment with cladribine tablets.

Effects of High Efficacy Multiple Sclerosis Disease Modifying Drugs on the Immune Synapse: A Systematic Review.

Co-signaling and adhesion molecules are important elements for creating immune synapses between T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells; they positively or negatively regulate the interaction between a T cell receptor with its cognate antigen, presented by the major histocompatibility complex. We conducted a systematic review on the effects of High Efficacy Disease Modifying Drugs (HEDMDs) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) on the co-signaling and adhesion molecules that form the immune synapse. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and other sources to identify clinical or preclinical reports on the effects of HEDMDs on co-signaling and adhesion molecules that participate in the formation of immune synapses in patients with MS or other autoimmune disorders. We included reports on cladribine tablets, anti- CD20 monoclonal antibodies, S1P modulators, inhibitors of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase, and natalizumab. In 56 eligible reports among 7340 total publications, limited relevant evidence was uncovered. Not all co-signaling and adhesion molecules have been studied in relation to every HEDMD, with more data being available on the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (that affect CD80, CD86, GITR and TIGIT), cladribine tablets (affecting CD28, CD40, ICAM-1, LFA-1) and the S1P modulators (affecting CD86, ICAM-1 and LFA-1) and less on Natalizumab (affecting CD80, CD86, CD40, LFA-1, VLA-4) and Alemtuzumab (affecting GITR and CTLA-4). The puzzle of HEDMD effects on the immune synapse is far from complete. The available evidence suggests that distinguishing differences exist between drugs and are worth pursuing further.

Cladribine tablets after treatment with natalizumab (CLADRINA) - rationale and design.

Individual disease modifying therapies approved for multiple sclerosis (MS) have limited effectiveness and potentially serious side effects, especially when administered over long periods. Sequential combination therapy is a plausible alternative approach. Natalizumab is a monoclonal therapeutic antibody that reduces leukocyte access to the central nervous system that is associated with an increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and disease reactivation after its discontinuation. Cladribine tablets act as a synthetic adenosine analog, disrupting DNA synthesis and repair, thereby reducing the number of lymphocytes. The generation of prospective, rigorous safety, and efficacy data in transitioning from natalizumab to cladribine is an unmet clinical need. To test the feasibility of transitioning patients with relapsing forms of MS natalizumab to cladribine tablets. Cladribine tablets after treatment with natalizumab (CLADRINA) is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, collaborative phase IV, research study that will generate hypothesis regarding the safety, efficacy, and immunological impact of transition from natalizumab to cladribine tablets in patients with relapsing forms of MS. Participants will be recruited from three different sites. The primary endpoint is the absolute and percent change from baseline of lymphocytes and myeloid cell subsets, as well as blood neurofilament light levels. The secondary endpoint is the annualized relapse rate over the 12- and 24-month trial periods. Exploratory endpoints include the expanded disability status scale, and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes. The CLADRINA trial will generate data regarding the safety, efficacy, and immunological impact of the transition from natalizumab to cladribine. As the pace of immunological knowledge of MS continues, insight into disease modifying therapy transition strategies is needed.

Harmonized Data Quality Indicators Maintain Data Quality in Long-Term Safety Studies Using Multiple Sclerosis Registries/Data Sources: Experience from the CLARION Study.

Understanding the long-term safety of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) in routine clinical practice can be undertaken through registry-based studies. However, variability of data quality across such sources poses the challenge of data fit for regulatory decision-making. CLARION, a non-interventional cohort safety study of cladribine tablets, combines aggregated data from MS registries/data sources, except in Germany (which utilizes primary data collection). We describe the application of key data quality indicators (DQIs) within CLARION to evaluate data quality over time, as recommended by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) guideline on registry-based studies. DQIs were defined with participating registries/sources; they were used to assess data quality according to the EMA Data Quality Framework, addressing consistency, accuracy, completeness, and study representativeness. DQIs were associated with potential remedial measures if data quality was not met. DQIs were summarized overall and for individual MS registries/data sources to November 1, 2022. A total of 28 DQIs were analyzed using data from 5069 patients arising from eight MSregistries/data sources and 14countries. The Representativeness DQIs showed that 72.0% of patients were female, median age at MS diagnosis was 29.0 to 43.3 years, and 93.5% had relapsing-remitting MS. Consistency DQIs showed a total of 2899 patients had achieved at least two years of follow-up; 6.9% did not have any recorded visits during this timeframe. Discrepant values were assessed as part of Accuracy DQIs, and improvements over time were noted for recorded dates of MS onset and diagnosis. Regarding Completeness DQIs, 191/5069 (3.8%) patients were lost to follow-up. The application of 28 DQIs within the CLARION study has helped with understanding, not only intrinsic and question-specific determinants of data quality, but also tracking the quality of post-authorization safety data obtained from MS registries/data sources, thereby providing a foundation for the regulatory decision-making process.

Quantifying the administration and monitoring time burden of several disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom: A time and motion study

BackgroundThe treatment landscape for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) has changed dramatically in recent decades, including an increasing number of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) with varied administration and monitoring requirements. Coupled with greater focus on earlier treatment, these factors have resulted in stretching of the capacity of MS specialist services and allied healthcare professionals (HCPs). To assist with the effective planning of MS services in the UK NHS, this study quantified the administration and monitoring time burden associated with high-efficacy DMTs (alemtuzumab, cladribine tablets, fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab) for relapsing MS. MethodsA Time and Motion (T&M) study was conducted across four MS centres in the UK, over 3–4 months per centre (Aug 2019–Feb 2021). Time dedicated by HCPs (including but not limited to neurologists, MS specialist nurses, infusion nurses, and healthcare assistants) to pre-specified drug administration and monitoring activities, elicited during pre-study interviews at each centre, was assessed for each of the selected DMTs. Administration activities included: installing peripheral access; pre-medication administration (if needed); preparing drug for infusion; infusion initiation, monitoring, and disconnection; and patient monitoring post-infusion. Monitoring activities included: booking appointments for blood draws; blood draw; retrieval and review of blood results; maintaining blood records and follow-up with the patient; checking availability of MRI results and follow-up with the patient; booking appointments for neurologist or nurse consultations; and checking patient files prior to clinic visits. A T&M model was built using observational T&M study results, data obtained through pre-study interviews, as well as stipulated monitoring intervals from relevant Summaries of Product Characteristics for the selected DMTs, to estimate active HCP time with each DMT, extrapolated over a period of 4 years per-patient. ResultsFor oral DMTs, projected total active HCP time (monitoring only) per-patient over 4 years was 14.7 h for cladribine tablets and 19.2 h for fingolimod. For infused DMTs, total time (administration and monitoring) for alemtuzumab was 37.7 h (6.0 and 31.6 h, respectively), 48.1 h for natalizumab (17.4 and 30.8 h, respectively), and 23.5 h for ocrelizumab (6.1 and 17.4 h, respectively). ConclusionsWhile active HCP time varied across centres, infused DMTs were projected to require the greatest amount of HCP time associated with administration and monitoring over 4 years versus oral DMTs. These findings may assist MS-specific HCPs in planning and delivering the equitable provision of DMT services for patients with relapsing MS.

Time to Qualifying Relapse by Previous Disease-Modifying Therapy Status in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Cladribine Tablets Over 2 Years in the CLARIFY-MS Study

Time to Qualifying Relapse by Previous Disease-Modifying Therapy Status in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Cladribine Tablets Over 2 Years in the CLARIFY-MS Study

Long-Term, Comparative Safety Study of People with Multiple Sclerosis Newly Started on Cladribine Tablets (CLARION): Study Status Update and Representativeness

Long-Term, Comparative Safety Study of People with Multiple Sclerosis Newly Started on Cladribine Tablets (CLARION): Study Status Update and Representativeness

Sustained No Evidence of Disease Activity Over 4 Years for Patients Treated with Cladribine Tablets: Cohort Study from Sheikh Shakbout Medical Center, Abu Dhabi

Sustained No Evidence of Disease Activity Over 4 Years for Patients Treated with Cladribine Tablets: Cohort Study from Sheikh Shakbout Medical Center, Abu Dhabi

Real World Experience for Cladribine Tablets in Management of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in UAE: Cohort Study from Rashid Hospital -Dubai

Real World Experience for Cladribine Tablets in Management of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in UAE: Cohort Study from Rashid Hospital -Dubai

Practical Guidance on the Use of Cladribine Tablets in the Management or Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Expert Opinion from Qatar

Practical Guidance on the Use of Cladribine Tablets in the Management or Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Expert Opinion from Qatar

CO12 5 Years of Real-World Data on the Use of Cladribine Tablets for the Treatments of Multiple Sclerosis in Portugal

CO12 5 Years of Real-World Data on the Use of Cladribine Tablets for the Treatments of Multiple Sclerosis in Portugal

RWD11 Real-World Persistence on Cladribine Tablets of Patients with RMS over 4 Years Based on Claims Data

RWD11 Real-World Persistence on Cladribine Tablets of Patients with RMS over 4 Years Based on Claims Data

Early Use of Cladribine Tablets Impact on Disease Control in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Cohort Study from Tawam Hospital, UAE

Early Use of Cladribine Tablets Impact on Disease Control in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Cohort Study from Tawam Hospital, UAE

Real-World Evidence with Five-Year Data (2017-2022) on the Use of Cladribine Tablets in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in England: an Updated Analysis from the CLARENCE Study

Real-World Evidence with Five-Year Data (2017-2022) on the Use of Cladribine Tablets in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in England: an Updated Analysis from the CLARENCE Study

Post-Approval Safety of Cladribine Tablets in the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: 2023 Update

Post-Approval Safety of Cladribine Tablets in the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: 2023 Update

Rebound of Multiple Sclerosis Disease Activity After Switching from Fingolimod or Natalizumab to Cladribine Tablets: Real World Experience from the Arabian Gulf

Rebound of Multiple Sclerosis Disease Activity After Switching from Fingolimod or Natalizumab to Cladribine Tablets: Real World Experience from the Arabian Gulf